Roach's Mathematical Equations in Predicting Pathological Stage in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Can multiparametric MRI replace Roach equations in staging prostate cancer before external beam radiation therapy?

PURPOSE

To investigate the agreement between Roach equations (RE) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in assessing the T-stage of prostate cancer (PCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with biopsy-proven PCa and previous RE assessment prospectively underwent mpMRI on a 3.0T magnet before external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Using Cohen's kappa statistic, we assessed the agreement between RE and mpMRI in defining the T-stage (≥T3 vs.T≤2) and risk category according to the National comprehensive cancer network criteria (≤intermediate vs. ≥high). We also calculated sensitivity and specificity for ≥T3 stage in an additional group of thirty-seven patients with post-prostatectomy histological examination (mpMRI validation group).

RESULTS

The agreement between RE and mpMRI in assessing the T stage and risk category was moderate (k=0.53 and 0.56, respectively). mpMRI changed the T stage and risk category in 21.9% (95%C.I. 13.4-33-4) and 20.5% (95%C.I. 12.3-31.9), respectively, prevalently downstaging PCa compared to RE. Sensitivity and specificity for ≥T3 stage in the mpMRI validation group were 81.8% (95%C.I. 65.1-91.9) and 88.5% (72.8-96.1).

CONCLUSION

RE and mpMRI show moderate agreement only in assessing the T-stage of PCa, translating into an mpMRI-induced change in risk assessment in about one fifth of patients. As supported by high sensitivity/specificity for ≥T3 stage in the validation group, the discrepancy we found is in favour of mpMRI as a tool to stage PCa before ERBT.

Pelvic lymph node irradiation for prostate cancer: who, why, and when?

Prostate cancers are best characterized by their clinical (TNM) stage, Gleason score, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. These 3 factors are known to influence the risk of pelvic nodal involvement. By combining these prognostic factors, nomograms and equations have been developed and are widely used in clinical practice as an accurate way of predicting the probability of a given pathological stage. Patients who have a significant risk of pelvic nodal metastasis will likely have higher biochemical failure rates. Results from the multi-institutional prospective trials have shown that patients at an intermediate to high risk for pelvic nodal involvement experience disease progression-free survival benefits from the use of whole pelvic radiotherapy combined with hormone therapy. Yet, significant biological interactions between radiation treatment volumes and timing of hormone therapy have been shown. Further study of these issues is necessary to define the best treatment for patients at significant risk of pelvic lymph node involvement.

The role of whole pelvic radiotherapy in locally advanced prostate cancer

Routine PSA testing has led to diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer at earlier stages than previously. Earlier and technically-improved treatment, together with escalation of dose has enhanced cure rates. Although, the incidence of nodal metastases is now lower than in pre-PSA days, more extended pelvic lymphadenectomies have shown the actual rate of lymph node involvement to be higher than had been determined from standard radical prostate surgery. As in cancers in other sites, especially in their earlier stages, lymph node metastases may exist in the absence of haematogenous dissemination. This, together with the improved rates of control of the primary prostate tumour, suggests that elective irradiation of early-stage lymph nodes from prostate cancer should enhance survival in a manner analogous to improvements seen with this approach in other cancers. Although, the absolute incidence of positive nodes in locally advanced prostate cancer warrants elective radiotherapy, it is relatively low and the modest improvements to be expected may be undetected in the results of a small trial.

Radiotherapy in the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Evolving Standards, Consensus, Controversies and New Directions

Major advances have been made in the definitive use of various forms of radiotherapy (RT) in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Despite tremendous gains, the radiation oncology community continues to struggle with several key questions. In general, the areas of controversy pertain to how to improve the therapeutic ratio of RT. Specifically, key issues include dose escalation; the relative benefit of alternative forms of RT (ie, brachytherapy and protons); target localization; the use, timing, and duration of androgen deprivation; and the need for pelvic nodal irradiation. Multiple efforts have been made to address each of these issues; however, there is no consensus on how to resolve them. This review is an evidence-based critique of the available treatment approaches considered for the optimal use of radiotherapy as definitive management of clinically localized PCa.