Value of pre-intervention computed tomography perfusion imaging in the assessment of tissue outcome and long-term clinical prognosis in patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke receiving reperfusion therapy: a systematic review

Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MRI, Associations with Clinical Severity and Prognosis in Ischemic Strokes

BACKGROUND

The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores have important shortcomings. Amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging might offer more valuable information in ischemic strokes assessment.

PURPOSE

To utilize APTw, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and computed tomography perfusion (CTP) for the assessment of clinical symptom severity and 90-day prognosis in patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

61 patients (mean age 63.2 ± 9.7 years; 46 males, 15 females) with ischemic strokes were included in the study.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3T/turbo spin echo (TSE) T1 -weighted imaging, T2 -weighted imaging, T2 -fluid attenuated inversion recovery (T2 -FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and single-shot TSE APTw imaging.

ASSESSMENT

APTw, ADC, and CTP were used to compare patient subgroups and construct a prognostic nomogram model.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Pearson correlation analysis, multivariate logistic regression analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA), receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs). The significance threshold was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Correlation analysis revealed that APTw and NIHSS exhibit the highest correlation (r = -0.634, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.418 to -0.782), surpassing that of ADC and lesion size. Multivariable analysis revealed APTw (odds ratio [OR] 0.905, 95% CI 0.845-0.970), ADC (OR 0.745, 95% CI 0.609-0.911), and infarct core-cerebral blood volume (IC-CBV) (OR 0.547, 95% CI 0.310-0.964) as potential risk factors associated with a poor prognosis. The nomogram model demonstrated the highest predictive efficacy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.960 (95% CI 0.911-0.988), exceeding that of APTw, ADC, and IC-CBV individually.

DATA CONCLUSION

The APTw technique holds potential value in categorizing and managing patients with ischemic stroke, offering guidance for the implementation of clinical treatment strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Use of ABC/2 method for rapidly estimating the target mismatch on computed tomography perfusion imaging in patients with acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Target mismatch (ischemic core, mismatch volume and mismatch ratio) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) highly relies on the automated perfusion analysis software.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using the ABC/2 method to rapidly estimate the target mismatch on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging in patients with AIS, using RAPID results as a reference.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 243 patients with anterior circulation AIS who underwent CTP imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Target mismatch associated perfusion parameters were derived from RAPID results and calculated using the ABC/2 method. Paired t-test was used to assess the difference of volumetric parameters between the two methods. The ability of using the ABC/2 method to predict the important cutoff volumetric metrics was also evaluated.

RESULT

There was no significant difference in the volumes of ischemic core (P = 0.068), ischemic area (P = 0.209), and mismatch volume (P = 0.518) between ABC/2 and RAPID. Using RAPID results as reference, the ABC/2 method showed high accuracy for predicting perfusion parameters (70 mL and 90 mL: sensitivity=98.5% and 98.5%, specificity=100% and 100%, positive predictive value [PPV]=100% and 100%, negative predictive value [NPV]=93.8% and 92.9%; 10 mL and 15mL: sensitivity=99.6% and 99.5%, specificity=55.6% and 50.0%, PPV=96.6% and 94.8%, NPV=90.9% and 92.3%; 1.2 and 1.8: sensitivity=99.6% and 94.8%, specificity=75.0% and 96.9%, PPV=98.7% and 99.5%, NPV=90.0% and 73.8%).

CONCLUSION

The ABC/2 method may be a feasible alternative to RAPID for estimation of target mismatch parameters on CTP in patients with AIS.