A new bladder allows kinetic venous augmentation with a roller pump

Peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass with modified assisted venous drainage and transthoracic aortic crossclamp: optimal management for robotic mitral valve repair

The purpose of this study was to evaluate peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with modified assisted venous drainage (MAVD) and transthoracic aortic cross-clamping to maintain a bloodless surgical field, adequate myocardial protection, systemic flow and pressure during robotic surgical repair of the mitral valve. Peripheral CPB was established with a standard Duraflo®-coated closed circuit with femoral arterial and venous cannulation. An additional 17 Fr wire-bound cannula was inserted into the right internal jugular vein and drainage rates of 200-400 mL/min were regulated using a separate roller-head pump. A transthoracic aortic crossclamp with antegrade cardioplegia was used for myocardial protection. Mitral valve (MV) repair was then performed through two 1-cm ports for the robotic arms and a 4-cm intercostal incision for the camera and passing suture. From October 2001 to October 2002, 25 patients underwent robotic MV repair. Average surgical times include leaflet resection and repair, 20 min, and insertion of annuloplasty ring, 28 min; average perfusion times, crossclamp 88 min and total bypass time of 126 min. There were no incisional conversions, no reoperations for bleeding and no deaths, strokes or perioperative myocardial infarctions. Twenty-one (84%) patients were extubated in the operating room. Average LOS was 2.7 days with eight (32%) patients discharged home in less than 24 hours. In conclusion, peripheral CPB with gravity drainage of the lower body and MAVD of the upper body allow safe and effective support during robotically assisted minimally invasive MV repair. This approach may be applied to other forms of minimally invasive cardiac surgery that requires CPB.

A new top-loading venous bag provides vacuum-assisted venous drainage

A new venous bag has been developed, prototyped, and tested. The new bag has its inlet, outlet purge, and infusion tubes extending upward from the top of the bag, and are threaded through, bonded to, and sealed within a flat rigid top plate. This design allows the bag to be hung from its top plate by its tubes. It also allows the bag to be: 1) dropped into or removed from its holder, as is done with existing hard-shell reservoirs so that its weight pulls it into the holder without the need for eyelets and hooks and 2) placed closer to the floor so that gravity drainage is facilitated. The V-Bag® (VB) is easily sealed within an accompanying rigid housing. Once sealed, vacuum applied to the housing is transmitted across the flexible walls of the bag to the venous blood. Thus, vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD) is obtained as it is with a hard-shell reservoir, but without any contact of air with the blood. Bench tests, using a circuit that simulated the venous side of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit, showed that applying suction to the housing increased venous flow, and the fractional increase in flow was not a function of the venous cannula, but of the level of vacuum applied. In the gravity drainage mode, the bubble counts at the outlet of the V-Bag compared to two other bags were lower at any pumping condition. When used in the VAVD mode, bubble counts were two orders of magnitude lower than when using kinetically assisted venous drainage (KAVD) with a centrifugal pump. Results obtained with the VB suggest its clinical usefulness.

Hypovolemia in extracorporeal life support can lead to arterial gaseous microemboli

Next to severely decreased pump flow, hypovolemia in extracorporeal life support (ELS) can result in subatmospheric venous line pressure. Such pressure may lead to degassing and resultant gaseous microemboli (GME), with potential changes in neurological clinical outcome. CME activity resulting from degassing was investigated in relation to subatmospheric venous line pressure, partial oxygen pressure (pO2 ), and hematocrit in a model of a centrifugal pump-based circuit for long-term ELS. Additionally, a device that provides instantaneous volume buffer capacity during hypovolemia was evaluated in relation to GME appearance. An exponential relationship was found between decreasing venous line pressure and GME downstream of the centrifugal pump (P = 0.001). Arterial bubble activity appeared at subatmospheric venous line pressures of -200 mm Hg and less. A rising (pO2 ) increased formation of GME (P = 0.05). A rise in hematocrit, in contrast, did not affect embolic activity (P = 0.22). With simulated hypovolemia, volume buffer capacity added to the venous line dampened fluctuations of venous line pressure by approximately 40%, but a significant reduction in GME formation could not be found (P = 0.22). Moreover, the device enabled a 14% higher support flow. With ELS flow being related to patient volume status, hypovolemia can diminish support. A coherent decrease of venous line pressure triggers degassing of blood-dissolved gases and causes arterial GME, which can become massive during persistent conditions of limited venous return. Incorporation of a volume buffer capacity device into the extracorporeal support circuit enables a higher and more stable support flow in critically low patient filling.

Can minimized cardiopulmonary bypass systems be safer?

Although a growing body of evidence indicates superiority of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass (mCPB) systems over conventional CPB systems, limited venous return can result in severe fluctuations of venous line pressure which can result in gaseous emboli. In this study, we investigated the influence of sub-atmospheric pressures and volume buffer capacity added to the venous line on the generation of gaseous emboli in the mCPB circuit.

Two different mCPB systems (MEC - Maquet, n=7 and ECC.O - Sorin, n=8) and a conventional closed cardiopulmonary bypass (cCPB) system (n=12) were clinically evaluated. In the search for a way to increase volume buffer capacity of mCPB systems, we additionally evaluated the ‘Better Bladder’ (BB) in a mock circulation by simulating, repeatedly, decreased venous return while measuring pressure and gaseous embolic activity.

Arterial gaseous emboli activity during clinical perfusion with a cCPB system was the lowest in comparison to the mCPB systems (312±465 versus 311±421 with MEC and 1,966±1,782 with ECC.O, counts per 10 minute time interval, respectively; p=0.03). The average volume per bubble in the arterial line was the highest in cases with cCPB (12.5±8.3 nL versus 8.0±4.2 nL with MEC and 4.6±4.8 nL with ECC.O; p=0.04 for both). Significant cross-correlation was obtained at various time offsets from 0 to +35 s between sub-atmospheric pressure in the venous line and gaseous emboli activity in both the venous and arterial lines. The in vitro data showed that incorporation of the BB dampens fluctuations of venous line pressure by approximately 30% and decreases gaseous emboli by up to 85%.

In conclusion, fluctuations of sub-atmospheric venous line pressure during kinetic-assisted drainage are related to gaseous emboli. Volume buffer capacity added to the venous line can effectively dampen pressure fluctuations resulting from abrupt changes in venous return and, therefore, can help to increase the safety of minimized cardiopulmonary bypass by reducing gaseous microemboli formation resulting from degassing.

Venous drainage--gravity or assisted?

Since the early start of cardiopulmonary bypass, vascular access has been recognized as a main variable for obtaining optimal blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass. In particular, venous drainage can limit the maximum flow as the wide, low-resistance, collapsible veins are connected with smaller stiff cannulas and tubing. Due to the introduction of long venous cannulas for minimally invasive cardiac surgery and the desire to limit hemodilution during cardiopulmonary bypass, more and more centers have started using assisted venous drainage techniques. This article gives an overview of these techniques, with their respective advantages and disadvantages.

Reserve-driven flow control for extracorporeal life support: proof of principle

Extracorporeal life support systems lack volume-buffering capacity. Therefore, any decrease in venous intravascular volume available for drainage may result in acutely reduced support flow. We recently developed a method to quantify drainable volume and now conceived a reserve-driven pump control strategy, which is different from existing pressure or flow servo control schemes. Here, we give an outline of the algorithm and present animal experimental data showing proof of principle. With an acute reduction in circulatory volume (10-15%), pump flow immediately dropped from 4.1 to 1.9 l/min. Our pump control algorithm was able to restore bypass flow to 3.2 l/min (about 80% of the original level) and, thereby, reduced the duration of the low-flow condition. This demonstrates that a reserve-driven pump control strategy, based on the continuous monitoring of drainable volume, may maintain extracorporeal circulatory support flow, despite serious changes in filling conditions.