Secondary ablation of saphenous veins: The reasons and the ratios

Risk factors for saphenous vein recanalization after endovenous radiofrequency ablation

Target vein recanalization is defined as the postoperative detection of blood flow in a venous segment previously ablated. It can be occurred after thermal-tumescent procedures, as radiofrequency (RFA) and endovenous laser (EVLA) ablation techniques. Despite several papers described and analyzed incidence and consequences of recanalization, limited data are published on risk factors for this condition. The aim of this general review is to investigate clinical and instrumental risk factors for great and small saphenous veins recanalization after RFA, indicating their impact in the follow-up period.

Secondary Ablation of Recanalized Saphenous Vein after Endovenous Thermal Ablation

BACKGROUND

To describe the occlusion rate and clinical response of a redo ablative procedure in symptomatic patients with recanalization of saphenous vein after endovascular thermal ablation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in a prospectively collected data of symptomatic patients with recanalization of the great saphenous vein (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV) after endovascular thermal ablation who underwent a secondary ablation (SA) from June 2015 to May 2018.

RESULTS

Ten patients (15 limbs) with recanalization of the GSV or SSV were treated with SA. The median age was 67 years and 60% were men. The median time from the first ablation was 7.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6.5-9.6). For SA, radiofrequency ablation was performed in 12 limbs (80%) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in 3 cases (20%). The GSV was the treated vessel in 14 cases (93.3%). No complications were reported. Median follow-up was 13 months. Preoperative and 1-year follow-up Venous Clinical Severity Score was 9 (IQR 5-10) and 4 (IQR 2-8), respectively. Duplex ultrasound evaluation after 1 year showed an occlusion rate of 93.3% evidencing a partially recanalized vein in 1 treated limb.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the occlusion rate was 93.3% at 1 year after SA; clinical improvement and no complications were reported. SA appears to be a valid option for the treatment of symptomatic patients with recanalized GSV or SSV.