A UK consensus on the administration of aripiprazole for the treatment of mania

Partial agonists of dopamine receptors: mechanisms and clinical effects of aripiprazole, brexpiprazole and cariprazine

Aripiprazole, brexpiprazole and cariprazine are partial dopamine (and serotonin) agonists developed as novel antipsychotics. This article discusses their pharmacology, evidence on their licensed and off-licence uses (including psychosis, mania, bipolar depression, Tourette syndrome and autism spectrum disorder) and side-effects. In schizophrenia, they have a low risk of Parkinsonism or hyperprolactinaemia, cause modest increases in body weight and are of moderate efficacy.

How Can Drug Metabolism and Transporter Genetics Inform Psychotropic Prescribing?

Many genetic variants in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters have been shown to be relevant for treating psychiatric disorders. Associations are strong enough to feature on drug labels and for prescribing guidelines based on such data. A range of commercial tests are available; however, there is variability in included genetic variants, methodology, and interpretation. We herein provide relevant background for understanding clinical associations with specific variants, other factors that are relevant to consider when interpreting such data (such as age, gender, drug-drug interactions), and summarize the data relevant to clinical utility of pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatry and the available prescribing guidelines. We also highlight areas for future research focus in this field.

A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in adult and pediatric bipolar disorder in randomized controlled trials and observational studies

BACKGROUND

Aripiprazole (ARP) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD). However, no prior investigation considered both randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. We here evaluated the efficacy and safety of ARP compared with placebo (PCB) and other drugs at 3- and 12-weeks in adult and pediatric population including, for the first time, both observational and controlled studies.

METHODS

All studies were systematically located by searching electronic sources (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINHAIL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov) till June 30th, 2015. The primary outcome was ARP efficacy (mean change from baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale); secondary outcomes regarded acceptability and safety. Results Sixteen RCTs and 6 non-RCTs met our inclusion criteria; 2505 and 2932 patients were included in the analyses of acute and stabilization phase, respectively. In both the acute and stabilization phases ARP efficacy was superior to PCB and comparable to other drugs. The safety profile was similar to other drugs considering in particular sedation, akathisia, weight gain, extrapyramidal and gastroenteric symptoms, with a significant lower risk of hyperprolactinemia particularly at 12-weeks.

LIMITATIONS

Data on failed trials are generally limited.

CONCLUSIONS

ARP resulted to be an effective treatment in children and adults with BD at 3- and 12-weeks both in a controlled experimental setting or in the real world clinical practice, being poorly associated with hyperprolactinemia. Larger studies are needed to confirm our results related to the maintenance phases and to the pediatric bipolar population.

Fast Versus Slow Strategy of Switching Patients With Schizophrenia to Aripiprazole From Other Antipsychotics

This study aimed to compare strategies differing in the speed of switching schizophrenic patients to aripiprazole from other antipsychotic agents, with dual administration for 2 weeks and then tapering off the current antipsychotic in fast (within 1 week) versus slow (within 4 weeks) strategies. This 8-week, open-label, randomized, parallel study assigned patients with a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder to either the fast-switching (n = 38) or slow-switching (n = 41) group. Efficacy assessments at 5 time points included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Clinical Global Impression scale. Safety assessments included extrapyramidal symptoms, metabolic profile, serum prolactin level, QTc interval, and adverse events. Drug concentrations and cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 genotypes were also measured. The fast- and slow-switching groups were comparable in demographical and clinical features at baseline and dropout rate. In the intention-to-treat analysis using mixed-effects models, there were significant within-group decreases over time in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores (P = 0.03) and its subscores except for positive subscores, whereas no between-group differences were found. A reduction in body weight (P = 0.01) and lower levels of total cholesterol (P = 0.03), triglycerides (P = 0.03), and prolactin (P = 0.01) were noted in both groups but no increase in extrapyramidal symptoms or prolongation of QTc. The blood concentrations of aripiprazole in all patients were in a therapeutic range at day 56, with CYP2D6*10 polymorphisms being associated with aripiprazole concentrations. In conclusion, there is no significant difference between the fast- and slow-switching strategy in terms of improvements in clinical symptoms and metabolic profile in this 8-week study.

Aripiprazole: from pharmacological profile to clinical use

Clinical experience with aripiprazole has confirmed the effectiveness and the safety of this novel antipsychotic drug in patients with schizophrenia as well as for the treatment of mania in type I bipolar disorder. However the generalization of the results from clinical trials requires further effort in order to address some issues and to overcome incorrect and partial interpretation of the clinical evidence. This article provides some straightforward guidance that may help clinical psychiatrists to translate the mechanism of action of aripiprazole into clinical setting, thus improving the appropriate use of the drug through rational application of its pharmacological profile. Examples of paradigmatic clinical situations are presented and discussed, suggesting possible intervention strategies, which may contribute to achieving the most appropriate use of the pharmacological properties of aripiprazole in real life settings.

Strategies for Transitioning Therapy to Aripiprazole from Other Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the optimal approach for transitioning therapy to aripiprazole from other antipsychotics in schizophrenia and to describe these strategies.

DATA SOURCES:

MEDLINE (January 2000-March 2012) and PubMed (January 2000-March 2012) searches were conducted using the search terms aripiprazole, switch, and switching. Citations from references were reviewed to identify additional primary literature.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

Articles identified as primary literature were considered for inclusion. Case series, opinion papers, and review articles were also examined. Literature was required to be in English. For evaluation purposes, included articles were randomized trials specifically comparing different switching strategies from an alternative antipsychotic to aripiprazole. Randomized trials and single-arm studies that evaluated the effect of a change to aripiprazole and reported switching methods were also reviewed but not evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Aripiprazole, an atypical antipsychotic agent with a unique mechanism of action, causes fewer adverse effects when compared with other atypical antipsychotics. Patients unable to tolerate or unresponsive to their current regimens might benefit from a change to aripiprazole, but the best method for switching is unknown. Four randomized trials were identified that compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of at least 2 different switching strategies. The 5 strategies used a combination of immediate or titrated initiation of aripiprazole with immediate or tapered discontinuation of the current antipsychotic. A significant worsening of symptoms in the abrupt discontinuation group when compared with the combined tapered discontinuation groups was seen in 1 trial at week 2; however, all other comparisons yielded no significant differences among switching strategies.

CONCLUSIONS:

Strategies for transitioning therapy to aripiprazole from alternative antipsychotics in schizophrenia have been investigated in randomized trials, but studies have failed to establish a preferred method. Despite the lack of evidence, experts recommend an overlap strategy that includes maintaining the current antipsychotic dosage while titrating to a therapeutic dose of aripiprazole.

Aripiprazole in patients with bipolar mania and beyond: an update of practical guidance

BACKGROUND

Aripiprazole is an atypical antipsychotic with a pharmacological and clinical profile distinct from other atypical antipsychotics.

SCOPE

A European multidisciplinary advisory panel of university-based experts in bipolar disorders convened in April 2010 to review new clinical guidelines for the management of mania and the role of aripiprazole in its treatment. This report describes the consensus reached on how best to use aripiprazole in the treatment of mania.

FINDINGS

Current guidelines recommending aripiprazole for first-line treatment of mania have not generally translated to clinical practice. The panel agreed that clinicians may not feel sufficiently knowledgeable on how to use aripiprazole effectively in mania, and that the perception that aripiprazole is less sedating than other antipschotics may hamper its use. There was consensus about the importance of ensuring that clinicians understood the distinction between antimanic efficacy and sedation. Most acutely manic patients may require night-time sedation, but continuous daytime sedation is not necessarily indicated and may interfere with long-term compliance. If sedation is necessary, guidelines recommend the use of adjunctive benzodiazepines only for a short-time.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical practice guidelines widely recommend aripiprazole as a first-line treatment for mania. Although clinical trials may not represent all patient subpopulations, they show that aripiprazole is well tolerated and has a long-term stabilizing potential. The successful use of aripiprazole rests on using the appropriate initial dose, titrating and adjusting the dose as needed and using appropriate concomitant medication to minimize any short-term adverse events. Low incidence of sedation makes aripiprazole a reasonable long-term treatment choice. If short-term sedation is required an adjunctive sedative agent can be added and removed when no longer needed. Clinical considerations should influence treatment choice, and a better distinction between sedation and antimanic effects should be an educational target aimed to overcome potential barriers for using non-sedative antimanic agents such as aripiprazole.

Aripiprazole monotherapy in the treatment of bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Aripiprazole is approved for the acute and maintenance treatment of manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. The aim of the present work was to review and meta-analyze the findings of all the available randomized double-blind controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of aripiprazole in the treatment of bipolar disorder.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Aripiprazole RCTs were identified with a systematic search of MEDLINE and repositories. Standard meta-analytic techniques were applied.

RESULTS

Two thousand three hundred and three patients took part in the aripiprazole acute mania RCTs. At week 3 the pooled aripiprazole vs. placebo effect size was 0.34 and the NNT was 6 for response and 14 for remission. On average, response started at day 3. Suicide rates were negligible for all groups in mania but they were not reported in the acute depression trials. The meta-analysis of acute bipolar depression RCTs revealed a significant difference at week 8 with a weak effect size equal to 0.17. The analysis of maintenance data suggest that the median survival time for the aripiprazole group was not evaluable (very long), while the median survival time for placebo was 118-203 days depending on the clinical subpopulation.

DISCUSSION

The current meta-analysis supports the usefulness of aripiprazole during all phases of bipolar illness. Its effect against acute bipolar depression is weak and the efficacy during the maintenance phase is proven only against new manic episodes in patients with an index manic episode who had previously responded to aripiprazole during the acute phase.

The pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder: the question of modern advances

INTRODUCTION

Lithium has been the mainstay of treatment for patients with bipolar disorder in the United States since 1970. Major treatment guidelines recommend lithium as a first-line treatment for mania and maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder, yet lithium has fallen out of favor while other agents have grown in popularity. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence for treatments that were available in 1970 and to determine if the field has made any significant advance in the treatment of mania, bipolar depression, and maintenance.

METHODS

We conducted a MEDLINE search through 2009, and examined only English-language, randomized/controlled, placebo, or comparison studies. Tolerability as a factor was not considered for this review.

RESULTS

Lithium, valproate, benzodiazepines, and antipsychotics have been reported effective for mania-which was essentially the state of the field in 1970. Despite an FDA indication for the use of lamotrigine for depression and depression maintenance, the supporting evidence is conflicting. For bipolar maintenance, the evidence is overwhelming in support of lithium and very thin for valproate and carbamazepine. There is emerging evidence that several atypical antipsychotics may have efficacy in prevention.

DISCUSSION

The gold standard for treating bipolar disorder in 1970 was lithium, and the gold standard in 2009 remains lithium. Newer agents may increase our armamentarium to some extent, but it is not clear if they represent a major advance in treatment. They still need to be tested against the gold standard.

Aripiprazole in acute mania and long-term treatment of bipolar disorder: a critical review by an Italian working group

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic illness that is characterized by recurrent episodes of mania, depression or mixed symptoms. BD has a prevalence of approximately 2-4% in the general population and is associated with a substantial burden in terms of morbidity and mortality. Mania is one of the most difficult to treat manifestations of BD and antipsychotic drugs play a major therapeutic role in this respect. Acting mainly at dopamine receptors, first-generation antipsychotics are effective in controlling symptoms of BD; however, these drugs cause troublesome extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and hyperprolactinaemia. The more recently developed second-generation antipsychotics, which act at other receptors, provide a broader spectrum of clinical efficacy and have a more favourable tolerability profile than first-generation antipsychotics. Some second-generation antipsychotics are, however, associated with adverse effects such as weight gain and metabolic disorders, which may be cause for concern. Aripiprazole, a recently introduced second-generation antipsychotic, has a unique receptor-binding profile and mechanism of action, which are thought to account for its low propensity for weight gain, metabolic disturbances and sedation. Aripiprazole is approved in the US and in Europe for the acute management and maintenance of manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. In both the acute and long-term maintenance settings, clinical trials have shown aripiprazole to be clinically effective in terms of response rates, remission rates and prevention of relapse. The lack of a sedative effect does not affect the efficacy of aripiprazole in controlling mania and agitation. With both short- and long-term aripiprazole treatment, adverse event rates were similar to placebo and significantly lower than seen with comparators; one exception to this is the occurrence of EPS, which was observed more frequently in aripiprazole recipients than in patients receiving placebo, but less frequently than in patients treated with haloperidol. Aripiprazole is likely to promote treatment adherence because of its favourable tolerability profile, but more specifically focused studies are required to confirm this hypothesis. The efficacy and favourable metabolic profile of aripiprazole make it a good option in the management of acute mania and maintenance treatment, especially in an outpatient setting. Thus, aripiprazole provides clinicians with a valuable additional therapeutic option for BD. Cognizant of the lack of standardized strategies for aripiprazole dosing, switching, and prevention and management of adverse effects, an expert consensus meeting was held in Italy with the aim of producing guidelines for the use of aripiprazole in acute and long-term management of BD mania. The resulting dosage, administration and switching recommendations outlined in this report are based on empirical results from well designed aripiprazole clinical trials and clinical experience, and are in accord with the manufacturer's prescribing information. However, careful evaluation of the individual patient and a thorough risk/benefit assessment should be made prior to initiating any treatment plan.

Treatment of psychotic symptoms in bipolar disorder with aripiprazole monotherapy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available clinical trials concerning the usefulness of aripiprazole in the treatment of the psychotic symptoms in bipolar disorder.

METHODS

A systematic MEDLINE and repository search concerning clinical trials for aripiprazole in bipolar disorder was conducted.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on acute mania suggests that the effect size of aripiprazole versus placebo was equal to 0.14 but a more reliable and accurate estimation is 0.18 for the total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score. The effect was higher for the PANSS-positive subscale (0.28), PANSS-hostility subscale (0.24) and PANSS-cognitive subscale (0.20), and lower for the PANSS-negative subscale (0.12). No data on the depressive phase of bipolar illness exist, while there are some data in favour of aripiprazole concerning the maintenance phase, where at week 26 all except the total PANSS score showed a significant superiority of aripiprazole over placebo (d = 0.28 for positive, d = 0.38 for the cognitive and d = 0.71 for the hostility subscales) and at week 100 the results were similar (d = 0.42, 0.63 and 0.48, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The data analysed for the current study support the usefulness of aripiprazole against psychotic symptoms during the acute manic and maintenance phases of bipolar illness.

Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in the treatment of bipolar disorder: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The current article is a systematic review concerning the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in the treatment of bipolar disorder.

METHODS

A systematic Medline and repositories search concerning the usefulness of aripiprazole in bipolar disorder was performed, with the combination of the words 'aripiprazole' and 'bipolar'.

RESULTS

The search returned 184 articles and was last updated on 15 April 2009. An additional search included repositories of clinical trials and previous systematic reviews specifically in order to trace unpublished trials. There were seven placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs), six with comparator studies and one with add-on studies. They assessed the usefulness of aripiprazole in acute mania, acute bipolar depression and during the maintenance phase in comparison to placebo, lithium or haloperidol.

CONCLUSION

Aripiprazole appears effective for the treatment and prophylaxis against mania. The data on bipolar depression are so far negative, however there is a need for further study at lower dosages. The most frequent adverse effects are extrapyramidal signs and symptoms, especially akathisia, without any significant weight gain, hyperprolactinaemia or laboratory test changes.