Evaluation of CEA in Patients with known Residual Disease after Resection of Colonic Cancer

Circulating Tumor DNA, Imaging, and Carcinoembryonic Antigen: Comparison of Surveillance Strategies Among Patients Who Underwent Resection of Colorectal Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Almost one-third of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients experience recurrence after resection; nevertheless, follow-up strategies remain controversial. We sought to systematically assess and compare the accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), imaging [positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) scans], and circulating tumor DNA (CtDNA) as surveillance strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL were systematically searched. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess methodological quality. We performed a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and reported pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) values for each surveillance strategy.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the analysis. PET scans had the highest sensitivity to detect recurrence (0.95; 95%CI 0.91-0.97), followed by CT scans (0.77; 95%CI 0.67-0.85). CtDNA positivity had the highest specificity to detect recurrence (0.95; 95%CI 0.91-0.97), followed by increased CEA levels (0.88; 95%CI 0.82-0.92). Furthermore, PET scans had the highest DOR to detect recurrence (DOR 120.7; 95%CI 48.9-297.9) followed by CtDNA (DOR 37.6; 95%CI 20.8-68.0).

CONCLUSION

PET scans had the highest sensitivity and DOR to detect recurrence, while CtDNA had the highest specificity and second highest DOR. Combinations of traditional cross-sectional/functional imaging and newer platforms such as CtDNA may result in optimized surveillance of patients following resection of CRC.

The detection and evaluation of human tumor metastases

Many biochemical indices are purported to have clinical utility in the detection and management of neoplasia. Experience gained during the past decade tends to indicate their having a more important role in the detection and monitoring of metastases than of the primary lesion. From this present review of some of the commoner human tumours, it is concluded that such marker substances are important adjuncts in the management of germ cell and certain endocrine and endocrine-related tumours. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) provides a marker for many gastrointestinal cancers, but there are no presently available substances with clinical usefulness for either breast or lung neoplasms. Alternative approaches to the detection of metastases are also presented. The particular use of antibody probes at an immunohistochemical level has been claimed to be able to detect micrometastastic disease in bone marrow or tumour-related monoclonal antibody probes may have application to other cancers in the future.