1
|
van Nieuw Amerongen MP, de Grooth HJ, Veerman GL, Ziesemer KA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Tuinman PR. Prediction of Morbidity and Mortality After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3459-3470. [PMID: 38383661 PMCID: PMC10997705 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14997-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has a complication rate of up to 60%. Prediction models could be helpful to preoperatively estimate which patients are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to determine the best prediction models for morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy and to identify commonalities among the models. PATIENTS AND METHODS A systematic review was performed in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , study ID CRD42022350846). Pubmed, Embase, and Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection were searched for studies published between 2010 and August 2022. The Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Extracted data were tabulated and a narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS Of the 15,011 articles identified, 22 studies were included using data from tens of thousands of patients. This systematic review included 33 different models, of which 18 models were newly developed. Many studies showed a high risk of bias. The prognostic accuracy of models differed between 0.51 and 0.85. For most models, variables are readily available. Two models for mortality and one model for pulmonary complications have the potential to be developed further. CONCLUSIONS The availability of rigorous prediction models is limited. Several models are promising but need to be further developed. Some models provide information about risk factors for the development of complications. Performance status is a potential modifiable risk factor. None are ready for clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P van Nieuw Amerongen
- Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - H J de Grooth
- Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G L Veerman
- Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K A Ziesemer
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P R Tuinman
- Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acharya R, Mahapatra A, Verma HK, Bhaskar LVKS. Unveiling Therapeutic Targets for Esophageal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9542-9568. [PMID: 37999111 PMCID: PMC10670555 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive and deadly disease, ranking as the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite advances in treatment, the prognosis remains poor. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for achieving complete remission, with treatment options varying based on disease stage. Surgical intervention and endoscopic treatment are used for localized cancer, while systemic treatments like chemoradiotherapy and targeted drug therapy play a crucial role. Molecular markers such as HER2 and EGFR can be targeted with drugs like trastuzumab and cetuximab, and immunotherapy drugs like pembrolizumab and nivolumab show promise by targeting immune checkpoint proteins. Epigenetic modifications offer new avenues for targeted therapy. Treatment selection depends on factors like stage, tumor location, and patient health, with post-operative and rehabilitation care being essential. Early diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and supportive care are key to improving outcomes. Continued research is needed to develop effective targeted drugs with minimal side effects. This review serves as a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers dedicated to enhancing esophageal cancer treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakesh Acharya
- Department of Zoology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur 495009, India; (R.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Ananya Mahapatra
- Department of Zoology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur 495009, India; (R.A.); (A.M.)
| | - Henu Kumar Verma
- Department of Immunopathology, Institute of lungs Health and Immunity, Comprehensive Pneumology Center, Helmholtz Zentrum, Neuherberg, 85764 Munich, Germany;
| | - L. V. K. S. Bhaskar
- Department of Zoology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur 495009, India; (R.A.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin Y, Vervoort D, Thapa B, Sapkota R, Mitchell JD. Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery for Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Thorac Surg Clin 2022; 32:405-412. [PMID: 35961748 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
The burden of respiratory and upper-gastrointestinal diseases especially affects low- and middle-income countries. Five billion people lack access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical care, including thoracic surgical care. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS) has been shown to reduce complications, shorten hospital lengths of stay, and minimize health care costs, thereby enabling patients to pay less out-of-pocket and/or limit time away from work and families. Experiences with MITS exist but are limited in low- and middle-income countries; professional societies, academic institutions, policymakers, and industry can facilitate scale-up of MITS by increasing financing, expanding surgical training, and optimizing surgical supply chains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihan Lin
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, C-31012631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Dominique Vervoort
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bibhusal Thapa
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ranjan Sapkota
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Manmohan Cardio-Thoracic Vascular and Transplant Center, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - John D Mitchell
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, C-31012631 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murakami K, Yoshida M, Uesato M, Toyozumi T, Isozaki T, Urahama R, Kano M, Matsumoto Y, Matsubara H. Does thoracoscopic esophagectomy really reduce post-operative pneumonia in all cases? Esophagus 2021; 18:724-733. [PMID: 34247287 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-021-00855-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
It has been said that "thoracoscopy suppresses the occurrence of pneumonia in comparison to thoracotomy", but does it reflect real clinical practice? To resolve this clinical question, we compared the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies from limited institutes (CLIs) in which a large number of high-volume centers were the main participants to those of retrospective cohort studies based on nationwide databases (CNDs) in which both high-volume centers and low-volume hospitals participated. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the short-term outcomes of thoracoscopic to open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the three above-mentioned research formats. In total, 43 studies with 21,057 patients, which included 1 RCT with 115 patients, 38 CLIs with 6,126 patients and 4 CNDs with 14,816 patients, were selected. Pneumonia was one of the most important complications. Although significant superiority in thoracoscopic esophagectomy was observed in RCTs (p = 0.005) and CLIs (p = 0.003), no such difference was seen in findings using nationwide databases (p = 0.69). In conclusion, unlike RCTs and CLIs, CNDs did not show the superiority of thoracoscopic surgery in terms of post-operative pneumonia. RCTs and CLIs were predominantly performed by high-volume hospitals, while CNDs were often performed by low-volume hospitals. In actual clinical practice including various types of hospitals, the superiority of thoracoscopic over open esophagectomy regarding the incidence of pneumonia may, therefore, decrease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kentaro Murakami
- Department of Frontier Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare, 6-1-14 Konodai, Ichikawa City, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaya Uesato
- Department of Frontier Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takeshi Toyozumi
- Department of Frontier Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Isozaki
- Department of Frontier Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ryuma Urahama
- Department of Frontier Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kano
- Department of Frontier Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasunori Matsumoto
- Department of Frontier Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hisahiro Matsubara
- Department of Frontier Surgery Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Siaw‐Acheampong K, Kamarajah SK, Gujjuri R, Bundred JR, Singh P, Griffiths EA. Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJS Open 2020; 4:787-803. [PMID: 32894001 PMCID: PMC7528517 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophagectomy is a demanding operation that can be performed by different approaches including open surgery or a combination of minimal access techniques. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of open, minimally invasive and robotic oesophagectomy techniques for oesophageal cancer. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting open oesophagectomy, laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy (LAO), thoracoscopically assisted oesophagectomy (TAO), totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) or robotic MIO (RAMIO) for oesophagectomy. A network meta-analysis of intraoperative (operating time, blood loss), postoperative (overall complications, anastomotic leaks, chyle leak, duration of hospital stay) and oncological (R0 resection, lymphadenectomy) outcomes, and survival was performed. RESULTS Ninety-eight studies involving 32 315 patients were included in the network meta-analysis (open 17 824, 55·2 per cent; LAO 1576, 4·9 per cent; TAO 2421 7·5 per cent; MIO 9558, 29·6 per cent; RAMIO 917, 2·8 per cent). Compared with open oesophagectomy, both MIO and RAMIO were associated with less blood loss, significantly lower rates of pulmonary complications, shorter duration of stay and higher lymph node yield. There were no significant differences between surgical techniques in surgical-site infections, chyle leak, and 30- and 90-day mortality. MIO and RAMIO had better 1- and 5-year survival rates respectively compared with open surgery. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive and robotic techniques for oesophagectomy are associated with reduced perioperative morbidity and duration of hospital stay, with no compromise of oncological outcomes but no improvement in perioperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S. K. Kamarajah
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Freeman HospitalNewcastle University NHS Foundation Trust HospitalsNewcastle upon TyneUK
- Institute of Cellular MedicineUniversity of NewcastleNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - R. Gujjuri
- College of Medical and Dental SciencesNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - J. R. Bundred
- College of Medical and Dental SciencesNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - P. Singh
- Regional Oesophago‐Gastric UnitRoyal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation TrustGuildfordUK
| | - E. A. Griffiths
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal SurgeryUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pu S, Chen H, Zhou C, Yu S, Liao X, Zhu L, He J, Wang B. Major Postoperative Complications in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis. J Surg Res 2020; 257:554-571. [PMID: 32927322 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the existing literature comparing cardiopulmonary complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with open esophagectomy (OE) and conduct a meta-analysis based on the relevant studies. METHODS A systematic search for articles was performed in Medline, Embase, Wiley Online Library, and the Cochrane Library. The relative risks or odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by using fixed or random-effects models. The I2 and X2 tests were used to test for statistical heterogeneity. We performed a metaregression for the pulmonary complications with the adenocarcinoma proportion and tumor stage. Publication bias and small-study effects were assessed using Egger's test and Begg's funnel plot. RESULTS A total of 30,850 participants were enrolled in the 63 studies evaluated in the meta-analysis. Arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary complications, gastric tip necrosis, anastomotic leakage, and vocal cord palsy were chosen as outcomes. The occurrence rate of arrhythmia was significantly lower in patients receiving MIE than in patients receiving OE (OR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.53-0.89), with heterogeneity (I2 = 30.7%, P = 0.067). The incidence of pulmonary complications was significantly lower in patients receiving MIE (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.45-0.63) but heterogeneity remained (I2 = 72.1%, P = 0.000). The risk of gastric tip necrosis (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.07-2.05) after OE was lower than that after MIE. Anastomotic leakage, pulmonary embolism, and vocal cord palsy showed no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS MIE has advantages over OE, especially in reducing the incidence of arrhythmia and pulmonary complications. Thus, MIE can be recommended as the preferred alternative surgery method for resectable esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengyu Pu
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China
| | - Heyan Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China
| | - Can Zhou
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China
| | - Shibo Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China
| | - Xiaoqin Liao
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China
| | - Lizhe Zhu
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China
| | - Jianjun He
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Workum F, Klarenbeek BR, Baranov N, Rovers MM, Rosman C. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33:5827029. [PMID: 32350519 PMCID: PMC7455468 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive esophagectomy is increasingly performed for the treatment of esophageal cancer, but it is unclear whether hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) or totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE) should be preferred. The objective of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of studies comparing HMIE with TMIE. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles comparing HMIE and TMIE were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for critical appraisal of methodological quality. The primary outcome was pneumonia. Sensitivity analysis was performed by analyzing outcome for open chest hybrid MIE versus total TMIE and open abdomen MIE versus TMIE separately. Therefore, subgroup analysis was performed for laparoscopy-assisted HMIE versus TMIE, thoracoscopy-assisted HMIE versus TMIE, Ivor Lewis HMIE versus Ivor Lewis TMIE, and McKeown HMIE versus McKeown TMIE. There were no randomized controlled trials. Twenty-nine studies with a total of 3732 patients were included. Studies had a low to moderate risk of bias. In the main analysis, the pooled incidence of pneumonia was 19.0% after HMIE and 9.8% after TMIE which was not significantly different between the groups (RR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.97-2.20). TMIE was associated with a lower incidence of wound infections (RR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.13-2.90) and less blood loss (SMD: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.34-1.22) but with longer operative time (SMD:-0.33, 95% CI: -0.59--0.08). In subgroup analysis, laparoscopy-assisted HMIE was associated with a higher lymph node count than TMIE, and Ivor Lewis HMIE was associated with a lower anastomotic leakage rate than Ivor Lewis TMIE. In general, TMIE was associated with moderately lower morbidity compared to HMIE, but randomized controlled evidence is lacking. The higher leakage rate and lower lymph node count that was found after TMIE in sensitivity analysis indicate that TMIE can also have disadvantages. The findings of this meta-analysis should be considered carefully by surgeons when moving from HMIE to TMIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Address correspondence to: Frans van Workum, Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Nikolaj Baranov
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maroeska M Rovers
- Department of Health Evidence and Operating Rooms, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wei ZD, Zhang HL, Yang YS, Chen LQ. Effectiveness of Transthoracic Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis. J INVEST SURG 2020; 34:963-973. [PMID: 32036710 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1725189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transthoracic hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) is frequently performed in patients with esophageal cancer. However, no conclusive benefit has been defined for HMIE compared with open esophagectomy (OE) or totally MIE (TMIE). The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of HMIE compared with OE and TMIE. METHODS PubMed, Embase (via OVID) and Cochrane databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies up to January 2019. Studies comparing the efficacy of transthoracic HMIE with OE or TMIE were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS Twenty-nine relevant studies comprising 3994 patients were identified and included in the analysis of HMIE vs OE. HMIE decreased the incidence of postoperative total morbidity (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.80, p = 0.00), pneumonia (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.66, p = 0.00), in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.83, p = 0.01), duration of hospitalization (SMD=-1.03, 95% CI -1.73 to -0.33, p = 0.00) and the estimated intraoperative blood loss (SMD=-1.01, 95% CI -1.62 to -0.40, p = 0.00) compared with OE. Twenty-one relevant studies comprising 3007 patients were identified and included in the analysis of HMIE vs TMIE. HMIE increased estimated intraoperative blood loss [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.02, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.58, p = 0.00] and the incidence of postoperative pneumonia (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.26, p = 0.00) compared with TMIE. No statistical differences were observed for other surgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In our opinion, HMIE is a promising surgical technique. But further RCTs are still needed to confirm the advantages and disadvantages of HMIE mentioned above.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng-Dao Wei
- Medical Office Administration, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Han-Lu Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu-Shang Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Long-Qi Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kumble LD, Silver E, Oh A, Abrams JA, Sonett JR, Hur C. Treatment of early stage (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma: Personalizing the best therapy choice. World J Meta-Anal 2019; 7:406-417. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v7.i9.406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophagectomy is considered the primary form of management for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC); however, the surgery is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. For patients with early-stage EAC, endoscopic resection (ER) presents a potential curative treatment option that is less invasive and carries fewer risks procedure related risks, but it is associated with higher rates of cancer recurrence following the procedure. For some patients, age and comorbidities may prevent them from having esophagectomy as a treatment option, while other patients may be operative candidates but do not wish to undergo esophagectomy for a variety of reasons related to their values and preferences. Furthermore, while anxiety of cancer recurrence following ER may significantly diminish a patient’s quality of life (QOL), so might the morbidity surrounding esophagectomy. In addition to considering health status, patient preferences, and impacts on QOL, physicians and patients must also consider what treatments would be both beneficial and available to the patient, considering esophagectomy methods-minimally invasive vs open-or the use of chemoradiotherapy in addition to ER. Our article reviews and summarizes available treatment options for patients with early EAC and their potential effects on the health and wellbeing of patients based on the current data. We conclude with a request for more research of available options for early EAC patients, the conditions that determine when each option should be employed, and their effects not only on patient health but also QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisabeth Silver
- General Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Aaron Oh
- General Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Julian A Abrams
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Joshua R Sonett
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Chin Hur
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang J, Chen L, Ge K, Yang JL. Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2019; 11:1081-1091. [PMID: 31798787 PMCID: PMC6883181 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i11.1081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first line treatment regimen for esophageal cancer is still surgical resection and the choice of surgical scheme depends on surgeon. Now the efficacy comparison of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (HMIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) is still controversial.
AIM To compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of HMIE and OE in patients with esophageal cancer.
METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for related articles. The odds ratio (OR) or standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of HMIE and OE.
RESULTS Seventeen studies including a total of 2397 patients were selected. HMIE was significantly associated with less blood loss (SMD = -0.43, 95%CI: -0.66, -0.20; P = 0.0002) and lower incidence of pulmonary complications (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.57, 0.90; P = 0.004). No significant differences were seen in the lymph node yield (SMD = 0.11, 95%CI: -0.08, 0.30; P = 0.26), operation time (SMD = 0.24, 95%CI: -0.14, 0.61; P = 0.22), total complications rate (OR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.46, 0.99; P = 0.05), cardiac complication rate (OR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.62, 1.34; P = 0.64), anastomotic leak rate (OR = 0.95, 95%CI: 0.67, 1.35; P = 0.78), duration of intensive care unit stay (SMD = -0.01, 95%CI: -0.21, 0.19; P = 0.93), duration of hospital stay (SMD = -0.13, 95%CI: -0.28, 0.01; P = 0.08), and total mortality rates (OR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.47, 1.06; P = 0.09) between the two treatment groups.
CONCLUSION Compared with the OE, HMIE shows less blood loss and pulmonary complications. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of HMIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiao Yang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ling Chen
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ke Ge
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jian-Le Yang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang Hospital, 12 Lingyin Road, Hangzhou 310013, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanghi V, Amin H, Sanaka MR, Thota PN. Resection of early esophageal neoplasms: The pendulum swings from surgical to endoscopic management. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11:491-503. [PMID: 31798770 PMCID: PMC6885444 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i10.491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is a highly lethal disease and is the sixth leading cause of cancer related mortality in the world. The standard treatment is esophagectomy which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This led to development of minimally invasive, organ sparing endoscopic therapies which have comparable outcomes to esophagectomy in early cancer. These include endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. In early squamous cell cancer, endoscopic submucosal dissection is preferred as it is associated with cause specific 5-year survival rates of 100% for M1 and M2 tumors and 85% for M3 and SM1 tumors and low recurrence rates. In early adenocarcinoma, endoscopic resection of visible abnormalities is followed by ablation of the remaining flat Barrett’s mucosa to prevent recurrences. Radiofrequency ablation is the most widely used ablation modality with others being cryotherapy and argon plasma coagulation. Focal endoscopic mucosal resection followed by radiofrequency ablation leads to eradication of neoplasia in 93.4% of patients and eradication of intestinal metaplasia in 73.1% of patients. Innovative techniques such as submucosal tunneling with endoscopic resection are developed for management of submucosal tumors of the esophagus. This review includes a discussion of various endoscopic techniques and their clinical outcomes in early squamous cell cancer, adenocarcinoma and submucosal tumors. An overview of comparison between esophagectomy and endoscopic therapy are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vedha Sanghi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Hina Amin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Madhusudhan R Sanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Prashanthi N Thota
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
郭 鑫, 吴 源, 贾 龙, 李 雅, 闫 玉, 陈 群. [Effects of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy on circulating tumor cells in patients with esophageal cancer]. NAN FANG YI KE DA XUE XUE BAO = JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY 2018; 38:318-323. [PMID: 29643038 PMCID: PMC6744158 DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.03.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open esophagectomy (OE) on the level of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). METHODS A total of 73 patients with EC undergoing MIE (n=38) or OE (n=35) in our department between October, 2015 and October, 2017 were enrolled, with 10 patients with benign esophagus disease and 10 healthy volunteers as controls. The levels of CTCs in the peripheral blood of the participants were detected using CanPatrolTM technique and analyzed for their association with the operation methods and perioperative complications. RESULTS CTCs were detected in 60.3% (44/73) of the EC patients but in none of the control subjects. CTC level after the surgery was significantly higher than that during the surgery, and CTC level during the surgery was significantly higher than that before surgery (P<0.001). The preoperative and intra-operative CTC levels were not significantly different between MIE and OE groups (P>0.05), but the postoperative CTC level was significantly lower in MIE group than in OE group, and postoperative increment of CTC level (from the preoperative level) was significantly lower in MIE group than in OE group (P<0.001). The total incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in MIE group than in OE group (28.9% vs 54.3%, P=0.023), and in both groups, CTC levels in patients with complications were significantly higher than those in patients without complications (P=0.001 and P=0.005 in MIE and OE groups, respectively). CONCLUSION MIE may help to reduce the number of peripheral blood CTCs early after the operation, and dynamic monitoring CTCs level assists in evaluation of the prognosis of EC patients. CTC level may serve as an indicator for monitoring the prognosis of EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 鑫 郭
- />南方医科大学珠江医院胸心外科,广东 广州 510280Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - 源周 吴
- />南方医科大学珠江医院胸心外科,广东 广州 510280Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - 龙飞 贾
- />南方医科大学珠江医院胸心外科,广东 广州 510280Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - 雅玲 李
- />南方医科大学珠江医院胸心外科,广东 广州 510280Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - 玉生 闫
- />南方医科大学珠江医院胸心外科,广东 广州 510280Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - 群清 陈
- />南方医科大学珠江医院胸心外科,广东 广州 510280Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen F, Luo H, Xing L, Liang N, Xie J, Zhang J. Feasibility and efficiency of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin versus radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of two centers. Thorac Cancer 2017; 9:59-65. [PMID: 29024498 PMCID: PMC5754287 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Revised: 09/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with capecitabine and cisplatin for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods A total of 90 patients were included from two different centers. Forty‐nine patients were treated with CCRT consisting of capecitabine (850 mg/m2, oral, twice a day for 1–14 days) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2) weekly during radiotherapy (RT). The remaining 41 patients were treated with RT alone. The overall response, overall survival, progression‐free survival, and toxicity rates were recorded. Results Compared to the RT group (51.2%; P = 0.029), the overall response rate in the CCRT group (73.5%) was obviously higher. A complete response was achieved in 34.7% and 14.6% of patients in the CCRT and RT groups, respectively (P = 0.030). Median progression‐free and median overall survival rates were significantly higher in the CCRT group (24.7 and 30.6 months; P < 0.05) compared to the RT group (16.6 and 18.7 months). Acute toxic effects were more severe in the CCRT group, but no significant difference in grade 3 or 4 acute toxicities was observed between the groups. Conclusion Both CCRT with capecitabine and cisplatin and RT alone are feasible to treat elderly patients and yield a good performance status with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. CCRT improved the tumor response without increasing the side effects compared to RT alone. CCRT is recommended for patients over 65 with good performance status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangjie Chen
- Department of Oncology, Weifang Medical College, Weifang, China
| | - Hui Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ligang Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
| | - Ning Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jian Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jiandong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qianfoshan Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|