Evaluation of a ‘DIY’ Test for the Detection of Colorectal Cancer

Accuracy of self-checked fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer in Thai patients

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) has been associated with a reduction in CRC incidence and CRC-related mortality. However, a conventional FOBT requires stool collection and handling, which may be inconvenient for participants. The EZ-DetectTM (Siam Pharmaceutical Thailand) is a FDA-approved chromogen-substrate based FOBT which is basically a self-checked FOBT (no stool handling required). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of EZ-Detect for CRC detection.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted in the Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand between November 2013 and May 2014. Some 96 patients with histologically-proven CRC and 101 patients with normal colonoscopic findings were invited to perform self-checked FOBT according to the manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS were compared with endoscopic and pathologic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for CRC detection were calculated.

RESULTS

The present study revealed the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of this self-checked FOBT for CRC detection to be 41% (95% CI: 31-51), 97% (95% CI: 92-99), 93% (95% CI: 81-98) and 63% (95% CI: 55-70), respectively. The overall accuracy of the self-checked FOBT for identifying CRC was 70%. The sensitivity for CRC detection based on 7th AJCC staging was 29% for stage I, 32% for stage II and 50% for stage III/IV (P=0.19). The sensitivity was 33% for proximal colon and 42% for distal colon and rectal cancer (P=0.76). Notably, none of nine infiltrative lesions gave a positive FOBT.

CONCLUSIONS

The self-checked FOBT had an acceptable accuracy of CRC detection except for infiltrative tumors. This home-administrated or 'DIY' do-it-yourself FOBT could be considered as one non-invasive and convenient tool for CRC screening.

Home testing past, present and future: lessons learned and implications for HIV home tests

The recent approval in the United States of the first rapid home test to diagnose HIV raises questions about its potential use and impact. We reviewed the existing literature on the unassisted use of home tests involving self-collection and testing of biological samples by untrained users-including existing HIV self-testing studies-to shed some light on what can be expected from the availability of the HIV home test. The studies reviewed showed that most participants could properly perform home tests, obtain accurate results, and interpret them-yielding high correlations with laboratory and health-professional performed tests. Users often had trouble performing blood-based tests. Participants generally understood the need to confirm positive test results. Materials accompanying HIV home tests should emphasize symptoms of acute infection and the need for additional testing when recent infection is suspected. Different home-test-based screening modalities, personalized HIV-counseling resources and HIV home test impact evaluation methods should be studied.

Performance characteristics and comparison of two fecal occult blood tests in patients undergoing colonoscopy

We investigated the use of a new type of FOBT (EZ-Detect) that uses the blood's pseudo-peroxidase activity as an enzymatic catalyst, in a one-step chromogen-substrate system performed by the patient. Asymptomatic patients >/=50 years old received three Hemoccult II (HO) cards and three EZ-Detect (EZ) packages to be used in three consecutive bowel movements. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detection of colorectal neoplasia was calculated. The study included 207 patients, with a mean age of 58.9 years. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of adenomas was similar for the EZ and HO tests (66.7% vs. 71.0%; P=0.48), while for advanced adenomas diagnostic accuracy for the EZ and HO tests was 86.0% vs. 94.2% (P=0.01), respectively. Most patients preferred the EZ test (92% vs. 8%). We conclude that the EZ test has a diagnostic profile similar to that of the HO test for identification of adenomas; however, for advanced adenomas the diagnostic accuracy was slightly better for the HO. The EZ test was preferred by most patients, which may increase colorectal cancer screening compliance.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies for colorectal cancer screening in Japan

To determine the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies in Japan and to determine the influence of long-term compliance with screening programs on the selection of strategies, the natural history of a simulated cohort of 40-year-old Japanese of both genders was modeled with and without colorectal cancer screening until age 75 years. Survival, number of complications, and direct medical costs were compared among several combinations of screening examinations. In addition, the age of initiating screening was varied, as was the long-term compliance rate. Strategies using immunological fecal occult blood test were found to be the most cost-effective. Immunological fecal occult blood test followed by colonoscopy, if positive, would save 24.05 (5.88 discounted) days of life and cost 28,420 yen (US $210) per screened person, thus offering a cost-effectiveness ratio of 1.765 million yen (US $13,100) per year of life saved. If long-term compliance is 100%, initiating screening at age 40 years offers more years of life saved and a low incremental cost of screening. However, if more likely dropout rates are considered, initiation at age 40 years is dominated by later initiation of screening.

Filtering strategies in mass population screening for colorectal cancer: an economic evaluation

On the basis of clinical trial data, 13 strategies for initial screening (filtering) for colorectal cancer are modeled for the purpose of economic evaluation. A wide range of detection cost estimates are generated, although ranking options by detection cost ignores the important consideration of undetected cancers. Formulating the problem as one of cost-effectiveness, however, allows the authors to demonstrate that members of a subset of strategies uniquely outperform all others and that the optimum strategy can be identified by the ex ante specification of the valuation of cancers missed on screening.