Practice Patterns in Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Survey Data

OBJECTIVE

Although screening protocols for patients who present with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASNHL) exist, there are no clear guidelines to direct practitioners. In particular, various thresholds have been proposed for the degree of hearing loss that should prompt MRI studies, but the topic remains understudied. This project aims to compare protocols followed by practitioners to guide their imaging practices.

STUDY DESIGN

Web-based survey.

SETTING

Otolaryngology faculty at academic medical centers.

METHODS

A list of 530 otolaryngologists (276 otology/neurotology specialists, 254 general otolaryngologists) was compiled. A survey consisting of three parts: demographics, general practice patterns, and simulated patient cases was distributed.

RESULTS

A total of 468 surveys were successfully distributed, resulting in 88 (18.8%) responses. The majority of respondents (63.8%) self-reported their definition of ASNHL as ">30 dB hearing asymmetry at one frequency OR >20 dB hearing asymmetry at two continuous frequencies OR >10 dB hearing asymmetry at three contiguous frequencies." Overall, general otolaryngologists were more likely to observe asymmetric findings with serial audiogram alone, whereas otology/neurotology specialists were more likely to obtain imaging.

CONCLUSION

There is significant variability between providers with regard to managing patients with ASNHL and evidence-based guidelines would be useful in guiding imaging practices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Age-Related Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is a prevalent but often underdiagnosed and undertreated condition among individuals aged 50 and above. It is associated with various sociodemographic factors and health risks including dementia, depression, cardiovascular disease, and falls. While the causes of ARHL and its downstream effects are well defined, there is a lack of priority placed by clinicians as well as guidance regarding the identification, education, and management of this condition.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to identify quality improvement opportunities and provide clinicians trustworthy, evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification and management of ARHL. These opportunities are communicated through clear actionable statements with explanation of the support in the literature, evaluation of the quality of the evidence, and recommendations on implementation. The target patients for the guideline are any individuals aged 50 years and older. The target audience is all clinicians in all care settings. This guideline is intended to focus on evidence-based quality improvement opportunities judged most important by the guideline development group (GDG). It is not intended to be a comprehensive, general guide regarding the management of ARHL. The statements in this guideline are not intended to limit or restrict care provided by clinicians based on their experience and assessment of individual patients.

ACTION STATEMENTS

The GDG made strong recommendations for the following key action statements (KASs): (KAS 4) If screening suggests hearing loss, clinicians should obtain or refer to a clinician who can obtain an audiogram. (KAS 8) Clinicians should offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, appropriately fit amplification to patients with ARHL. (KAS 9) Clinicians should refer patients for an evaluation of cochlear implantation candidacy when patients have appropriately fit amplification and persistent hearing difficulty with poor speech understanding. The GDG made recommendations for the following KASs: (KAS 1) Clinicians should screen patients aged 50 years and older for hearing loss at the time of a health care encounter. (KAS 2) If screening suggests hearing loss, clinicians should examine the ear canal and tympanic membrane with otoscopy or refer to a clinician who can examine the ears for cerumen impaction, infection, or other abnormalities. (KAS 3) If screening suggests hearing loss, clinicians should identify sociodemographic factors and patient preferences that influence access to and utilization of hearing health care. (KAS 5) Clinicians should evaluate and treat or refer to a clinician who can evaluate and treat patients with significant asymmetric hearing loss, conductive or mixed hearing loss, or poor word recognition on diagnostic testing. (KAS 6) Clinicians should educate and counsel patients with hearing loss and their family/care partner(s) about the impact of hearing loss on their communication, safety, function, cognition, and quality of life (QOL). (KAS 7) Clinicians should counsel patients with hearing loss on communication strategies and assistive listening devices. (KAS 10) For patients with hearing loss, clinicians should assess if communication goals have been met and if there has been improvement in hearing-related QOL at a subsequent health care encounter or within 1 year. The GDG offered the following KAS as an option: (KAS 11) Clinicians should assess hearing at least every 3 years in patients with known hearing loss or with reported concern for changes in hearing.

Multiple Audiometric Analysis in the Screening of Vestibular Schwannoma

Introduction

Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss is the main early symptom of retrocochlear lesions, hence its importance in screening for vestibular schwannomas. Currently, there is no consensus regarding its definition. The objective was to identify the audiometric pattern that would serve as a predictor for vestibular schwannoma in patients with asymmetric hearing loss.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted that included patients with asymmetric hearing loss attending a secondary care center and a tertiary care center. Clinical, audiometric and imaging (MRI with gadolinium) variables were collected. Asymmetric hearing loss was defined as a difference of 15 dB in one or more frequencies between both ears. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of different audiometric patterns were analyzed.

Results

A total of 107 patients were studied and divided into two groups: group 1 without vestibular schwannoma (n=98); and group 2 with vestibular schwannoma (n=9). No significant difference in demographic characteristics or audiometric patterns was found in patients with and without vestibular schwannoma. The audiometric pattern with the best sensitivity as a screening test was a difference >20 dB in the 4,000 Hz frequency, with a sensitivity of 77.78%, specificity of 30.61%, PPV of 8.33%, NPV of 93.75% and accuracy of 34.50%.

Conclusion

The audiometric pattern with the best results was a difference >20 dB in the 4,000 Hz frequency range; however, patients with asymmetric hearing loss could not be differentiated from patients with retrocochlear lesions based only on audiometry. Asymmetrical hearing loss must be studied with MRI.

Sudden and Asymmetric Hearing Loss Among Active Duty Service Members: Underscoring the Importance of Active Screening

Military personnel are at increased risk of asymmetric hearing loss secondary to noise exposure. This report illustrates the importance of expeditiously evaluating for retrocochlear pathology even in young active duty service members with asymmetric or sudden hearing loss. A 36-year-old male presented with right-sided sudden hearing loss and dizziness. Audiometry revealed profound mid-to-high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss in the right ear. A 10-day course of oral steroid therapy and two intratympanic steroid injections were unsuccessful in restoring hearing. MRI revealed a 4.2 cm contrast-enhancing cerebellopontine angle tumor, consistent with a vestibular schwannoma (VS). Microsurgical resection utilizing a retrosigmoid craniotomy approach was performed with near-total resection of the tumor and preservation of the facial nerve but not the cochlear nerve. Despite preservation of the facial nerve, progression of post-operative facial weakness required gold weight placement to prevent exposure keratopathy. The patient had recovered partial function in all facial nerve branches at last follow-up. In light of the rising global incidence of VS, any asymmetric or sudden hearing loss in military service members should be evaluated with audiometry and referral to otolaryngology for workup of retrocochlear pathology.

Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss and vestibular schwannoma: when to image?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review the literature on the use of audiometric protocols in the guidance of when to obtain MRI for detection of vestibular schwannoma. This discussion will focus on the sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effective analysis of audiometric criteria of asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASNHL) when used to decide when MRI scans should be performed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The sensitivity for detecting vestibular schwannomas when invoking published audiometric protocols for triggering MRI acquisition in ASNHL ranged from 50 to 100%. Specificity of these protocols ranged from 23 to 83%. Such audiometric protocols are efficient, achieving sensitivity and specificity at these rates while reducing the screening rate to 18 to 35%. The reduced procurement of MRI while using such audiometric protocols is associated with annual cost savings of between 23 and 82%. While no definitive recommendations can be made from this review, some audiometric protocols offer a better balance of sensitivity and specificity than others.

SUMMARY

Audiometric protocols for triggering MRI acquisition in ASNHL for evaluation of vestibular schwannoma can be both sensitive and specific. These are competitive measures, and so no protocol is both 100% sensitive and specific. Such protocols become less effective in populations with increased incidence of noise-induced hearing loss. Invocation of such audiometric protocols can considerably reduce the annual cost of MRI evaluation for vestibular schwannomas.

Radiographic findings in young adults with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss

PURPOSE

To evaluate radiographic findings in US Navy recruits found to have asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASNHL) during routine medical screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of US Navy recruits receiving screening audiometry and medical suitability evaluation from January 2011 to October 2016. Single-institution, institutional review board-approved study of US Navy recruits screened for hearing loss over a six-year period. All recruits with ASNHL were evaluated by an otolaryngologist and received diagnostic radiographic evaluation. Audiometric and imaging results were retrospectively reviewed for this population and compared to common screening criteria.

RESULTS

ASNHL was identified in 674 of 228,504 total recruits screened. This population was 91% male and between 17 and 29 years old (mean age 21.1). Six-hundred fifty-three (97%) met criteria for further ASNHL evaluation. Subjective hearing loss was reported in only 6% of patients. Six-hundred sixty-one (99%) received magnetic resonance imaging of the internal auditory canals. Intracranial pathology was identified in 43 (6.3%) patients and 2 (0.3%) had a causative intracranial lesion corresponding to ASNHL. No patients were found to have a vestibular schwannoma.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population of healthy young adults with audiometric proven ASNHL, 0.3% had radiographic proven intracranial pathology explaining the hearing loss. Intracranial masses may be less likely to cause ASNHL in this population; further research is needed to determine appropriate MRI screening methods for young adults with ASNHL.