Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Cause for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A protocol for meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is increasing year by year, the clinical manifestations are complex and diverse, and the adverse effects of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors and gastrointestinal motility drugs have been of great concern in recent years. The effectiveness of tegoprazan in the treatment of GERD is still controversial. This protocol describes a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science will be searched from the database inception to 1 March 2023. All randomized controlled trials related to tegoprazan for GERD will be included. Extracted data will include publication details, basic information, demographic data, intervention details and patient outcomes. The primary outcome will be complete resolution of major symptoms, complete resolution of heartburn, proportion of heartburn-free days, chronic cough, hoarseness, and adverse events. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Article selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers. If the meta-analysis is precluded, we will conduct a descriptive synthesis using a best-evidence synthesis approach.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will provide reliable evidence to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan in the treatment of GERD and help patients, physicians and clinical investigators choose the most appropriate treatment.

Application of B-ultrasound for localization and its impact on first-attempt success rates of nasogastric tube insertion in critically ill patients

The objective of this study is to explore the application effect of B-ultrasound positioning in assisting nasointestinal tube implantation in critically ill patients. This study is a retrospective study. In this study, 90 cases of severe patients with nasointestinal tube implantation were included. According to the different ways of nasointestinal tube insertion received by patients, 61 patients with conventional blind insertion methods were included in the blind insertion group, and 29 patients with conventional methods and B-ultrasound assisted positioning were included in the B-ultrasound positioning group. The general clinical data, success rate of catheterization, catheterization time, pyloric passage rate, and target nutritional value time of the 2 groups were compared. The changes of the 2 groups after catheterization were compared by SOFA and APACHE II. The contents of albumin and lymphocyte count were compared between the 2 groups before and after catheterization. The time of target nutritional value of the patients of the B-ultrasound positioning group was markedly decreased comparing with the patients of the blind insertion group. The index of catheterization time of the patients between the blind insertion group and B-ultrasound positioning group had no obvious contrast. The APACHE II score and SOFA score of the patients of the B-ultrasound positioning group were obviously lower than the blind insertion group. The contents of lymphocyte count of the patients of the B-ultrasound positioning group were markedly increased comparing with the patients of the blind insertion group after catheterization, but the contents of albumin content had no obvious change. The scores of respiratory system, circulatory system, nervous system, and urinary system in the B-ultrasound positioning group were significantly higher than those in the blind insertion group, while the COPT scores were significantly lower than those in the blind insertion group. B-ultrasound assisted nasointestinal tube implantation is well tolerated in critically ill patients, and can effectively ameliorate the nutritional status and of the ill patients.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults and Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Health: A Narrative Review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), a form of sleep-disordered breathing, is a significant health concern that leads to substantial morbidity. The collapse or occlusion of the upper airway, which results in reduced or cessation of airflow, is the pathophysiology of sleep apnea. The condition has been attributed to numerous cardiovascular, metabolic, and neuropsychological issues and carries serious health concerns. The ensuing intermittent hypoxia and sleep disruption set off a chain of physiological reactions that aid in developing endothelial dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and oxidative stress. The following line of treatment depends on the appropriate diagnosis of sleep apnea and the underlying cause. The gold standard for diagnosis is polysomnography (PSG), which assesses different physiological parameters during sleep. However, because polysomnography is expensive, patients may use more friendly screening and diagnostic testing kits, like home sleep apnea testing. The clinical symptoms and head and neck history may reveal essential risk factors. The primary objectives of management treatments for sleep apnea are to lessen symptoms, enhance sleep quality, and reduce any health concerns that may be present. It is advised to start with lifestyle changes such as quitting alcohol and sedative use, losing weight, and exercising frequently. The primary treatment for moderate to severe sleep apnea is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, which includes administering pressurized air to keep the airway open while you sleep. Oral appliances, positional therapy, surgery, and complementary therapies are other treatment choices that can be adapted to each patient's needs and preferences. The goal of the review is to evaluate the morphological and functional aspects of the upper airway, including the nose and throat, that influence the onset and severity of OSA. With a focus on the interaction between otorhinolaryngologists, sleep medicine specialists, and other healthcare professionals, we aim to consider how OSA affects otorhinolaryngology-related medical issues, look at any potential reciprocal relationships, and provide a summary of the interdisciplinary management strategy for OSA. We tried to analyse the various surgical and non-surgical therapy options for OSA management available in the otorhinolaryngology field for improving OSA symptoms and results.