Effect of oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative neurological outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A scoping review of the literature

2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery

Clinical practice guidelines consolidate and evaluate all pertinent evidence on a specific topic available at the time of their formulation. The goal is to assist physicians in determining the most effective management strategies for patients with a particular condition. These guidelines assess the impact on patient outcomes and weigh the risk-benefit ratio of various diagnostic or therapeutic approaches. While not a replacement for textbooks, they provide supplementary information on topics relevant to current clinical practice and become an essential tool to support the decisions made by specialists in daily practice. Nonetheless, it is crucial to understand that these recommendations are intended to guide, not dictate, clinical practice, and should be adapted to each patient's unique needs. Clinical situations vary, presenting a diverse array of variables and circumstances. Thus, the guidelines are meant to inform, not replace, the clinical judgement of healthcare professionals, grounded in their professional knowledge, experience and comprehension of each patient's specific context. Moreover, these guidelines are not considered legally binding; the legal duties of healthcare professionals are defined by prevailing laws and regulations, and adherence to these guidelines does not modify such responsibilities. The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) and the European Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (EBCP) constituted a task force of professionals specializing in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management. To ensure transparency and integrity, all task force members involved in the development and review of these guidelines submitted conflict of interest declarations, which were compiled into a single document available on the EACTS website (https://www.eacts.org/resources/clinical-guidelines). Any alterations to these declarations during the development process were promptly reported to the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP. Funding for this task force was provided exclusively by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, without involvement from the healthcare industry or other entities. Following this collaborative endeavour, the governing bodies of EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP oversaw the formulation, refinement, and endorsement of these extensively revised guidelines. An external panel of experts thoroughly reviewed the initial draft, and their input guided subsequent amendments. After this detailed revision process, the final document was ratified by all task force experts and the leadership of the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, enabling its publication in the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the British Journal of Anaesthesia and Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. Endorsed by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, these guidelines represent the official standpoint on this subject. They demonstrate a dedication to continual enhancement, with routine updates planned to ensure that the guidelines remain current and valuable in the ever-progressing arena of clinical practice.

Cerebral Oxygen Saturation Associates with Changes in Oxygen Transport Parameters during Cardiopulmonary Bypass

(1) Background: Adequate organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) requires accurate estimation and adjustment of flow rates which conventional methods may not always achieve. Perioperative monitoring of cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO2) may detect changes in oxygen transport. This study aims to compare estimated and measured perfusion flow rates and assess the capacity of ScO2 to detect subtle changes in oxygen transport during CPB. (2) Methods: This observational study included 50 patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, all of whom provided written informed consent. Perfusion flow rates were estimated using the DuBois formula and measured using echocardiography and a flow probe in the arterial line of the CPB system. ScO2 was continuously monitored, alongside intermittent measurements of oxygen delivery and extraction ratios. (3) Results: Significant discrepancies were found between estimated flow rates (5.2 [4.8-5.5] L/min) and those measured at the start of the surgery (4.6 [4.0-5.0] L/min). These discrepancies were flow rate-dependent, being more pronounced at lower perfusion rates and diminishing as rates increased. Furthermore, ScO2 showed a consistent correlation with both oxygen delivery (r = 0.48) and oxygen extraction ratio (r = 0.45). (4) Conclusions: This study highlights discrepancies between estimated and actual perfusion flow rates during CPB and underscores the value of ScO2 monitoring as a continuous, noninvasive tool for maintaining adequate organ perfusion, suggesting a need for improved, patient-tailored perfusion strategies.