Single-incision transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy: challenges and limitations in a North American population

Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: time to expand indications?

In 2016, the American Thyroid Association published a statement on remote-access thyroid surgery claiming that it should be reserved to patients with thyroid nodule ≤ 3 cm, thyroid lobe < 6 cm and without thyroiditis. We retrospectively enrolled all patients who underwent robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy between February 2012 and March 2022. We compared surgical outcomes between patients who presented a thyroid gland with a nodule ≤ 3 cm, thyroid lobe < 6 cm and without thyroiditis (Group A) and patients without these features (Group B). The rate of overall complications resulted comparable (p = 0.399), as well as the operative time (p = 0.477) and the hospital stay (p = 0.305). Moreover, bleeding resulted associated to thyroid nodule > 3 cm (p = 0.015), although all bleedings but one occurred in the remote-access site from the axilla to the neck. In experienced hands, robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy is feasible and safe even in patients with large thyroid nodules or thyroiditis.

Remote-access robotic thyroidectomy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Recently, robotic surgery has been introduced as a new surgical approach to the thyroid.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this systematic review is to critically examine safety and feasibility of the different robotic approaches.

METHODS

The literature on robotic thyroidectomy was systematically reviewed. Primary endpoints were surgery duration, length of hospital stay, complications, postoperative pain and cosmetic satisfaction.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies with a total of 14433 patients were included. Depending on the robotic approach used, operative duration ranged between 89 and 230 min and hospitalisation stay between 0.1 and 5.6 days. Complication rates varied between 7.3% and 29%. Postoperative pain visual analogue scores (VAS) ranged from 0.6 to 4.71.

CONCLUSION

Robotic thyroidectomy results in high cosmetic satisfaction and quality of life. No differences in complication rates between robotic and traditional approaches are observed, supporting safety and feasibility of these robotic techniques.

Transaxillary gasless endoscopic hemithyroidectomy versus conventional open hemithyroidectomy: early single-centre experience

Conventional open thyroidectomy is defined as a gold standard in thyroid gland disease treatment. However, progressive surgery methods such as endoscopic technique provide better structure visualisation and improved cosmetic effect. Our study aim is to compare conventional open (COH) and endoscopic transaxillary hemithyroidectomy (TAH) and define the learning curve for TAH procedure. We retrospectively analysed 107 COH and 65 TAH cases. Patients' demographic data and surgery results were compared. Also, surgeon learning curve analysis using cumulative sum (CUSUM) was performed for the duration of the surgery. TAH was applied to younger female patients with lower thyroid gland volume. COH group patients were hospitalised for longer in comparison with TAH (p < 0.05). Mean TAH surgery time was longer (78.1 min, SD = 22.6) compared with COH (66.7 min, 15.3) (p < 0.05). Overall complication rate was comparable between groups. There was a tendency towards a lower unintentional parathyroidectomy rate in TAH group. TAH group results showed significantly longer surgery time for patients whose body mass index (BMI) was over 30 (kg/m²), compared to whose BMI was below 30 (kg/m²) (p = 0.004). Shortest endoscopic surgery time (64.9 ± 12.45 min) was achieved between 41 and 50 cases. CUSUM analysis showed that surgery time decreased after the 30th TAH case. TAH approach compared to COH results in longer surgery time, shorter hospital stay and comparable rate of postoperative complications. However matched pair studies are necessary to clarify the results. After thirty cases, the surgeon became proficient in transaxillary endoscopic thyroid surgery.

Postsurgical complications after robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy: critical analysis of a large cohort of European patients

In the last decade, robot-assisted trans-axillary thyroidectomy has spread rapidly and has been proven to be a safe and effective procedure. However, several case series have reported new complications that have led to criticism regarding this approach. This study analyzed the incidence of complications in a large cohort of European patients. We enrolled all patients who underwent robot-assisted trans-axillary thyroidectomy from 2012 to 2020 at the University Hospital of Pisa Department of Endocrine Surgery. We analyzed complications and divided them into 2 groups. Group A included conventional complications, such as transient or permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, transient or permanent hypocalcemia, hemorrhage, and tracheal injury. Group B included unconventional complications, such as brachial plexus palsy, track seeding, seroma, great vessels injury, and skin flap perforation. There were 31 postsurgical complications (5.7%). Group A included 25 complications (4.6%): transient and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred in 7 patients (1.3%) and in 1 (0.2%), respectively; transient and permanent hypocalcemia occurred in 9 patients (1.7%) and in 1 (0.2%), respectively. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 6 patients (1.1%) and tracheal injury in 1 (0.2%). Group B included 6 complications (1.1%): 1 patient with brachial plexus injury (0.2%), 1 with track seeding (0.2%), and 4 with seroma (0.7%). Robotic trans-axillary thyroidectomy is a safe approach with a risk of postoperative complications comparable to the conventional technique. Almost all complications after a novel introduction are anecdotal. With an accurate patient selection, high-volume institutions with experienced surgeons can perform this technique safely.

Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient education source for novel surgical techniques in thyroid surgery

Background

Patients and physicians are increasingly utilizing online video sharing sites such as YouTube for obtaining and disseminating health-related information in multimedia format; however, due to its free, open-access platform, YouTube videos fall short in providing validated, up-to-date medical information, and may even convey unintended messages to patients who are seeking additional information on surgeries. We evaluated the relevance, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos on novel surgical techniques in thyroid surgery.

Methods

The top 50 indexed YouTube videos for the queries, "robotic thyroid surgery" and "transoral thyroid surgery", were assessed by two independent reviewers for video quality and reliability for patient understanding. Videos were scored using Global Quality Score (GQS), a scale for video quality, and DISCERN Scoring, a questionnaire for reliability and quality measures of information presented.

Results

The mean ± standard deviation (SD) duration of the videos (n=50) was 8.1±3.7 minutes. Total views were 261,440 and the mean ± SD time since upload was 3.6±2.6 years. The median and interquartile range of video power index (VPI) was 1.9 (0.5-3.7), GQS was 3.0 (2.0-4.0), and DISCERN score was 2.8 (2.3-3.2). Most videos were uploaded by physicians (75.8%) and the highest number of videos (63.6%) uploaded were from the United States (US). Videos with higher quality and reliability scores were uploaded by academic professionals, and included videos of physicians who described procedural information, perioperative instructions, and possible postoperative complications (P<0.05). Adequate medical information on the procedure and discussion of complications in YouTube videos were independent predictors of advanced educational quality and reliability.

Conclusions

Clinical information on new surgical techniques such as transoral and robotic thyroid surgeries in YouTube videos scored low on quality and reliability as a source of patient education. Physicians should provide supplemental educational material online and offline to aid patient understanding of novel procedures.

Impact of body mass index on robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy

Obesity is associated with increased operating times and higher complication rates in many types of surgery. Its impact on robotic thyroidectomy however, is not well documented. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy (RTAT). A retrospective review of prospectively collected data of all patients who underwent RTAT at Yonsei University Health System from October 2007 to December 2014 was performed. Patients were divided into three groups based on BMI (Group 1: BMI < 25, Group 2: BMI 25-29.99, Group 3: BMI ≥ 30), and compared. A total of 3697 patients were analyzed. No differences between the three groups were observed in clinicopathological factors, extent of surgery or length of stay. After multivariate analysis, only seroma and transient voice hoarseness were related to increasing BMI. Total operative time was significantly longer for Group 3 patients with less-than-bilateral total thyroidectomy (BTT), but was not significantly different for patients with BTT. Although obese patients undergoing RTAT have a slightly higher risk of seroma, transient voice hoarseness, and longer operative times, BMI did not influence the other important surgical outcomes of thyroidectomy. Therefore, obesity should not be a contraindication for performing RTAT.

Evolution Strategies in Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy: Considerations on the First 449 Cases Performed

Background: In the past 20 years, the fast spread of new surgical technologies has reached an important peak with the advent of the robotic surgery. Many studies have been run about a cosmetic desire to avoid neck scars after thyroid surgery and this has led to the development of remote access robotic thyroidectomy (RT). Among the various RT approaches, unilateral transaxillary access is one of the most widely used, reporting excellent results in terms of feasibility and patient's compliance. The mini-invasive technique demonstrated many potential shortcoming overcomes with the robotic approach. At our institution a team of 3 skilled endocrine surgeons with experience in laparoscopic and robotic procedures performed RT. Our aim is to report our 8-year single-centre robot-assisted thyroidectomy experience, by applying a gasless unilateral transaxillary approach with the so-called hybrid technique, and to demonstrate its safety and feasibility.

Methods: In the period between September 2010 and June 2018 at our institution, a total of 472 patients underwent thyroid and parathyroid transaxillary surgery. The hybrid technique was applied for all the robotic procedures. A total of 412 procedures were performed with the use of external “Modena Retractor” (CEATEC^® Medizintechnik) and with 3 surgeons. According to international guidelines, our indications for robotic surgery were benign lesions with a diameter <5 cm, Graves' disease, well-differentiated thyroid cancers, and parathyroid adenomas.

Results: In this series, a total of 449 cases were registered. General data of patients were analyzed: gender, age, body mass index, tumor size, preoperative fine-needle aspiration examination, definitive histological examination, operative time, and postoperative complications.

Conclusions: This study confirms the application of robotic approach in thyroid surgery as a feasible technique in terms of safety and complications risk. The hybrid technique, together with a dedicated surgical team, can lead to obtaining the same outcomes of traditional anterior cervicotomic surgery, adding a scarless thyroidectomy.

Gasless Transaxillary Endoscopic Thyroidectomy with Robotic Assistance: A High-Volume Experience in North America

BACKGROUND

Since its introduction nine years ago, gasless transaxillary thyroidectomy with robotic assistance (RT) has achieved a relatively limited application in North America. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of RT in a recent large, diverse North American population.

METHODS

Consenting patients were selected for the RT approach from November 2010 to July 2015 based on patient preference, and their perioperative data were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 301 robotic thyroidectomies completed in 281 patients, 160 were total thyroidectomy and 141 were lobectomy. Women predominated (98.9%), with a mean age of 41 years (range 17-74 years) and a mean follow-up of 24 months (range 3-71 months). The mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.7 kg/m² (range 17-44 kg/m²). However, 33.3% of patients had a BMI 25-29.9 kg/m², 12.4% had a BMI 30-34.9 kg/m², 3.5% had a BMI 35-39.9 kg/m², and 0.7% had a BMI ≥40 kg/m². Excluding 20 completion lobectomy, the indications for surgery were indeterminate cytology (53%), malignant cytology (10%), growth (18%), Graves' disease (12%), and other (5%). The mean size of the largest resected nodule was 2.5 cm (range 0.7-6.4 cm). Mean operating time for robotic lobectomy and total thyroidectomy was 81 and 109 minutes, respectively. One patient was converted to standard cervicotomy for failure to progress endoscopically. Complications included temporary dysphonia (6.0%), permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve deficit (1.3%), hypocalcemia (temporary 8.2%, permanent 1.1%), seroma (0.7%), and hematoma requiring reoperation (0.3%). Complications did not differ in patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m² compared to those with a BMI <25 kg/m² or with respect to nodules >3 cm or surgery for Graves' thyroiditis. One patient developed grade II arm lymphedema ipsilateral to the axillary incision at two years, which resolved with conservative management. No patient had a surgical site infection or brachial plexopathy. Cancer was present histologically in 133 (48%) patients. Among 91 patients with cancer of the index nodule, 48.4% had papillary, 44.0% follicular variant papillary, 2.2% minimally invasive follicular carcinoma, and 5.5% minimally invasive Hürthle cell carcinoma. One patient had sclerosing variant thyroid paraganglioma. To date, all patients are without evidence of tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

At a high-volume center, gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroid surgery done with robotic assistance is a safe, efficient, and effective approach in a diverse North American patient population.

Factors affecting operative time in robotic thyroidectomy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors related to operative time in robotic thyroidectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 240 patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy. The total thyroidectomy cases and lobectomy cases were both categorized into those with long operative times (LOTs; upper 25% of cases) and those with short operative times (SOTs; lower 25%).

RESULTS

Among the total thyroidectomy cases, body mass index (BMI) ≥23 kg/m² (hazard ratio [HR] 5.34; P = .008) and bilateral central neck dissection (CND; HR 14.92; P = .028) were more frequent in the LOT group in multivariate analysis. Among the lobectomy cases, BMI ≥23 kg/m² (HR 12.92; P = .003) and unilateral CND (HR 21.38; P = .017) were the only independent risk factors for prolonged operative time.

CONCLUSION

Body habitus and clinical nodal status in the central compartment should be considered in deciding the indications for robotic thyroidectomy.

Remote Access Robotic Facelift Thyroidectomy: A Multi-institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was developed as a new surgical approach to the thyroid gland using a remote incision site. Early favorable results led to this confirmatory multi-institutional experience.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing RFT in five North American academic endocrine surgical practices were compiled. Surgical indications, operative times, final pathology, nodule size, complications, and postoperative management (drain use and length of hospital stay) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 102 RFT procedures were undertaken in 90 patients. All but one of the patients (98.9 %) were female, and the mean age was 41.9 ± 13.1 years (range 12-69 years). The indication for surgery was nodular disease in 91.2 % of cases; 8.8 % were completion procedures performed for a diagnosis of cancer. The mean size of the largest nodule was 1.9 cm (range 0-5.6 cm). The mean total operative time for a thyroid lobectomy was 162 min (range 82-265 min). No permanent complications occurred. There were 4 cases (3.9 %) of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve weakness, no cases of hypocalcemia, and 3 (2.9 %) hematomas. There were no conversions to an anterior cervical approach. The majority of patients were managed on an outpatient basis (61.8 %) and without a drain (65.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

RFT is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. RFT can continue to be offered to carefully selected patients as a way to avoid a visible cervical scar. Future prospective studies to compare this novel approach to other remote access approaches are warranted.

Postoperative Pain Evaluation After Robotic Transaxillary Thyroidectomy Versus Conventional Thyroidectomy: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) is an emerging technique with excellent cosmetic results but is supposedly more invasive and painful than conventional thyroidectomy (CT). This prospective study compared pain after RATT and CT.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were a nodule <5 cm and volume <30 mL. Patients received the same analgesia. Pain was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) in the recovery room (VASrr), on the first postoperative day at 8:00 a.m. (VAS 8 a.m.) and 8:00 p.m. (VAS 8 p.m.), at 8:00 a.m. on the second postoperative day (VAS 8*a.m.), and after 7 days (VAS 7). Operative time and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

From May 2015 to September 2015, 124 patients (all women) underwent thyroidectomy: 62 underwent RATT and 62 underwent CT. Mean age was 39.7 ± 10.2 years in the RATT group and 41.4 ± 12.5 years in the CT group. Groups were comparable for thyroid volume and nodule diameter. Operative time was longer in the RATT group than in the CT group (119.4 ± 25.5 versus 70.3 ± 11.0 minutes). Complications were three transient hypocalcemia in RATT and four in the CT group. No definitive complications occurred. VASrr was lower in the RATT group (1.79 ± 2.06 versus 2.5 ± 1.18; P < .0001). There was no difference between groups for VAS 8 a.m., VAS 8 p.m., and VAS 8*a.m., but VAS 7 was higher in the RATT group (0.85 ± 1.77 versus 0.17 ± 0.52; P < .010).

DISCUSSION

RATT is as safe and effective as CT. Patients undergoing RATT, surprisingly, experienced less pain in the immediate postoperative period. However, the VAS 7 score was higher in the RATT group, probably because the intact neck is favorable in the early phase of recovery, but the large dissection takes longer for healing.

Comprehensive application of robotic retroauricular thyroidectomy: The evolution of robotic thyroidectomy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

As an evolvement of the robotic application to the thyroidectomy, we sought to seek the potential role of robotic thyroidectomy with the retroauricular (RA) approach prior to future comparative study between RA and transaxillary thyroidectomy. This study aims to verify the surgical feasibility of robotic RA thyroidectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with planned data collection.

METHODS

A total of 87 patients who underwent robotic RA thyroidectomy for clinically suspicious papillary thyroid carcinoma or benign lesions from January 2013 to May 2014 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

All robotic surgeries via RA approach were successfully performed, without any significant intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery. Based on patient-reported outcome questionnaires, all patients were satisfied with their postoperative surgical scars.

CONCLUSION

Robotic RA thyroidectomy is technically feasible and safe, with satisfactory cosmetic results for patients where indicated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 126:1952-1957, 2016.

Robotic transaxillary thyroid surgery

Recent technological advances have led to a rapid progress in endocrine surgery. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques in thyroid surgery, robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery (RATS) has emerged as one of the most promising approaches. Its main advantages are improved cosmetic outcome, avoiding cervical incisions, increased patient satisfaction, improved visualization, arms articulations, eliminating surgeon's natural tremor, thereby increasing precision. The main disadvantages are longer operative time, and increased cost compared to conventional thyroidectomy, as well as potential injuries to the brachial plexus, skin flap, esophagus, and trachea. Large-scale studies, mainly from South-Korea, have proved that in skilled hands, RATS is a safe alternative to conservative thyroidectomy and should be presented to patients with aesthetic concerns. As with any new emerging technique, careful patient selection is crucial, and further evidence must be sought to confirm its indications.

Trends in Robotic Thyroid Surgery in the United States from 2009 Through 2013

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to describe national trends in robotic thyroid surgery from 2009 through 2013.

METHODS

The University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) database was searched for patients undergoing robotic thyroidectomy (RT) from 2009 through 2013. Another U.S. institution's RT data, not included in the UHC database, were also evaluated. Patient demographics, institutional volume, comorbid conditions, complications, and cost information were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one institutions performed 484 RT during the study period. From 2009 through 2011, U.S. annual RT volume increased from 39 cases to 140. Annual volume dropped to 69 cases in 2012 and 93 cases in 2013. Higher-volume centers reported lower complication rates (p<0.02). Hematoma formation (3.7%) was the most common complication, and there was one death. More than 10% of patients were obese. Brachial plexus injury and axillary skin flap perforations were reported in <1% of cases. Mean cost for a total RT was $13,287 ($5,125-42,444).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2009 through early 2011, there was a steady increase in RT volume, especially among high-volume institutions. In mid-to-late 2011, there was a noticeable drop in RT volume, which significantly altered the projected trajectory of the procedure in this country. Despite higher complication rates, lower-volume centers perform the majority of RT and are also responsible for recent increases in RT utilization patterns in the United States.

Endoscopic retroauricular thyroidectomy: preliminary results

BACKGROUND

We sought to seek the potential role of endoscopic thyroidectomy with the retroauricular (RA) approach prior to future comparative study with the robotic RA thyroidectomy. Therefore, this study aims to verify the surgical feasibility of endoscopic RA thyroidectomy.

METHODS

Eighteen patients who underwent endoscopic RA thyroidectomy for clinically suspicious papillary thyroid carcinoma or benign lesions from January to December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

All endoscopic operations via RA or modified facelift approach were successfully performed, without any significant intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery. Based on patient-reported outcome questionnaires, all patients were satisfied with their postoperative surgical scars.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic RA thyroidectomy is technically feasible and safe with satisfactory cosmetic results for patients where indicated.

Current status of robotic surgery in Japan

The da Vinci S surgical system (Intuitive Surgical) was approved as a medical device in 2009 by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Robotic surgery has since been used in gastrointestinal, thoracic, gynecological, and urological surgeries. In April 2012, robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) was first approved for insurance coverage. Since then, RALP has been increasingly used, with more than 3,000 RALP procedures performed by March 2013. By July 2014, 183 institutions in Japan had installed the da Vinci surgical system. Other types of robotic surgeries are not widespread because they are not covered by public health insurance. Clinical trials using robotic partial nephrectomy and robotic gastrectomy for renal and gastric cancers, respectively, have recently begun as advanced medical treatments to evaluate health insurance coverage. These procedures must be evaluated for efficacy and safety before being covered by public health insurance. Other types of robotic surgery are being evaluated in clinical studies. There are several challenges in robotic surgery, including accreditation, training, efficacy, and cost. The largest issue is the cost-benefit balance. In this review, the current situation and a prospective view of robotic surgery in Japan are discussed.

Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery-feasibility and safety of a novel technique

Developments in technology have led to a rapid progress in robotic endocrine surgery applications. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques in thyroid surgery, robot-assisted transaxillary thyroid surgery (RATS) has emerged as one of the most promising approaches. Its main advantages are improved cosmetic outcome, avoiding cervical incisions, thereby increasing patient satisfaction, and improved visualization, arms articulations, and precision, resulting in fewer surgical complications. The main disadvantages are potential new injuries to the brachial plexus, esophagus, and trachea, longer operative time, and increased cost compared to conventional thyroidectomy. In skilled hands, RATS is a safe alternative to conservative thyroidectomy and should be presented to patients with aesthetic concerns. As with any new emerging technique, careful patient selection is crucial, and further evidence must be sought to confirm its indications over time.

Commentary: is robotic thyroid surgery worth the learning curve?

There are numerous potential applications of robotic technology to head and neck procedures, including thyroidectomy. The learning curve for robotic thyroid surgery appears to be steep, as highlighted in a study published in this issue. This commentary explores the challenges with learning robotic thyroid surgery and questions the potential risks and benefits of increased adoption of this approach.