Pedicle screw placement in patients with variant atlas pedicle

The morphological classification and clinical significance of atlas vertebral artery sulcus based on computed tomography three-dimensional reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to research the morphological classification and clinical significance of vertebral artery sulcus on atlas based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction.

METHODS

Three-dimensional reconstruction images of 300 adult atlases were collected. A total of 600 atlas vertebral artery sulci were selected in this study. The parameters required for placement of C1 pedicle screw, including depth of grinding drilling (ao), width (cd), length ab), height (H), lateral wall thickness (L1), inner wall thickness (L2), medial angle (∠α), and the cephalad angle to the transverse plane of atlas pedicle (∠β), were measured.

RESULTS

CT three-dimensional reconstruction images showed that there were five types of atlas vertebral artery sulci: no process type (n = 494 cases, 82.33%), upper process type (n = 29, 4.83%), lower process type (n = 25, 4.17%), double process type (n = 19, 3.17%), and posterior ring type (33, 5.50%). One-way ANOVA tests showed that the five groups differed significantly in the parameter of ao, L2, H, ∠α and ∠β. One-way ANOVA with the LSD post hoc tests showed that the parameter ao of the group of no process type was less than that of the group of upper or lower process type (P < 0.05), and ao of the group of lower process or posterior ring type was less than that of the group of the upper type (P < 0.05). The parameter of ao of the male group was larger than that of the female group.

CONCLUSION

No process type of the atlas vertebral artery sulcus was the most common, and the medial angle and cephalad angle of the atlas pedicle in this type were the smallest. When pedicle screws are inserted, the above two angles should not be too large. Male's ao was larger than that of female's. All these findings should be considered to avoid the deviation of the nail track.

Three-dimensional anatomic analysis and navigation templates for C1 pedicle screw placement perpendicular to the coronal plane: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the corridor for atlas pedicle screw placement perpendicular to the coronal plane and to develop patient-specific navigation templates for pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis. A total of 71 patients (41 males and 30 females) were involved in this study from June 2016 to June 2018, and they were divided into a template group (39 patients) and a conventional group (32 patients). The CT-based 3D reconstruction models were analyzed in the template group. From the perspective of the 3D atlas in a coronal view, the pedicle corridor was obtained. Taking the center of the tangential circle of the pedicle as the entry point, we simulated screw placement perpendicular to the coronal plane. Then, the individual navigation template was designed and used in surgery. In the conventional group, free-hand pedicle screw placement was performed perpendicular to the coronal plane. The diameter of the maximum tangential circle and screw length of the pedicle corridor were measured in the template group. The surgical time, radiation exposure time, screw grading criteria and so on were evaluated and compared between the two groups after surgery.

RESULTS

;The diameter of the maximum tangential circle and the distance between the entry point and posterior tubercle were significantly greater in males than in females. The operation was successfully completed in all patients, without aggravation of nerve injury, and the follow-up was 12-20 months, with an average of 15.6 months. A total of 78 screws were inserted in the template group, and 64 screws were inserted in the conventional group. The surgical times in the template group and conventional group were 76.47±24.44 min and 125.63±36.41 min, respectively. The radiation exposure times in the template group and conventional group were 3.51±1.77 and 10.15±4.95, respectively, and there was a significant difference between the two groups. In the template group, the deviation in the screw entry point and screw angle were 1.92±1.67 mm and 2.08±1.98°, respectively. The medial angle deviation between the left and right sides was 2.71±1.88° in the template group, which was significantly less than the deviation of 3.76±2.22° in the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

A pedicle screw trajectory perpendicular to the coronal plane can be quickly obtained based on the perspective of 3D models. The technique of screw placement perpendicular to the coronal plane assisted by navigation templates has a shorter operative time, lessintraoperative fluoroscopy and a higher safety of screw placement than traditional surgery.

Comparison of the Accuracy of C1 Pedicle Screw Fixation Using Fluoroscopy and Free-Hand Techniques in Patients With Posterior Arch Thickness of Less Than 4 mm

BACKGROUND

C1 pedicle screw insertion is not easy, and more fluoroscopy can be required for safe insertion. Fluoroscopy is time consuming and increases patient radiation exposure. There have been no studies comparing the accuracy of C1 pedicle screw insertion using the fluoroscopy and free-hand techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a free-hand C1 pedicle screw insertion method in patients with the posterior arch thickness of less than 4 mm in the thinnest part of the groove, and to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of C1 pedicle screw insertion using fluoroscopy vs using the free-hand technique.

METHODS

A total of 25 patients who had atlantoaxial instability with a C1 posterior arch &lt;4 mm and were treated with C1 pedicle screw insertion were included. In 10 patients, fluoroscopy was used for C1 pedicle screw insertion, and 15 patients underwent the free-hand technique. We compared the radiologic and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In patients who underwent the free-hand technique, 96.5% of screws were rated as safe (grade A or B), and 80.0% of screws in the fluoroscopy group were rated as safe. Postoperative occipital neuralgia occurred in one patient in the fluoroscopy group and did not occur in the free-hand technique group. There was no significant difference in the improvement of Nurick grade between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

C1 pedicle screw insertion using the free-hand technique is feasible and safe in patients with a C1 posterior arch &lt;4 mm.