"We hear and we fear" - Insights of 1203 Women on Personnel Conversations During Cesarean Delivery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the preferences of women undergoing cesarean delivery regarding intraoperative conversations among healthcare personnel.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted by distribution of an open anonymous questionnaire on social media platforms during March 2022, targeting respondents with a history of cesarean delivery. The primary outcome was patients' experience of "being disturbed by professional and casual conversations of the personnel", rated on a 1-5 Likert scale.

RESULTS

1203 participants completed the questionnaire, with 97.6% reporting intraoperative conversations among personnel. Casual conversations were perceived as "disturbing" by more respondents vs. professional talk (33.4% vs. 27.6%, respectively, p = 0.0077). Logistic regression analysis revealed associations between feeling disturbed and higher intraoperative stress and pain - adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-4.5, and OR 2.7, 95%CI 1.8-4.0, respectively, for professional conversations; OR 3.0, 95%CI 2.0-4.4, and OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1-2.7, respectively, for casual conversations. Feeling disturbed by professional conversations was also associated with urgent vs. elective operations (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.4-3.0). Direct personnel-patient communication was associated with significantly lower stress levels (60.8% vs. 72.5% in the remaining cohort, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Intraoperative conversations of the personnel occur during vast majority of cesarean deliveries. Given that a substantial proportion of patients find these conversations disturbing, it is advisable to conduct a preliminary assessment of maternal preferences. This proactive step can help tailor communication strategies to individual patient comfort and preferences, ultimately enhancing the birthing experience and maternal well-being.

Acupuncture provides short-term pain relief for patients in a total joint replacement program

OBJECTIVE

Given the risks of opioid medications, nonpharmacological strategies should be considered for total joint replacement patients. We investigated acupuncture as an adjunct therapy for postsurgical pain management in a total joint replacement program by examining which total hip and knee replacement patients elected to receive acupuncture and the effect of acupuncture on short-term pain.

DESIGN

A total joint replacement program using fast-track physiotherapy offered elective postsurgical acupuncture to all patients, at no additional cost, as an adjunct therapy to opioids for pain management.

SETTING

The Joint Replacement Center at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, a 630-bed teaching and specialty hospital in Minneapolis, Minnesota from 2010 to 2012.

SUBJECTS

Our sample included 2,500 admissions of total hip (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) patients.

METHODS

Self-reported pain was assessed before and after acupuncture using a 0-10 scale and categorized as none/mild (0-4) and moderate/severe pain (5-10).

RESULTS

Seventy-five percent of admissions included acupuncture. Women (Odds Ratio: 1.48, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.22, 1.81) had higher odds of receiving acupuncture compared to men, and nonwhite patients (Odds Ratio: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.78) had lower odds of receiving acupuncture compared to white patients. Average short-term pain reduction was 1.91 points (95% CI: 1.83, 1.99), a 45% reduction from the mean prepain score. Forty-one percent of patients reported moderate/severe pain prior to receiving acupuncture, while only 15% indicated moderate/severe pain after acupuncture.

CONCLUSIONS

Acupuncture may be a viable adjunct to pharmacological approaches for pain management after THR or TKR.