1
|
van Leeuwen GL, Kooijman MA, Schuurmann RCL, van Leeuwen BL, van Munster BC, van der Wal-Huisman H, de Vries JPPM. Health Literacy and Disease Knowledge of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease or Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Scoping Review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:935-947. [PMID: 38552837 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.03.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This scoping review summarises health literacy and disease knowledge in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and the influencing factors. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL covering the period January 2012 to October 2022. REVIEW METHODS This scoping review was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Inclusion criteria encompassed studies addressing health literacy, knowledge, perception, or awareness in patients with AAA or PAD. Two authors independently reviewed abstracts and full texts, resolving any discrepancies through discussion or by consulting a third author for consensus. All article types were included except letters, editorials, study protocols, reviews, and guidelines. No language restrictions were applied. Primary outcomes were health literacy and disease knowledge. Secondary outcomes were factors that could influence this. Quality assessment was done using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). RESULTS The review included 32 articles involving a total of 5 268 patients. Four articles reported health literacy and the rest disease knowledge. Ten studies (31%) met all quality criteria. Twenty studies were quantitative, eight were qualitative, and four were mixed methods studies. The review revealed inadequate health literacy in the majority of patients, and disease knowledge was relatively low among patients with AAA and PAD, with disparities in measures and assessment tools across studies. Factors influencing health literacy and disease knowledge included socioeconomic status, education, income, and employment. CONCLUSION This scoping review revealed low health literacy and low disease knowledge in patients with AAA and PAD. Standardised health literacy assessment may contribute to improve communication strategies and decision aids to enhance patients' understanding and engagement in healthcare decisions, however further research is needed to prove its merits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goudje L van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Maria-Annette Kooijman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Richte C L Schuurmann
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara L van Leeuwen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara C van Munster
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke van der Wal-Huisman
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jean-Paul P M de Vries
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lyu Y, Xu Q, Liu J. Exploring the medical decision-making patterns and influencing factors among the general Chinese public: a binary logistic regression analysis. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:887. [PMID: 38523310 PMCID: PMC10962172 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18338-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With the ongoing evolution of the healthcare system and shifts in cultural paradigms, there is a pressing need to delve into the medical decision-making behaviors of general Chinese public and understand their underlying motivations. This research seeks to elucidate the prevailing tendencies in these decision-making processes and to empirically validate the pivotal factors that shape their choices, offering valuable insights for healthcare policymakers and institutions. METHOD A comprehensive survey was administered to 2,696 Chinese residents to examine their medical decision-making patterns. These patterns were classified into two primary categories: Unilateral Decision-making (Doctor-dominant, Family-centric, and Patient-driven subtypes) and Collaborative Decision-making (Doctor-led, Doctor-Patient, Patient-Family, and Doctor-Patient-Family subtypes). Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to empirically pinpoint the significant factors influencing these decision-making frameworks. RESULTS The study's analysis reveals distinct preferences in medical decision-making among Chinese residents. In the Collaborative Decision-making category, chosen by 70.81% of participants, the subtypes are as follows: Doctor-led (29.90%), Doctor-Patient (13.54%), Patient-Family (2.93%), and Doctor-Patient-Family (24.44%). The Unilateral Decision-making, preferred by 29.19%, includes Doctor-dominant (23.22%), Family-centric (1.74%), and Patient-driven (4.23%) models. The preference for Collaborative Decision-making is associated with higher educational levels, specific marital statuses (particularly married but childless), and choices of rural residents' basic medical insurance or occupational basic medical insurance. In contrast, Unilateral Decision-making correlates with males, individuals with religious beliefs, certain occupational roles (like civil servants), and holders of commercial or publicly funded medical insurance. CONCLUSION This study elucidates the complex interplay of socio-cultural and individual determinants shaping medical decision-making in China. The findings reveal a marked inclination towards collaborative models, closely linked to educational level, marital status, and specific insurance types, reflecting an evolving trend towards participatory healthcare. Simultaneously, the persistence of unilateral models, influenced by gender, religious beliefs, and occupational roles, highlights the heterogeneity within Chinese healthcare preferences. These insights are crucial for policymakers and healthcare practitioners, underscoring the need for adaptable, culturally attuned healthcare frameworks that cater to this diversity, thereby enhancing patient engagement and healthcare efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuwen Lyu
- Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China
| | - Qian Xu
- School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China
| | - Junrong Liu
- Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nielsen LS, Primdahl J, Clausen B, Bremander A. A joint venture: patients' experiences with goal setting in rheumatology rehabilitation - a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38375771 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2313122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore how patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) perceive participation in the goal setting process prior to interdisciplinary rehabilitation. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 participants admitted to an interdisciplinary rehabilitation stay for patients with RMDs at two Danish rehabilitation centres. Qualitative content analysis was applied. RESULTS The participants perceived goal setting as a joint venture between two parties: the health professionals and the participant. Three categories were formed, which described both facilitators and barriers in the process. Responsibility for goal setting described the importance of shared responsibility, or health professionals as experts, taking full responsibility for goal setting. Equipped for goal setting included perceptions of being well prepared for the process, or considerations that goal setting was difficult because of a lack of information. An equal member of the team entailed both the feeling of being recognised as one in the team, or feeling like an outsider. CONCLUSION Goal setting is perceived as a challenge by some patients. Participation in goal setting depends on both the capacity and the opportunity to participate which are factors linked to patients' level of health literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisbeth Skovly Nielsen
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- The Danish Rheumatism Association's Rehabilitation Centre, Sano, Denmark
| | - Jette Primdahl
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Hospital of Southern Jutland, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | - Brian Clausen
- The Danish Rheumatism Association's Rehabilitation Centre, Sano, Denmark
| | - Ann Bremander
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Spenshult Research and Development Centre, Halmstad, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luck CC, Bass SB, Chertock Y, Kelly PJA, Singley K, Hoadley A, Hall MJ. Understanding perceptions of tumor genomic profile testing in Black/African American cancer patients in a qualitative study: the role of medical mistrust, provider communication, and family support. J Community Genet 2024:10.1007/s12687-024-00700-3. [PMID: 38366313 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00700-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Tumor genomic profiling (TGP) examines genes and somatic mutations specific to a patient's tumor to identify targets for cancer treatments but can also uncover secondary hereditary (germline) mutations. Most patients are unprepared to make complex decisions related to this information. Black/African American (AA) cancer patients are especially at risk because of lower health literacy, higher levels of medical mistrust, and lower awareness and knowledge of genetic testing. But little is known about their TGP attitudes or preferences. Five in-person focus groups were conducted with Black/AA cancer patients (N = 33) from an NCI-designated cancer center and an affiliated oncology unit in an urban safety-net hospital located in Philadelphia. Focus groups explored participants' understanding of TGP, cultural beliefs about genetics, medical mistrust, and how these perceptions informed decision-making. Participants were mostly female (81.8%), and one-third had some college education; mean age was 57 with a SD of 11.35. Of patients, 33.3% reported never having heard of TGP, and 48.5% were not aware of having had TGP as part of their cancer treatment. Qualitative analysis was guided by the principles of applied thematic analysis and yielded five themes: (1) mistrust of medical institutions spurring independent health-information seeking; (2) genetic testing results as both empowering and overwhelming; (3) how provider-patient communication can obviate medical mistrust; (4) how unsupportive patient-family communication undermines interest in secondary-hereditary risk communication; and (5) importance of developing centralized patient support systems outside of treatment decisions. Results improve understanding of how Black/AA patients perceive of TGP and how interventions can be developed to assist with making informed decisions about secondary hereditary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caseem C Luck
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
| | - Sarah Bauerle Bass
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Yana Chertock
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Patrick J A Kelly
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Katie Singley
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Ariel Hoadley
- Risk Communication Laboratory, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Rm 947, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA
| | - Michael J Hall
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hild S, Teigné D, Fairier D, Ruelle Y, Aubin-Auger I, Sidorkiewicz S, Citrini M, Gocko X, Cerisey C, Ferrat E, Rat C. Development and evaluation of a decision aid for women eligible for organized breast cancer screening according to international standards: A multi-method study. Breast 2024; 73:103613. [PMID: 38056169 PMCID: PMC10749284 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND and purpose: In France, women lack information to make a shared decision to start breast cancer screening. Decision aids are useful to facilitate this discussion, yet few meet international standards. The objective of this project was to build, validate and measure the quality of a decision aid for organized breast screening in France, in line with international standards, intended for both women and healthcare professionals. MATERIALS AND METHODS This mixed-methods study was conducted between January 2017 and June 2022. The prototype was developed from a qualitative study, systematic review and targeted literature review and alpha tested during two Delphi rounds. Readability was evaluated with the Flesch score and content with International Patient Decision Aid Standards Instrument (IPSASi). RESULTS An online decision aid, accessible at www.Discutons-mammo.fr, written in French was developed. The content included eligibility, information about breast screening the advantages and disadvantages of screening, patient preferences and a patient-based discussion guide using text, infographics, and videos. The Flesch readability test score was 65.4 and the IPDASi construct quality score was 176 out of 188. CONCLUSIONS This decision aid complies with IPDASi standards and could help women eligible for breast screening in France make a shared decision with a specialized healthcare professional about whether or not to participate in organized breast screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandrine Hild
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Nantes University, 1, rue Gaston Veil, 44035, Nantes, France.
| | - Delphine Teigné
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Nantes University, 1, rue Gaston Veil, 44035, Nantes, France; University Research Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
| | - Damien Fairier
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Nantes University, 1, rue Gaston Veil, 44035, Nantes, France; University Research Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
| | - Yannick Ruelle
- Department of General Practice, Sorbonne University Paris Nord, UR 3412, DUMG, F-93430, Villetaneuse, France.
| | | | | | - Marie Citrini
- Patient Perspective, Sorbonne University, Paris, Nord, France.
| | - Xavier Gocko
- University Jean Monnet of Saint Etienne, Department of Medicine, Saint Etienne, France.
| | | | - Emilie Ferrat
- University Paris-Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB, Equipe CEpiA, F-94010, Creteil, Paris, France.
| | - Cédric Rat
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Nantes University, 1, rue Gaston Veil, 44035, Nantes, France; National Institute for Health and Medical Research/INSERM U1302 Team 2, CRCINA, Nantes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Blanchette V, Maranda-Pelletier S, Bilodeau G, Giguere A. Factors influencing the engagement of older adults with neurocognitive disorders in the design of decision aids: A qualitative descriptive study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 119:108061. [PMID: 38035412 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors influencing the engagement of older adults with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) in the design of decision aids (DAs). METHODS We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with 23 older adults with NCDs who were accompanied by 27 caregivers. This is a secondary analysis of a published study to identify the features of DAs designed for this population and their caregivers. RESULTS Several behaviours and attitudes of caregivers and researchers hindered the older adults' engagement in the DA design process. Specific communication strategies can be employed to support their engagement and overcome the communication challenges inherent to this population, such as memory, attention, hearing, or visual impairments. Adopting the appropriate attitude, taking the time, and providing guidance to the older person can help them focus on the topic, while developing trust between participants is a facilitator to obtain their feedback. CONCLUSION Findings from this project could serve to inform the communication and co-design of DAs with older people with NCDs and their caregivers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Caregivers and researchers have key roles to play in facilitating communication with older persons with NCDs so they are empowered to help in co-designing DAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Blanchette
- VITAM - Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Human Kinetic and Podiatric Medicine, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada
| | - Sarah Maranda-Pelletier
- University Laval, Quebec City, Canada; School of Psychology, University Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Anik Giguere
- VITAM - Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maas L, Raskin N, van Onna M, Cornelissen D, Bours S, van der Weijden T, van den Bergh JP, van Oostwaard M, Wyers CE, Hiligsmann M, Boonen A. Development and usability of a decision aid to initiate anti-osteoporosis medication treatment in patients visiting the fracture liaison service with a recent fracture. Osteoporos Int 2024; 35:69-79. [PMID: 37733067 PMCID: PMC10786983 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06906-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
This study describes the development of a decision aid (DA), aimed at supporting patients in their decision whether to start anti-osteoporosis medication. People with recent fractures or osteoporosis and health professionals were supportive of the DA initiative. An experimental study been started to assess (cost-)effectiveness of the DA. PURPOSE At fracture liaison services (FLS), patients with a recent fracture ánd osteoporosis or a prevalent vertebral fracture are advised to start anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM). This study describes the development of a decision aid (DA) to support patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) in their decision about whether to start AOM. METHODS The DA was developed according to International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS). A systematic procedure was chosen including scope, design, prototype development, and alpha testing. A previously developed DA for women with osteoporosis was used as a basis. Furthermore, input from literature searches, the Dutch guideline on management of osteoporosis, and from people with a fracture or osteoporosis was used. The updated DA was evaluated during alpha testing. RESULTS The DA facilitates the decision of patients whether to initiate AOM treatment and provides information on fractures and osteoporosis, general risk factors that increase the likelihood of a subsequent fracture, the role of lifestyle, personalized risk considerations of a subsequent fracture with and without AOM treatment, and AOM options and their characteristics in an option grid. Alpha testing with 15 patients revealed that patient preferences and needs were adequately presented, and several suggestions for improvement (e.g. adding more specific information, simplifying terminology, improving icon use) were accounted for. Participants from the alpha testing recommended use of the DA during outpatient visits. CONCLUSION Professionals and persons with osteoporosis were supportive of the proposed DA and its usability. The DA could help in a shared decision-making process between patients and HCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Maas
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Nele Raskin
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes van Onna
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis Cornelissen
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandrine Bours
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Joop P van den Bergh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Marsha van Oostwaard
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline E Wyers
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Richter R, Jansen J, Bongaerts I, Damman O, Rademakers J, van der Weijden T. Communication of benefits and harms in shared decision making with patients with limited health literacy: A systematic review of risk communication strategies. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 116:107944. [PMID: 37619376 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Risk communication (RC), as part of shared decision making, is challenging with people with limited health literacy (LHL). We aim to provide an overview of strategies to communicate benefits and harms of diagnostic and treatment options to this group. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cinahl and PsycInfo. We included 28 studies on RC in informed/shared decision making without restriction to a health setting or condition and using a broad conceptualization of health literacy. Two researchers independently selected studies and one researcher performed data extraction. We descriptively compared findings for people with LHL towards recommendations for RC. RESULTS Health literacy levels varied in the included studies. Most studies used experimental designs, primarily on visual RC. Findings show verbal RC alone should be avoided. Framing of risk information influences risk perception (less risky when positively framed, riskier when negatively framed). Most studies recommended the use of icon arrays. Graph literacy should be considered when using visual RC. CONCLUSIONS The limited available evidence suggests that recommended RC strategies seem mainly to be valid for people with LHL, but more research is required. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS More qualitative research involving people with LHL is needed to gain further in-depth insights into optimal RC strategies. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO ID 275022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy Richter
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Iris Bongaerts
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Olga Damman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jany Rademakers
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dennison Himmelfarb CR, Beckie TM, Allen LA, Commodore-Mensah Y, Davidson PM, Lin G, Lutz B, Spatz ES. Shared Decision-Making and Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2023; 148:912-931. [PMID: 37577791 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
Shared decision-making is increasingly embraced in health care and recommended in cardiovascular guidelines. Patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-clinician communication, and models of patient-centered care are critical to improve health outcomes and to promote equity, but formal models and evaluation in cardiovascular care are nascent. Shared decision-making promotes equity by involving clinicians and patients, sharing the best available evidence, and recognizing the needs, values, and experiences of individuals and their families when faced with the task of making decisions. Broad endorsement of shared decision-making as a critical component of high-quality, value-based care has raised our awareness, although uptake in clinical practice remains suboptimal for a range of patient, clinician, and system issues. Strategies effective in promoting shared decision-making include educating clinicians on communication techniques, engaging multidisciplinary medical teams, incorporating trained decision coaches, and using tools (ie, patient decision aids) at appropriate literacy and numeracy levels to support patients in their cardiovascular decisions. This scientific statement shines a light on the limited but growing body of evidence of the impact of shared decision-making on cardiovascular outcomes and the potential of shared decision-making as a driver of health equity so that everyone has just opportunities. Multilevel solutions must align to address challenges in policies and reimbursement, system-level leadership and infrastructure, clinician training, access to decision aids, and patient engagement to fully support patients and clinicians to engage in the shared decision-making process and to drive equity and improvement in cardiovascular outcomes.
Collapse
|
10
|
Toapanta N, Salas-Gama K, Pantoja PE, Soler MJ. The role of low health literacy in shared treatment decision-making in patients with kidney failure. Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:i4-i11. [PMID: 37711638 PMCID: PMC10497376 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The classic paternalist medicine in nephrology has been modified to a shared decision-making model that clearly offers a benefit in patients with kidney disease. One of the cornerstones of shared treatment decision in patients with kidney failure is the understanding of kidney disease. As kidney disease is silent until advanced stages and is also an entity with a complex pathophysiology with little knowledge in the general population, its presence and understanding are difficult for most people. Health literacy (HL) plays a crucial role in the care of patients with kidney disease and the shared treatment decision. Limited HL has been associated with inefficient use of health services, non-compliance of medications, worse quality of life and increased mortality. In this review, we will address the importance of low HL in nephrology in terms of diagnosis, measurement, its effect on shared decision-making and how to increase it in people with kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Néstor Toapanta
- Department of Nephrology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karla Salas-Gama
- Quality, Process and Innovation Direction, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Health Services Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Hospital University, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- PhD candidate at the Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health program, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Percy Efrain Pantoja
- Quality, Process and Innovation Direction, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Health Services Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Hospital University, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María José Soler
- Department of Nephrology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cellina M, Cacioppa LM, Cè M, Chiarpenello V, Costa M, Vincenzo Z, Pais D, Bausano MV, Rossini N, Bruno A, Floridi C. Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening: The Future Is Now. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4344. [PMID: 37686619 PMCID: PMC10486721 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer has one of the worst morbidity and fatality rates of any malignant tumour. Most lung cancers are discovered in the middle and late stages of the disease, when treatment choices are limited, and patients' survival rate is low. The aim of lung cancer screening is the identification of lung malignancies in the early stage of the disease, when more options for effective treatments are available, to improve the patients' outcomes. The desire to improve the efficacy and efficiency of clinical care continues to drive multiple innovations into practice for better patient management, and in this context, artificial intelligence (AI) plays a key role. AI may have a role in each process of the lung cancer screening workflow. First, in the acquisition of low-dose computed tomography for screening programs, AI-based reconstruction allows a further dose reduction, while still maintaining an optimal image quality. AI can help the personalization of screening programs through risk stratification based on the collection and analysis of a huge amount of imaging and clinical data. A computer-aided detection (CAD) system provides automatic detection of potential lung nodules with high sensitivity, working as a concurrent or second reader and reducing the time needed for image interpretation. Once a nodule has been detected, it should be characterized as benign or malignant. Two AI-based approaches are available to perform this task: the first one is represented by automatic segmentation with a consequent assessment of the lesion size, volume, and densitometric features; the second consists of segmentation first, followed by radiomic features extraction to characterize the whole abnormalities providing the so-called "virtual biopsy". This narrative review aims to provide an overview of all possible AI applications in lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Cellina
- Radiology Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20121 Milano, Italy;
| | - Laura Maria Cacioppa
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.M.C.); (N.R.); (A.B.)
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cè
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Vittoria Chiarpenello
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Marco Costa
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Zakaria Vincenzo
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Daniele Pais
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Maria Vittoria Bausano
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Nicolò Rossini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.M.C.); (N.R.); (A.B.)
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.M.C.); (N.R.); (A.B.)
| | - Chiara Floridi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.M.C.); (N.R.); (A.B.)
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Division of Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Murugesu L, Damman OC, Timmermans DRM, de Wit S, Nieuwenhuijze M, Smets EMA, Fransen MP. Health literate-sensitive shared decision-making in maternity care: needs for support among maternity care professionals in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:594. [PMID: 37605153 PMCID: PMC10440871 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05915-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) in maternity care is challenging when clients have insufficient health literacy (HL) skills. This study gained insight in how professionals apply HL-sensitive SDM in Dutch maternity care and their needs for support therein. METHODS Maternity care professionals (n = 30) completed a survey on SDM and the role of HL. Midwives (n = 13) were observed during simulated conversations discussing pain relief options and interviewed afterwards. The client-actors were instructed to portrait specific inadequate HL skills. Observation items focused on adapting communication to HL, and SDM (OPTION-5). RESULTS In the survey, professionals indicated experiencing most challenges when estimating clients' information comprehension. Observations showed that most midwives created choice awareness and informed clients about options, whereas exploring preferences and actual decision-making together with clients were observed less frequently. Their perceived HL-related obstacles and needs for support related to clients' information comprehension. In the interviews, midwives reported putting much effort into explaining available options in maternity care, but also that decisions about pain relief are often postponed until the moment of labour. CONCLUSION Professionals' self-reported needs focus on clients' information comprehension. However, observations indicate that it is not the stage of informing, but rather value clarification and actual decision-making that need improvement in HL-sensitive SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laxsini Murugesu
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Olga C Damman
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne de Wit
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Universiteitssingel 60, Maastricht, 6229 ER, the Netherlands
- CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Medical Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam P Fransen
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Van Bostraeten P, Aertgeerts B, Bekkering G, Delvaux N, Haers A, Vanheeswyck M, Vandekendelaere A, Van der Auwera N, Dijckmans C, Ostyn E, Soontjens W, Matthysen W, Schenk N, Mertens L, Jaeken J, Agoritsas T, Vermandere M. Digital encounter decision aids linked to clinical practice guidelines: results from user testing SHARE-IT decision aids in primary care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:97. [PMID: 37217915 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02186-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Encounter decision aids (EDAs) are tools that can support shared decision making (SDM), up to the clinical encounter. However, adoption of these tools has been limited, as they are hard to produce, to keep up-to-date, and are not available for many decisions. The MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation has created a new generation of decision aids that are generically produced along digitally structured guidelines and evidence summaries, in an electronic authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp). We explored general practitioners' (GPs) and patients' experiences with five selected decision aids linked to BMJ Rapid Recommendations in primary care. METHODS We applied a qualitative user testing design to evaluate user experiences for both GPs and patients. We translated five EDAs relevant to primary care, and observed the clinical encounters of 11 GPs when they used the EDA with their patients. We conducted a semi-structured interview with each patient after the consultation and a think-aloud interview with each GPs after multiple consultations. We used the Qualitative Analysis Guide (QUAGOL) for data analysis. RESULTS Direct observations and user testing analysis of 31 clinical encounters showed an overall positive experience. The EDAs created better involvement in decision making and resulted in meaningful insights for patients and clinicians. The design and its interactive, multilayered structure made the tool enjoyable and well-organized. Difficult terminology, scales and numbers hindered understanding of certain information, which was sometimes perceived as too specialized or even intimidating. GPs thought the EDA was not suitable for every patient. They perceived a learning curve was required and the need for time investment was a concern. The EDAs were considered trustworthy as they were provided by a credible source. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that EDAs can be useful tools in primary care by supporting actual shared decision making and enhancing patient involvement. The graphical approach and clear representation help patients better understand their options. To overcome barriers such as health literacy and GPs attitudes, effort is still needed to make the EDAs as accessible, intuitive and inclusive as possible through use of plain language, uniform design, rapid access and training. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study protocol was approved by the The Research Ethics Committee UZ/KU Leuven (Belgium) on 31-10-2019 with reference number MP011977.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Van Bostraeten
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Geertruida Bekkering
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Delvaux
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anna Haers
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matisse Vanheeswyck
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexander Vandekendelaere
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Niels Van der Auwera
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Dijckmans
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elise Ostyn
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Willem Soontjens
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wout Matthysen
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Noémie Schenk
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lien Mertens
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasmien Jaeken
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Agoritsas
- Division General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mieke Vermandere
- Academic Center for General Practice, department of PH&PC, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chettri SR, Pignone MP, Deal AM, Sepucha KR, Blizard LB, Huh R, Liu YJ, Ubel PA, Lee CN. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction: Does the Quality of Decisions Matter? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1891-1900. [PMID: 36437408 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12785-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about how the quality of decisions influences patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We hypothesized that higher decision quality for breast reconstruction would be independently associated with better PROs. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Patients were enrolled before surgery and followed for 18 months. We used BREAST-Q scales to measure PROs and linear regression models to explore the relationship between decision quality (based on knowledge and preference concordance) and PROs. Final models were adjusted for baseline BREAST-Q score, radiation, chemotherapy, and major complications. RESULTS The cohort included 101 patients who completed baseline and 18-month surveys. Breast reconstruction was independently associated with higher satisfaction with breasts (β = 20.2, p = 0.0002), psychosocial well-being (β = 14.4, p = 0.006), and sexual well-being (β = 15.7, p = 0.007), but not physical well-being. Patients who made a high-quality decision had similar PROs as patients who did not. Among patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction, higher decision quality was associated with lower psychosocial well-being (β = -14.2, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Breast reconstruction was associated with better PROs in some but not all domains. Overall, making a high-quality decision was not associated with better PROs. However, patients who did not have reconstruction had a trend toward better well-being after making a high-quality decision, whereas patients who did have reconstruction had poorer well-being after making a high-quality decision. Additional research on the relationship between decision quality and PROs is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shibani R Chettri
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Michael P Pignone
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Karen R Sepucha
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lillian B Blizard
- Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ruth Huh
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Peter A Ubel
- Fuqua Business School, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Clara N Lee
- The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA. .,The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Garrett WS, Verma A, Thomas D, Appel JM, Mirza O. Racial Disparities in Psychiatric Decisional Capacity Consultations. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74:10-16. [PMID: 36004436 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this study, the authors examined potential disparities and biases in the placement and outcomes of decisional capacity evaluations across races, controlling for patient characteristics. METHODS The authors reviewed 181 patient decisional capacity consultations requested for the consultation-liaison psychiatry service at a tertiary care medical center from 2018 to 2019. The racial distribution of patients in these consultations was compared with the racial distribution of hospital inpatient admissions from 2018 to 2019. The authors analyzed patient outcomes by using logistic regression that controlled for race, gender, age, education, primary insurance, type of capacity assessment, and psychiatric diagnosis. RESULTS Decisional capacity consultations were placed disproportionately for Black (43% of consultations vs. 18% of total admissions) and Hispanic patients (26% of consultations vs. 21% of admissions) compared with White and Asian patients. Among 130 patients with a capacity determination, 95 (53% of total sample) were determined not to have capacity, an outcome that did not differ by race but was more likely to occur among patients diagnosed as having delirium. Sixty-seven patients with no capacity (37% of total sample) experienced a change in treatment, an outcome that was less likely to occur among Hispanic patients in the univariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Significant racial disparities were observed during the placement of a decisional capacity consultation. These findings reveal the potential biases introduced with both the initial challenge to a patient's capacity and the subsequent outcomes of the consultation. As such, the balance of risk versus benefit or utility of these consultations in certain populations must be carefully considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William S Garrett
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (all authors) and Department of Psychiatry, NYC Health + Hospitals/Harlem (Mirza), New York City; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore (Thomas)
| | - Anita Verma
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (all authors) and Department of Psychiatry, NYC Health + Hospitals/Harlem (Mirza), New York City; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore (Thomas)
| | - Daniel Thomas
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (all authors) and Department of Psychiatry, NYC Health + Hospitals/Harlem (Mirza), New York City; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore (Thomas)
| | - Jacob M Appel
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (all authors) and Department of Psychiatry, NYC Health + Hospitals/Harlem (Mirza), New York City; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore (Thomas)
| | - Omar Mirza
- Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (all authors) and Department of Psychiatry, NYC Health + Hospitals/Harlem (Mirza), New York City; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore (Thomas)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Westerbeek L, de Bruijn GJ, van Weert HC, Abu-Hanna A, Medlock S, van Weert JC. General Practitioners’ needs and wishes for clinical decision support Systems: A focus group study. Int J Med Inform 2022; 168:104901. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
17
|
Vogels-Broeke M, Cellissen E, Daemers D, Budé L, de Vries R, Nieuwenhuijze M. Women's decision-making autonomy in Dutch maternity care. Birth 2022; 50:384-395. [PMID: 35977033 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A positive childbirth experience is an important outcome of maternity care. A significant component of a positive birth experience is the ability to exercise autonomy in decision-making. In this study, we explore women's reports of their autonomy during conversations about their care with maternity care practitioners during pregnancy and childbirth. METHOD Data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey of women living in The Netherlands that asked about their experiences during pregnancy and childbirth, including their role in conversations concerning decisions about their care. RESULTS A total of 3494 women were included in this study. Most women scored high on autonomy in decision-making conversations. During the latter stage of pregnancy (32+ weeks) and in childbirth, women reported significantly lower levels of autonomy in their care conversations with obstetricians as compared with midwives. Linear regression analyses showed that women's perception of personal treatment increased women's reported autonomy in their conversations with both midwives and obstetricians. Almost half (49.1%) of the women who had at least one intervention during birth reported pressure to accept or submit to that intervention. This was indicated by 48.3% of women with induced labor, 47.3% who had an instrumental vaginal birth, 45.2% whose labor was augmented, and 41.9% of women who had a cesarean birth. CONCLUSIONS In general, women's sense of autonomy in decision-making conversations during prenatal care and birth is high, but there is room for improvement, and this appeared most notably in conversations with obstetricians. Women's sense of autonomy can be enhanced with personal treatment, including shared decision-making and the avoidance of pressuring women to accept interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike Vogels-Broeke
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Cellissen
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Darie Daemers
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Luc Budé
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond de Vries
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cork T, White S. Exploring community pharmacists' use of health literacy interventions in their everyday practice. Res Social Adm Pharm 2022; 18:3948-3952. [PMID: 35810054 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited health literacy often results in people inadequately understanding medicines-related information and subsequently not taking medicines as prescribed. Using health literacy interventions is important for community pharmacists, as they are increasingly managing long-term conditions. However, there appear to be no previous studies of community pharmacists' everyday use of health literacy interventions in the UK. OBJECTIVES To explore UK community pharmacists' perspectives on the usability of health literacy interventions in their everyday practice. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants, following attendance at health literacy training that included practicing the use of four health literacy interventions (Teach-Back, Chunk and Check, Simple Language and visual aids) and two months experience of attempting to use them in their everyday practice. Participants were pharmacists from community pharmacies in Staffordshire, England who were invited to participate by an email sent to the pharmacy. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Analysis technique. RESULTS Four themes emerged from 11 interviews undertaken: intervention appeal, limitations, adaptations and continued use. Participants reported using all four health literacy interventions in their everyday practice but Teach-Back appeared to be favoured most. Most participants talked about practicing Teach-Back before using it with patients but described it as useable with patients of all ages, without being prohibitively time consuming. Chunk and Check seemed to be viewed as a type of Teach-Back, whilst visual aids were reported as being used in conjunction with Teach Back rather than as a standalone intervention. Participants reported that Simple Language was an easy concept but easily 'slipped back' into medical jargon and were challenged to use simple enough words. All participants said they would continue to use all four health literacy interventions. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that with training, community pharmacists can successfully incorporate these four health literacy interventions into their everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Cork
- Keele University, Pharmacy Dept. Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
| | - Simon White
- Keele University, Pharmacy Dept. Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tracy MC, Thompson R, Muscat DM, Bonner C, Hoffmann T, McCaffery K, Shepherd HL. Implementing shared decision-making in Australia. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 171:15-21. [PMID: 35562274 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Person-centred care (PCC) and shared decision-making (SDM) are part of national clinical standards for an increasing number of areas of health care delivery. In addition to existing standards for accrediting hospitals, day surgery facilities, public dental services and medical education in Australia, new standards governing primary health care and digital mental health services have been added. Implementation and measurement of PCC and SDM to comply with standards, and training of health professionals, remain challenges for the Australian health sector. Consumer involvement in health research, policy and clinical service governance continues to increase and the National Health and Medical Research Council has begun to encourage consumer and community involvement in health and medical research. This increased consumer engagement and moves towards more PCC provision is reflected in a focus on encouraging patients to ask questions during their clinical care and supports improvements in consumer health literacy. SDM support tools are now being culturally adapted whilst a need for more systemic approaches to their development and implementation persists. With increasing resources and tools for all aspects of PCC and SDM challenges to find sustainable solutions to ensure tools are kept up to date with the best available evidence remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite C Tracy
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Danielle Marie Muscat
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tammy Hoffmann
- Centre for Evidence-Informed Health Decisions in the Institute of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Raymer DS, Allen LA, Chaussee EL, McIlvennan CK, Thompson JS, Fairclough DL, Dunlay SM, Matlock DD, LaRue SJ. Health Literacy in Patients Considering a Left Ventricular Assist Device: Findings from the DECIDE-LVAD Trial. J Card Fail 2022; 28:1318-1325. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
21
|
Treffalls JA, Treffalls RN, Harbin Z, Clothier W, Tolbert PH, Yan Q, Davies MG. Quality Analysis of Online Resources for Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 83:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.12.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
22
|
Ossin DA, Carter EC, Cartwright R, Violette PD, Iyer S, Klein GT, Senapati S, Klaassen Z, Botros SM. Shared decision-making in urology and female pelvic floor medicine and reconstructive surgery. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 19:161-170. [PMID: 34931058 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00551-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is a hallmark of patient-centred care that uses informed consent to help guide patients with making complex health-care decisions. In SDM, patients and providers work together to determine the best course of action based on both the current available evidence and the patient's values and preferences. SDM not only provides a framework for the legal and ethical obligations providers need to fulfil for informed consent, but also leads to improved knowledge of treatment options and satisfaction of decision-making for patients. Tools such as decision aids have been developed to support SDM for complex decisions. Several decision aids are available for use in the field of urology and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, but these decision aids are also associated with barriers to SDM implementation including patient, provider and systematic challenges. However, solutions to such barriers to SDM include continued development of SDM tools to improve patient engagement, expand training of providers in SDM communication models and a process to encourage implementation of SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Ossin
- Division of Urogynecology, Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, Joe R & Theresa Long School of Medicine, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| | - Emily C Carter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK
| | - Rufus Cartwright
- Department of Urogynaecology, LNWH NHS Trust, London, UK & Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Philippe D Violette
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (HEI) and Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shilpa Iyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Geraldine T Klein
- Department of Urology Eisenhower Medical Associates, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
| | - Sangeeta Senapati
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northshore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.,Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Zachary Klaassen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Augusta University-Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Sylvia M Botros
- Division of Urogynecology, Department of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, Joe R & Theresa Long School of Medicine, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wheldon CW, Garg A, Galvin AM, Moore JD, Thompson EL. Decision support needs for shared clinical decision-making regarding HPV vaccination among adults 27-45 years of age. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:3079-3085. [PMID: 33980398 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identify HPV information needs and shared clinical decision-making preferences among adults 27-45 and describe differences in needs and preferences among underserved and vulnerable populations. METHODS Participants 27-45 years old with no history of HPV vaccination completed a cross-sectional web-based survey between April-May 2020 (N = 702). Preferred role in shared clinical decision making was described across demographic groups and sociodemographic correlates of HPV vaccine information needs. RESULTS Most (77.6%) reported a preference to make a medical decision on their own or after consulting with a healthcare provider, while the remaining respondents preferred to make a joint decision (17.0%) or for their doctor to make the decision (5.4%). Over 80% needed more information about safety, effectiveness, personal benefit, provider recommendation, side effects, and risks. Education was the strongest demographic factors associated with higher information needs (p<0.05). CONCLUSION The majority of individuals across demographic groups were individually focused with regard to their healthcare decisions and wanted more information about HPV vaccine safety, side effects, and risks, in addition to personalized information about benefits from HPV vaccination. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Patient-centered interventions are needed to engage adults in shared decision-making regarding HPV vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Wheldon
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave. Ritter Hall Annex 9th Floor, Room 955, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA.
| | - Ashvita Garg
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd Fort Worth, TX 76107 USA.
| | - Annalynn M Galvin
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd Fort Worth, TX 76107 USA.
| | - Jonathan D Moore
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd Fort Worth, TX 76107 USA.
| | - Erika L Thompson
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd Fort Worth, TX 76107 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Role of weight bias and patient-physician communication in the underutilization of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021; 17:1926-1932. [PMID: 34429250 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A growing body of evidence supports the efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery for clinically severe obesity. Despite this empirical support, bariatric surgery remains profoundly underutilized. The reasons for underutilization are likely multifactorial, including health insurance coverage and benefits design, lack of awareness about bariatric surgery by patients, and anecdotal concerns about safety. We believe that there are two other factors-the occurrence of weight stigma and bias and suboptimal communication between patients and providers-that also serve as barriers to greater utilization. The article reviews the existing literature related to these two factors. The review also highlights the science of shared medical decision-making as a potential strategy to promote appropriate conversations between patients and providers, both surgical and nonsurgical, about the efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery. Shared medical decision-making is used in other areas where complex medical decisions are required. We believe that it has great potential to contribute to the increased utilization for the millions of individuals who could benefit from bariatric surgery.
Collapse
|
25
|
Ten Haaf K, van der Aalst CM, de Koning HJ, Kaaks R, Tammemägi MC. Personalising lung cancer screening: An overview of risk-stratification opportunities and challenges. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:250-263. [PMID: 33783822 PMCID: PMC8251929 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Randomised clinical trials have shown the efficacy of computed tomography lung cancer screening, initiating discussions on whether and how to implement population‐based screening programs. Due to smoking behaviour being the primary risk‐factor for lung cancer and part of the criteria for determining screening eligibility, lung cancer screening is inherently risk‐based. In fact, the selection of high‐risk individuals has been shown to be essential in implementing lung cancer screening in a cost‐effective manner. Furthermore, studies have shown that further risk‐stratification may improve screening efficiency, allow personalisation of the screening interval and reduce health disparities. However, implementing risk‐based lung cancer screening programs also requires overcoming a number of challenges. There are indications that risk‐based approaches can negatively influence the trade‐off between individual benefits and harms if not applied thoughtfully. Large‐scale implementation of targeted, risk‐based screening programs has been limited thus far. Consequently, questions remain on how to efficiently identify and invite high‐risk individuals from the general population. Finally, while risk‐based approaches may increase screening program efficiency, efficiency should be balanced with the overall impact of the screening program. In this review, we will address the opportunities and challenges in applying risk‐stratification in different aspects of lung cancer screening programs, as well as the balance between screening program efficiency and impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Ten Haaf
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn M van der Aalst
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC) Heidelberg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin C Tammemägi
- Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Nutbeam D, Trevena L, McCaffery KJ. Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:521-524. [PMID: 32472490 PMCID: PMC7878628 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05912-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Research into health literacy and shared decision-making has largely developed along parallel, but distinct lines over the past two decades. There is little evidence that the concepts and related practice have intersected except in the most functional way, for example, to simplify shared decision-making tools by improving readability scores of decision aids. This paper presents an integrated model to strengthen and sustain patient engagement in health care by drawing on the strengths of both concepts. This includes addressing patients' skills and capacities, alongside modifications to written and verbal information. We propose an expanded model of shared decision-making which incorporates health literacy concepts and promotes two-tiered intervention methods to improve the targeting and personalization of communication and support the development of transferable health literacy skills among patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle M Muscat
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Heather L Shepherd
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Don Nutbeam
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, The University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Wiser Healthcare, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Murugesu L, Damman OC, Derksen ME, Timmermans DRM, de Jonge A, Smets EMA, Fransen MP. Women's Participation in Decision-Making in Maternity Care: A Qualitative Exploration of Clients' Health Literacy Skills and Needs for Support. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18031130. [PMID: 33514070 PMCID: PMC7908258 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Shared decision-making requires adequate functional health literacy (HL) skills from clients to understand information, as well as interactive and critical HL skills to obtain, appraise and apply information about available options. This study aimed to explore women's HL skills and needs for support regarding shared decision-making in maternity care. In-depth interviews were held among women in Dutch maternity care who scored low (n = 10) and high (n = 13) on basic health literacy screening test(s). HL skills and perceived needs for support were identified through thematic analysis. Women appeared to be highly engaged in the decision-making process. They mentioned searching and selecting general information about pregnancy and labor, constructing their preferences based on their own pre-existing knowledge and experiences and by discussions with partners and significant others. However, women with low basic skills and primigravida perceived difficulties in finding reliable information, understanding probabilistic information, constructing preferences based on benefit/harm information and preparing for consultations. Women also emphasized dealing with uncertainties, changing circumstances of pregnancy and labor, and emotions. Maternity care professionals could further support clients by guiding them towards reliable information. To facilitate participation in decision-making, preparing women for consultations (e.g., agenda setting) and supporting them in a timely manner to understand benefit/harm information seem important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laxsini Murugesu
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.E.D.); (M.P.F.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-2056-676-33
| | - Olga C. Damman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (O.C.D.); (D.R.M.T.)
| | - Marloes E. Derksen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.E.D.); (M.P.F.)
| | - Danielle R. M. Timmermans
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (O.C.D.); (D.R.M.T.)
| | - Ank de Jonge
- Department of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Ellen M. A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Mirjam P. Fransen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.E.D.); (M.P.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shersher V, Haines TP, Sturgiss L, Weller C, Williams C. Definitions and use of the teach-back method in healthcare consultations with patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:118-129. [PMID: 32798080 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review and synthesise definitions of the teach-back method in the literature. The second aim is to synthesise the barriers, facilitators and perceptions of teach-back use in healthcare consultations with patients. METHODS A systematic review and thematic synthesis following Braun and Clarke's method. RESULTS The primary search found 1429 citations and the secondary search added 221 citations. Screening identified 66 citations eligible for data extraction. We contrasted and synthesised operational definitions of the teach-back method. The synthesis generated seven themes related to healthcare provider (HCP) and patient perceptions of teach-back (effectiveness, stigma and time-related perceptions), the universal application of teach-back, patient health outcomes and healthcare provider training. DISCUSSION Operational definitions of the teach-back method varied in the literature and contained implied steps. HCPs and patient perceptions of teach-back operated as both enablers and barriers to its use. HCPs training programs for the teach-back method were identified as beneficial for altering HCPs perceptions about the method and increased its use with patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Standardising operational definitions of the teach-back method can support replicability of research and enhance HCPs communication skills training programs. HCPs training on teach-back use can support the increased use of the technique with broader patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violetta Shersher
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, VIC, 3199, Australia.
| | - Terry P Haines
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, VIC, 3199, Australia
| | - Liz Sturgiss
- Department of General Practice, School of Primary and Allied Healthcare, Monash University, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Carolina Weller
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Cylie Williams
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, VIC, 3199, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Durand MA, Yen RW, O'Malley AJ, Schubbe D, Politi MC, Saunders CH, Dhage S, Rosenkranz K, Margenthaler J, Tosteson ANA, Crayton E, Jackson S, Bradley A, Walling L, Marx CM, Volk RJ, Sepucha K, Ozanne E, Percac-Lima S, Bergin E, Goodwin C, Miller C, Harris C, Barth RJ, Aft R, Feldman S, Cyr AE, Angeles CV, Jiang S, Elwyn G. What matters most: Randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery conversation aids across socioeconomic strata. Cancer 2020; 127:422-436. [PMID: 33170506 PMCID: PMC7983934 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with early‐stage breast cancer are more likely to report poorer physician‐patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery, lower involvement in decision making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. The objective of this study was to understand how to support women across socioeconomic strata in making breast cancer surgery choices. Methods We conducted a 3‐arm (Option Grid, Picture Option Grid, and usual care), multisite, randomized controlled superiority trial with surgeon‐level randomization. The Option Grid (text only) and Picture Option Grid (pictures plus text) conversation aids were evidence‐based summaries of available breast cancer surgery options on paper. Decision quality (primary outcome), treatment choice, treatment intention, shared decision making (SDM), anxiety, quality of life, decision regret, and coordination of care were measured from T0 (pre‐consultation) to T5 (1‐year after surgery. Results Sixteen surgeons saw 571 of 622 consented patients. Patients in the Picture Option Grid arm (n = 248) had higher knowledge (immediately after the visit [T2] and 1 week after surgery or within 2 weeks of the first postoperative visit [T3]), an improved decision process (T2 and T3), lower decision regret (T3), and more SDM (observed and self‐reported) compared to usual care (n = 257). Patients in the Option Grid arm (n = 66) had higher decision process scores (T2 and T3), better coordination of care (12 weeks after surgery or within 2 weeks of the second postoperative visit [T4]), and more observed SDM (during the surgical visit [T1]) compared to usual care arm. Subgroup analyses suggested that the Picture Option Grid had more impact among women of lower SES and health literacy. Neither intervention affected concordance, treatment choice, or anxiety. Conclusions Paper‐based conversation aids improved key outcomes over usual care. The Picture Option Grid had more impact among disadvantaged patients. Lay Summary The objective of this study was to understand how to help women with lower incomes or less formal education to make breast cancer surgery choices. Compared with usual care, a conversation aid with pictures and text led to higher knowledge. It improved the decision process and shared decision making (SDM) and lowered decision regret. A text‐only conversation aid led to an improved decision process, more coordinated care, and higher SDM compared to usual care. The conversation aid with pictures was more helpful for women with lower income or less formal education. Conversation aids with pictures and text helped women make better breast cancer surgery choices.
A paper‐based pictorial conversation aid (pictures plus text) is beneficial to all patients with early‐stage breast cancer and particularly to disadvantaged patients. Between‐surgeon variation suggests that the maximal impact of such interventions requires standardized physician training combined with these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Anne Durand
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,UMR 1027 Team EQUITY, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | - Renata W Yen
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - A James O'Malley
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Danielle Schubbe
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Mary C Politi
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Catherine H Saunders
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Shubhada Dhage
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Julie Margenthaler
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Eloise Crayton
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sherrill Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ann Bradley
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Linda Walling
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Christine M Marx
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert J Volk
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Karen Sepucha
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elissa Ozanne
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- Massachusetts General Hospital Chelsea HealthCare Center, Chelsea, Massachusetts
| | | | - Courtney Goodwin
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Camille Harris
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Rebecca Aft
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Amy E Cyr
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Shuai Jiang
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Barton JL, Kunneman M, Hargraves I, LeBlanc A, Brito JP, Scholl I, Montori VM. Envisioning Shared Decision Making: A Reflection for the Next Decade. MDM Policy Pract 2020; 5:2381468320963781. [PMID: 35187247 PMCID: PMC8855401 DOI: 10.1177/2381468320963781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the evolving evidence in favor of shared decision making (SDM) and of decades-long calls for its adoption, SDM remains uncommon in routine care. Reflecting on this lack of progress, we sought to reimagine the future of SDM and the path to take us there. In late 2017, a multidisciplinary and international group of six researchers were challenged by a senior SDM scholar to envision the future and, based on a provocatively critical view of the present, to write letters to themselves from the year 2028. Letters were exchanged and discussed electronically. The group then met in person to discuss the letters. Since the letters painted a dystopian picture, they triggered questions about the nature of SDM, who should benefit from SDM, how to measure its contribution to care, and what new ways can be invented to design and test interventions to implement SDM in routine care. Through contrasting the purposefully generated dystopias with an ideal future for SDM, we generated reflections on a research agenda for SDM. These reflections hinged on recognizing SDM's contributing to care, that is, as a way to advance the problematic human situation of patients. These focused on three distinct yet complimentary contributors to SDM: 1) the process of making decisions, 2) humanistic communication, and 3) fit-to-care of the resulting decision. The group then concluded that to move SDM from envisioned to routine practice, and to ensure it reaches all, particularly persons rendered vulnerable by current forms of health care, a substantial investment in implementation research is necessary. Perhaps the discussion of these reflections can contribute to a path forward that will improve the likelihood of the future we dream for SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marleen Kunneman
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Ian Hargraves
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Annie LeBlanc
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Juan P Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Isabelle Scholl
- Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ozkaynak M, Metcalf N, Cohen DM, May LS, Dayan PS, Mistry RD. Considerations for Designing EHR-Embedded Clinical Decision Support Systems for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Pediatric Emergency Departments. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11:589-597. [PMID: 32906153 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was aimed to explore the intersection between organizational environment, workflow, and technology in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) and how these factors impact antibiotic prescribing decisions. METHODS Semistructured interviews with 17 providers (1 fellow and 16 attending faculty), and observations of 21 providers (1 physician assistant, 5 residents, 3 fellows, and 12 attendings) were conducted at three EDs in the United States. We analyzed interview transcripts and observation notes using thematic analysis. RESULTS Seven themes relating to antibiotic prescribing decisions emerged as follows: (1) professional judgement, (2) cognition as a critical individual resource, (3) decision support as a critical organizational resource, (4) patient management with imperfect information, (5) information-seeking as a primary task, (6) time management, and (7) broad process boundaries of antibiotic prescribing. DISCUSSION The emerging interrelated themes identified in this study can be used as a blueprint to design, implement, and evaluate clinical decision support (CDS) systems that support antibiotic prescribing in EDs. The process boundaries of antibiotic prescribing are broader than the current boundaries covered by existing CDS systems. Incongruities between process boundaries and CDS can under-support clinicians and lead to suboptimal decisions. We identified two incongruities: (1) the lack of acknowledgment that the process boundaries go beyond the physical boundaries of the ED and (2) the lack of integration of information sources (e.g., accessibility to prior cultures on an individual patient outside of the organization). CONCLUSION Significant opportunities exist to improve appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing by considering process boundaries in the design, implementation, and evaluation of CDS systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Ozkaynak
- College of Nursing, University of Colorado-Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Noel Metcalf
- College of Nursing, University of Colorado-Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Daniel M Cohen
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Larissa S May
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis Health, Davis, California, United States
| | - Peter S Dayan
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, United States
| | - Rakesh D Mistry
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Palmer NR, Shim JK, Kaplan CP, Schillinger D, Blaschko SD, Breyer BN, Pasick RJ. Ethnographic investigation of patient-provider communication among African American men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035032. [PMID: 32759241 PMCID: PMC7409964 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the USA, African American men bear a disproportionate burden of prostate cancer (PCa) compared with all other groups, having a higher incidence and mortality, poorer quality of life and higher dissatisfaction with care. They are also less likely to receive guideline-concordant treatment (eg, undertreatment of aggressive disease). Inadequate patient-provider communication contributes to suboptimal care, which can be exacerbated by patients' limited health literacy, providers' lack of communication skills and time constraints in low-resource, safety net settings. This study is designed to examine the communication experiences of African American patients with PCa as they undertake treatment decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using an ethnographic approach, we will follow 25 African American men newly diagnosed with PCa at two public hospitals, from diagnosis through treatment decision. Data sources include: (1) audio-recorded clinic observations during urology, radiation oncology, medical oncology and primary care visits, (2) field notes from clinic observations, (3) patient surveys after clinic visits, (4) two in-depth patient interviews, (5) a provider survey, and (6) in-depth interviews with providers. We will explore patients' understanding of their diagnoses and treatment options, sources of support in decision-making, patient-provider communication and treatment decision-making processes. Audio-recorded observations and interviews will be transcribed verbatim. An iterative process of coding and team discussions will be used to thematically analyse patients' experiences and providers' perspectives, and to refine codes and identify key themes. Descriptive statistics will summarise survey data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine in-depth patient-provider communication among African American patients with PCa. For a population as marginalised as African American men, an ethnographic approach allows for explication of complex sociocultural and contextual influences on healthcare processes and outcomes. Study findings will inform the development of interventions and initiatives that promote patient-centred communication, shared decision-making and guideline-concordant care. This study was approved by the University of California San Francisco and the Alameda Health System Institutional Review Boards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nynikka R Palmer
- Division of General Internal Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Janet K Shim
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Celia P Kaplan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Dean Schillinger
- Division of General Internal Medicine at San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sarah D Blaschko
- Division of Urology, Highland Hospital, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Benjamin N Breyer
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rena J Pasick
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, Brière N, Freitas A, Garvelink MM, Dogba MJ, Durand PJ, Desroches S, Croteau J, Rivest LP, Légaré F. Engaging Caregivers in Health-Related Housing Decisions for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Cluster Randomized Trial. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2020; 60:947-957. [PMID: 31095318 PMCID: PMC7362613 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Informal caregivers are rarely as involved as they want to be in the housing decisions of cognitively impaired older adults. Lack of awareness of available options and their benefits and risks may lead to decisions that do not reflect older adults’ preferences, and to guilt and regret. We assessed the effect of training home care teams in interprofessional shared decision-making (SDM) on the proportion of caregivers who report being active in this decision. Research Design and Methods In a two-arm pragmatic cluster randomized trial with home care teams working in health centers in the Province of Quebec, we randomized health centers to receive training in interprofessional SDM (intervention) or not (control). Eligible caregivers had made a housing decision for a cognitively impaired adult aged 65 years or older who was receiving services from a home care team. The primary outcome was the proportion of caregivers reporting an active role in decision making. We performed intention-to-treat multilevel analysis. Results We consecutively enrolled a random group of 16 health centers and recruited 309 caregivers, among whom 296 were included in the analysis. In the intervention arm, the proportion of caregivers reporting an active role in decision making increased by 12% (95% CI −2% to 27%; p = .10). After removal of an influential cluster outlier, the proportion increased to 18% (95% CI: 7%–29%; p < .01). Discussion and Implications Training home care teams in interprofessional SDM increased caregiver involvement in health-related housing decisions for cognitively impaired older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhéda Adekpedjou
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nathalie Brière
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Québec, Canada
| | - Adriana Freitas
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Mirjam M Garvelink
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | | | | | - Sophie Desroches
- School of Nutrition, Québec, Canada.,CHU de Québec Research Centre, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordie Croteau
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Louis-Paul Rivest
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Harrington RL, Hanna ML, Oehrlein EM, Camp R, Wheeler R, Cooblall C, Tesoro T, Scott AM, von Gizycki R, Nguyen F, Hareendran A, Patrick DL, Perfetto EM. Defining Patient Engagement in Research: Results of a Systematic Review and Analysis: Report of the ISPOR Patient-Centered Special Interest Group. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:677-688. [PMID: 32540224 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lack of clarity on the definition of "patient engagement" has been highlighted as a barrier to fully implementing patient engagement in research. This study identified themes within existing definitions related to patient engagement and proposes a consensus definition of "patient engagement in research." METHODS A systematic review was conducted to identify definitions of patient engagement and related terms in published literature (2006-2018). Definitions were extracted and qualitatively analyzed to identify themes and characteristics. A multistakeholder approach, including academia, industry, and patient representation, was taken at all stages. A proposed definition is offered based on a synthesis of the findings. RESULTS Of 1821 abstracts identified and screened for eligibility, 317 were selected for full-text review. Of these, 169 articles met inclusion criteria, from which 244 distinct definitions were extracted for analysis. The most frequently defined terms were: "patient-centered" (30.5%), "patient engagement" (15.5%), and "patient participation" (13.4%). The majority of definitions were specific to the healthcare delivery setting (70.5%); 11.9% were specific to research. Among the definitions of "patient engagement," the most common themes were "active process," "patient involvement," and "patient as participant." In the research setting, the top themes were "patient as partner," "patient involvement," and "active process"; these did not appear in the top 3 themes of nonresearch definitions. CONCLUSION Distinct themes are associated with the term "patient engagement" and with engagement in the "research" setting. Based on an analysis of existing literature and review by patient, industry, and academic stakeholders, we propose a scalable consensus definition of "patient engagement in research."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maya L Hanna
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ridgefield, CT USA
| | | | - Rob Camp
- Community Advisory Board Programme, EURORDIS, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Clarissa Cooblall
- Scientific & Health Policy Initiatives, ISPOR, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | - Theresa Tesoro
- Scientific & Health Policy Initiatives, ISPOR, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Damman OC, Jani A, de Jong BA, Becker A, Metz MJ, de Bruijne MC, Timmermans DR, Cornel MC, Ubbink DT, van der Steen M, Gray M, van El C. The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:524-540. [PMID: 31840346 PMCID: PMC7155090 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent emphasis on value-based health care (VBHC) is thought to provide new opportunities for shared decision-making (SDM) in the Netherlands, especially when using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine medical encounters. It is still largely unclear about how PROMs could be linked to SDM and what we expect from clinicians in this respect. AIM To describe approaches and lessons learned in the fields of SDM and VBHC implementation that converge in using PROMs in medical encounters. APPROACH Based on input from three Dutch forerunner case examples and available evidence about SDM and VBHC, we describe barriers and facilitators regarding the use of PROMs and SDM in the medical encounter. Barriers and facilitators were structured according to a conversational model that included monitoring and managing, team talk, option talk, choice talk, and decision talk. Key lessons learned and recommendations were synthesized. RESULTS The use of individual, N = 1 PROMs scores in the medical encounter has been largely achieved in the forerunner projects. Conversation on monitoring and managing is relatively well implemented, and option talk to some extent, unlike team talk, and decision talk. Aggregated PROMs information describing outcomes of treatment options seemed to be scarcely used. Experienced barriers largely corresponded to what is known from the literature, eg, perceived lack of time and lack of tools summarizing the options. Some concerns were identified about increasing health care consumption as a result of using PROMs and SDM in the medical encounter. CONCLUSION Successful implementation of SDM within VBHC initiatives may not be self-evident, even though individual, N = 1 PROMs scores are being used in the medical encounter. Education and staff resources on meso and macro levels may facilitate the more time-consuming SDM aspects. It seems fruitful to especially target team talk and choice talk in redesigning clinical pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga C Damman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anant Jani
- Value Based Healthcare Programme, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Brigit A de Jong
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie Becker
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot J Metz
- Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, GGz Breburg and Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Martine C de Bruijne
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R Timmermans
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk T Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije van der Steen
- Department of Strategy and Policy, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Muir Gray
- Value Based Healthcare Programme, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Carla van El
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Poitras ME, Hudon C, Godbout I, Bujold M, Pluye P, Vaillancourt VT, Débarges B, Poirier A, Prévost K, Spence C, Légaré F. Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:489-502. [PMID: 31815348 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Patients with complex care needs who frequently use health services often face challenges in managing their health and with integrated care, leading to frequent decision making. These complex care needs require a good understanding of health issues and their impact on daily life. As the decisional needs of this particular clientele have yet to be described in scientific literature, they warrant further study. OBJECTIVES To assess the decision-making needs of patients with complex care needs (PCCN) who frequently use health care services. METHODS We performed a multicenter cross-sectional qualitative descriptive study in four institutions of the health and social services network of Quebec (Canada). We enrolled a convenience sample of PCCNs who frequently use health care services, health care providers, case managers, and decision-makers. We conducted interviews and focus groups and investigated decisional needs according to the Ottawa decision support framework: roles played and desired in the decision-making process, facilitators, and barriers. We conducted qualitative data collection and qualitative deductive/inductive thematic analysis within and across participating groups. RESULTS In total, 16 patients, 38 clinicians, six case managers, and 14 decision-makers participated in the study. The decisional needs of this clientele are numerous, varied and different from those of the general population. We identified 26 decisional needs grouped under five themes. The most frequent decisions related to visiting the emergency department, moving to a nursing home, and adhering to a plan or treatment. In addition, we identified new themes such as patients' fear and mistrust of health professionals, differences of opinion between health professionals and health professionals' preconceived opinions of patients. CONCLUSION We observed a wide range of types of decisions that patients face and differences in decision-making needs across participating groups. Our results should inform future research on the development of a patient decision aid tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Eve Poitras
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Catherine Hudon
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Godbout
- Quebec SPOR Unit (Health Systems and Social Services Research Component, Knowledge Translation and Implementation) and Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mathieu Bujold
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre Pluye
- Method Development, Quebec SPOR SUPPORT Unit (Patient Oriented Research), Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Vanessa T Vaillancourt
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Béatrice Débarges
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Annie Poirier
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karina Prévost
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claude Spence
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Peinado S, Paquin RS, Rini C, Roche M, Butterfield RM, Berg JS, Powell CM, Bailey DB, Lewis MA. Values clarification and parental decision making about newborn genomic sequencing. Health Psychol 2020; 39:335-344. [PMID: 31886693 PMCID: PMC7078054 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using an online decision aid developed to support parental decision making about newborn genomic sequencing, we tested whether adding a values clarification exercise to educational content would improve decision making outcomes and influence intention to pursue genomic sequencing. We also examined whether the effect of values clarification varied depending on one's health literacy level. METHOD In an online experiment, women and men aged 18 to 44 who were either pregnant or had a pregnant partner, were currently trying to get pregnant, or were preparing for a pregnancy within the next 2 years were randomly assigned to complete either a decision aid with educational information about newborn genomic sequencing or a decision aid with the same educational information and a values clarification exercise. RESULTS Of the 1,000 participants who completed the decision aid, those who completed the values clarification exercise reported less decision regret, F(1, 995) = 6.19, p = .01, and were clearer about their personal values, F(1, 995) = 6.39, p = .01. Moderation analyses revealed that the benefit of values clarification on decisional conflict was particularly evident among participants with lower health literacy, B = -3.94, SE = 1.67, t = -2.36, p = .018. There was not a significant moderation effect of health literacy and decision aid condition on decision regret. CONCLUSIONS Adding a values clarification exercise to decision aids for parents making decisions about genomic sequencing may improve the decision-making experience and provide some benefit to individuals with lower health literacy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Peinado
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International,
Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Ryan S. Paquin
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International,
Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Christine Rini
- John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical
Center, Hackensack, NJ and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington,
DC
| | - Myra Roche
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Rita M. Butterfield
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jonathan S. Berg
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Cynthia M. Powell
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Donald B. Bailey
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability
Studies, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Megan A. Lewis
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International,
Research Triangle Park, NC
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Henselmans I, van Laarhoven HW, van Maarschalkerweerd P, de Haes HC, Dijkgraaf MG, Sommeijer DW, Ottevanger PB, Fiebrich H, Dohmen S, Creemers G, de Vos FY, Smets EM. Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oncologist 2019; 25:e578-e588. [PMID: 32162796 PMCID: PMC7066716 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative systematic treatment offers uncertain and often limited benefits, and the burden can be high. Hence, treatment decisions require shared decision making (SDM). This trial examined the independent and combined effect of an oncologist training and a patient communication aid on SDM. METHODS In this multicenter randomized controlled trial with four parallel arms (2016-2018), oncologists (n = 31) were randomized to receive SDM communication skills training or not. The training consisted of a reader, two group sessions, a booster session, and a consultation room tool (10 hours). Patients (n = 194) with advanced cancer were randomized to receive a patient communication aid or not. The aid consisted of education on SDM, a question prompt list, and a value clarification exercise. The primary outcome was observed SDM as rated by blinded observers from audio-recorded consultations. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported SDM, patient and oncologist satisfaction, patients' decisional conflict, patient quality of life 3 months after consultation, consultation duration, and the decision made. RESULTS The oncologist training had a large positive effect on observed SDM (Cohen's d = 1.12) and on patient-reported SDM (d = 0.73). The patient communication aid did not improve SDM. The combination of interventions did not add to the effect of training oncologists only. The interventions affected neither patient nor oncologist satisfaction with the consultation nor patients' decisional conflict, quality of life, consultation duration, or the decision made. CONCLUSION Training medical oncologists in SDM about palliative systemic treatment improves both observed and patient-reported SDM. A patient communication aid does not. The incorporation of skills training in (continuing) educational programs for medical oncologists is likely to stimulate the widely advocated uptake of shared decision making in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry NTR 5489. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and often small benefits, and the burden can be high. Hence, treatment decisions require shared decision making (SDM). SDM is increasingly advocated for ethical reasons and for its beneficial effect on patient outcomes. Few initiatives to stimulate SDM are evaluated in robust designs. This randomized controlled trial shows that training medical oncologists improves both observed and patient-reported SDM in clinical encounters (n = 194). A preconsultation communication aid for patients did not add to the effect of training oncologists. SDM training effectively changes oncologists' practice and should be implemented in (continuing) educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Pomme van Maarschalkerweerd
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Hanneke C.J.M. de Haes
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Marcel G.W. Dijkgraaf
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Dirkje W. Sommeijer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Medical OncologyFlevoziekenhuis, AlmereThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Serge Dohmen
- Department of Medical OncologyBovenIJZiekenhuis, AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Geert‐Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical OncologyCatharinaziekenhuis, EindhovenThe Netherlands
| | - Filip Y.F.L. de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Ellen M.A. Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dolan H, Alden DL, Friend JM, Lee PY, Lee YK, Ng CJ, Abdullah KL, Trevena L. Culture, Self, and Medical Decision Making in Australia and China: A Structural Model Analysis. MDM Policy Pract 2019; 4:2381468319871018. [PMID: 31565670 PMCID: PMC6755644 DOI: 10.1177/2381468319871018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective. To explore and compare the influences of individual-level
cultural values and personal attitudinal values on the desire for medical
information and self-involvement in decision making in Australia and China.
Methods. A total of 288 and 291 middle-aged adults from
Australia and China, respectively, completed an online survey examining cultural
and personal values, and their desired level of self-influence on medical
decision making. Structural equation modeling was used to test 15 hypotheses
relating to the effects of cultural and personal antecedents on the individual
desire for influence over medical decision making. Results. Similar
factors in both Australia and China (total variance explained: Australia 29%;
China 35%) predicted desire for medical information, with interdependence
(unstandardized path coefficient βAustralia = 0.102,
P = 0.014; βChina = 0.215, P =
0.001), independence (βAustralia = 0.244, P <
0.001; βChina = 0.123, P = 0.037), and health locus
of control (βAustralia = −0.140, P = 0.018;
βChina = −0.138, P = 0.007) being significant
and positive predictors. A desire for involvement in decisions was only
predicted by power distance, which had an opposite effect of being negative for
Australia and positive for China (total variance explained: Australia 11%; China
5%; βAustralia = 0.294, P < 0.001; China:
βChina = −0.190, P = 0.043). National culture
moderated the effect of independence on desire for medical information, which
was stronger in Australia than China (Z score = 1.687,
P < 0.05). Conclusions. Study results
demonstrate that in both countries, desire for medical information can be
influenced by individual-level cultural and personal values, suggesting
potential benefits of tailoring health communication to personal mindsets to
foster informed decision making. The desired level of self-involvement in
decision making was relatively independent of other cultural and personal values
in both countries, suggesting caution against cultural stereotypes. Study
findings also suggest that involvement preferences in decision making should be
considered separately from information needs at the clinical encounter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hankiz Dolan
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Ping Yein Lee
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Yew Kong Lee
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Chirk Jenn Ng
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Khatijah Lim Abdullah
- Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Bilodeau G, Witteman H, Légaré F, Lafontaine-Bruneau J, Voyer P, Kröger E, Tremblay MC, Giguere AMC. Reducing complexity of patient decision aids for community-based older adults with dementia and their caregivers: multiple case study of Decision Boxes. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027727. [PMID: 31072861 PMCID: PMC6528048 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify patient decision aids' features to limit their complexity for older adults with dementia and their family caregivers. DESIGN Mixed method, multiple case study within a user-centred design (UCD) approach. SETTING Community-based healthcare in the province of Quebec in Canada. PARTICIPANTS 23 older persons (aged 65+ years) with dementia and their 27 family caregivers. RESULTS During three UCD evaluation-modification rounds, participants identified strengths and weaknesses of the patient decision aids' content and visual design that influenced their complexity. Weaknesses of content included a lack of understanding of the decision aids' purpose and target audience, missing information, irrelevant content and issues with terminology and sentence structure. Weaknesses of visual design included critics about the decision aids' general layout (density, length, navigation) and their lack of pictures. In response, the design team implemented a series of practical features and design strategies, comprising: a clear expression of the patient decision aids' purpose through simple text, picture and personal stories; systematic and frequent use of pictograms illustrating key points and helping structure patient decision aids' general layout; a glossary; removal of scientific references from the main document; personal stories to clarify more difficult concepts; a contact section to facilitate implementation of the selected option; GRADE ratings to convey the quality of the evidence; a values clarification exercise formatted as a checklist and presented at the beginning of the document to streamline navigation; involvement of a panel of patient/caregiver partners to guide expression of patient priorities; editing of the text to a sixth grade reading level; UCD process to optimise comprehensiveness and relevance of content and training of patients/caregivers in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS The revised template for patient decision aids is designed to meet the needs of adults living with dementia and their caregivers better, which may translate into fewer evaluation-modification rounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Bilodeau
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Holly Witteman
- Laval University, Family and Emergency Medicine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Knowledge Transfer and Health Technology Assessment Research Group, Research Center of Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CRCHUQ), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Philippe Voyer
- Faculte des Sciences Infirmieres de l'Universite Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kröger
- Laval University Research Center on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Tremblay
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Universite Laval Faculte de medecine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anik M C Giguere
- Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Henselmans I, Brugel SD, de Haes HCJM, Wolvetang KJA, de Vries LM, Pieterse AH, Baas-Thijssen MCM, de Vos FYF, van Laarhoven HWM, Smets EMA. Promoting shared decision making in advanced cancer: Development and piloting of a patient communication aid. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:916-923. [PMID: 30591283 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To learn how to configure a patient communication aid (PCA) to facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) about treatment for advanced cancer. METHODS The PCA consists of education about SDM, a question prompt list, and values clarification methods. Study 1. A first version was presented to 13 patients, 8 relatives and 14 bereaved relatives in interviews. Study 2. A second version was used by 18 patients in a pilot study. Patients and oncologists were interviewed, patients were surveyed, and consultations were audio-recorded. RESULTS Respondents reported that the aid facilitated patient control over information, raised choice awareness and promoted elaboration. Risks were identified, most importantly that the aid might upset patients. Also, some respondents reported that the PCA did not, or would not support decision making because they felt sufficiently competent, did not perceive a role for themselves, or did not perceive that the decision required elaboration. CONCLUSIONS Opinions on the usefulness of the PCA varied. It was challenging to raise awareness about the presence of a choice, and to find a balance between comprehensive information and sensitivity. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS A future study should demonstrate whether the PCA can improve SDM, and whether this effect is stronger when oncologists receive training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Sabrina D Brugel
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke C J M de Haes
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kim J A Wolvetang
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura M de Vries
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arwen H Pieterse
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | | | - Filip Y F de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Macalalad-Josue AA, Palileo-Villanueva LA, Sandoval MA, Panuda JP. Development of a Patient Decision Aid on the Choice of Diabetes Medication for Filipino Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc 2019; 34:44-55. [PMID: 33442136 PMCID: PMC7784104 DOI: 10.15605/jafes.034.01.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a locally adapted patient decision aid (PtDA) on treatment intensification among Filipino patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and to test the feasibility of using PtDAs in a low middle-income country. METHODOLOGY A qualitative approach and an iterative process of development of a PtDA were employed for this study. We describe the process of developing a Filipino version of the Diabetes Medication Decision Aid. This PtDA was designed to help the patient choose the appropriate treatment intensification based on his own values and preferences, in consultation with his physician. The process involved decisional needs assessment through focus group discussions and key informant interviews, systematic literature review, iterative process of the development of a PtDA with clinical encounters (pilot testing), and preliminary field testing. RESULTS Decisional needs assessment revealed that Filipino patients are open to participate in shared decision-making if given the opportunity, including those with low socioeconomic status who likely have low health literacy. Physicians prefer to have visual aid tools to help them support their patient's decision-making. A PtDA prototype of a set of flash cards in Filipino was created and revised in an iterative method. We developed a more visually appealing tool after inputs from the expert panel and patient advisory group. Its use during clinical encounters provided additional insights from patients and clinicians on how to improve the PtDA. Preliminary field testing showed that its use is feasible in the target patient population. CONCLUSION Filipino patients, clinicians, and diabetes nurse educators have contributed to the creation of the first Filipino PtDA for diabetes treatment intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Angelica Macalalad-Josue
- Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital
| | | | - Mark Anthony Sandoval
- Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital
| | - Jose Paolo Panuda
- Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Numerical skills are essential to make informed decisions in our daily life. Unfortunately, many people lack basic numeracy, which limits their ability to accurately interpret risks (i.e., risk literacy). In this paper, we provide an overview of research investigating the role of numeracy in two prominent domains, where most research was concentrated, health and finance. We summarize what has been learned so far in these domains and suggest promising venues for future research. We conclude that it is important to conduct interventions to improve numeracy in less numerate individuals and to help them make informed decisions and achieve better life outcomes.
Collapse
|
45
|
Hormonal contraception, breastfeeding and bedside advocacy: the case for patient-centered care. Contraception 2018; 99:73-76. [PMID: 30423320 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Postpartum contraceptive decision making is complex, and recommendations may be influenced by breastfeeding intentions. While biologically plausible, concerns about the adverse impact of hormonal contraception on breast milk production have not been supported by the clinical evidence to date. However, the data have limitations, which can lead providers with different priorities around contraception and breastfeeding to interpret the data in a way that advances their personal priorities. Discrepancies in interpretations can lead to divergent recommendations for individual women and may cause conflict. Furthermore, providers must recognize that decision making about contraception and breastfeeding takes place in complex cultural, historical and socioeconomic contexts. Implicit bias may influence a provider's counseling. Unrecognized biases toward one patient or another, or one practice or another, may influence a provider's counseling. It is crucial for providers to strive to recognize their own biases. Providers need to respectfully recognize each patient's values and preferences regarding hormonal contraception and breastfeeding. Developing a patient-centered decision tool or implementing patient-centered interview techniques specifically around breastfeeding and contraception could help to minimize provider-driven variability in care.
Collapse
|
46
|
Roy M, Corkum JP, Urbach DR, Novak CB, von Schroeder HP, McCabe SJ, Okrainec K. Health Literacy Among Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg 2018; 43:96-106. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4754-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
47
|
Attanasio LB, Kozhimannil KB, Kjerulff KH. Factors influencing women's perceptions of shared decision making during labor and delivery: Results from a large-scale cohort study of first childbirth. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:1130-1136. [PMID: 29339041 PMCID: PMC5977392 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine correlates of shared decision making during labor and delivery. METHODS Data were from a cohort of women who gave birth to their first baby in Pennsylvania, 2009-2011 (N = 3006). We used logistic regression models to examine the association between labor induction and mode of delivery in relation to women's perceptions of shared decision making, and to investigate race/ethnicity and SES as potential moderators. RESULTS Women who were Black and who did not have a college degree or private insurance were less likely to report high shared decision making, as well as women who underwent labor induction, instrumental vaginal or cesarean delivery. Models with interaction terms showed that the reduction in odds of shared decision making associated with cesarean delivery was greater for Black women than for White women. CONCLUSIONS Women in marginalized social groups were less likely to report shared decision making during birth and Black women who delivered by cesarean had particularly low odds of shared decision making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Strategies designed to improve the quality of patient-provider communication, information sharing, and shared decision making must be attentive to the needs of vulnerable groups to ensure that such interventions reduce rather than widen disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura B Attanasio
- Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Katy B Kozhimannil
- Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kristen H Kjerulff
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Penn State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bonner C, McKinn S, Lau A, Jansen J, Doust J, Trevena L, McCaffery K. Heuristics and biases in cardiovascular disease prevention: How can we improve communication about risk, benefits and harms? PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:843-853. [PMID: 29269097 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Revised: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/08/2017] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines recommend medication based on the probability of a heart attack/stroke in the next 5-10 years. However, heuristics and biases make risk communication challenging for doctors. This study explored how patients interpret personalised CVD risk results presented in varying formats and timeframes. METHODS GPs recruited 25 patients with CVD risk factors and varying medication history. Participants were asked to 'think aloud' while using two CVD risk calculators that present probabilistic risk in different ways, within a semi-structured interview. Transcribed audio-recordings were coded using Framework Analysis. RESULTS Key themes were: 1) numbers lack meaning without a reference point; 2) risk results need to be both credible and novel; 3) selective attention to intervention effects. Risk categories (low/moderate/high) provided meaningful context, but short-term risk results were not credible if they didn't match expectations. Colour-coded icon arrays showing the effect of age and interventions were seen as novel and motivating. Those on medication focused on benefits, while others focused on harms. CONCLUSION CVD risk formats need to be tailored to patient expectations and experiences in order to counteract heuristics and biases. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Doctors need access to multiple CVD risk formats to communicate effectively about CVD prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carissa Bonner
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Shannon McKinn
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Annie Lau
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Jenny Doust
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Australia.
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ratanawongsa N, Quan J, Handley MA, Sarkar U, Schillinger D. Language-concordant automated telephone queries to assess medication adherence in a diverse population: a cross-sectional analysis of convergent validity with pharmacy claims. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:254. [PMID: 29625571 PMCID: PMC5889590 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3071-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinicians have difficulty accurately assessing medication non-adherence within chronic disease care settings. Health information technology (HIT) could offer novel tools to assess medication adherence in diverse populations outside of usual health care settings. In a multilingual urban safety net population, we examined the validity of assessing adherence using automated telephone self-management (ATSM) queries, when compared with non-adherence using continuous medication gap (CMG) on pharmacy claims. We hypothesized that patients reporting greater days of missed pills to ATSM queries would have higher rates of non-adherence as measured by CMG, and that ATSM adherence assessments would perform as well as structured interview assessments. Methods As part of an ATSM-facilitated diabetes self-management program, low-income health plan members typed numeric responses to rotating weekly ATSM queries: “In the last 7 days, how many days did you MISS taking your …” diabetes, blood pressure, or cholesterol pill. Research assistants asked similar questions in computer-assisted structured telephone interviews. We measured continuous medication gap (CMG) by claims over 12 preceding months. To evaluate convergent validity, we compared rates of optimal adherence (CMG ≤ 20%) across respondents reporting 0, 1, and ≥ 2 missed pill days on ATSM and on structured interview. Results Among 210 participants, 46% had limited health literacy, 57% spoke Cantonese, and 19% Spanish. ATSM respondents reported ≥1 missed day for diabetes (33%), blood pressure (19%), and cholesterol (36%) pills. Interview respondents reported ≥1 missed day for diabetes (28%), blood pressure (21%), and cholesterol (26%) pills. Optimal adherence rates by CMG were lower among ATSM respondents reporting more missed days for blood pressure (p = 0.02) and cholesterol (p < 0.01); by interview, differences were significant for cholesterol (p = 0.01). Conclusions Language-concordant ATSM demonstrated modest potential for assessing adherence. Studies should evaluate HIT assessments of medication beliefs and concerns in diverse populations. Trial registration NCT00683020, registered May 21, 2008. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3071-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Ratanawongsa
- General Internal Medicine and UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Judy Quan
- General Internal Medicine and UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Margaret A Handley
- General Internal Medicine and UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Division of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Urmimala Sarkar
- General Internal Medicine and UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Dean Schillinger
- General Internal Medicine and UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations at San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Roh YH, Koh YD, Kim JO, Noh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH. Patients With Limited Health Literacy Have Similar Preferences but Different Perceptions in Surgical Decision-making for Carpal Tunnel Release. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476:846-851. [PMID: 29470230 PMCID: PMC6260054 DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health literacy is the ability to obtain, process, and understand health information needed to make appropriate health decisions. The proper comprehension by patients regarding a given disease, its treatment, and the physician's instructions plays an important role in shared decision-making. Studies have disagreed over the degree to which differences in health literacy affect patients' preferences for shared decision-making; we therefore sought to evaluate this in the context of shared decision-making about carpal tunnel release. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Do patients with limited health literacy have different preferences of shared decision-making for carpal tunnel release than those with greater levels of health literacy? (2) How do patients with limited health literacy retrospectively perceive their role in shared decision-making after carpal tunnel release? METHODS Over a 32-month period, one surgeon surgically treated 149 patients for carpal tunnel syndrome. Patients were eligible if they had cognitive and language function to provide informed consent and complete a self-reported questionnaire and were not eligible if they had nerve entrapment other than carpal tunnel release or had workers compensation issues; based on those, 140 (94%) were approached for study. Of those, seven (5%) were lost to followup before 6 months, leaving 133 for analysis here. Their mean age was 55 years (range, 31-76 years), and 83% (111 of 133) were women. Thirty-three percent (44 of 133) of patients had less than a high school education. Health literacy was measured according to the Newest Vital Sign during the initial visit, and a score of ≤ 3 was considered limited health literacy. Forty-four percent of patients had limited health literacy. The Control Preferences Scale was used for patients to indicate their preferred role in surgical decision-making preoperatively and to assess their perceived level of involvement postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine whether patients' clinical, demographic, and health literacy factors accounted for the preoperative preferences and postoperative assessments of their role in shared decision-making. A total of 133 patients would provide 94% power for a medium effect size for linear regression with five main predictors. RESULTS We found no differences between patients with lower levels of health literacy and those with greater health literacy in terms of preferences of shared decision-making for carpal tunnel release (3.0 ± 1.6 versus 2.7 ± 1.4; mean difference, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, -0.2 to 0.8; p = 0.25). A history of surgical procedures (coefficient = -0.32, p < 0.01) and a lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (coefficient = 0.17, p = 0.02) were independently associated with a preference for an active role in shared decision-making. However, patients with limited health literacy (coefficient = -0.31, p = 0.01) and an absence of a caregiver (coefficient = -0.28, p = 0.03) perceived a more passive role in actual decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Physicians should be aware of the discrepancy between preferences and perceptions of shared decision-making among patients with limited health literacy, and physicians should consider providing a decision aid tailored to basic levels of health literacy to help patients achieve their preferred role in decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prognostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Hak Roh
- Y. H. Roh, Y. D. Koh, J. O. Kim Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea J. H. Noh Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kangwon National University Hospital, Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon-si, Gangwon-do, Korea H. S. Gong, G. H. Baek Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|