Referral Patterns and Positive Airway Pressure Adherence upon Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Characteristics of Adults Undergoing Soft Tissue and Orthognathic Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical and demographic characteristics of adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing soft tissue and orthognathic sleep surgery, assess temporal trends in surgery type and proportion of women undergoing surgery, and provide clinical perspective before wide-spread implementation of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS).

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, adults diagnosed with OSA from 2009 to 2016 were identified in a large integrated healthcare system. Characteristics between cohort members who did and did not undergo sleep surgeries were compared. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations of different characteristics with whether surgery was performed.

RESULTS

Of 172,216 adults with OSA, 2,262 (1.3%) underwent sleep surgery during 2009-2017. The most common sleep surgery was palate surgery (56.9%), which decreased proportionately over time. In multivariable analysis, older age and obesity were associated with lower odds of undergoing surgery. Those who underwent tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were more likely to have larger tonsils and not require additional surgery, whereas tongue reduction recipients were more likely to have severe OSA and require multiple surgery types. The proportion of women undergoing surgery increased over time (p < 0.001 from trend test).

CONCLUSION

Clinical and demographic characteristics associated with soft tissue and orthognathic sleep surgery were identified in a large adult cohort prior to widespread implementation of HGNS. An increase in sleep surgery among women and a decrease in palate surgery over time were observed. The findings provide clinical perspective on sleep surgery performed prior to implementation of HGNS and may inform future studies examining its associations with patient characteristics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2023.

Barriers and communication behaviors impacting referral to sleep surgery: qualitative patient perspectives

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Physician-patient interactions influence the immediate encounter and leave lasting impressions for future health care encounters. We aimed to understand patient experiences and decision-making for considering sleep surgery, in terms of barriers and communication behaviors that facilitate or hinder referral for consideration of sleep surgery management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) when continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy has failed.

METHODS

We employed qualitative methods, using semistructured interviews of adults with OSA who presented for sleep surgery consultation after unsatisfactory therapy with CPAP. Open-ended questions traced symptoms and progression of sleep apnea burden, trials of noninvasive OSA therapies, outcomes, and patient expectations and concerns. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using content analysis to identify themes.

RESULTS

Ten adult patients with OSA were enrolled March through April 2021 and reached predominant thematic saturation. Barriers to sleep surgery consultation included: (1) delays in OSA diagnosis due to limited OSA awareness among patients or primary providers and patients' perceived inconvenience of sleep testing, (2) patients faulted for slow progress, (3) patient-reported lack of urgency by providers in troubleshooting noninvasive management options, (4) scheduling delays and waitlists, and (5) cost. Patients were receptive to noninvasive treatment options, but inadequate improvement led to frustration after multiple encounters. Patients appreciated empathetic providers who shared information through transparent and understandable explanations and who presented multiple treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Experiences of patients with OSA highlight the need for shared decision-making through improved communication of unresolved concerns and alternative management options, including timely referral for sleep surgery consultation when indicated.

CITATION

Ikeda AK, McShay C, Marsh R, et al. Barriers and communication behaviors impacting referral to sleep surgery: qualitative patient perspectives. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(1):111-117.

Cancer Risk Associated with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A National Study

OBJECTIVE

In 2021 the U.S. FDA issued a Class 1 safety recall notice for specific devices due to a risk of carcinogen exposure. The objective of this study was to evaluate reports of cancer linked to CPAP devices to understand implications for the field of sleep medicine.

METHODS

Cases of cancer involving CPAP devices were retrieved from the MAUDE database from 2014 to 2021 and analyzed with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 2571 patient injuries were associated with CPAP. Reports of cancer (n = 209; 4.62%) were the second most commonly documented patient problem associated with CPAP, although 1950 (43.13%) patients had a device problem without an associated injury. Of the 209 cancer cases associated with CPAP, 200 (95.7%) of the adverse event reports were received by the FDA in 2021. There were 174 (9.15%) descriptions of the CPAP polyurethane sound abatement foam degrading in association with a cancer diagnosis, but degradation was more commonly not associated with malignancy (n = 1728; 90.85%). Other frequently documented CPAP device problems included broken devices (n = 279; 6.92%), fire (n = 182; 4.51%), and patient-device incompatibility (n = 144; 3.57%).

CONCLUSION

Malignancy associated with CPAP devices has been reported; however, future studies are required to establish causation. Given 95.7% of those documented cases were reported in 2021, otolaryngologists should be prepared to discuss the risks of carcinogenesis associated with CPAP. The otolaryngology community should also be aware of the potential bandwagon effect and the implications for CPAP compliance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 132:2270-2274, 2022.

A New Metric for Precision Medicine: PAP and Hypoglossal Neurostimulation

CITATION

Jacobowitz O, Woodson BT. A new metric for precision medicine: PAP and hypoglossal neurostimulation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(8):1079-1080.

Untreated Sleep Apnea: An Analysis of Administrative Data to Identify Risk Factors for Early Nonadherence

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Discontinuation of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is widely reported, but research has not adequately addressed nonadherence with diagnostic testing for sleep disorders and initiation of PAP. This study sought to identify drivers of nonadherence with diagnostic sleep testing and PAP treatment initiation among patients preauthorized for these services.

METHODS

This observational cohort study used preauthorization records from a sleep management program and administrative medical claims from a large commercial health insurer. Participants included adults preauthorized for sleep testing and a subset in whom OSA was diagnosed and who were preauthorized for PAP treatment. Outcome measures were nonadherence with diagnostic sleep testing and PAP treatment initiation, identified as lack of a claim for a preauthorized service within 3 months of preauthorization of that service. Risk factors for nonadherence included patient demographics, prescribing factors, signs and symptoms of OSA, comorbidities, and prior health service utilization.

RESULTS

Of 51,749 patients preauthorized for diagnostic testing, 23.5% did not undergo testing. Among 19,968 patients preauthorized for PAP treatment, 11.1% did not initiate treatment. Testing and treatment ordered by primary care providers, residence outside the Midwest region, and two or fewer office visits within 6 months before preauthorization were strong predictors of nonadherence. Apnea-hypopnea index score < 30 events/h was also a strong predictor of nonadherence with treatment initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds to existing knowledge about risk factors for nonadherence with sleep testing and treatment initiation following preauthorization. Health plans and providers should develop strategies to better engage patients with higher risk of nonadherence.

Voice and swallowing outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea

OBJECTIVE

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is an effective treatment for a subset of patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Although multiple clinical trials demonstrate its efficacy, no previous literature explores the potential impact the stimulator has on swallowing and voice. Our primary objective is to evaluate patient reported post-operative changes in voice or swallowing following hypoglossal nerve stimulator placement.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

Patients scheduled to receive a hypoglossal stimulator were enrolled. Participants completed baseline Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) questionnaires preoperatively and again at 1week, 3months, and 6months post-operatively following placement of a hypoglossal nerve stimulator.

RESULTS

9 males and 5 females completed the study. The mean pre-operative VHI-10 and EAT-10 score was 3 and 0.8 respectively. Using linear mixed models, a clinically and statistically significant increase in the mean EAT-10 score was observed post-operatively at 1week (p=0.007), which was not observed at the time points the stimulator was active. A clinically and statistically significant decrease in VHI-10 score was observed following 2months of active stimulator use (p=0.02), which was not observed at any other time point.

CONCLUSION

The implantation and use of the hypoglossal nerve stimulator over 5months did not demonstrate any sustained, patient reported changes in voice handicap and swallowing function. While larger studies are warranted, our findings can be used to provide further informed consent for hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation.

Impact of an oral appliance on obstructive sleep apnea severity, quality of life, and biomarkers

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

To investigate outcomes including efficacy, quality of life, and levels of inflammatory markers of a mandibular advancement device (MAD) for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

METHODS

Patients with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15/hr who only accepted MAD therapy (study group) or who refused any treatment (control group) were recruited. At baseline and at 6 months, polysomnography, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 1β, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

At baseline, the study group (n = 30) showed a higher percentage of rapid eye movement sleep and higher CRP levels (P < .05) than the control group (n = 10). At 6 months, the MAD significantly improved AHI and lowest oxygen saturation (P < .01), non-rapid eye movement (N)1 and N3 sleep stages (P < .05), ESS score (P < .05), FOSQ total score (P < .01), interleukin 1β (P < .05), and TNF-α (P < .01) compared with the untreated group. In the overall, moderate, and severe OSA groups, 63.3%, 75%, and 50%, respectively, achieved at least good response.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a MAD significantly improved polysomnographic parameters, quality of life, and some inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-β, and TNF-α) in a significant proportion of patients with moderate OSA and in some patients with severe OSA. Hence, a MAD may be a viable alternative therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe OSA who refuse continuous positive airway pressure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b. Laryngoscope, 128:1720-1726, 2018.