"Once you open that door, it's a floodgate": Exploring work-related grief among community service workers providing care for structurally vulnerable populations at the end of life through participatory action research

"You can't die here": an exploration of the barriers to dying-in-place for structurally vulnerable populations in an urban centre in British Columbia, Canada

BACKGROUND

One measure of quality in palliative care involves ensuring people approaching the end of life are able to receive care, and ultimately die, in the places they choose. Canadian palliative care policy directives stem from this tenet of autonomy, acknowledging that most people prefer to die at home, where they feel safe and comfortable. Limited research, however, considers the lack of 'choice' people positioned as structurally vulnerable (e.g., experiencing extreme poverty, homelessness, substance-use/criminalization, etc.) have in regard to places of care and death, with the option of dying-in-place most often denied.

METHODS

Drawing from ethnographic and participatory action research data collected during two studies that took place from 2014 to 2019 in an urban centre in British Columbia, Canada, this analysis explores barriers preventing people who experience social and structural inequity the option to die-in-place. Participants include: (1) people positioned as structurally vulnerable on a palliative trajectory; (2) their informal support persons/family caregivers (e.g., street family); (3) community service providers (e.g., housing workers, medical professionals); and (4) key informants (e.g., managers, medical directors, executive directors). Data includes observational fieldnotes, focus group and interviews transcripts. Interpretive thematic analytic techniques were employed.

RESULTS

Participants on a palliative trajectory lacked access to stable, affordable, or permanent housing, yet expressed their desire to stay 'in-place' at the end of life. Analysis reveals three main barriers impeding their 'choice' to remain in-place at the end of life: (1) Misaligned perceptions of risk and safety; (2) Challenges managing pain in the context of substance use, stigma, and discrimination; and (3) Gaps between protocols, policies, and procedures for health teams.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings demonstrate how the rhetoric of 'choice' in regard to preferred place of death is ethically problematic because experienced inequities are produced and constrained by socio-structural forces that reach beyond individuals' control. Ultimately, our findings contribute suggestions for policy, programs and practice to enhance inclusiveness in palliative care. Re-defining 'home' within palliative care, enhancing supports, education, and training for community care workers, integrating palliative approaches to care into the everyday work of non-health care providers, and acknowledging, valuing, and building upon existing relations of care can help to overcome existing barriers to delivering palliative care in various settings and increase the opportunity for all to spend their end of life in the places that they prefer.

Exploring the Lived Experiences of Rural Hospice Social Workers in Navigating "Cracked" Systems

Social workers often encounter health and resource disparities and caregiver challenges in support of hospice patients and families. Social workers also play a critical role in navigating systems and confronting systemic barriers. Their input regarding macro practice is invaluable, though there is not much literature pertaining to end-of-life disparities as experienced from the social worker point of view. There is also limited research from the hospice social worker perspective, with little pertaining to those providing care in rural areas. To address these gaps, this phenomenological study explored the lived experiences of rural hospice social workers to better understand their role in these matters. Data collection occurred through in-depth unstructured qualitative interviews. A total of 19 rural hospice workers participated in the study. There were four main themes identified: systemic issues in hospice settings, resource and geographic barriers, tensions and benefits of interprofessional collaboration, and hospice work environment. Based on these findings, recommendations for hospice social work practice, research, and policy include support of and elevation of the voice of hospice social workers on the interprofessional team, assessment of resource barriers to improve hospice social work interventions and improve quality of life for dying persons, education of hospice administrators to understand best ways to support hospice social, and implementation of policy change to expedite access to caregiver resources at end of life.

Bereavement in the context of homelessness: A rapid review

It is common for the bereaved who are experiencing homelessness to be unrecognized grievers, who are then not adequately supported in their bereavement. This rapid review gathered published information from 17 references on how bereavement is experienced within the context of homelessness (from 509 references imported for screening). Four themes identified for understanding the bereavement experience were bereavement as a risk factor for homelessness, anticipatory grief, increased frequency of death, and ways of processing grief. Current practices used for support were themed into memorials, advocacy, and trauma-informed care. Themes for gaps and barriers to support were bereavement being systematically overlooked and environmental features present. The summary of findings is intended to help inform future research, policy, legislation, and cultural responses to grief and bereavement with the hope it may reduce people's grief from being disenfranchized.