Fall arrest strategy training improves upper body response time compared to standard fall prevention exercise in older women: A randomized trial

Strength in arms: empowering older adults against the risk of slipping and falling-a theoretical perspective

Background

Slips and falls are a serious health concern, particularly among older adults. Current physical therapy protocols strengthen the legs to improve balance. However, arm movements help maintain balance during a slip incident. Understanding how arm movements improve balance may help clinicians develop more comprehensive fall-prevention protocols to improve patient outcomes.

Clinical question

What limitations exist in current fall prevention protocols for reducing falls in older adults during slip incidents, and what new strategies can enhance these outcomes?

Key results

Slip incidents often result in a sideways loss of balance, leading to hip fractures in older adults. During a slip, the legs do not produce sideways motion and are less effective in regaining balance in this direction. Contrary, the arms produce 100 + degrees of abduction and this motion reduces falls by 200%+ during a slip incident. Notably, older adults exhibit 35.7% decreased arm abduction acceleration responses compared to younger adults during a slip incident. This delay may be attributed to age-related decreases in type II fibers of the deltoid. High-velocity and ballistic training have been shown to improve the proportion and size of type II fibers as well as improve fall outcomes when focused on the lower extremities.

Clinical application

Therefore, I propose incorporating arm abductor training, alongside leg exercises, as a cost-effective and low-risk intervention to enhance the slip responses in older adults. In light of its minimal risk and considerable potential benefits, starting arm abductor exercises with older adults is a sensible move.

Reactive responses of the arms increase the Margins of Stability and decrease center of mass dynamics during a slip perturbation

Although reactive arm motions are important in recovering from a slip event, the biomechanical influences of upper extremity motions during slipping are not clear. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether reactive arm motions during slip recovery leads to increased margins of stability (MoS), and decreased center of mass (CoM) velocity and excursion. Thirty-two participants were randomized into 2 conditions: arms free and arms constrained. Participants traversed a 10-meter walkway and were exposed to an unexpected slip while wearing a protective harness. Anterior-posterior and medial-lateral MoS, as well as the CoM excursion and velocity during the slip perturbation was quantified using a three-dimensional motion capture system. In the frontal plane, individuals with their arms unconstrained demonstrated greater MoS (0.06 ± 0.03 vs -0.01 ± 0.02 m, p < 0.01), decreased CoM excursion (0.05 ± 0.02 vs 0.08 ± 0.01 m, p = 0.015), and a reduced CoM velocity (0.07 ± 0.03 vs. 0.14 ± 0.02 m/s, p < 0.01) compared to individuals with their arms constrained. In the sagittal plane, individuals with their arms unconstrained demonstrated, decreased CoM excursion (0.83 ± 0.13 vs 1.14 ± 0.20 m, p < 0.01) reduced CoM velocity (1.71 ± 0.08 vs. 1.79 ± 0.07 m/s, p = 0.02), but no differences in margins of stability (0.89 ± 0.13 vs 0.94 ± 0.10 m, p = 0.32). Our findings demonstrate that arm motions during a slip perturbation act to restore balance by minimizing displacement and velocity of the body CoM during a slip event in the frontal plane.

Differential Item Functioning of the Mini-BESTest Balance Measure: A Rasch Analysis Study

The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), a 14-item scale, has high content validity for balance assessment. This study further examines the construct validity of the Mini-BESTest with an emphasis on its measurement invariance. The Mini-BESTest was administered to 292 neurological patients in two sessions (before and after rehabilitation) and evaluated with the Rasch analysis (Many-Facet Rating Scale Model: persons, items, sessions). Categories' order and fit to the model were assessed. Next, maps, dimensionality, and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined for construct validity evaluation. DIF was inspected for several clinically important variables, including session, diagnosis, and assistive devices. Mini-BESTest items had ordered categories and fitted the Rasch model. The item map did not flag severe construct underrepresentation. The dimensionality analysis showed that another variable extraneous to balance affected the score of a few items. However, this multidimensionality had only a modest impact on measures. Session did not cause DIF. DIF for assistive devices affected six items and caused a severe measurement artefact. The measurement artefact caused by DIF for diagnosis was negligible. The Mini-BESTest returns interval measures with robust construct validity and measurement invariance. However, caution should be used when comparing Mini-BESTest measures obtained with and without assistive devices.