Assessment of extravasation on ruptured uterine artery pseudoaneurysm using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography during uterine balloon tamponade

Differential diagnosis of uterine vascular anomalies: Uterine pseudoaneurysm as a cause of massive hemorrhage

In this article, we comment on the paper by Kakinuma et al published recently. We focus specifically on the diagnosis of uterine pseudoaneurysm, but we also review other uterine vascular anomalies that may be the cause of life-threating hemorrhage and the different causes of uterine pseudoaneurysms. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm is a complication of both surgical gynecological and non-traumatic procedures. Massive hemorrhage is the consequence of the rupture of the pseudoaneurysm. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm can develop after obstetric or gynecological procedures, being the most frequent after cesarean or vaginal deliveries, curettage and even during pregnancy. However, there are several cases described unrelated to pregnancy, such as after conization, hysteroscopic surgery or laparoscopic myomectomy. Hemorrhage is the clinical manifestation and it can be life-threatening so suspicion of this vascular lesion is essential for early diagnosis and treatment. However, there are other uterine vascular anomalies that may be the cause of severe hemorrhage, which must be taken into account in the differential diagnosis. Computed tomography angiography and embolization is supposed to be the first therapeutic option in most of them.

Post-cesarean section pseudoaneurysm of uterine artery: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm is an extraluminal collection of blood caused by damage to the arterial wall which can result from cesarean section, myomectomy, hysterectomy, laparoscopic excision of deep endometriotic lesions, dilation and curettage and uterine cervical conization. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm may go unnoticed as a possible cause of post-partum hemorrhage.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of 25 years female who presented with 3 episodes of per vaginal bleeding on the 34th postoperative day of cesarean section. Computed tomography angiogram confirmed the aneurysm of the left uterine artery and the artery was embolized for the management of aneurysm. Follow-up scan showed normal blood flow and her symptoms were relieved after the procedure.

DISCUSSION

Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm can be diagnosed by Doppler ultrasound which shows intrauterine mass with swirling blood flow. The gold standard investigation is computed tomography angiography. Uterine artery embolization is the recent treatment approach which is both safe and effective.

CONCLUSION

Women who present with postpartum vaginal bleeding should be promptly evaluated for uterine artery pseudoaneurysm. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm can then be effectively managed through embolization, ensuring timely intervention and improved maternal health outcomes.

Cervical Cerclage to Prevent Intrauterine Balloon Prolapse

Intrauterine balloon prolapse sometimes occurs, and the intrauterine balloon must be reinserted. Furthermore, intrauterine balloon tamponade (IBT) failure can necessitate additional invasive procedures. We report a case of cervical cerclage with IBT for placenta previa with a cervical dilation. In our case, emergency cesarean section was performed at 35 + 4 weeks of gestation because of persistent hemorrhage. During the operation, we performed IBT to prevent further postpartum hemorrhage. However, immediately after the operation, uterine cervical dilatation was 6 cm, which resulted in cervical dilation and prolapse of the intrauterine balloon. Therefore, we performed cervical cerclage using absorbable sutures with IBT and blood transfusion. We speculated that the intrauterine balloon might have induced cervical canal ripening during the operation. Our case suggested that cervical cerclage with IBT is a useful method to prevent intrauterine balloon prolapse in cases with cervical dilation.

An Unruptured True Aneurysm of the Uterine Artery during Pregnancy

The antenatal diagnosis of an unruptured true aneurysm of the uterine artery is extremely rare and has never been reported, whereas pseudoaneurysms associated with previous trauma or cesarean section have been reported several times. True aneurysms occur when the artery or vessel weakens and bulges, sometimes forming a blood-filled sac. Nearly all cases of pelvic true aneurysms involved ovarian arteries which ruptured during the peripartum period. The case presented here is unique in terms of being an unruptured true aneurysm of the uterine artery with a first diagnosis during pregnancy at 32 weeks of gestation and the spontaneous development of thrombosis in the aneurysm in late pregnancy, documented at 37 weeks of gestation. The diagnosis of a true aneurysm of the uterine artery was based on, (1) a demonstration of the cystic mass located in proximity to the lower segment of the uterus with ultrasound characteristics of arterial flow in the mass, and (2) the occurrence in a woman who had no history of trauma or surgery in the pelvis. The finding during cesarean section confirmed the prenatal sonographic finding. The pregnancy ended with successful outcomes.

Diagnosis and treatment of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm: Case series and literature review

BACKGROUND

Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm (UAP) is a rare but potentially life-threatening cause of hemorrhage. Nonetheless, its knowledge could be insufficient among obstetricians, gynecologists, and radiologists. We aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of UAP.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed nine female patients diagnosed with UAP at our institute between 2013 and 2020.

RESULTS

Seven cases presented with a history of traumatic surgery including cesarean section, dilation and curettage, laparoscopic myomectomy, and cervical conization. Two cases occurred after spontaneous vaginal delivery and second-trimester pregnancy termination. The main symptom was heavy/massive/prolonged vaginal bleeding. All patients were first evaluated by color Doppler ultrasonography and three cases were confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. Severn patients underwent transarterial embolization (TAE) of the uterine arteries, and two were managed conservatively. All patients had good outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

UAP can develop after traumatic pelvic operations and non-traumatic delivery/abortion. It may be more common than previously considered. The risk of rupture may be correlated with multiple factors other than the mass size. TAE of the uterine artery could be an effective management strategy for ruptured UAP. However, some cases can resolve spontaneously without TAE, suggesting that conservative management can be employed in some women.