Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in patients with colorectal cancer

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios pre- and post-surgery in stage III CRC: a study of 2,742 patients

PURPOSE

Stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) is typically treated with surgery; however, it has a high recurrence rate and inconsistent benefits from postoperative chemotherapy. Inflammatory markers like the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have shown prognostic value in various cancers. However, the prognostic significance of NLR measured before and after CRC surgery is not clear. This study aims to clarify the prognostic value of the combination of pre- and post-surgery NLR in stage III CRC patients.

METHODS

Patients with stage III CRC treated between 2001 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed using data from the Chang Gung Medical Research Database. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on their pre- and post-operative NLR levels. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the associations between NLR levels and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

Data from 2,742 patients, median age of 62 years and 54% male, were analyzed. After adjustment, patients in Group IV, with high NLR values both before and after surgery, had greater risks of worse DFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.50), OS (aHR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.14-1.63), and CSS (aHR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04-1.55) compared to Group I.

CONCLUSIONS

High NLR levels before and after surgery is a strong predictor of poor outcomes in stage III CRC patients. The findings suggest that monitoring NLR at both time points can be a valuable prognostic tool, guiding postoperative care and treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Enhancing recovery and reducing inflammation: the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery recommendations on inflammatory markers in laparoscopic surgery-a scoping review

Introduction

The relationship between the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines and inflammatory markers in laparoscopic surgery has garnered increasing attention. These recommendations are designed to minimize surgical stress and potentially improve recovery outcomes by modifying perioperative care.

Objective

This scoping review aims to evaluate the impact of ERAS recommendations on inflammatory markers in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries, identifying current research gaps and consolidating findings from existing studies.

Methods

Guided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and adhering to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this review analyzed studies from databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. We included both randomized controlled trials and observational studies that assessed inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells (WBC), and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) in laparoscopic surgery patients managed with ERAS recommendations.

Results

Out of 64 initial studies, 7 met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 2,047 patients. Most of the studies focused on laparoscopic colorectal surgeries. Commonly assessed markers were CRP and WBC. The findings consistently showed that ERAS guideline could mitigate the inflammatory response, evidenced by reduced levels of CRP and IL-6, which correlated with fewer postoperative complications and expedited recovery.

Conclusion

ERAS recommendations appear to beneficially modulate inflammatory responses in laparoscopic surgery, which suggests a potential for enhanced recovery outcomes. However, the evidence is currently limited by the small number of studies and inherent methodological biases. Further robust RCTs are required to strengthen the evidence base and refine these protocols for broader clinical application.

Systematic Review Registration

https://osf.io/tj8mw/.

A Prospective and Randomized Control Study on Effects of Thymalfasin for Injection on Perioperative Immune Function and Long-term Prognosis of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

The objective of this study is to explore the effects of thymalfasin for injection on perioperative immune function and long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In total, 400 patients who entered the groups from February 2019 to January 2021 and underwent radical resection of CRC in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were the study subjects. They were separated into experimental group (0-199, XELOX chemotherapy and thymalfasin for injection) and control group (200-400, XELOX chemotherapy) by random number table, and the experimental group was randomly divided into conventional-dose group (n = 100, 1.6 mg of thymalfasin for injection, twice a week) and high-dose group (n = 100, 1.6 mg of thymalfasin for injection, thrice a week) according to a ratio of 1:1, to analyze the effects of different treatment schemes on perioperative immune function and long-term prognosis of CRC patients. Compared with control group, the conventional-dose group and high-dose group had notably lower incidences of perioperative infection (P < 0.05), with no significant difference in both groups (P > 0.05). The experimental group had significantly lower overall incidence of early and late postoperative complications, local recurrence rate and the incidence of distant metastasis, and higher perioperative immune function indexes and median disease free survival (DFS) (P < 0.05).         The conventional-dose and high-dose thymalfasin for injection effectively improves the perioperative immune function of CRC patients and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, as an effective treatment for such patients, which can benefit patients.

Video- assisted thoracoscopic lung resection with or without enhanced recovery after surgery: a single institution, prospective randomized controlled study

Purpose

This study was conducted to evaluate the postoperative short-term outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol.

Methods

A single-institution, prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. The primary outcome measures were postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and postoperative short-term effects.

Results

Among the 611 patients, 305 were assigned to the ERAS group, and 306 were assigned to the routine group. The ERAS group achieved earlier oral feeding, earlier mobilization, a shorter duration of drainage (2.0 vs. 5.0 days, P<0.001), and a shorter hospital stay (3.0 vs. 7.0 days, P<0.001). The biological impacts were confirmed to be significantly better for the ERAS group. Furthermore, the ERAS group also had a lower incidence of PPCs (11.5% vs. 22.9%, P<0.001) than did the routine group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following predictors of drainage tube removal on the 1st day after surgery without pneumonia during hospitalization: comorbidity (P=0.029), surgical procedure (P=0.001), and operation time (P=0.039).

Conclusions

Implementation of the ERAS protocol led to a decreased incidence of PPCs, suggesting that the ERAS protocol has a better biological impact on patients undergoing VATS for lung resection. Multigradient individual ERAS protocols are recommended at different institutions according to the individual conditions of patients.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0009ZT9&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0002ZGN&ts=3&cx=ks7hrg, identifier NCT04451473.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Combined with an "Antimicrobial-Free" Strategy for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) combined with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in the treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) without antibiotics. Methods: In this study, a total of 160 patients with AUA who underwent LA between January 2018 and December 2021 were included and divided into the antibiotic group (n = 80) or the no-antibiotic group (n = 80). The patients in the antibiotic group received the ERP combined with antimicrobials during the perioperative period, while those in the no-antibiotic group only received the ERP during the perioperative period. The clinical data of these patients were collected to compare the inflammation level and stress state before and after surgery. In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications and the recovery speed of the patients were compared between groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the inflammation level and stress state before or after surgery, the incidence of postoperative complications or the recovery speed between the antibiotic group and the no-antibiotic group (P > .05). Conclusion: The use of ERP combined with LA as an antimicrobial-free treatment scheme in the perioperative period was found to be safe and effective for patients with AUA. Therefore, this approach is clinically valuable.

Efficacy of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Cancer-Specific Survival in Elderly Patients with Localized Colon Cancer: A Single Center Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Purpose

The prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been studied for colorectal cancer. Elderly patients in general tend to have comorbidities and decreased organ function that potentially influence the NLR score. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between NLR and cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with colon cancer, using a propensity score-matched analysis.

Patients and Methods

A total of 203 patients aged over 75 years who underwent curative resection for colon cancer and were diagnosed pathologically with stage II/III disease were eligible for entry to the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to NLR score: NLR-High (NLR≥4.5) group (NLR-H, n=60) and NLR-Low (NLR<4.5) group (NLR-L, n=143). After propensity score matching, 57 patients in each group were matched.

Results

Before matching, Charlson comorbidity index was significantly higher in the NLR-H group (4 vs 2, p<0.001). After matching, all factors were similar between the groups. The median follow-up period was 43 months (range, 1-160 months). Five-year relapse-free-survival (69.8% vs 87.3%, p=0.030) and cancer-specific survival (83.0% vs 96.0%, p=0.042) were significantly lower in the NLR-H group.

Conclusion

NLR appears to be a cancer-specific prognostic marker in elderly patients with colon cancer.

Preoperative Risk Factors and Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Complications Associated with Total Gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the risk factors for patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing total gastrectomy (TG) that predict postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage, postoperative pneumonia, and heart disease.

METHODS

We collected 106 patients who received TG for GC between May 2009 and May 2017 at Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, including clinicopathologic, surgical, postoperative complication, laboratory test, and physiologic test data.

RESULTS

Of 106 patients, 92 (86.8%) had no complications, and 14 (13.2%) had complications. Univariate analyses revealed that a high American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ≥3.5 significantly correlated with postoperative complications. Multivariate analyses showed that high ASA-PS was an independent prognostic factor of postoperative complications. The cancer recurrence rate was 34.8% in the noncomplication group and 71.4% in the complication group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with postoperative complications are prone to recurrence and poor prognosis. For patients with high-risk GC with poor ASA-PS and high NLR, more thorough perioperative management is essential.

Analysis of the Effect of Fast Recovery Surgery Concept on Perioperative Nursing Care of Patients with Radical Resection of Cervical Cancer and Its Influence on Psychological Status

Objective

To explore the applied effect of fast-track surgery concept in the perioperative nursing of patients undergoing radical cervical cancer surgery and its influence on mental state.

Methods

The clinical data of 110 patients undergoing radical cervical cancer surgery in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were randomly divided into a research group (n = 55) and a reference group (n = 55). The reference group received routine clinical nursing, and the research group received fast-track surgical nursing. Then, we compared their nursing effect and influence on the mental state of patients in the two groups.

Results

The Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores of patients in the two groups after intervention were significantly lower than those before the intervention (P < 0.001), and after intervention, patients in the research group had significantly lower KPS scores as compared to patients in the reference group (P < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores of patients in the two groups after intervention in comparison with before intervention (P < 0.001), and patients in the research group after intervention had significantly lower SAS and SDS scores compared to the reference group (P < 0.001). Patients in the research group spent short time on expelling gas, eating, and getting out of bed as compared to the reference group (P < 0.001); after intervention, compared to patients in the reference group, patients in the research group had significantly higher scores in cognitive function, emotional function, social function, and physical function (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in IgA, IgM, and IgG levels before intervention (P > 0.05). After intervention, the IgA, IgM, and IgG levels of patients in the two groups were all lower than before intervention, and patients in the research group had significantly higher IgA, IgM, and IgG levels as compared to the reference group (P < 0.001); the complication rate of patients in the research group was significantly lower than that in the reference group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The fast-track surgery concept effectively helps improve the negative emotion of patients, shorten recovery time, improve quality of life, and reduce the impact on immune function in the radical cervical cancer surgery, and it is worthy of promotion and application, with a high safety.

The Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR) and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) on Long-Term Survival in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB) Procedures

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases, apart from commonly known risk factors, are related to inflammation. There are several simple novel markers proposed to present the relation between inflammatory reactions activation and atherosclerotic changes. They are easily available from whole blood count and include neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelets to lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The RDW results were excluded from the analysis.

METHOD AND RESULTS

The study based on retrospective single-centre analysis of 682 consecutive patients (131 (19%) females and 551 (81%) males) with median age of 66 years (60-71) who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) procedure. During the median 5.3 +/- 1.9 years follow-up, there was a 87% cumulative survival rate. The laboratory parameters including preoperative MLR > 0.2 (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.33-4.55, p = 0.004) and postoperative NLR > 3.5 (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.09-2.79, p = 0.019) were found significant for long-term mortality prediction in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Hematological indices NLR and MLR can be regarded as significant predictors of all-cause long-term mortality after OPCAB revascularization. Multivariable analysis revealed preoperative values of MLR > 0.2 and postoperative values of NLR > 3.5 as simple, reliable factors which may be applied into clinical practice for meticulous postoperative monitoring of patients in higher risk of worse prognosis.