Pharmaco-epidemiology of antidepressant exposure in a UK cohort record-linkage study

Relationship of psychotropic medication use with physical function among postmenopausal women

To examine cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships of psychotropic medications with physical function after menopause. Analyses involved 4557 Women's Health Initiative Long Life Study (WHI-LLS) participants (mean age at WHI enrollment (1993-1998): 62.8 years). Antidepressant, anxiolytic, and sedative/hypnotic medications were evaluated at WHI enrollment and 3-year follow-up visits. Performance-based physical function [Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)] was assessed at the 2012-2013 WHI-LLS visit. Self-reported physical function [RAND-36] was examined at WHI enrollment and the last available follow-up visit-an average of 22 [±2.8] (range: 12-27) years post-enrollment. Multivariable regression models controlled for socio-demographic, lifestyle, and health characteristics. Anxiolytics were not related to physical function. At WHI enrollment, antidepressant use was cross-sectionally related to worse self-reported physical function defined as a continuous (β = -6.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.48, -4.07) or as a categorical (< 78 vs. ≥ 78) (odds ratio [OR] = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.48, 2.98) outcome. Antidepressant use at WHI enrollment was also associated with worse performance-based physical function (SPPB) [< 10 vs. ≥ 10] (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.21) at the 2012-2013 WHI-LLS visit. Compared to non-users, those using sedative/hypnotics at WHI enrollment but not at the 3-year follow-up visit reported a faster decline in physical function between WHI enrollment and follow-up visits. Among postmenopausal women, antidepressant use was cross-sectionally related to worse self-reported physical function, and with worse performance-based physical function after > 20 years of follow-up. Complex relationships found for hypnotic/sedatives were unexpected and necessitate further investigation.

Temporal trends of antidepressant utilization patterns in children and adolescents in Hong Kong: A 14-year population-based study with joinpoint regression analysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited research on real-world antidepressant utilization patterns in children and adolescents, particularly in non-western countries. We aimed to examine temporal trends of antidepressant prescribing practice among Chinese children and adolescents in Hong Kong over 14-year period.

METHODS

This population-based study identified 9566 patients aged 5-17 years who had redeemed at least one antidepressant prescription within 2005-2018, using data from health-record database of Hong Kong public healthcare services. We calculated annual prescription rates (per 1000 persons) for any antidepressant, antidepressant drug classes, and individual antidepressants. Joinpoint-regression analyses were performed to assess temporal antidepressant prescription trends, quantified by average annual-percent-change (AAPC), with 95 % confidence-intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Overall antidepressant prescription rate significantly increased over time (AAPC: 7.30 [95 % CI: 6.70-7.90]), from 3.883 in 2005 to 9.916 in 2018. The use of selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine-reuptake-inhibitors (SNRIs), and other antidepressants significantly increased over 14 years, while tricyclic-antidepressants remained stable. SSRI represented the most commonly-prescribed drug class. Fluoxetine and sertraline constituted the two most frequently-prescribed individual antidepressants, while desvenlafaxine (AAPC: 55.68 [30.74-85.39]) and bupropion (AAPC: 35.28 [23.68-47.98]) exhibited the sharpest increase in prescription rates over the study period.

LIMITATIONS

Medication adherence could not be assessed and actual drug use may be overestimated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results affirm a significant rising trend of antidepressant prescriptions among Chinese children and adolescents over time. All antidepressant drug-classes, except TCA, demonstrated significantly increased use, with SSRI being the most frequently-prescribed drug class. Future investigation should clarify indications, hence off-label use, of antidepressant initiation in this vulnerable population.

Antidepressant and antipsychotic drug prescribing and diabetes outcomes: A systematic review of observational studies

AIMS

Psychotropic medication may be associated with adverse effects, including among people with diabetes. We conducted a systematic review of observational studies investigating the association between antidepressant or antipsychotic drug prescribing and type 2 diabetes outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO to 15th August 2022 to identify eligible studies. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess study quality and performed a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We included 18 studies, 14 reporting on antidepressants and four on antipsychotics. There were 11 cohort studies, one self-controlled before and after study, two case-control studies, and four cross-sectional studies, of variable quality with highly heterogeneous study populations, exposure definitions, and outcomes analysed. Antidepressant prescribing may be associated with increased risk of macrovascular disease, whilst evidence on antidepressant and antipsychotic prescribing and glycaemic control was mixed. Few studies reported microvascular outcomes and risk factors other than glycaemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies of antidepressant and antipsychotic drug prescribing in relation to diabetes outcomes are scarce, with shortcomings and mixed findings. Until further evidence is available, people with diabetes prescribed antidepressants and antipsychotics should receive monitoring and appropriate treatment of risk factors and screening for complications as recommended in general diabetes guidelines.

What affected UK adults' adherence to medicines during the COVID-19 pandemic? Cross-sectional survey in a representative sample of people with long-term conditions

Aim

Medicines non-adherence is associated with poorer outcomes and higher costs. COVID-19 affected access to healthcare, with increased reliance on remote methods, including medicines supply. This study aimed to identify what affected people's adherence to medicines for long-term conditions (LTCs) during the pandemic.

Subject and methods

Cross-sectional online survey of UK adults prescribed medicines for LTCs assessing self-reported medicines adherence, reasons for non-adherence (using the capability, opportunity and motivation model of behaviour [COM-B]), medicines access and COVID-19-related behaviours.

Results

The 1746 respondents reported a mean (SD) of 2.5 (1.9) LTCs, for which they were taking 2.4 (1.9) prescribed medicines, 525 (30.1%) reported using digital tools to support ordering or taking medicines and 22.6% reported medicines non-adherence. No access to at least one medicine was reported by 182 (10.4%) respondents; 1048 (60.0%) reported taking at least one non-prescription medicine as a substitute; 409 (23.4%) requested emergency supply from pharmacy for at least one medicine. Problems accessing medicines, being younger, male, in the highest socioeconomic group and working were linked to poorer adherence. Access problems were mostly directly or indirectly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Respondents were generally lacking in capabilities and opportunities, but disruptions to habits (automatic motivation) was the major reason for non-adherence.

Conclusion

Navigating changes in how medicines were accessed, and disruption of habits during the COVID-19 pandemic, was associated with suboptimal adherence. People were resourceful in overcoming barriers to access. Solutions to support medicines-taking need to take account of the multiple ways that medicines are prescribed and supplied remotely.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-022-01813-0.

Antidepressant utilization patterns and predictors of treatment continuation in pregnant women: A 16-year population-based cohort

OBJECTIVE

Existing data on prenatal antidepressant prescribing patterns are mostly derived from Western countries, with limited research assessing antidepressant continuation and reinitiation during pregnancy. This study aimed to examine antidepressant prescribing practice among Chinese pregnant women in Hong Kong.

METHODS

This population-based study identified women aged 15-50 years who delivered their first and singleton child, and had redeemed at least one antidepressant prescription within 3 months pre-pregnancy and/or during pregnancy between 2003 and 2018, using data from the health-record database of Hong Kong public healthcare services. Antidepressant utilization patterns before and during pregnancy, and factors associated with antidepressant continuation and reinitiation following medication discontinuation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 466,358 pregnancies, 3019 (0.67%) received antidepressants within 3 months of pre-pregnancy and/or during pregnancy, and 2700 (0.58%) had prenatal antidepressant use. There was a significant rising trend of prenatal antidepressant use over time (0.6% in 2003 to 1.3% in 2018; odds ratio: 1.09, 95% confidence interval = [1.08, 1.10], p < 0.001). A consistent pattern of decreasing overall antidepressant use from 3 months pre-pregnancy to the second trimester was observed, followed by a slight increase in the third trimester. Almost half (n = 949, 49.5%) of 1918 women on antidepressants in 3 months pre-pregnancy continued treatment beyond the first trimester. A total of 8.2% that discontinued antidepressants in 3 months pre-pregnancy or in the first trimester reinitiated treatment in the later stage of pregnancy. Older age at conception (⩾35 years), recent calendar year of delivery (2015-2018), pre-existing depression/anxiety disorders, longer-term pre-pregnancy antidepressant treatment and pre-pregnancy prescription of other psychotropics were significantly associated with antidepressant continuation. Antidepressant reinitiation was predicted by pre-existing depression/anxiety disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results that prenatal antidepressant use is increasingly prevalent and half of pregnant women discontinued antidepressants 3 months before or after conception underscore the need for future research to clarify the risk and benefit of antidepressant continuation versus discontinuation to facilitate development of evidence-based guidelines, so as to optimize maternal and fetal outcomes.

The sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with major depressive disorder receiving SSRIs as first-line antidepressant treatment in European countries

INTRODUCTION

Due to favorable antidepressant (AD) efficacy and tolerability, selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are consistently recommended as substances of first choice for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in international guidelines. However, little is known about the real-world clinical correlates of patients primarily prescribed SSRIs in contrast to those receiving alternative first-line ADs.

METHODS

These secondary analyses are based on a naturalistic, multinational cross-sectional study conducted by the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression at ten research sites. We compared the socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of 1410 patients with primary MDD, who were either prescribed SSRIs or alternative substances as first-line AD treatment, using chi-squared tests, analyses of covariance, and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

SSRIs were prescribed in 52.1% of MDD patients who showed lower odds for unemployment, current severity of depressive symptoms, melancholic features, suicidality, as well as current inpatient treatment compared to patients receiving alternative first-line ADs. Furthermore, patients prescribed SSRIs less likely received add-on therapies including AD combination and augmentation with antipsychotics, and exhibited a trend towards higher response rates.

CONCLUSION

A more favorable socio-demographic and clinical profile associated with SSRIs in contrast to alternative first-line ADs may have guided European psychiatrists' treatment choice for SSRIs, rather than any relevant pharmacological differences in mechanisms of action of the investigated ADs. Our results must be cautiously interpreted in light of predictable biases resulting from the open treatment selection, the possible allocation of less severely ill patients to SSRIs as well as the cross-sectional study design that does not allow to ascertain any causal conclusions.

The international prevalence of antidepressant use before, during, and after pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of timing, type of prescriptions and geographical variability

BACKGROUND

Antidepressant use during pregnancy has increased over the last decades, while safety has been under debate. Our aim was to measure the international prevalence of antidepressant use before, during, and after pregnancy and examine timing, type of prescriptions and geographic variability.

METHODS

We searched Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar from their inception until February 19, 2019. We determined pooled prevalence estimates of antidepressants before, during, and after pregnancy, as well as stratified according to substantive variables.

RESULTS

We identified 40 cohorts from 15 countries, together reporting on 14,072,251 pregnancies. Included studies had a low risk of bias, often reporting on large representative cohorts. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were the most commonly used antidepressants during pregnancy, with an international prevalence estimate of 3.0% (95%CI 2.3;3.7). While Europe and Australasia had pooled prevalence estimates of 1.6% and 1.3% respectively, Northern America had a prevalence estimate of 5.5% (Q-value = 126.19; df = 2; p-value<0.01). Highest SSRI prevalence rates were found for sertraline (1.10%), followed by citalopram and fluoxetine (0.77% and 0.76% respectively) (Q-value = 121.25; df = 5; p-value<0.01). Qualitative analysis indicated an increase in antidepressant use over subsequent calendar years.

LIMITATIONS

Substantial heterogeneity remained unaccounted for throughout the analyses, even after accounting for hypothetical contributors.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed substantial regional differences in antidepressant use around pregnancy, which could be due to variability in prescription behavior, healthcare seeking behavior and organization of healthcare. There is an urgent need for evidence on effectiveness, benefit, and harm of antidepressants during pregnancy to guide clinical practice.