The use of antipsychotics is associated with lower mortality in patients with Alzheimer's disease: A nationwide population-based nested case-control study in Taiwan

Predictors for survival in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a large comprehensive meta-analysis

The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasing as the population ages, and patients with AD have a poor prognosis. However, knowledge on factors for predicting the survival of AD remains sparse. Here, we aimed to systematically explore predictors of AD survival. We searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for relevant literature from inception to December 2022. Cohort and case-control studies were selected, and multivariable adjusted relative risks (RRs) were pooled by random-effects models. A total of 40,784 reports were identified, among which 64 studies involving 297,279 AD patients were included in the meta-analysis after filtering based on predetermined criteria. Four aspects, including demographic features (n = 7), clinical features or comorbidities (n = 13), rating scales (n = 3) and biomarkers (n = 3), were explored and 26 probable prognostic factors were finally investigated for AD survival. We observed that AD patients who had hyperlipidaemia (RR: 0.69) were at a lower risk of death. In contrast, male sex (RR: 1.53), movement disorders (including extrapyramidal signs) (RR: 1.60) and cancer (RR: 2.07) were detrimental to AD patient survival. However, our results did not support the involvement of education, hypertension, APOE genotype, Aβ42 and t-tau in AD survival. Our study comprehensively summarized risk factors affecting survival in patients with AD, provided a better understanding on the role of different factors in the survival of AD from four dimensions, and paved the way for further research.

Diagnostic progression to bipolar disorder in 17,285 adolescents and young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A longitudinal follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the diagnostic progression to bipolar disorder (BD) among adolescents and young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

METHODS

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we enrolled adolescents and young adults aged 10-29 years with ADHD between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2010, who were followed up until December 31, 2011, to determine progression to BD. Cox regression analysis was used to examine candidate risk and protective factors.

RESULTS

At the 11-year follow-up, the progression rate from ADHD to BD was 5.12%. Of the participants who progressed, 62.16% (322/518) progressed within the first 3 years. Risk factors for progression were as follows: older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.058; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.033-1.084), comorbidity with autistic spectrum disorder (HR, 1.839; 95% CI, 1.415-2.391), disruptive behavior disorder (HR, 1.434; 95% CI, 1.132-1.816), intelligence disability (HR, 1.744; 95% CI, 1.399-2.176), depressive disorder (HR, 1.978; 95% CI, 1.577-2.482), alcohol use disorder (HR, 1.705; 95% CI, 1.057-2.751), cluster A (HR, 2.508; 95% CI, 1.167-5.391) or B (HR, 2.718; 95% CI, 1.974-3.741) personality disorder, and a family history of BD (HR, 2.618; 95% CI, 1.823-3.758) Identified protective factors were male sex (HR, 0.771; 95% CI, 0.630-0.943) and cluster C personality disorder (HR, 0.278; 95% CI, 0.086-0.898).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated the specific risk and protective factors for BD progression among adolescents and young adults with ADHD. It is important for clinician and mental health care providers to recognize identified factors to focus on early detection and prompt intervention.

The Association between Use of Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonists and the Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Nationwide Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent upper airway collapse. Benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) are associated with pharyngeal muscle relaxation, increased apnea duration, and hypoxia, which might worsen OSA. This study aimed to examine the association between the use of BZRAs and the risk of OSA. The study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Database of Taiwan between 2002 and 2011. We only included new users who were never exposed to any BZRAs and identified 1848 participants with OSA, and 1848 matched controls. A logistic regression model was used to determine the association between the use of BZRAs and the development of OSA. BZRA exposure was divided into usage patterns, dosage, duration, and pharmacokinetic class. We found an increased risk of OSA in current users and recent past users compared with distant past users. Patients with a higher cumulative dose of BZRAs were more likely to develop OSA compared to those with a lower cumulative dose. We found an increased risk of OSA in patients treated with BZRAs, especially for current users and those with higher cumulative doses. A reduced risk of OSA was found in Z-drug users compared with benzodiazepine users.

Efficacy of serotonergic antidepressant treatment for the neuropsychiatric symptoms and agitation in dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Serotonergic dysfunction may be involved in the etiology of overall neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and agitation in patients with dementia; therefore, we aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of serotonergic antidepressants in such populations.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the date of their inception until December 11, 2020 to examine the effect of serotonergic antidepressants on the outcomes of interest in patients with dementia. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Co-primary outcomes were mean changes in overall NPS and agitation as a specific symptom of NPS. Secondary outcomes were mean changes in depressive symptoms, cognition, and care burden.

RESULTS

Fourteen randomized controlled trials were eligible (n = 1,374; mean age = 76.8 years; mean proportion of female = 61.9 %). Serotonergic antidepressants significantly reduced the overall NPS (k = 12, n = 1276, Hedges' g = -0.49, 95 % confidence intervals [CIs] = -0.74 to -0.24, p < 0.001) and agitation severity (k = 9, n = 749, Hedges' g = -0.28, 95 % CIs = -0.43 to -0.14, p < 0.001), both with small effect size in patients with dementia. For secondary outcome, serotonergic antidepressants also significantly improved depressive symptoms, cognition, and care burden with small to very small effect sizes (depressive symptoms, k = 8, n = 938, Hedges' g = -0.32, 95 % CIs = -0.49 to -0.15, p < 0.001;cognition, k = 6, n = 983, Hedges' g = 0.15, 95 % CIs = 0.002 to 0.29, p = 0.046; care burden, k = 7, n = 961, Hedges' g = -0.24, 95 % CIs = -0.41 to -0.07, p = 0.005). Subgroup analysis showed that both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and non-SSRIs significant reduced agitation and depressive symptoms (For agitation, SSRIs, k = 6, n = 605, Hedges' g = -0.25, 95 % CIs = -0.41 to -0.09, p=0.002; non-SSRIs, k = 3, n = 144, Hedges' g = -0.41, 95 % CIs = -0.74 to -0.08, p = 0.016; For depression, SSRIs, k = 6, n = 736, Hedges' g = -0.29, 95 % CIs = -0.48 to -0.09, p=0.004; non-SSRIs, k = 343, n = 144, Hedges' g = -0.43, 95 % CIs = -0.78 to -0.09, p = 0.016), whereas only SSRIs reduced overall NPS (k = 9, n = 1109, Hedges' g = -0.49, 95 % CIs = -0.78 to -0.20, p = 0.001) and care burden (k = 5, n = 740, Hedges' g = -0.29, 95 % CIs = -0.50 to -0.08, p=0.007).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis indicates that serotonergic antidepressants effectively alleviate overall NPS, agitation, depressive symptoms, and care burden, and improve cognitive function.

Mortality Risk of Atypical Antipsychotics for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: A Meta-Analysis, Meta-Regression, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) exert a short-term mortality risk in people with dementia. We assessed whether additional randomized clinical trials influence the current evidence and the potential effect modifiers.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials from their inception through March 2018. A random-effects model was used for analysis. Potential effect modifiers were examined through meta-regression. Trial sequential analysis was performed to quantify the statistical reliability of data in the cumulative meta-analysis with adjustment of significance levels for sparse data and repetitive testing on accumulating data. Certainty of evidence and risk of bias were also evaluated.

RESULTS

We found that compared with placebos, AAPs may increase the risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.536; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.028-2.296; P = 0.036, high certainty). In the subgroup analysis, the estimated ORs were the highest for olanzapine (1.919; P = 0.232), followed by those for quetiapine (1.663; P = 0.506), aripiprazole (1.649; P = 0.297), and risperidone (1.354; P = 0.277); however, the mortality risk presented by individual AAPs did not exhibit between-group differences. The meta-regression did not identify any effect modifiers, including the chlorpromazine equivalent dose, trial duration, and cognitive status. The trial sequential analysis revealed that future similar trials are unlikely to alter our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical antipsychotics are associated with increased short-term mortality risk, although a disease-drug interaction may contribute to such risk in people with dementia. Patients with dementia may still benefit by AAPs after appropriate assessment of the disease severity as well as the dosage of AAPs, treatment duration, and monitoring of AAPs.

The effect of antidementia drugs on mortality in patients with Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease is associated with a higher mortality rate after the diagnosis. We hypothesized that patients with Alzheimer's disease who received antidementia drugs may have a lower mortality rate than those without such treatment.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed Alzheimer's disease aged ⩾65 years during 2001-2006 were identified in the National Health Institute Research Database, Taiwan. We included patients with Alzheimer's disease who received antidementia drugs as the exposure group (ADD group), and compared them with a non-exposure group who did not receive any antidementia drugs (non-ADD group) matched for age at the index date, gender and Charlson Comorbidity Index score before the index date. All-cause mortality rates and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores at one and two years after the index date were compared between the ADD and non-ADD groups.

RESULTS

There were 529 patients in non-ADD group and 529 in the ADD group. The mortality rate was significantly lower in the ADD group compared with the non-ADD group (42% versus 58.6%; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that antidementia drugs may have a protective effect against mortality in patients with Alzheimer's disease.