Artificial Intelligence-Based Quantification of Epithelial Proliferation in Mammary Glands of Rats and Oviducts of Göttingen Minipigs

Quantitative Assessment of Epithelial Proliferation in Rat Mammary Gland Using Artificial Intelligence Independent of Choice of Proliferation Marker

Epithelial proliferation in the rat mammary gland is recommended in regulatory guidelines as an endpoint for assessment of the in vivo carcinogenic potential of insulin analogues. Epithelial proliferation is traditionally assessed by immunohistochemical staining of a proliferation marker, for example, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) or Ki67, followed by labor-intensive manual counting of positive and negative cells. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an approach for image analysis based on artificial intelligence, which can be used for quantification of proliferation in rat mammary gland, independent of the choice of proliferation marker. Furthermore, the aim was to compare the markers BrdU, Ki67, and phosphorylated histone H3 (PHH3). A sequence of image analysis applications were developed, which allowed for quantification of proliferative activity in the mammary gland epithelium. These endpoints agreed well with manually counted labeling indices, with correlation coefficients in the range ≈0.92-0.93. In addition, all three proliferation markers were significantly correlated and could detect the variation in epithelial proliferation during the estrous cycle. In conclusion, image analysis can be used to quantify epithelial proliferation in the rat mammary gland and thereby replace time-consuming manual counting. Furthermore, BrdU, Ki67, and PHH3 can be used interchangeably to assess proliferation.

Deep Learning Approaches and Applications in Toxicologic Histopathology: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Whole slide imaging enables the use of a wide array of digital image analysis tools that are revolutionizing pathology. Recent advances in digital pathology and deep convolutional neural networks have created an enormous opportunity to improve workflow efficiency, provide more quantitative, objective, and consistent assessments of pathology datasets, and develop decision support systems. Such innovations are already making their way into clinical practice. However, the progress of machine learning - in particular, deep learning (DL) - has been rather slower in nonclinical toxicology studies. Histopathology data from toxicology studies are critical during the drug development process that is required by regulatory bodies to assess drug-related toxicity in laboratory animals and its impact on human safety in clinical trials. Due to the high volume of slides routinely evaluated, low-throughput, or narrowly performing DL methods that may work well in small-scale diagnostic studies or for the identification of a single abnormality are tedious and impractical for toxicologic pathology. Furthermore, regulatory requirements around good laboratory practice are a major hurdle for the adoption of DL in toxicologic pathology. This paper reviews the major DL concepts, emerging applications, and examples of DL in toxicologic pathology image analysis. We end with a discussion of specific challenges and directions for future research.

Whole-slide imaging, tissue image analysis, and artificial intelligence in veterinary pathology: An updated introduction and review

Since whole-slide imaging has been commercially available for over 2 decades, digital pathology has become a constantly expanding aspect of the pathology profession that will continue to significantly impact how pathologists conduct their craft. While some aspects, such as whole-slide imaging for archiving, consulting, and teaching, have gained broader acceptance, other facets such as quantitative tissue image analysis and artificial intelligence-based assessments are still met with some reservations. While most vendors in this space have focused on diagnostic applications, that is, viewing one or few slides at a time, some are developing solutions tailored more specifically to the various aspects of veterinary pathology including updated diagnostic, discovery, and research applications. This has especially advanced the use of digital pathology in toxicologic pathology and drug development, for primary reads as well as peer reviews. It is crucial that pathologists gain a deeper understanding of digital pathology and tissue image analysis technology and their applications in order to fully use these tools in a way that enhances and improves the pathologist's assessment as well as work environment. This review focuses on an updated introduction to the basics of digital pathology and image analysis and introduces emerging topics around artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Mini Review: The Last Mile-Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning in Digital Toxicologic Pathology

The 2019 manuscript by the Special Interest Group on Digital Pathology and Image Analysis of the Society of Toxicologic pathology suggested that a synergism between artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies and digital toxicologic pathology would improve the daily workflow and future impact of toxicologic pathologists globally. Now 2 years later, the authors of this review consider whether, in their opinion, there is any evidence that supports that thesis. Specifically, we consider the opportunities and challenges for applying ML (the study of computer algorithms that are able to learn from example data and extrapolate the learned information to unseen data) algorithms in toxicologic pathology and how regulatory bodies are navigating this rapidly evolving field. Although we see similarities with the "Last Mile" metaphor, the weight of evidence suggests that toxicologic pathologists should approach ML with an equal dose of skepticism and enthusiasm. There are increasing opportunities for impact in our field that leave the authors cautiously excited and optimistic. Toxicologic pathologists have the opportunity to critically evaluate ML applications with a "call-to-arms" mentality. Why should we be late adopters? There is ample evidence to encourage engagement, growth, and leadership in this field.