Development and Validation of a Novel Surgical Simulation for Parotidectomy and Facial Nerve Dissection

A three-dimensionally printed otological model for cholesteatoma mastoidectomy training

PURPOSE

To relate the creation and expert validation (face and content validity) of an affordable three-dimensional (3-D) printed model of temporal bones with chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma (COMC) as a simulator for mastoidectomy.

METHODS

We performed computed tomography (CT) of the temporal bones of a patient with COMC followed at the University of São Paulo (USP) Hospital with 3-D Slicer to create a 3-D model of the affected bone using light-curing resin and silicone (cholesteatoma). The final 3-D printed images were scored by 10 otologists using a customized version of the Michigan Standard Simulation Scale Experience (MiSSES). Internal consistency and inter-rater reliability were assessed using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlations.

RESULTS

Otologists consistently scored the model positively for fidelity, educational value, reactions, and the overall model quality. Nine otologists agreed that the model was a good educational device for surgical training of COMC. All experts deemed the model ready-or nearly ready-for use. The final cost of the model, including raw materials and manufacturing, was 120 USD.

CONCLUSIONS

Using 3-D printing technology, we created the first anatomically accurate, low-cost, disease-reproducing 3-D model of temporal bones for mastoidectomy training for cholesteatoma.

Development of a novel 3D-printed and silicone live-wire model for thyroidectomy

PURPOSE

We present the development and validation of a novel and innovative low-cost model for thyroidectomy. The purpose is to provide a high-fidelity and inexpensive method to provide repetition to surgeons early on the learning curve.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The model consists of a 3D-printed laryngeal and tracheal framework, with silicone components to replicate the thyroid gland, strap muscles, and skin. A copper wire models the recurrent laryngeal nerve and is circuited with a buzzer to indicate contact with instruments. Thirteen resident trainees successfully completed the simulated thyroidectomy after viewing an instructional video. Face validity of the model was assessed with a 19-item 5-point Likert scale survey. Subject performance was assessed using a checklist of procedure steps.

RESULTS

Participant feedback indicated enthusiasm for realism of the recurrent nerve (4.46 average Likert rating, 5 indicates strong agreement), dissection of the nerve (4.15), use of the buzzer (4.69), and overall satisfaction (4.46). Soft tissue components scored poorly including realism of the skin (3.08), thyroid gland (3.31), and mobilization of the lobe (3.23), identifying aspects to improve. All participants reported increased confidence with thyroid surgery after using the model; this was most pronounced among junior residents (1.5 ± 0.76 versus 3.13 ± 1.13; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Thyroidectomy requires repetition and volume to gain competence. Use of the simulator early in training will provide confidence and familiarity, to enhance the educational value of subsequent live surgery.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 3D-printing in otolaryngology education

INTRODUCTION

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has received increased attention in recent years and has many applications. In the field of otolaryngology surgery, 3D-printed models have shown potential educational value and a high fidelity to actual tissues. This provides an opportunity for trainees to gain additional exposure, especially as conventional educational tools, such as cadavers, are expensive and in limited supply. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the uses of 3D-printing in otolaryngology education. The primary outcomes of investigation were surgical utility, anatomical similarity, and educational value of 3D-printed models. Secondary outcomes of interest included country of implementation, 3D-printer materials and costs, types of surgical simulators, and the levels of training of participants.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and previous reviews were searched from inception until June 2021 for eligible articles. Title, abstract, and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Data were analyzed using random-effects models. The National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool was used to rate the quality of the evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 570 abstracts were identified and screened by 2 independent reviewers. Of the 274 articles reviewed in full text, 46 articles met the study criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Surgical skill utility was reported in 42 studies (563 participants) and had a high degree of acceptance (84.8%, 95% CI: 81.1%-88.4%). The anatomical similarity was reported in 39 studies (484 participants) and was received positively at 80.6% (95% CI: 77.0%-84.2%). Educational value was described in 36 studies (93 participants) and had the highest approval rating by participants at 90.04% (87.20%-92.88%). A subgroup analysis by year of publication demonstrated that studies published after 2015 had higher ratings across all outcomes compared to those published prior to 2015.

CONCLUSION

This study found that 3D-printing interventions in otolaryngology demonstrated surgical, anatomical, and educational value. In addition, the approval ratings of 3D-printed models indicate a positive trend over time. Future educational programs may consider implementing 3D-printing on a larger scale within the medical curriculum to enhance exposure to otolaryngology.

Properties and Characteristics of Three-Dimensional Printed Head Models Used in Simulation of Neurosurgical Procedures: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Intracranial surgery can be complex and high risk. Safety, ethical and financial factors make training in the area challenging. Head model 3-dimensional (3D) printing is a realistic training alternative to patient and traditional means of cadaver and animal model simulation.

OBJECTIVE

To describe important factors relating to the 3D printing of human head models and how such models perform as simulators.

METHODS

Searches were performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science. Articles were screened independently by 3 reviewers using Covidence software. Data items were collected under 5 categories: study information; printers and processes; head model specifics; simulation and evaluations; and costs and production times.

RESULTS

Forty articles published over the last 10 years were included in the review. A range of printers, printing methods, and substrates were used to create head models and tissue types. Complexity of the models ranged from sections of single tissue type (e.g., bone) to high-fidelity integration of multiple tissue types. Some models incorporated disease (e.g., tumors and aneurysms) and artificial physiology (e.g., pulsatile circulation). Aneurysm clipping, bone drilling, craniotomy, endonasal surgery, and tumor resection were the most commonly practiced procedures. Evaluations completed by those using the models were generally favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this review indicate that those who practice surgery and surgical techniques on 3D-printed head models deem them to be valuable assets in cranial surgery training. Understanding how surgical simulation on such models affects surgical performance and patient outcomes, and considering cost-effectiveness, are important future research endeavors.

Three-dimensional printing in otolaryngology education: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The progressive expansion of the technology that facilitates the development of three-dimensional (3D) printing within the field of otorhinolaryngology has opened up a new study front in medicine. The objective of this study is to systematically review scientific publications describing the development of 3D models having applications in otorhinolaryngology, with emphasis on subareas with a large number of publications, as well as the countries in which the publications are concentrated.

METHODS

In this literature review, specific criteria were used to search for publications on 3D models. The review considered articles published in English on the development of 3D models to teach otorhinolaryngology. The studies with presurgical purposes or without validation of the task by surgeons were excluded from this review.

RESULTS

This review considered 39 articles published in 10 countries between 2012 and 2021. The works published prior to 2012 were not considered as per the inclusion criteria for the research. Among the 39 simulators selected for review, otology models comprised a total of 15 publications (38%); they were followed by rhinology, with 12 (31%); laryngology, with 8 (21%); and head and neck surgery, with 4 publications (10%).

CONCLUSION

The use of 3D technology and printing is well established in the context of surgical education and simulation models. The importance of developing new technological tools to enhance 3D printing and the current limitations in obtaining appropriate animal and cadaver models signify the necessity of investing more in 3D models.