Efficacy of whole-body vibration on balance control, postural stability, and mobility after thermal burn injuries: A prospective randomized controlled trial

The Efficacy of Whole-Body Vibration in Managing Postburn Victims' Complications: A Systematic Review

Burn injury is a complicated traumatic event with both systemic and local consequences. These complications include long periods of bed rest, pain, muscle weakness, vitamin D deficiency, and bone mineral density loss. Whole-body vibration demonstrated effectiveness in improving muscle power and bone mineral density in various musculoskeletal populations. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials aims to assess evidence for the effectiveness of using whole-body vibration on postburn survivors with at least 1% total body surface area on sensory and motor outcomes. A systematic search was conducted across six databases, which are, PubMed, Cochrane, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, from inception till March 2022. Retrieved studies were screened by title and abstract and full-text in two stages using Rayyan web-based. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool ROB 2.0. Six randomized controlled trials with 203 participants were included. Five of the included studies demonstrated an overall high risk of bias. Compared to conventional physiotherapy programs, whole-body vibration demonstrated improvement in functional mobility and balance using timed up and go and Biodex balance assessment, respectively. However, there were no differences between whole-body vibration and conventional physiotherapy program alone in bone mineral density and muscle power. Although the current evidence of whole-body vibration is limited, whole-body vibration combined with traditional physical therapy programs may improve functional mobility and balance in postburn survivors compared to physical therapy programs alone.

Effects of vibration training on motor and non-motor symptoms for patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Vibration therapy is one of the rehabilitation programs that may be effective in treating both motor and non-motor symptoms in Multiple Sclerosis patients. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of vibration therapy on motor and non-motor symptoms (functional mobility, balance, walking endurance, gait speed, fatigue, and quality of life) of this population.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, Google Search Engine, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Two reviewers independently assessed the study quality.

Results

Fourteen studies with 393 participants were finally included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that vibration therapy had a significant advantage over the control intervention in improving balance function [mean difference (MD) = 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-3.84, P = 0.03], and walking endurance (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.07-0.61, P = 0.01). Meanwhile, the degree of disability subgroup analysis revealed that the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (3.5-6) significantly improved functional mobility (MD: -1.18, 95% CI: -2.09 to 0.28, P = 0.01) and balance function (MD: 3.04, 95% CI: 0.49-5.59, P = 0.02) compared with the control group, and the EDSS (0-3.5) were more beneficial in walking endurance. The duration subgroup analysis indicated a significant difference in the effect of the duration (<4 weeks) on enhancing walking endurance (SMD: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.04-0.87, P = 0.03). However, no significant improvement was found in functional mobility, gait speed, fatigue, and quality of life.

Conclusion

Vibration therapy may improve balance function and walking endurance, and the degree of disability and duration of intervention may affect outcomes. The evidence for the effects of vibration therapy on functional mobility, gait speed, fatigue, and quality of life remains unclear. More trials with rigorous study designs and a larger sample size are necessary to provide this evidence.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier: CRD42022326852.