Age at Diagnosis, Extent of Disease and Breast Cancer Survival: A Population-Based Study in Florence, Italy

Breast cancer in elderly Korean women: clinicopathological and biological features

BACKGROUND

With an aging society, Korean women ≥70 years of age are increasingly being diagnosed with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinicopathological and biological characteristics of breast cancer in elderly Korean women and compare them with breast cancer in elderly (≥70 years) women globally and in Korean women of all ages.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological and biological features of breast cancer in elderly Korean women (≥70 years; n = 87) who sought treatment during 2004-2014 from a single institution. These data were indirectly compared with data of Korean women of all ages (nationwide Korean Breast Cancer Registry) or elderly women globally (meta-analysis).

RESULTS

Compared to elderly women with breast cancer globally, Korean elderly women had a more symptomatic presentation, lower ER expression, and overexpression or amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Compared to Korean women of all ages with breast cancer, elderly Korean women presented with advanced tumor stages, larger tumor size, more lymph node involvement, and more luminal B and basal-like subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer had a more aggressive clinicopathological and biological characteristics in elderly Korean women than in Korean women of all ages or elderly women globally.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of Invasive Papillary Carcinoma of the Breast

BACKGROUND

Invasive papillary carcinoma (IPC) of the breast is thought to carry a more favorable prognosis than invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The aim of this study is to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics between IPC and IDC and their prognosis using a large nationwide data set.

METHODS

Female patients diagnosed with malignant IPC and IDC between 2005 and 2014 were analyzed. Patients with incomplete survival data, stage 0/IV, unknown stage, or recurrent disease were excluded. Five-year overall survival was compared between IPC and IDC.

RESULTS

Among 308,426 patients, 1147 had IPC and 307,279 had IDC. IPC presented more in older postmenopausal women, black Americans, and people who had government insurance. IPC had larger tumor size, lower-grade, and earlier-stage disease, less node-positive disease, higher hormone positivity, and lower human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplification. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy rates were lower in IPC than those in IDC. IPC had a similar 5-year overall survival as compared with IDC overall (86.8% versus 88.7%) (P = 0.06). Age, pathologic stage, and radiation treatment were shown to be independent prognostic factors of IPC.

CONCLUSIONS

IPC has a similar prognosis as IDC, suggesting that these patients should follow the same treatment protocols.

[Survival rate of 10 years among women with breast cancer: a historic cohort from 2000-2014]

Breast cancer is a public health problem due to its high incidence, morbidity and mortality. The analysis of survival for this disease contributes to the description of behavior and prognostic factors. The scope of this article is to investigate survival for 10 years after diagnosis and the prognostic factors of women with breast cancer admitted to the Unified Health System Mastology Service in Joinville, State of Santa Catarina, between 2000 and 2014. A historical cohort study with data from the medical records and death certificates of 1,321 women, of whom 471 were considered eligible under the minimum follow-up criteria of 10 years (n = 288), and/or death before this period (n = 183). Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier model, the Log-Rank test and the Cox regression model was conducted. Overall survival at 10 years was 41% (CI 95%, 36.1%-45.0%). The risk of 10-year mortality stratified by tumor staging was higher among women with lymphatic invasion and staging II, and staging III, at 60 years or older. The findings suggest that the presence of lymphatic invasion, advanced age and intermediate/advanced staging of the disease can be considered indicators of a worse prognosis for breast cancer.

Molecular features in young vs elderly breast cancer patients and the impacts on survival disparities by age at diagnosis

Young and elderly breast cancer patients are more likely to have a poorer outcome than middle‐aged patients. The intrinsic molecular features for this disparity are unclear. We obtained data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) on May 15, 2017 to test the potential mediation effects of the molecular features on the association between age and prognosis with a four‐step approach. The relative contributions of the molecular features (PAM50 subtype, risk stratification, DNAm age, and mutations in TP53,PIK3CA,MLL3,CDH1,GATA3, and MAP3K1) to age disparities in survival were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models with or without the features. Young patients were significantly more likely to have basal‐like subtype, GATA3 mutations, and younger DNA methylation (DNAm) age than middle‐aged patients (P < .05). Both the young and elderly patients had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer recurrence after adjusted by race, tumor size, and node status (Hazard ratio [HR] (95% confidence interval [CI]): 2.81 [1.44, 5.45], 2.37 [1.45, 3.89], respectively). This increased risk was weakened in the young patients after further adjustments in the molecular features, particularly basal‐like subtype, GATA3 mutations, and DNAm age (HR [95%CI]: 1.87 [0.81, 4.32]), resulting in 33.5% decreased risk of recurrence. Meanwhile, the adjustments of the molecular features did not alter the recurrence risk for the elderly patients. Compared with middle‐aged patients of breast cancer, poorer prognosis of elderly patients may be caused by aging, while poorer prognosis of young patients was probably mediated through intrinsic characteristics, such as basal‐like subtype, GATA3 mutations, and DNAm age of the cancerous tissues.

Long-Term Cause-Specific Mortality After Surgery for Women With Breast Cancer: A 20-Year Follow-Up Study From Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Cancer Registries

BACKGROUND

Research into long-term cause-specific mortality of women diagnosed with breast cancer is important because it allows for the splitting of the population into patients who eventually die from breast cancer and from other causes. The adoption of this approach helps to identify patients with an elevated risk of eventual death from breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to examine the associations between both sociodemographic and clinicopathologic characteristics and the underlying risks of death from breast cancer and from other causes for women diagnosed with breast cancer. A second aim was to propose a predictive biomarker of cause-specific mortality in terms of treatment and several important characteristics of a patient.

METHODS

A cohort of 16 511 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer in 1990 was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries and followed for 20 years. A mixture model for the regression analysis of competing risks was used to identify factors and confounders that affected either the eventual cause-specific mortality or conditional cause-specific hazard rates, or both. Missing data were handled with multiple imputation.

RESULTS

Curvilinear relationships of age at diagnosis along with race, marital status, breast cancer type, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, extension, lymph node status, type of surgery, and radiotherapy status were significant risk factors for the cause-specific mortality, with extension and lymph node status appearing to be confounded with the effects of both type of surgery and radiotherapy status. The score obtained from combining a set of predictors showed to be an accurate predictive biomarker.

CONCLUSIONS

In cause-specific mortality of women diagnosed breast cancer, prognosis appears to depend on both sociodemographic and clinicopathologic factors. The predictive biomarker proposed in this study may help identifying the level of seriousness of the disease earlier than traditional methods, potentially guiding future allocation of resources for better patient care and management strategies.

A study of ductal versus non-ductal invasive breast carcinomas in older women: long-term clinical outcome and comparison with their younger counterparts

Ductal carcinoma is the commonest histological type found in invasive breast carcinomas and may be associated with worse prognosis, when compared to non-ductal carcinoma. Older patients tend to display more favourable tumour biology than younger patients. This study aimed to investigate the significance of histological type and its relationship with clinical outcome in the older group. A total of 808 older (≥70 years) women with early operable primary breast cancer underwent surgery as their primary treatment, followed by optimal adjuvant therapies, in the Nottingham Breast Unit between 1973 and 2009. The histological types of the surgical specimens were reviewed and compared with those in a previously characterised younger (<70 years) series (N = 1,733), in terms of distribution and correlation with clinical outcome. Ductal type was associated with a significantly worse clinical outcome when compared to non-ductal type in the older group in terms of 10-year rates of metastasis-free survival (75 vs 79 %, p = 0.028) and overall survival (44 vs 52 %; p = 0.015). Similar worse clinical outcome was found with the ductal type in the younger group in terms of 10-year rates of metastasis-free survival (65 vs 79 %; p = 0.001) and overall survival (60 vs 78 %; p = 0.001). For all patients with ductal type carcinomas, the older series showed significantly better 10-year metastasis-free survival (75 vs 65 %, p < 0.001) and breast cancer-specific survival (75 vs 69 %, p = 0.025) when compared to the younger series. In both old and the young, ductal cancers were associated with poor survival outcome when compared to non-ductal cancers. When compared to their younger counterparts, older patients with ductal type carcinomas had better metastasis-free and breast cancer-specific survival rates (their lower overall survival was likely to be due to death from other causes), despite having a lower likelihood of receiving adjuvant systemic therapy.

Comparison of Clinical Features and Treatment Outcome of Breast Cancers in Young and Elderly Chinese Patients

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological features and prognosis of operable breast cancers in young and elderly Chinese women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 209 patients aged ≤35 years and 213 patients aged ≥60 but <70 years, who received treatment between January 2000 and December 2004. The clinicopathological features, molecular subtypes, therapeutic strategies, and prognosis were evaluated. RESULTS: Tumor size was of significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.018), with more T2 and T3 tumors in the young group and more lymph node involvement in young patients with stage T1 tumors (p = 0.033). There were more triple-negative and less luminal A tumors in the young group (p = 0.018). 47.1% of tumors were not detected by mammography in the young group as compared to 5.5% in the elderly group (p < 0.001). More patients received chemotherapy in the young group (p < 0.001) and preferred breast-conserving surgery (p = 0.031). The 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 80 and 66% in the elderly and the young group, respectively (p = 0.001), but no difference was seen in overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with elderly women, young breast cancer patients have different clinicopathological features and molecular subtypes, and poorer DFS. Furthermore, the insidious onset of breast cancer in young women suggests that clinicians should pay more attention to young women with breast abnormalities.

Inequalities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in the Trent region, and implications for the NHS Breast Screening Programme

BACKGROUND

This study investigates risk factors for diagnosis with late-stage breast cancer in order to identify inequalities and inform the understanding of barriers affecting access to mammography screening.

METHODS

Data from the Trent Cancer Registry were used to identify all women with invasive breast cancer, diagnosed in 1998-2006. Risk of diagnosis with late-stage breast cancer was calculated to quantify strength of association between exposure and outcome.

RESULTS

Women outside the age group for routine screening were approximately 30% [<50 years, relative risk (RR) = 1.34 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.26-1.43) and >70 years, RR = 1.27 (95% CI: 1.19-1.36)] more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer; the most deprived women were 37% [RR = 1.37 (95% CI: 1.01-2.56)] more likely to be diagnosed with Stage IV breast cancer; ethnic minority women were 15% [RR = 1.15 (95% CI: 1.09-1.22)] more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer and women resident in 5 of 11 Trent Primary Care Trusts (PCT) had a greater than 30% increased risk of diagnosis with late-stage breast cancer than those in Nottingham City PCT.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the need for appropriate targeted interventions to address compositional and contextual inequalities that are evident in breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Changes in survival during the past two decades for breast cancer at the Kyoto University Hospital

AIMS

To report the changes in survival over 20 years of 775 breast cancer women operated between 1982 and 2003 at the Kyoto University Hospital in Japan, reflecting changes in clinical practice over that period.

RESULTS

Survival curves have significantly improved between the periods 1982-1989 and 1990-2003. The 5- and 10-year survival rates between these periods were 80.3% and 85.1%, and 67.5% and 75.0%, respectively. Moreover, there was a difference in overall survival curves of patients of stages II and III, of 35-54 ages, or of positive estrogen receptor (ER) status between these periods.

CONCLUSION

The present study presented the recent advance of the survival rates might be due to the rational development of breast cancer treatment, and suggested the possibility that the patients of stages II and III, of 35-54 ages, or of positive ER status were received benefits by these treatments.

Older female cancer patients: importance, causes, and consequences of undertreatment

Despite increased interest in treatment of senior cancer patients, older patients are much too often undertreated. This review aims to present data on treatment practices of older women with breast and gynecologic cancers and on the consequences of undertreatment on patient outcome. We also discuss the reasons and validity of suboptimal care in older patients. Numerous studies have reported suboptimal treatment in older breast and gynecologic cancer patients. Undertreatment displays multiple aspects: from lowered doses of adjuvant chemotherapy to total therapeutic abstention. Undertreatment also concerns palliative care, treatment of pain, and reconstruction. Only few studies have evaluated the consequences of nonstandard approaches on cancer-specific mortality, taking into account other prognostic factors and comorbidities. These studies clearly showed that undertreatment increased disease-specific mortality for breast and ovarian cancers. For other gynecological cancers, data were insufficient to draw conclusions. Objective reasons at the origin of undertreatment were, notably, higher prevalence of comorbidity, lowered life expectancy, absence of data on treatment efficacy in clinical trials, and increased adverse effects of treatment. More subjective reasons were putative lowered benefits of treatment, less aggressive cancers, social marginalization, and physician's beliefs. Undertreatment in older cancer patients is a well-documented phenomenon responsible for preventable cancer deaths. Treatments are still influenced by unclear standards and have to be adapted to the older patient's general health status, but should also offer the best chance of cure.

Risk assessment for cancer surgery in elderly patients

Global growth of the elderly population is requiring healthcare providers to cater for an expanding elderly cancer subpopulation. The aggression with which cancer should be treated in this subpopulation is an ethical dilemma and is an ongoing debate, as surgeons have feared increases in postoperative morbidity and mortality. As a result elderly patients often receive suboptimal cancer treatment. The need for standardization of cancer surgery is well recognized despite the difficulties in view of heterogeneity of the group. In this article, epidemiological changes, tumor biology specific to elderly cancer are visited, operative risk assessment tools are discussed, and interim results of ongoing multinational investigation ie, PACE (Preoperative Assessment of Cancer Elderly) revealed.

A French national survey on infiltrating breast cancer: analysis of clinico-pathological features and treatment modalities in 1159 patients

BACKGROUND

Despite the approximate 42,000 yearly new cases of breast cancer in France, there have been very few exhaustive studies on the clinicopathological features and treatment options of this disease.

METHODS

Thus, a prospective, non-selective, nationwide survey on infiltrating breast cancer (IBC) was conducted in France from September 2001 to April 2002, in order to assess the epidemiological features of newly diagnosed disease, the prognostic and predictive variables with a special emphasis on hormone receptors, and the current approaches to therapy in everyday clinical practice.

RESULTS

In total, 1159 patients were evaluable (median age 57 years); two-thirds of women were postmenopausal and 38% had undergone hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). Ductal and lobular infiltrating cancers represented 82.3% and 11.6% of cases, respectively. Most tumours expressed oestrogen (79.7%) and progesterone (69.7%) receptors. Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 oncogene was found in 20.6% of the assessed cases. IBC diagnosed in women under HRT presented significantly better clinico-pathological features than in non-users. All patients underwent surgery as first treatment: 77.5% breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and 22.5% mastectomy; 1024 patients also underwent axillary surgery. The overall axillary lymph-node involvement rate was 44.4%. Radiotherapy was proposed in 98% and 83% of the women who had undergone BCS and mastectomy, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered in 58.7% of patients and hormonal treatment was provided in 76.5% of patients; tamoxifen was the most widely used hormonal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a trend for global downstaging of IBC (with favourable clinico-pathological features), leading to a high rate of BCS. Postoperative treatments were widely used, in accordance with national and international guidelines. Use of aromatase inhibitors and taxanes was limited, but is likely to rise in the future.

Survival of young and older breast cancer patients in Geneva from 1990 to 2001

The effect of age on breast cancer survival is still a matter of controversy. Breast cancer in young women is thought to be more aggressive and to have worse prognosis but results from clinical research have been neither consistent nor definitive. In this study, we have assessed the impact of young age at diagnosis on tumor characteristics, treatment and survival of breast cancer. The study included 82 very young (< or = 35 years), 790 young (36-49), and 2125 older (50-69) women recorded between 1990 and 2001 at the Geneva Cancer Registry. Very young and young patients had more often stage II cancers (P = 0.009), poorly differentiated (P < 0.001) and estrogen receptor negative (P < 0.001) tumors. They were also more likely to receive chemotherapy (P < 0.001) and less likely to receive hormonal therapy (P < 0.001). Specific five-year survival was not different in the three groups (91%, 90%, and 89% for very young, young and older, respectively). When adjusting for all prognostic variables, age was not significantly related to mortality from breast cancer with a hazard ratio of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.3-2.0) for very young and 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8-1.4) for young patients compared to older women. Tumor stage, differentiation, estrogen receptor status, surgery, and radiotherapy were all independent determinants of breast cancer prognosis. We conclude that age is not an independent prognostic factor when accounting for breast tumor characteristics and treatment.

Breast cancer treatment in older women

This article presents the author's current approaches to the management of breast cancer in older women, with emphasis on clinical and surgical treatment of the disease in this population. There are controversies surrounding the management of breast cancer in this population regarding adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy and surgical options. We endeavor to address these issues in the article.

Age-related variations in progression of cancer at diagnosis and completeness of cancer registry data

There is some evidence that stage and grade at diagnosis of cancer decreases with age and that the availability of data on stage and grade of cancer decreases with age. This may be because older people tend to receive less intensive investigation of cancer but this has not been confirmed. We investigated the relationship between age at diagnosis of cancer and both stage and grade at diagnosis, and the chances of data on stage or grade at diagnosis being unavailable, in people with colorectal cancer (n=12,419) and women with breast cancer (n=12,793) using 2 years of cancer registry data from the north of England. Stage and grade decreased with increasing age in colorectal cancer. Grade decreased but stage increased with increasing age in women with breast cancer. The chances of data on stage and grade at diagnosis being unavailable increased with age in all cases.

Breast cancer in elderly women

Although the number of elderly patients with breast cancer is increasing, knowledge about possible differences in the biology and clinical outcomes of breast cancer according to age is limited. Retrospectively were followed: diagnosis, surgical treatment, stage of disease, histology, and survival of breast cancer treated women at the Surgical and Oncological Clinic in Nis between 1985 and 1990. Patients were divided in two groups: study (=65 years) and control (<65 years). The study involved 2196 women (862 study group; 1334 control group). Ductal carcinoma was the most frequently observed histological type (70.3% versus 61.92%). The majority of our patients presented with early-stage disease (69.02% versus 60.20%). Estrogen receptor positive tumors occurred in 67.88% of elderly patients versus 28.42% of young cases, and negative axillary lymph nodes were observed in 45.78 and 34.40% of patients in the elderly and young group, respectively. Modified radical mastectomy was selected by a large proportion of patients in both groups. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy were more frequently performed in the younger group (P < 1 x 10(-8)). There is no significant difference in disease-specific survival by age. In our population the presentation, surgical treatment, and survival from breast cancer is similar in older and younger women.

The surgical management of elderly cancer patients

Although cancer in the elderly is extremely common, few health professionals in oncology are familiar with caring for series of oncogeriatric patients. Surgery is at present the first choice, but is frequently delivered suboptimally: under-treatment is justified by concerns about unsustainable toxicity, whilst over-treatment is explained by the lack of knowledge in optimising preoperative risk assessment. This article summarises the point of view of the Surgical Task Force @ SIOG (International Society for Geriatric Oncology), pointing out differences from, and similarities to, the younger cohorts of cancer patients, and highlighting the latest updates and trends specifically related to senior cancer patients.

Survival of women with breast cancer in Ottawa, Canada: variation with age, stage, histology, grade and treatment

This study examined the 5-year survival of 2192 breast cancer women diagnosed between 1994 and 1997 in Ottawa, Canada, by age, TNM stage, histology, grade and treatment, including assessment of the independent value of variables in defining prognosis. Our results showed that age, stage, treatment and grade significantly influenced outcome regardless of the confounding factors considered, with histology failing to achieve significant independent prognostic information. The survival rates were highest at ages 50–69 years for stage I and at ages 40–49 years for stages II–IV. The rates were lowest at ages ⩽39 years for stages I–II and at ages ⩾70 years for stages III–IV. The differences in survival between grade 1 and grade 3 were 9% in stage I and 20% in stage II. The treatment leading to the best survival was surgery plus radiation for stages I–II and surgery combined with chemotherapy for stages III–IV. Lobular carcinoma had a better prognosis than ductal carcinoma; this can be explained by more grade 1 and less grade 3 cases in lobular carcinoma. The worse prognosis for young patients than other ages can be explained by their higher proportion of poorly differentiated cancers. Stage I patients aged 50–69 years having the best survival is likely due to the earlier diagnosis achieved through screening.

The need for targeted research into breast cancer in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is a major source of morbidity and mortality in elderly women. Despite this, many trials on which clinical practice is based have under-represented the elderly. Consequently there is little evidence to guide best practice in this age group.

METHODS

A search of the major literature databases was performed using the search terms 'breast cancer' and 'elderly'. Articles relevant to the treatment of breast cancer in the elderly were selected.

RESULTS

The elderly receive less aggressive treatment for breast cancer compared with younger patients. Primary endocrine therapy is sometimes substituted for operation, and axillary surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy are commonly omitted. Evidence for and against such treatment strategies is inadequate, making it difficult to determine what constitutes best practice.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for research to be targeted at the older age group of patients with breast cancer to enable the development of specific treatment guidelines.

Young age as an adverse prognostic factor in premenopausal women with operable breast cancer

Data regarding young age as an independent prognostic factor have been conflicting. We investigated this variable in 696 premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese women with operable breast cancer who participated in a clinical trial of adjuvant surgical oophorectomy and tamoxifen. Tumor size and axillary lymph node status did not vary with age. Women < 35 years had a greater fraction of histologic grade III tumors (P = 0.06), and in the two thirds of patients with available data, in women < 35 years, there was a lower percentage of estrogen- and progesterone receptor-positive tumors and a higher percentage of HER2/neu-positive tumors (P > 0.14 for each group). In univariate analyses, compared to women > or = 45 years, women < 35 years and 35-39 years were at greater risk for death (P = 0.002 and P = 0.023, respectively), and compared to women > or = 40, women < 40 were at greater risk of death (P = 0.002). Multivariate analyses supported a conclusion that younger age was an independent adverse prognostic factor for survival (P = 0.005, age as a continuous variable). Kaplan-Meier analyses in all patients and in oophorectomy and tamoxifen-treated patients, but not in observation-only patients, showed statistically significant poorer disease-free and overall survival in women < 40 years compared to those > or = 40 years. Thus, despite efficacy of the combined adjuvant hormonal therapy, younger age was a risk factor for poorer survival.