Adverse Effects From Inappropriate Medication Administration via a Jejunostomy Feeding Tube

Enteral Medication for the Tube-Fed Patient: Making This Route Safe and Effective

The administration of medication through an enteral access device requires important forethought. Meeting a patient's therapeutic needs requires achieving expected drug bioavailability without increasing the risk for toxicity, therapeutic failure, or feeding tube occlusion. Superimposing gut dysfunction, critical illness, or enteral nutrition-drug interaction further increases the need for a systematic approach to prescribing, evaluating, and preparing a drug for administration through an enteral access device. This review will explain the fundamental factors involved in drug bioavailability through the gut, address the influencing considerations for the enterally fed patient, and describe best practices for enteral drug preparation and administration.

More than just crushing: a prospective pre-post intervention study to reduce drug preparation errors in patients with feeding tubes

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Incorrect drug preparation for patients with feeding tubes can result in harm for the patient and the preparing person. Combined intervention programs are effective tools to reduce such preparation errors. However, to date, intervention programs have been mostly tested in hospitals with computerized physician order entry (CPOE), unit-dose systems, or ward-based clinical pharmacists. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to develop and evaluate an intervention program tailored to hospitals without such preconditions.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective pre-/post-intervention study on a gastroenterological intensive care unit (ICU) and a surgical ward for oral, dental and maxillofacial diseases (surgical ward). During the study periods, observers documented and evaluated drug preparation processes of all peroral drugs for patients with feeding tubes. The primary endpoint was the rate of inappropriately crushed and/or suspended solid peroral drugs in regards to all solid peroral drugs.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Altogether, we evaluated 775 drug preparation processes of solid peroral drugs on the ICU and 975 on the surgical ward. The intervention program significantly reduced incorrect crushing and/or suspending of solid peroral drugs for administration to patients with feeding tubes from 9·8% to 4·2% (P < 0·01) on the ICU and from 5·7% to 1·4% (P < 0·01) on the surgical ward.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The implementation of the newly developed intervention program significantly reduced the rate of inappropriately prepared solid peroral drugs, suggesting that it is an effective measure to enable safe drug administration for inpatients with feeding tubes.

Intravenous to Oral Conversion of Antihypertensives: A Toolkit for Guideline Development

Objective:

To provide a toolkit of information for hospitals to use in developing intravenous to oral conversion protocols for antihypertensives.

Data Sources:

Articles describing intravenous to oral conversion protocols for any therapeutic category were identified in an English-language MEDLINE search (1990-April 2010) using a wide variety of MeSH terms. References from selected articles were reviewed for additional material.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Experimental and observational English-language studies and review articles that focused on oral transition of intravenous drugs were selected.

Data Synthesis:

Most of the literature on conversion from intravenous to oral formulations involves antimicrobials. There is considerable evidence documenting reduced costs and improved patient flow through the health-care system following implementing these protocols with drugs like antimicrobials, histamine-2 receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors. Although antihypertensives have not been studied, principles and implementation strategies used for other drug classes can be applied to antihypertensives. Guidance is provided on framing the problem, issues surrounding oral absorption principles, information pertaining to oral conversion in specific disease slates, and implementation and documentation strategies. Detailed tables of oral and intravenous antihypertensives are provided.

Conclusions:

We recommend that hospitals consider developing protocols on conversion of intravenous to oral antihypertensives in an attempt to reduce unnecessarily prolonged intravenous therapy. Information contained in this article can be used as a toolkit to select information specific to the characteristics of individual health-care systems.