Estimation of perioperative invasiveness of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection evaluated by energy metabolism

The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative invasiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal cancer quantitatively by using energy metabolism. In fifty-three patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal cancer, resting energy expenditure using an indirect calorimeter, body weight and basal energy expenditure using the Harris–Benedict equation before and after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Resting energy expenditure/body weight and resting energy expenditure/basal energy expenditure were 19.7 ± 2.5 kcal/kg/day and 0.96 ± 0.12 on the day of endoscopic submucosal dissection, whereas one day after the endoscopic submucosal dissection they increased to 21.0 ± 2.9 kcal/kg/day and 1.00 ± 0.13 (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively). The stress factor on the postoperative day 1 was computed as 1.06. The increase was lower comparing with that experienced for surgery, suggesting that the perioperative invasiveness of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection is lower in comparison to that during surgery. Furthermore, in spite of technical difficulty, stress factor of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection was approximately equal to that of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. (The study of the resting energy metabolism and stress factor using an indirect calorimeter in the perioperative period of endoscopic operation: UMIN000027135)

Energy metabolism during the perioperative period of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

The aim of this study was to investigate the change in the energy metabolism and invasiveness in the perioperative period of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Fifty-two consecutive patients were enrolled into the study between July 2013 and May 2014 and examined resting energy expenditure using an indirect calorimeter, body weight and basal energy expenditure using the Harris-Benedict equation before and after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Resting energy expenditure/body weight and resting energy expenditure/basal energy expenditure were 20.2 ± 3.0 kcal/kg/day and 0.96 ± 0.11 on the day of endoscopic submucosal dissection, whereas one day after the endoscopic submucosal dissection they were 21.7 ± 3.2 kcal/kg/day and 1.03 ± 0.14, showing significant increases (p<0.001, respectively). The stress factor on the postoperative day 1 was computed as 1.07. This increase was low in comparison to that experienced for surgery, suggesting that the degree of perioperative invasiveness in patients receiving endoscopic submucosal dissection is lower in comparison to that during surgery (The study of the resting energy metabolism and stress factor using an indirect calorimeter in the perioperative period of endoscopic operation: UMIN000027135).

Doubly labelled water assessment of energy expenditure: principle, practice, and promise

The doubly labelled water method for the assessment of energy expenditure was first published in 1955, application in humans started in 1982, and it has become the gold standard for human energy requirement under daily living conditions. The method involves enriching the body water of a subject with heavy hydrogen (2H) and heavy oxygen (18O), and then determining the difference in washout kinetics between both isotopes, being a function of carbon dioxide production. In practice, subjects get a measured amount of doubly labelled water (2H 218 O) to increase background enrichment of body water for 18O of 2000 ppm with at least 180 ppm and background enrichment of body water for 2H of 150 ppm with 120 ppm. Subsequently, the difference between the apparent turnover rates of the hydrogen and oxygen of body water is assessed from blood-, saliva-, or urine samples, collected at the start and end of the observation interval of 1-3 weeks. Samples are analyzed for 18O and 2H with isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The doubly labelled water method is the indicated method to measure energy expenditure in any environment, especially with regard to activity energy expenditure, without interference with the behavior of the subjects. Applications include the assessment of energy requirement from total energy expenditure, validation of dietary assessment methods and validation of physical activity assessment methods with doubly labelled water measured energy expenditure as reference, and studies on body mass regulation with energy expenditure as a determinant of energy balance.

Do PICU patients meet technical criteria for performing indirect calorimetry?

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Indirect calorimetry (IC) is considered gold standard for assessing energy needs of critically ill children as predictive equations and clinical status indicators are often unreliable. Accurate assessment of energy requirements in this vulnerable population is essential given the high risk of over or underfeeding and the consequences thereof. The proportion of patients and patient days in pediatric intensive care (PICU) for which energy expenditure (EE) can be measured using IC is currently unknown. In the current study, we aimed to quantify the daily proportion of consecutive PICU patients who met technical criteria to perform indirect calorimetry and describe the technical contraindications when criteria were not met.

METHODS

Prospective, observational, single-centre study conducted in a cardiac and general PICU. All consecutive patients admitted for at least 96 h were included in the study. Variables collected for each patient included age at admission, admission diagnosis, and if technical criteria for indirect calorimetry were met. Technical criteria variables were collected within the same 2 h each morning and include: provision of supplemental oxygen, ventilator settings, endotracheal tube (ETT) leak, diagnosis of chest tube air leak, provision of external gas support (i.e. nitric oxide), and provision of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

RESULTS

288 patients were included for a total of 3590 patient days between June 2014 and February 2015. The main reasons for admission were: surgery (cardiac and non-cardiac), respiratory distress, trauma, oncology and medicine/other. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 0.7 (0.3-4.6) years. The median length of PICU stay was 7 (5-14) days. Only 34% (95% CI, 32.4-35.5%) of patient days met technical criteria for IC. For patients less than 6 months of age, technical criteria were met on significantly fewer patient days (29%, p < 0.01). Moreover, 27% of patients did not meet technical criteria for IC on any day during their PICU stay. Most frequent reasons for why IC could not be performed included supplemental oxygen, ECMO, and ETT leak.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, technical criteria to perform IC in the PICU were not met for 27% of patients and were not met on 66% of patient days. Moreover, criteria were met on only 29% of days for infants 6 months and younger where children 24 months of age and older still only met criteria on 40% of patient days. This data represents a major gap in the feasibility of current recommendations for assessing energy requirements of this population. Future studies are needed to improve methods of predicting and measuring energy requirements in critically ill children who do not meet current criteria for indirect calorimetry.

Nutrition and metabolism in the rehabilitative phase of recovery in burn children: a review of clinical and research findings in a speciality pediatric burn hospital

During the rehabilitation phase of burn injury, patient care transitions from critical care medicine to restorative treatment strategies that encompass physical and occupational therapies, nutrition repletion, and psychosocial support for community reintegration. As pediatric burn patients undergo rehabilitation, nutrition assessment remains ongoing to define nutritional status and any alterations in metabolism that may take place. For some, a persistent hypermetabolic state appears evident, and weight loss may continue. The severity and duration however varies among patients. Many patients enter their rehabilitative phase with visible lean body mass depletion, and the focus of nutritional therapy for them shifts to replenishing nutritional status, while supporting rehabilitative efforts. Over the past decade, we have conducted studies on energy and protein metabolism, body composition, including bone mineralization, and general wellness in over 130 patients to better understand changes in metabolism and nutritional status during the rehabilitative phase of recovery. This abstract summarizes our findings.