Swallowing after total laryngectomy surgery: where are we after 150 years?

Purpose of review

Recent findings

Dysphagia is a common sequela following total laryngectomy surgery; however, there is significant variability in its assessment and management. Manometry enables an accurate understanding of the underlying mechanism of dysphagia and precise assessment of any oesophageal dysfunction. EndoFLIP is a useful tool to better understand dysfunction of the upper oesophageal sphincter particularly to detect stricture.

Summary

Following total laryngectomy surgery, dysphagia is common; clinicians need to be alert to early indicators of dysfunction and understand the tools to comprehensively characterize swallow function. Accurate diagnosis of a stricture is important, as this aspect of dysfunction can be modified, and may alleviate surrogate problems such as a leaking voice prosthesis. Clinicians should have a low threshold to examine patients for oesophageal dysfunction due to the high prevalence of dysmotility following a laryngectomy.

Accuracy of contrast swallow study in assessment of caustic esophageal stricture length in children: Agreement study

BACKGROUND

Caustic esophageal stricture length assessment is essential for planning endoscopic management and predicting its prognosis. We aimed to assess the accuracy of contrast swallow study (CSS) in measuring stricture length in comparison to endoscopy (definitive investigation for actual length measurement).

METHOD

Medical records of caustic esophageal strictures between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Reliability study was done to compare between radiological and endoscopic measurement of stricture length.

RESULT

124 CSSs for 91 patients were analyzed. Six studies showed no stricture, single stricture was reported in 101 studies, double strictures were reported in 16 studies, triple strictures were reported in one study (136 radiological stricture). Endoscopy revealed 133 true strictures. Number of the strictures was consistent between CSS and endoscopy in 112 studies (90.3%) and different in 12 studies (9.7%). Eight endoscopies revealed strictures not reported in CSS (5.5% false negative strictures), while 10 CSSs reported 11 strictures that were not detected during the endoscopy (7.6% false positive strictures). Reliability analysis revealed interclass correlation coefficient = 0.6 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.7) indicating moderate reliability.

CONCLUSION

CSS is not accurate in assessing caustic esophageal stricture length. Combination of CSS and endoscopic investigation is better for proper evaluation of these patients. Level III of evidence.

Pharyngoesophageal Segment Distention Across Volumes and Pathology

Purpose Patients receive multiple bolus trials during a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) to assess swallow function, inclusive of narrowing within the pharyngoesophageal segment (PES). While differences in the narrowest and widest segments are visualized, the ratio of distention across boluses is not well understood. Method A retrospective review of 50 consecutive VFSSs with five boluses of varied viscosity and volume was performed. Still images at maximal PES distention were captured and scaled using a 19-mm disk. Measurements of the narrowest and widest segments were obtained, and a distention ratio was calculated. Studies were categorized by PES phenotype as normal, esophageal web, cricopharyngeal bar, or narrow PES. PES distention ratios were evaluated across bolus trials and within PES phenotypes using a mixed-methods repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results Of the 50 studies, there were 11 normal, 16 web, 10 bar, and 13 narrow PES. Quantitative differences were present for the narrowest (p = .01) and widest (p = .002) points across bolus volumes. No difference was present in distention ratio (p = .2) across volumes. Evaluating the PES phenotype, web, normal, bar, and narrow PES distention ratios differed (p = .03). Bar and PES narrow distention ratios were lower compared to that of the normal group (p = .01 for normal vs. bar and p = .02 for normal vs. PES narrow). Conclusions PES distention ratio stability across varying bolus volumes and phenotypes suggests that a reduction in trials during a VFSS may permit an equivalent PES evaluation to traditional exams. Ultimately, this could improve our understanding and accurate diagnosis of PES dysfunction.

Endoscopic dilatation improves long-term dysphagia following head and neck cancer therapies: a randomized control trial

Long-term pharyngeal dysphagia is a common complication following head and neck cancer (HNC) therapies. High-level evidence for pharyngoesophageal junction (POJ) dilatation as a treatment in this population is lacking. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of POJ dilatation in dysphagic HNC survivors. This single-center, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial (St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia) randomly assigned (1:1) HNC survivors with long-term dysphagia (≥12 months postcompleted HNC therapies) to receive either graded endoscopic dilatations or sham dilatation (placebo). Patients were blinded to intervention types. Two strata were used for permuted randomization: (1) HNC therapies (total laryngectomy vs. chemoradiation alone); (2) Prior POJ dilatation (nil vs. previous dilatation). The primary endpoint was a short-term clinical response in swallowing function (3 months), defined as (1) a decrease in Sydney Swallow Questionnaire score by ≥200 or a score ≤ ULN; and (2) satisfactory global clinical assessment. The secondary endpoints were dysphagia relapse and serious adverse events. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000707369). Between 13 January 2013 and 16 January 2017, 41 patients were randomly assigned to endoscopic dilatation (n = 21) or placebo (n = 20). The short-term response rate in the endoscopic dilatation group was 76% (n = 16), compared with 5% (n = 1) in the placebo group (P < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events. The finding of a mucosal tear postdilatation was associated strongly with clinical response (OR 13.4, 95% CI [2.4, 74.9], P = 0.003). Kaplan-Meier estimate of dysphagia relapse is 50% by 9.6 months (95% CI [6.0, 19.2]) from completion of dilatation. Endoscopic dilatation of the POJ is a safe and efficacious therapy for the treatment of long-term dysphagia in HNC survivors. Close follow-up and repeat dilatation are necessary given the high dysphagia relapse rate.

Prevalence and Associated Impacts of Cervical Esophageal Clearance Issues Post Chemoradiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)

At present, the nature and extent of upper esophageal stage clearance issues following nonsurgical management of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is not well elucidated. The aim of this study was to conduct an initial retrospective study of the prevalence and severity of upper esophageal clearance impairments in a cohort of patients post-NPC management. A secondary aim was to explore any observed relationship between severity of impairment with both (a) aspiration and (b) temporal oropharyngeal swallowing measures. A cohort of 134 NPC patients who received curative intent (chemo)radiotherapy (C/RT) and completed a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed. An Esophageal Clearance parameter, based on the scale used in MBSImP was used to classify the presence and severity of esophageal impairment on thin liquid and semisolids. Data on oral and pharyngeal temporal measures, pharyngeal constriction, and penetration/aspiration were also collected. The prevalence of cervical esophageal clearance impairment was high with ratings > 0 observed among 83% and 97% of patients on thin liquid and semisolids, respectively. With the increasing impairment, significantly (p < 0.05) increased oral transit times were observed for liquid swallows, and increased pharyngeal transit times for semisolids. Significantly higher proportions of patients presented with penetration/aspiration in the group with more severe esophageal clearance impairment. Results confirm that cervical esophageal clearance impairment is highly prevalent post-C/RT treatment for NPC. Causality cannot be determined from this study; however, this initial evidence supports that esophageal impairment may coexist in patients post NPC, presenting with more severe oral/pharyngeal deficits, and the impact of this on swallow function needs to be considered. Further systematic research is required.

The Prevalence of Cricopharyngeal Webs in Elderly Cadavers

OBJECTIVE

Cricopharyngeal webs (CPW) are a frequent cause of solid food dysphagia. They are difficult to diagnose and are often missed on swallowing fluoroscopy. The prevalence of CPWs is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of CPWs in elderly cadavers.

METHODS

Direct laryngoscopy and cervical esophagoscopy were performed in 19 embalmed cadavers by independent two-clinician consensus. Cadaver demographics and the presence and laterality of a CPW were recorded. The prevalence of CPW was calculated, and the size of the cricopharyngeus muscle (CPM) was quantified.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 83 ( ± 12) years. Fifty-three percent were female, and the mean body mass index was 19.7 ( ± 3). The causes of death were cardiovascular disease (10 of 19), cancer (5 of 19), and respiratory failure (4 of 19). A CPW was present in 68% (13 of 19) of cadavers. Forty-seven percent (9 of 19) had a unilateral web, and 21% (4 of 19) had a bilateral web. There was no laterality predominance (P > 0.05). Forty-two percent (8 of 19) had no CPM prominence; 32% (6 of 19) had a small/moderate CPM prominence; and 26% (5 of 19) had a significant CPM prominence.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of cricopharyngeal webs in elderly cadavers is high (68%). The clinician should maintain a high index of suspicion for CPWs in patients with no other identifiable etiology of solid food dysphagia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b Laryngoscope, 129:63-66, 2019.

The critical importance of pharyngeal contractile forces on the validity of intrabolus pressure as a predictor of impaired pharyngo-esophageal junction compliance

INTRODUCTION

Restrictive defects of the pharyngo-esophageal junction (PEJ) are common in both structural and neurological disorders and are amenable to therapies aiming to reduce outflow resistance. Intrabolus pressure (IBP) acquired with high-resolution manometry and impedance (HRMI) is an indicator of resistance and a marker of reduced PEJ compliance. Constraints and limitations of IBP as well as the optimal IBP parameter remain undefined.

AIMS

To determine: (i) the impact of peak pharyngeal pressure (PeakP) on the diagnostic accuracy of IBP for the detection of a restrictive defect at the PEJ and (ii) the optimal IBP parameter for this purpose.

METHODS

In 52 dysphagic patients previously treated for head and neck cancer. Five candidate IBP measures and PeakP were obtained with HRMI, as well as a presence of a stricture determined by a mucosal tear after endoscopic dilatation. Predictive values of IBP measures were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for all patients and reiterated as patients with lowest PeakP were progressively removed from the cohort.

RESULTS

All IBP parameters had fair to good accuracy at predicting strictures. Intrabolus pressure measured at a discrete point of maximum admittance 1 cm above the maximal excursion of the upper esophageal sphincter had highest sensitivity (0.76) and specificity (0.78). When PeakP was at least 57 mm Hg both sensitivity and specificity improved to 0.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharyngeal propulsive force has substantial impact on the accuracy of IBP as a predictor of a PEJ stricture. When PeakP is ≥57 mm Hg, an elevated IBP is highly predictive of a restrictive defect at the PEJ.

Esophageal Dysmotility in Patients following Total Laryngectomy

Objectives Dysphagia is common in total laryngectomees, with some symptoms suggesting esophageal dysmotility. Tracheoesophageal (TE) phonation requires effective esophagopharyngeal air passage. Hence, esophageal dysmotility may affect deglutition or TE phonation. This study aimed to determine (1) the characteristics of esophageal dysmotility in laryngectomees, (2) whether clinical history is sensitive in detecting esophageal dysmotility, and (3) the relationship between esophageal dysmotility and TE prosthesis dysfunction. Study Design Multidisciplinary cross-sectional study. Setting Tertiary academic hospital. Subjects and Methods For 31 participants undergone total laryngectomy 1 to 12 years prior, clinical histories were taken by a gastroenterologist and a speech pathologist experienced in managing dysphagia. Esophageal high-resolution manometry was performed and analyzed using Chicago Classification v3.0. Results Interpretable manometric studies were obtained in 23 (1 normal manometry). Esophageal dysmotility patterns included achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, diffuse esophageal spasm, and other major (30%) and minor (50%) peristaltic disorders. The sensitivity of predicting any esophageal dysmotility was 28%, but it is noteworthy that patients with achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm (DES) were predicted. Two of 4 participants with TE puncture leakage had poor esophageal clearance. Of 20 TE speakers, 12 had voice problems, no correlation between poor voice, and any dysmotility pattern. Conclusions Peristaltic and lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction are common in laryngectomees. Clinical history, while not predictive of minor motor abnormalities, predicted correctly cases with treatable spastic motor disorders. Dysmotility was not associated with poor phonation, although TE puncture leakage might be linked to poor esophageal clearance. Esophageal dysmotility should be considered in the laryngectomees with persisting dysphagia or leaking TE puncture.