Postoperative delirium indicating an adverse drug interaction involving the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine?

Novel techniques for intraoperative parathyroid gland identification: a comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

The parathyroid glands (PGs) are critical for calcium regulation and homeostasis. The preservation of PGs during neck surgery is crucial to avoid postoperative hypoparathyroidism. There are no existing guidelines for intraoperative PG identification, and the current approach relies heavily on the experience of the operating surgeon. A technique that accurately and rapidly identifies PGs would represent a useful intraoperative adjunct.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to assess common dye and fluorescence-based PG imaging techniques and examine their utility for intraoperative PG identification. A literature search of published data on methylene blue (MB), indocyanine green (ICG) angiography, near-infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF), and the PGs between 1971 and 2020 was conducted on PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

NIRAF and near-infrared (NIR) parathyroid angiography have emerged as promising and reliable techniques for intraoperative PG identification. NIRAF may aid with real-time identification of both normal and diseased PGs and reduce the risk of postoperative complications such as hypocalcemia. Further large prospective multicenter studies should be conducted in thyroid and parathyroid surgical patient populations to confirm the clinical efficacy of these intraoperative NIR-based PG detection techniques.

Drug-drug Interactions in Psychiatric Practice, Part 1: Reasons, Importance, and Strategies to Avoid and Recognize Them

This column begins a series exploring drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with a special emphasis on psychiatric medications. As explained in this column, this topic is important for multiple reasons. First, a large percentage of the population is receiving psychiatric medications. Second, these patients are likely to be on multiple medications which means that they are at risk for an adverse DDI. Third, DDIs may occur but not be recognized even though they have significant health care consequences for the patient. Fourth, these consequences can range from a catastrophic outcome to more everyday clinical problems involving a myriad of presentations as enumerated in this column. Also discussed in this column is the fact that all drugs, including psychiatric medications, interact on the basis of their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics rather than their therapeutic use. Therefore, psychiatric medications may interact with medications prescribed for nonpsychiatric reasons as well as with other psychiatric medications. Tables are included that explain reasons for multiple medication use and principles to follow to minimize the risk of adverse DDIs.

[Not Available]

BACKGROUND

Methylene blue is used in medical practice for various reasons. Recent findings point to a potential interaction with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) that could lead to serotonergic toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the risk of serotonergic toxicity associated with the interaction between methylene blue and SRIs.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant publications were searched systematically via MEDLINE (1946 to March 21, 2013) and Embase (1974 to 2013, week 11) with the following search terms: "methylene blue", "methylthioninium", "monoamine oxidase inhibitors", "serotonin reup-take inhibitors", and "serotonin syndrome". No restrictions were applied in relation to the indication for methylene blue or the language of publication. The reference lists of identified articles were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Eighteen case reports and 2 case series were identified for inclusion. To date, no randomized controlled trials have been published.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The first case report indicating suspicion of an interaction between methylene blue and SRIs was published in 2003. Seventeen other case reports describing the same type of interaction have been published since then. The 2 case series provided data from about 325 parathyroidectomies in which methylene blue was used for staining. The 17 patients who experienced central nervous system toxicity were all taking SRIs in the preoperative period.

CONCLUSION

When administered in combination with SRIs, methylene blue may lead to serotonergic toxicity at doses as low as 0.7 mg/kg. Methylene blue would seem to have monoamine oxidase A inhibitory properties. Precautions should be taken to avoid this interaction. [Publisher's translation].

Psychostimulants, antidepressants and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists ('motor disinhibitors') have overlapping, but distinct, effects on monoamine transmission: the involvement of L-type Ca2+ channels and implications for the treatment of ADHD

Both psychostimulants and antidepressants target monoamine transporters and, as a consequence, augment monoamine transmission. These two groups of drugs also increase motor activity in preclinical behavioural screens for antidepressants. Substance P-preferring receptor (NK1R) antagonists similarly increase both motor activity in these tests and monoamine transmission in the brain. In this article, the neurochemical and behavioural responses to these three groups of drugs are compared. It becomes evident that NK1R antagonists represent a distinct class of compounds ('motor disinhibitors') that differ substantially from both psychostimulants and antidepressants, especially during states of heightened arousal or stress. Also, all three groups of drugs influence the activation of voltage-gated Ca(v)1.2 and Ca(v)1.3 L-type channels (LTCCs) in the brain, albeit in different ways. This article discusses evidence that points to disruption of these functional interactions between NK1R and LTCCs as a contributing factor in the cognitive and behavioural abnormalities that are prominent features of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Arising from this is the interesting possibility that the hyperactivity and impulsivity (as in ADHD) and psychomotor retardation (as in depression) reflect opposite poles of a behavioural continuum. A better understanding of this pharmacological network could help explain why psychostimulants augment motor behaviour during stress (e.g., in preclinical screens for antidepressants) and yet reduce locomotor activity and impulsivity in ADHD. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'CNS Stimulants'.

Systematic review of intravenous methylene blue in parathyroid surgery

Background

Methylene blue is an intraoperative adjunct for localization of enlarged parathyroid glands. The availability of preoperative and other intraoperative localization methods, and the reported adverse effects of methylene blue make its routine use debatable. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the use of methylene blue in parathyroidectomy.

Methods

A systematic review of English-language literature in MEDLINE and Scopus databases on the use of intravenous methylene blue in parathyroid surgery was carried out.

Results

There were no randomized clinical trials. Thirty-nine observational studies were identified, of which 33 did not have a control arm. The overall median staining rate for abnormal parathyroid glands was 100 per cent. The median cure rates in the methylene blue and no-methylene blue arms were 100 and 98 per cent respectively. Neurotoxicity was reported in 25 patients, all of whom were taking serotonergic medication.

Conclusion

Observational evidence suggests that methylene blue is efficacious in identifying enlarged parathyroid glands. Toxicity appears to be mild in the absence of concomitant use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The effectiveness of methylene blue in the context of currently used preoperative and intraoperative localization techniques has yet to be shown.

Concurrent Administration of Methylene Blue and a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor: A Recipe for Serotonin Syndrome

This case report describes the precipitation of serotonin syndrome in a patient taking a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, by infusion of methylene blue dye during a parathyroidectomy procedure. Methylene blue acts as a monamine oxidase inhibitor, thus increasing levels of serotonin in the brain. The authors describe the diagnosis and management of serotonin syndrome and suggest that more caution be exercised in the use of methylene blue.

CNS toxicity involving methylene blue: the exemplar for understanding and predicting drug interactions that precipitate serotonin toxicity

Methylene blue has only recently been noted to cause severe central nervous system toxicity. Methylene blue is used for various conditions, including, intravenously, in methemoglobinemia, vasoplegia and as an aid to parathyroidectomy (at doses of 1-7.5 mg kg(-1)). This review of the current evidence concludes that 13 of 14 of the reported cases of CNS toxicity were serotonin toxicity that met the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria. That has important preventative and treatment implications. Serotonin toxicity is precipitated by the monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) property of methylene blue interacting with serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Serotonin toxicity is reviewed, using the lessons inherent in the methylene blue story and experience, to illustrate how the mechanisms and potency of serotonergic drugs interact to determine severity. Recent human data showed that an intravenous dose of only 0.75 mg kg(-1) of methylene blue produced a peak plasma concentration of 500 ng ml(-1) (1.6 µM), indicating that the concentration in the central nervous system reaches a level that inhibits monoamine oxidase A. That is consonant with the actual occurrence of severe serotonin toxicity in humans at the dose of only 1 mg kg(-1). It seems that all proposed uses of methylene blue entail levels that block monoamine oxidase, so cessation of serotonin reuptake inhibitors should be very carefully considered before using methylene blue.

Risk of severe serotonin toxicity following co-administration of methylene blue and serotonin reuptake inhibitors: an update on a case report of post-operative delirium

In a previous case report, published in this journal, we described a postoperative delirium in a patient during recovery from parathyroidectomy. We noted that the delirium resembled serotonin toxicity and that the patient had been taking paroxetine until 2 days before surgery. We offered several tentative explanations for this event, including an adverse interaction between paroxetine and other agent(s) used in the course of the anaesthesia. Recent developments in characterisation of serotonin toxicity have prompted us to re-examine the clinical details surrounding this life-threatening event. It is now known to be important that the patient was given methylene blue, pre-operatively, to enable visualisation of the parathyroid glands. Methylene blue has been found to be a potent inhibitor of monoamine oxidase (MAO), and several cases of serotonin toxicity have been reported recently following its administration. All these cases are consistent with the well-known risk of serotonin toxicity when drugs that augment serotonergic transmission are given in combination with an MAO inhibitor. Methylene blue is used in a variety of surgical settings as well as for treatment of various types of hypotensive shock and methemoglobinaemia. It is also being studied for treatment of Alzheimer's disease and malaria. In this paper, we outline the pharmacology of methylene blue and the aetiology of serotonin toxicity to help prevent further unintentional co-administration of drugs that risk precipitating this life-threatening drug interaction.

Aprepitant: drug-drug interactions in perspective

The implications of chemotherapeutic drug-drug interactions can be serious and thus need to be addressed. This review concerns the potential interactions of the antiemetic aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist indicated for use (in Europe) in highly emetogenic chemotherapy and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) in combination with a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist and corticosteroids and (in the United States) in combination with other antiemetic agents, for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy including high-dose cisplatin. When considering use of aprepitant for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, its potential drug-drug interaction profile as a moderate inhibitor of cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme 3A4 (CYP3A4) has been a source of concern for some physicians and other health care professionals. We explore in this paper how real those concerns are. Our conclusion is that either no interaction or no clinically relevant interaction exists with chemotherapeutic agents (intravenous cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, intravenous vinorelbine) or 5-HT3 antagonists (granisetron, ondansetron, palonosetron). For relevant interactions, appropriate measures, such as corticosteroid dose modifications and extended International Normalized Ratio monitoring of patients on warfarin therapy, can be taken to effectively manage them. Therefore, the concern of negative interactions remains largely theoretical but needs to be verified with new agents extensively metabolized through the 3A4 pathway.

Prolonged postoperative altered mental status after methylene blue infusion during parathyroidectomy: a case report and review of the literature

Methylene blue (5 mg/kg) is routinely given at our institution during parathyroidectomy. The dye stains the parathyroid glands and helps in better surgical visualisation. The technique is generally considered to be safe except for causing pseudo-cyanosis. We report a case of a patient who had confusion, agitation and altered mental status during the early postoperative course probably secondary to methylene blue infusion.

Detrimental antidepressant drug-drug interactions: are they clinically relevant?

This paper takes the position that detrimental drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving antidepressants are clinically relevant. In doing so, it begins with a definition of the terms: drug-drug interaction, detrimental, and clinical relevance. It then discusses the issues of proof and provides an overview of the clinically relevant DDIs involving antidepressants. It also gives examples involving drugs besides antidepressants based on the premise that the underlying principles are applicable regardless of the therapeutic classes of the drugs involved.

Pharmacogenomics, informatics, and individual drug therapy in psychiatry: past, present and future

The modern era of psychopharmacology began in the 10 year period from the late 1940s to the late 1950s. During this period, the first antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics and mood stabilizers were all discovered. In the 1960s, the pharmacology of these drugs was elucidated and theories about the mechanisms of action proposed. In the 1970s and 1980s, new, more selective compounds were developed based on improved structure-activity relationships derived from in vitro receptor binding studies and animal models. These compounds entered clinical testing in the 1980s and began to be marketed in the late 1980s and 1990s. All of these agents were approved to treat psychiatric syndromes which are conditions defined by a cluster of signs and symptoms. None of these agents was developed based on an understanding of the pathophysiology of the illnesses being treated. None of these agents are curative and virtually all have limited clinical efficacy. In the earliest days of the modern era, there were few drugs available to combine and many had such broad actions that they were often marginally tolerated or unsafe when used in combination (tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors). With the advent of more medications, the frequency and extent of polypharmacy has exploded. In addition to simply having more drugs from which to select with different pharmacological profiles, many newer medications are also more selective in their pharmacological actions and thus are often better tolerated and safer when used in combination. In addition, there is the concern that the trade-off for more selective pharmacology may have been better tolerability at the expense of reduced efficacy, which clinicians then compensate for by using more medications in combination. For all of the above reasons, polypsychopharmacology has been present from the beginning of the modern era of psychopharmacotherapy and continues to be the rule rather than the exception. In fact, the frequency and the complexity of such polypsychopharmacology are both enormous and increasing. The percentage of patients being discharged from the Biological Branch of the National Institute of Mental Health on more than three psychiatric medications increased more than ten times between 1974-79, and 1990-95. The majority of patients seen in the Veterans Administration Medical System in the United States are on unique combinations of medications and the frequency and complexity of such polypharmacotherapy is increased in patients on psychiatric medications. Throughout the modern era, there have been attempts to determine whether there are populations of patients selectively responsible to specific agents (e.g. serotonin versus norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors). However, no compelling data have so far emerged. Instead, clinicians generally resort to combining drugs on the basis of symptoms such as psychosis and depression or anxiety and depression. Science has primarily informed the clinician about safety concerns rather than efficacy concerns when using such combinations. That will change in the future with a better understanding of the pathophysiology of psychiatric illnesses which in turn will lead to improved therapies and the potential for more rationally derived combination treatments.

Chemotherapy-induced emesis in elderly cancer patients: the role of 5-HT3-receptor antagonists in the first 24 hours

OBJECTIVE

This review highlights the need to optimize 5-HT3-receptor-antagonist-based antiemetic therapy for elderly cancer patients, particularly during the first 24 h after receiving chemotherapy, based on knowledge of the chemotherapeutic regimen, comorbidity, polypharmacy, dosing convenience and age-related health.

BACKGROUND

The proportion of elderly people (over 65 years of age) in the general population is increasing. Compared with the general population, elderly people have a greater risk of serious diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. Their chemotherapy can be compromised by factors including comorbidity, declining organ function, polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions and cognitive impairments. The use of aprepitant in this elderly population with many concomitant medications is not discussed. Many chemotherapeutic regimens are highly emetogenic, and nausea and vomiting are rated among the most distressing side effects of chemotherapy. The emetogenic potential of various chemotherapy regimens is reviewed, demonstrating clear differences in severity and time of symptom onset. Such differences are particularly important during the first 24 h after administration, when control of emetic symptoms can help to prevent the occurrence of subsequent episodes. The matter is further complicated by inter-patient differences in susceptibility to nausea and vomiting resulting from multiple factors including gender, age and alcohol intake. Individual patient evaluation is essential to identify those patients most at risk. Elderly patients may also be particularly sensitive to the serious physiological and physical effects of nausea and vomiting. Education about symptom management needs to recognize specific learning barriers in the elderly, such as declining sensory perception or cognitive impairment. 5-HT3-receptor antagonists have long been the gold standard for treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Pharmacological differences between 5-HT3-receptor antagonists suggest the need for careful consideration of individual patient characteristics. Selection of the most appropriate agent will optimize antiemetic therapy for elderly cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy-induced emesis in elderly cancer patients needs optimal control by a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist with uncomplicated 24-hour efficacy and good tolerability. Choosing a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist with a long duration of action, low risk of drug-drug interactions and once-daily dosing is important to ensure effective prophylaxis against nausea and vomiting in the elderly and simplify management for patients with cognitive impairment, declining organ function and comorbidity.

5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists in the management of nausea and vomiting in cancer and cancer treatment

The 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists, considered as 'gold standard' therapy for cancer patients, are generally perceived to have similar efficacy and safety profiles, andmost antiemetic guidelines do not distinguish between agents. However, important pharmacological differences exist between agents, which may translate into potential benefits for some patients. In particular, 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists vary in the nature of their receptor antagonism and plasma half-lives, possibly leading to differences in duration of action. Agents with a longer duration of action provide antiemetic protection throughout the acute emetic period (24 h) with a single daily dose, whereas shorter-acting agents, e.g. ondansetron, may require multiple dosing for full efficacy. Differences also exist between agents in their hepatic metabolism and cardiovascular safety, which may present particular problems for elderly patients who often receive additional medications for comorbid conditions, increasing the risk of drug-drug interaction. Recent antiemetic guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend preferential use of palonosetron for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy; however, this agent is newly approved and key clinical questions remain unanswered by clinical trial data. Selection of an appropriate 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonist should be based on proven efficacy and safety, as well as on the individual characteristics of the patient.

Optimising antiemetic therapy: what are the problems and how can they be overcome?

BACKGROUND

Management of chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-induced emesis has improved significantly following the introduction of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonists. Prophylactic use of these agents is recommended for the prevention of both chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, given with a corticosteroid. Despite these advances, nausea and vomiting remain among the most feared and debilitating adverse effects of cytotoxic therapy. The shift towards a more elderly population of patients with cancer presents additional considerations for supportive care, with an emphasis on achieving control of nausea and vomiting, whilst minimising toxicity and avoiding drug-drug interactions. This review presents some of the key issues for consideration in optimising antiemetic therapy. The PubMed search engine was used to search for relevant literature (up to December 2004) and relevant international congress materials collected during 2003 and 2004.

SCOPE

While the early stages of nausea and vomiting are 5-HT-mediated, identification of a role for substance P in late emesis has led to the development of the NK1-receptor antagonist, aprepitant. As a new agent, the clinical profile of aprepitant is still being explored, including its interaction with concomitant medications. Patients who achieve good control of acute and late-acute nausea and vomiting have a reduced risk of experiencing delayed onset symptoms, emphasising the importance of prophylactic management with effective agents. Although the 5-HT3-receptor antagonists are widely considered to have equivalent efficacy, they vary in half-life and the nature of antagonism at receptors. Their metabolic profiles also differ, with cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism affecting their propensity for drug-drug interactions. Several sets of guidelines are available that outline recommendations for selection and use of antiemetic therapy. However, under-use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists has been reported in both the radiotherapy and chemotherapy settings, and some commonly used doses may be suboptimal.

CONCLUSION

In optimising antiemetic therapy, wider implementation of guidelines is desirable, as is consideration of each patient's individual needs. Safety and tolerability of supportive care medications should be a key consideration, and cardiovascular warnings and the possibility of drug-drug interactions should be given sufficient consideration, particularly in view of the older age of the population with cancer.

The effect of granisetron on in vitro metabolism of doxorubicin, irinotecan and etoposide

OBJECTIVE

Doxorubicin, irinotecan and etoposide are all associated with the debilitating side-effects of nausea and vomiting, thereby necessitating concomitant antiemetic therapy. However, this may increase the potential for drug-drug interactions by inhibition or induction of the cytochrome P450 enzymes. A study was undertaken to investigate the effects of the 5-HT(3) -receptor antagonist granisetron on the metabolism of doxorubicin, irinotecan and etoposide in vitro in human liver microsomal preparations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Doxorubicin, 20 microM, irinotecan, 10 microM, and etoposide, 50 microM, were incubated in the presence of granisetron, 0 nM, 20 nM, 200 nM and 2000 nM, in human liver microsomal preparations (250 microg). The levels of unchanged doxorubicin, irinotecan and etoposide in the incubation mixture were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Positive controls were ketoconazole, 20 microM, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A metabolism, for irinotecan and etoposide and quercitrin, 2 mM, a potent inhibitor of aldo-keto reductase, for doxorubicin.

RESULTS

In the absence of granisetron, unchanged doxorubicin, irinotecan and etoposide levels decreased by 34.2 +/- 5.5%, 21.3 +/- 2.9% and 13.4 +/- 1.6% of control, respectively. Ketoconazole prevented the breakdown of both irinotecan and etoposide, while quercitrin inhibited the breakdown of doxorubicin. Granisetron had no effect on the rate of reduction of doxorubicin, irinotecan or etoposide.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study suggest that granisetron neither inhibits nor induces the enzymes involved in the metabolism of doxorubicin, irinotecan or etoposide. Thus, granisetron can be used safely to treat nausea and vomiting induced by these agents with minimal risk of drug-drug interactions.

Management of dementia and acute confusional states in the perioperative period

The fourth edition of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders defines delirium as "a reversible state of confusion with a reduced level of consciousness manifest as an inability to focus, sustain or shift attention." Pharmacologic agents are important contributors to delirium in hospitalized elderly patients and those patients in the perioperative state. Delirium is especially problematic in patients who are given multiple agents, including hypnotics and analgesics. With an appropriate history, physical examination, and investigations, the causes of delirium can be categorized and are usually due to drug intoxication, metabolic disorders, infection, cardiac disorders, stroke, trauma, reactions to pain, or isolation.

Treatment implications for radiation-induced nausea and vomiting in specific patient groups

Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) affect the management and quality of life of cancer patients. Current guidelines for RINV prevention recommend prophylaxis with a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT(3))-receptor antagonist for patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic radiotherapy regimens. Randomised trials have compared such antagonists with conventional antiemetics, and have demonstrated their efficacy and safety. Special consideration is needed for antiemetic treatment in certain patient groups, particularly the elderly and those with renal or hepatic impairment. Radiation oncologists should be aware of the effect on antiemetic treatment of factors such as comorbid conditions (particularly cardiovascular disease), polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions, and choose the agent with the lowest potential for additional complications. The most appropriate antiemetic treatment to improve patient compliance and quality of life should ideally combine proven efficacy with uncomplicated administration and convenient dosing regimens.

Same Old Story? Do We Need to Modify Our Supportive Care Treatment of Elderly Cancer Patients? Focus on Antiemetics

The incidence of cancer is highest among individuals > or =65 years of age. Physiological changes associated with aging, such as cognitive decline, renal and hepatic dysfunction, can often complicate treatment options, and the elderly represent a particular challenge to the oncologist because of the high incidence of comorbidity and polypharmacy. Effective supportive care is of particular importance in elderly cancer patients as they may recover less satisfactorily if adverse events are poorly controlled. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that supportive care agents, for example, antiemetics, are underutilised in this patient population. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens are frequently associated with nausea and vomiting--symptoms that can have deleterious effects on vulnerable patients if not adequately managed. The serotonin 5-HT3-receptor antagonists represent a class of antiemetics that are currently regarded as the gold standard treatment for chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. They are recommended as first-line treatment for patients at moderate-to-high risk of emesis. However, antiemetic guidelines do not differentiate between these agents and, more importantly, do not contain specific recommendations for the elderly. Pharmacological differences exist between the commonly available 5-HT3-receptor antagonists (dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron, tropisetron and palonosetron), namely receptor sensitivity, duration of action, metabolism and tolerability profile. Of particular concern with prescriptions to elderly cancer patients is the convenience of once-daily administration, the low potential for drug-drug interactions and cardiovascular adverse effect profile. Moreover, the addition of the newly approved neurokinin NK1-receptor antagonist aprepitant to the choice of antiemetic regimen may complicate therapy and exacerbate the drug-drug interaction risk in elderly patients. Therefore, the use of antiemetics that are well tolerated and with the lowest risk of drug-drug interactions is imperative in this patient population and will enable even those patients with several comorbidities and a high level of polypharmacy to receive effective antiemetic therapy.

5-HT3-receptor antagonists and the cytochrome P450 system: clinical implications

Many patients with cancer receive multiple chemotherapy agents as well as other medications for coexisting medical conditions. Despite the introduction of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, the management of nausea and vomiting following cancer treatment and after cancer surgery remains complex, particularly when patients are receiving multiple prescription medications. As a drug class, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have good antiemetic efficacy and an improved safety profile over conventional antiemetics. Nevertheless, pharmacologic differences exist between these agents, such as their interaction with the metabolic cytochrome P450 system. This review examines the major metabolic differences between the most frequently prescribed 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron. The potential drug interactions that these differences may precipitate and key genetic interindividual variations in drug metabolism are also considered. To avoid or minimize potential drug interactions, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with the lowest risk of these interactions should be considered as first choice.