Topical Refrigerant Spray for IVs: Patient/Provider Responses - Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized Study

The effect of using vapocoolant spray for pain reduction in arteriovenous fistula cannulation among patients undergoing hemodialysis: A randomized control trial

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of alkane vapocoolant spray in reducing pain during arteriovenous access cannulation in adult patients undergoing hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND

Developing and applying various approaches for pain relief remain important responsibility for nurses.

METHODS

This study was designed as an experimental study with a cross-over design. Thirty-eight patients on hemodialysis volunteered to undergo cannulation of their arteriovenous access, after the application of vapocoolant or placebo spray or no intervention. Subjective and objective pain levels were assessed, along with various physiological parameters pre- and post-cannulation.

RESULTS

Statistically significant between-group differences were observed in subjective pain at the venous (F = 4.97, p = 0.009) and arterial (F = 6.91, p = 0.001) puncture sites. The mean arterial site subjective pain scores were 4.45 ± 1.31 (no treatment), 4.04 ± 1.82 (placebo), and 2.98 ± 1.53 (vapocoolant spray). Significant between-group differences were observed in objective pain scores during arteriovenous fistula puncture (F = 5.13, p = 0.007). The mean objective pain scores after arteriovenous fistula puncture were 3.25 ± 2.66 (no treatment), 2.17 ± 1.76 (placebo), and 1.78 ± 1.66 (vapocoolant spray). Post-hoc test results indicated vapocoolant spray application was associated with significantly lower pain scores than no treatment or placebo. Patient blood pressure and heart rate recordings did not differ among the interventions.

CONCLUSION

Vapocoolant application was significantly more effective than the placebo or no treatment in reducing the pain of cannulation in adult patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Pain management with transdermal drug administration: A review

Pain management is an urgent issue to solve with complex mechanisms. Localized acute pain requires rapid and accurate delivery of drugs with less distribution in the blood circulation while chronic pain requires controlled release of drugs with long drug retention time. The transdermal route, a promising way with high patient compliance was known for painless delivery, long drug retention time, stable blood concentration, easily controlled dosage and release rate as well as the fewer side effects. This review presents transdermal route for pain management according to the different sites of action which drugs aim to reach, and illustrates different analgesic mechanisms, dosage forms, transdermal enhancements and clinical applications. In addition, the review concludes the difference of pain types and presents the future aims of pain management, thereby providing a reference for researches focusing on percutaneous analgesia.