Computable Phenotype of a Crohn's Disease Natural History Model

A foundation systematic review of natural language processing applied to gastroenterology & hepatology

OBJECTIVE

This review assesses the progress of NLP in gastroenterology to date, grades the robustness of the methodology, exposes the field to a new generation of authors, and highlights opportunities for future research.

DESIGN

Seven scholarly databases (ACM Digital Library, Arxiv, Embase, IEEE Explore, Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar) were searched for studies published between 2015 and 2023 that met the inclusion criteria. Studies lacking a description of appropriate validation or NLP methods were excluded, as were studies ufinavailable in English, those focused on non-gastrointestinal diseases and those that were duplicates. Two independent reviewers extracted study information, clinical/algorithm details, and relevant outcome data. Methodological quality and bias risks were appraised using a checklist of quality indicators for NLP studies.

RESULTS

Fifty-three studies were identified utilising NLP in endoscopy, inflammatory bowel disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, liver and pancreatic disease. Colonoscopy was the focus of 21 (38.9%) studies; 13 (24.1%) focused on liver disease, 7 (13.0%) on inflammatory bowel disease, 4 (7.4%) on gastroscopy, 4 (7.4%) on pancreatic disease and 2 (3.7%) on endoscopic sedation/ERCP and gastrointestinal bleeding. Only 30 (56.6%) of the studies reported patient demographics, and only 13 (24.5%) had a low risk of validation bias. Thirty-five (66%) studies mentioned generalisability, but only 5 (9.4%) mentioned explainability or shared code/models.

CONCLUSION

NLP can unlock substantial clinical information from free-text notes stored in EPRs and is already being used, particularly to interpret colonoscopy and radiology reports. However, the models we have thus far lack transparency, leading to duplication, bias, and doubts about generalisability. Therefore, greater clinical engagement, collaboration, and open sharing of appropriate datasets and code are needed.

Artificial Intelligence and IBD: Where are We Now and Where Will We Be in the Future?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Artificial intelligence (AI) is quickly demonstrating the ability to address problems and challenges in the care of IBD. This review with commentary will highlight today's advancements in AI applications for IBD in image analysis, understanding text, and replicating clinical knowledge and experience.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advancements in machine learning methods, availability of high-performance computing, and increasing digitization of medical data are providing opportunities for AI to assist in IBD care. Multiple groups have demonstrated the ability of AI to replicate expert endoscopic scoring in IBD, with expansion into automated capsule endoscopy, enterography, and histologic interpretations. Further, AI image analysis is being used to develop new endoscopic scoring with more granularity and detail than is possible using conventional methods. Advancements in natural language processing are proving to reduce laborious tasks required in the care of IBD, including documentation, information searches, and chart review. Finally, large language models and chatbots that can understand language and generate human-like replies are beginning to exhibit clinical intelligence that will revolutionize how we deliver IBD care. Today, AI is being deployed to replicate expert judgement in specific tasks where disagreement, subjectivity, and bias are common. However, the near future will herald contributions of AI doing what we cannot, including new detailed measures of IBD, enhanced analysis of images, and perhaps even fully automating care. As we speculate on future technologic capabilities that may improve how we care for IBD, this review will also consider how we will implement and fairly use AI in practice.