Chemoradiation in female patients with anal cancer: Patient-reported outcome of acute and chronic side effects

Pleasurable and problematic receptive anal intercourse and diseases of the colon, rectum and anus

The ability to experience pleasurable sexual activity is important for human health. Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) is a common, though frequently stigmatized, pleasurable sexual activity. Little is known about how diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus and their treatments affect RAI. Engaging in RAI with gastrointestinal disease can be difficult due to the unpredictability of symptoms and treatment-related toxic effects. Patients might experience sphincter hypertonicity, gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety, altered pelvic blood flow from structural disorders, decreased sensation from cancer-directed therapies or body image issues from stoma creation. These can result in problematic RAI - encompassing anodyspareunia (painful RAI), arousal dysfunction, orgasm dysfunction and decreased sexual desire. Therapeutic strategies for problematic RAI in patients living with gastrointestinal diseases and/or treatment-related dysfunction include pelvic floor muscle strengthening and stretching, psychological interventions, and restorative devices. Providing health-care professionals with a framework to discuss pleasurable RAI and diagnose problematic RAI can help improve patient outcomes. Normalizing RAI, affirming pleasure from RAI and acknowledging that the gastrointestinal system is involved in sexual pleasure, sexual function and sexual health will help transform the scientific paradigm of sexual health to one that is more just and equitable.

Predictive Factors for Toxicity After Primary Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing primary platinum-based chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy often experience toxicities. Normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) models quantify toxicity risk and aid in optimizing radiation therapy to minimize side effects. However, it is unclear which predictors to include in an NTCP model. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the identified predictors contributing to gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary (GU), and vaginal toxicities and insufficiency fractures for LACC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic search was performed and articles evaluating the relationship between predictors and toxicities in women with LACC treated with primary chemoradiation were included. The Quality In Prognosis Studies tool was used to assess risk of bias, with high-risk studies being excluded from further analysis. Relationships between dose-volume parameters, patient and treatment characteristics, and toxicity endpoints were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-three studies were identified. Twenty-six had a low or moderate risk of bias and were therefore included. Brachytherapy-related dose-volume parameters of the GI tract, including rectum and bowel equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) D2 cm3, were frequently related to toxicities, unlike GU dose-volume parameters. Furthermore, (recto)vaginal point doses predicted toxicities. Few studies evaluated external beam radiation therapy dose-volume parameters and identified rectum EQD2 V30 Gy, V40 Gy, and V55 Gy, bowel and bladder EQD2 V40 Gy as toxicity predictors. Also, total reference air kerma and vaginal reference length were associated with toxicities. Relationships between patient characteristics and GI toxicity were inconsistent. The extent of vaginal involvement at diagnosis, baseline symptoms, and obesity predicted GU or vaginal toxicities. Only 1 study evaluated insufficiency fractures and demonstrated lower pretreatment bone densities to be associated.

CONCLUSIONS

This review detected multiple candidate predictors of toxicity. Larger studies should consider insufficiency fractures, assess dose levels from external beam radiation therapy, and quantify the relationship between the predictors and treatment-related toxicities in women with LACC to further facilitate NTCP model development for clinical use.

Patient reported long-term side effects on bowel function and anal pain in anal cancer survivors - 3- and 6-year results from the Swedish national ANCA study

AIM

The primary therapeutic option for anal cancer treatment is chemoradiotherapy resulting in 80% survival. The aim of this study was to assess long-term bowel function impairment and anal pain at 3 and 6 years after anal cancer diagnosis, based on a hypothesis of an increase in impairment over time. A secondary aim was to investigate if chemoradiotherapy increased the risk for bowel impairment, compared to radiotherapy alone.

METHOD

The ANal CAncer study (ANCA) consists of a national Swedish cohort of patients diagnosed with anal cancer between 2011-2013. Patients within the study were invited to respond to a study-specific questionnaire at 3- and 6-years after diagnosis. Descriptive analyses for the primary endpoint and ordinal logistic regressions for secondary endpoint were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 388 patients (84%) were included in the study. At 3 years of follow-up, 264 patients were alive. A total of 195 of these patients (74%) answered a study specific questionnaire, and at 6 years 154 patients (67%). Fifty-seven percent experienced bowel urgency at both 3 and 6 years. There was an increased risk for repeated bowel movement within 1 h (OR 2.44 [95% CI: 1.08-5.61, p = 0.03]) at 3 years in patients who had been treated by chemoradiation compared to radiotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Impairment in bowel function and anal pain after anal cancer treatment should be expected and remains after 6 years. This suggests that long-term follow-up may be necessary in some form after customary follow-up. The addition of chemotherapy increases long-term side effects of bowel function.

Long-Term Patient-Reported Quality of Life of Anal Cancer Survivors Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy: Results From a Prospective Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has confirmed its superiority in improving acute treatment-related toxicities in anal cancer, without compromising tumor control. However, the effect of IMRT on long-term quality of life (QOL) is poorly documented. The study prospectively evaluated the long-term patient-reported QOL after IMRT-based chemoradiation in anal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-eight patients treated with IMRT and concurrent 5 fluorouracil/mitomycin-C were enrolled in the study. A prespecified secondary endpoint was prospective evaluation of long-term QOL. Fifty-four patients underwent QOL evaluation at baseline, after treatment, and during follow-up until 60 months, with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales and the Colorectal Cancer-Specific Quality Of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR29) scales. The QOL scores at baseline and posttreatment periods were compared.

RESULTS

For QLQ-C30, at 60 months, the mean scores of global health status, all functional scales, and all symptoms except diarrhea had improved, indicating normalization of QOL. Clinically and statistically significant improvements in the global health status (15.4; P = .003), role functioning (19.3; P = .0017), emotional functioning (18.9; P = .008), and social functioning (29.8; P ≤ .001) were observed. Diarrhea persisted as a concern over the years (P = .172). For European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-CR29, rectal pain (-38.6; P = .001), mucous or blood discharge per rectum (-22.8; P = .005), and perianal soreness (-37.3; P ≤ .001) were improved both clinically and statistically. Clinically significant fecal leakage was reported by 16% of patients (5.6; P = .421). Volumes receiving 45 and 54 Gy were independent predictors for fecal incontinence. Clinically and statistically significant urinary incontinence occurred in 21% of patients (17.5; P = .014). Deterioration of dyspareunia was clinically significant (26.7; P = .099) at 60 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with historical data, IMRT is associated with reduced long-term effects on QOL. The majority of patients treated with IMRT experienced clinically significant recovery of function and improvement in QOL over 5 years after completion of treatment. Specific toxicities such as chronic diarrhea, fecal incontinence, and urinary and sexual dysfunction were primarily responsible for deterioration of the long-term QOL. Future research aimed at reducing such toxicities is needed to further improve long-term QOL in anal cancer.

[Patient-reported outcomes in head and neck cancer treatment: relevance, challenges, and benefit]

Next to overall survival, quality of life is becoming more and more pivotal for cancer patients. The various domains of quality of life are complex and have different value to each patient. However, not only patients but also health care professionals, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory bodies ask: How can quality of life be reliably ascertained in clinical trials? For this purpose, carefully developed and validated specific questionnaires are needed: the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A key challenge is to define how results based on PROMs can be used for shared decision-making. Next to clinical factors such as health and nutritional status, quality of life acts as a prognostic factor for overall survival in cancer. Thus, it is crucial to take quality of life into account in daily clinical practice.

One-Year Treatment-Related Side Effects and Quality of Life After Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) and National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) data for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) treated with modern radiation therapy (RT) are lacking. The primary aim of this study was to report bowel and bladder PRO and NCI-CTCAE for patients with SCCA 1 year after RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2015 to 2020, we included patients in a prospective Danish national study. Data were collected before treatment (PT) and 1 year after treatment (1Y) using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0, as well as European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and CR29. We evaluated the combined PRO scores according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring guidelines, and classified changes according to score difference from PT to 1Y as no change (0-5), minor (5-10), moderate (11-20), and major (>20). Raw scores were reported as frequencies of each of the scores: Not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much.

RESULTS

Of the 270 patients, 81% had complete data sets, including PT and 1Y answers. Functional mean scores were equal to a matched normal population cohort at PT and 1Y. From PT to 1Y, C30 scores were stable despite minor improvements in global health status/quality of life (7.3), emotional functioning (9.3), insomnia (8.0), and appetite loss (7.8). For questionnaire CR29, bowel and bladder symptoms and sore skin improved with minor change (6.2), and buttocks, anal, or rectal pain improved with moderate change (18.3). Flatulence worsened moderately (12.6), and fecal incontinence had minor worsening (7.8). Agreement between PROs and NCI-CTCAE was generally only fair to moderate, especially for quantitative symptoms, such as pain (κ = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with SCCA who underwent definitive RT, only a few patients had high scores (indicating quite a bit or very much frequency of bother) regarding bowel and bladder symptoms.

Sexual dysfunction in female patients with anal cancer treated with curative intent: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are treated with sphincter-preserving radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy, achieving excellent oncologic outcomes. Patients, however, may experience treatment-related morbidity including sexual dysfunction. The objective of this systematic review was to review the literature on sexual dysfunction in female patients treated for anal cancer and to identify knowledge gaps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO prior to initiation. Databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. There were no restrictions on the study time period. Studies were limited to English. All study designs were included except review articles, letters to the editor, and case reports with less than ten patients.

RESULTS

In total, 1801 studies were retrieved and 19 met the inclusion criteria, including: 13 cross-sectional surveys, 3 prospective studies, 1 longitudinal intervention study, 1 retrospective chart review, 1 case control study. Sexual function was assessed using the female sexual functioning index (FSFI), EORTC-QLQ-CR30 and -CR38; response rates were low (<50 % in most studies). Sexual dysfunction was reported by up to 85 % of women; the most common symptoms being dyspareunia (17-65 %), vaginal dryness (22-88 %), and loss of libido (38-95 %). Gastrointestinal issues, such as bowel problems, and body image concerns additionally affected sexual function and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Sexual dysfunction is a common issue affecting most female patients treated for anal cancer and there is a paucity of evidence on the management of this important survivorship issue. There is additionally a lack of ethnic, economic, and educational diversity and there are no studies addressing the unique needs of LGBTQ individuals - future studies should make a concerted effort to include a diverse patient population.

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Improves Outcomes in Definitive Radiochemotherapy for Anal Cancer Whilst Reducing Acute Toxicities and Increasing Treatment Compliance

Simple Summary

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard of care in definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal cancer. Only a limited number of studies have analyzed the clinical results with VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy, the advanced form of IMRT). We conducted a retrospective study on patients treated at our institution. We compared the outcomes of VMAT-treated and 3DCRT (3D conformal radiotherapy)-treated patients. VMAT reduced acute toxicities (i.e., primarily dermatitis and enteritis) to a great extent. Additionally, VMAT relevantly improved treatment compliance (i.e., less CRT interruptions/delays, shorter overall treatment time, and higher absolute 5-fluorouracil dose applied). Finally, we found improved cancer-specific survival and distant control in VMAT-treated patients. The present study underlines the great progress that has been achieved with IMRT/VMAT in the CRT of anal cancer. Our study is the first to demonstrate an improvement in treatment compliance and outcomes with VMAT. Future studies could address whether VMAT is advantageous when compared to conventional IMRT.

Abstract

Background: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard of care in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal cancer. Until now, only a limited number of studies have analyzed the results with VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy). We conducted a retrospective study on patients treated at our institution. Patients and Methods: We included patients who received curative CRT for anal cancer. We compared VMAT-treated and 3DCRT (3D conformal radiotherapy)-treated patients. We analyzed toxicities (acute: CTCAE criteria; late: LENT/SOMA criteria), treatment compliance, overall survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), distant control (DC), and locoregional control. Results: A total of 149 patients (3DCRT: n = 87, VMAT: n = 62) were included. The median follow-up was longer in 3DCRT-treated patients (3DCRT: 61.3 months; VMAT: 39.1 months; p < 0.05). VMAT-treated patients had more G3 tumors (3DCRT: 12/87 (13.8%); VMAT: 18/62 (29.0%), p < 0.001). VMAT reduced acute toxicities ≥grade 3 (3DCRT: n = 48/87 (55.2%); VMAT: n = 11/62 (17.7%), p < 0.001). VMAT improved treatment compliance (less interruptions/delays) (3DCRT: 37/87, 42.5%; VMAT: 4/62, 6.5%; p < 0.001), provided a shorter median overall treatment time (3DCRT: 41 days; VMAT: 38 days; p = 0.02), and gave a higher median absolute 5-fluorouracil dose (3DCRT: 13,700 mg; VMAT: 14,400 mg; p = 0.001). Finally, we found improved CSS (p = 0.02; 3DCRT: 81.9% at 3 years; VMAT: 94.1% at 3 years) and DC (p = 0.01; 3DCRT: 89.4% at 3 years; VMAT: 100.0% at 3 years) with VMAT. Summary: Our study is the first to demonstrate improved treatment compliance and outcomes with VMAT for anal cancer. Previous studies have indicated that organs at risk sparing might be more improved with the use of VMAT vs. with conventional IMRT. Future studies should address whether these advantages lead to a further reduction in CRT-associated morbidity.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Anal Cancer—Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The number of anal cancer diagnoses has been rising steadily, so that the incidence has doubled in the past 20 years. Almost all anal cancers are induced by persistent infection with human papillomaviruses. Hitherto the care of patients with anal cancer has been heterogeneous and little experience exists with the primary management of anal cancer.

METHODS

The guideline was developed in accordance with the requirements of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. In line with the GRADE approach, the certainty of the evidence was assessed on the outcome level following a systematic literature search. Interdisciplinary working groups were set up to compile suggestions for recommendations, which were discussed and agreed upon in a formal consensus conference.

RESULTS

Ninety-three recommendations and statements were developed. No high-quality evidence was available to support recommendations for or against the treatment of stage I anal cancer with local excision alone as an alternative to chemoradiotherapy. Chemoradiotherapy is the gold standard in the treatment of stages II–III. Among other aspects regarding the timing and extent of response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy, the guideline panel recommended against obtaining a biopsy in the event of complete clinical response. Owing to lack of confidence in the available evidence, only open recommendations were given for treatment of stage IV.

CONCLUSION

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline provides a sound basis for optimizing the interdisciplinary, cross-sector care of anal cancer patients. Among other areas, gaps in research were identified with respect to the care of patients with early-stage or metastatic anal cancer. Approaches such as chemoradiotherapy combined with regional deep hyperthermia require further investigation. The role for immunotherapy in the management of metastasized anal cancer has also been insufficiently explored to date.

Stage I Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus: Is Radiation Therapy Alone Sufficient Treatment?

Simple Summary

The optimal treatment of early stage anal cancer is unknown. This patient population was relatively under-represented on the trials, which defined radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy as the standard treatment for anal cancer, thus radiation therapy alone may be an effective alternative treatment. The aim of this study was to use a large national database of anal cancer patients to compare overall survival of patients treated with radiation therapy alone to those treated with radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy. We found that patients who received radiation therapy alone were more likely to be ≥70 years old and less likely to be female. Treatment with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy was associated with a 31% reduction in the risk of death compared to treatment with radiation alone. Our results suggest that radiation with concurrent chemotherapy should be the standard treatment for early stage anal cancer patients.

Abstract

The optimal treatment for stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) remains undefined. Recently, wide local excision alone was found to have comparable survival to those treated with chemoradiation (CRT). Given that local excision may be sufficient for the treatment of stage I SCCA, we hypothesized that radiation therapy (RT) alone, compared to CRT would result in equivalent overall survival (OS) in this population. We identified non-surgically treated patients with stage I SCCA from the National Cancer Database from 2004–2015. We included only patients treated either with CRT (45–59.4 Gy with chemotherapy initiated within 14 days of RT) or RT alone (45–59.4 Gy with no chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was OS between CRT and RT patients. Propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to determine the effect of concurrent chemotherapy on OS using a Cox proportional hazards model with robust standard error to account for clustering in matched pairs. We identified 3552 stage I patients treated with CRT and 287 treated with RT. Compared to patients treated with CRT, those that received RT were more likely to be ≥70 years old (33.1% vs. 19.7%, p < 0.001) and less likely to be female (63.1% vs. 71.0%, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with a Charlson-Deyo score of 0 was similar in both groups (80.8% RT vs. 82.7% CRT, p = 0.164). The PSM cohort consisted of 287 pairs of patients with median follow-up 48.3 months (interquartile range, 24.4–85.1 months) and 151 deaths (86 RT, 65 CRT). CRT was associated with a 31% reduction in the risk of death (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.95, p = 0.023). We found that CRT was associated with improved OS, compared to RT alone, in patients with non-surgically treated stage I SCCA. These data suggest that de-intensification of therapy in stage I SCCA must be used with caution. However, given the retrospective nature of the data, prospective trials are required.

Preparing Patients for Sexual Dysfunction After Radiation for Anorectal Cancers: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Successful multimodality treatment of anorectal cancers has led to increased numbers of survivors who experience permanent, life-changing side effects of treatment. Little is known about sexual dysfunction (SD) in this population. The etiology of SD after anorectal cancer treatment is complex and multifactorial. However, pelvic radiation plays a significant negative role in anatomic, hormonal, and physiological aspects of sexual function.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Information was organized by key concepts useful for patient education, including (1) rates of SD after pelvic radiation for rectal cancer, (2) rates of SD after pelvic radiation for anal cancer, (3) mechanisms of SD and methods to reduce rates of SD, and (4) issues and opportunities related to patient education and discussion of SD after pelvic radiation.

RESULTS

SD after pelvic radiation for anorectal cancers is common in both men and women. Higher radiation doses may increase the risk for vaginal stenosis; however, it is unclear whether there are similar dose-volume relationships for men. Vaginal dilators and advanced radiation techniques can reduce the radiation dose to sexual organs at risk. Improvement is needed regarding counseling and education of patients about SD.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides information from previously published studies that clinicians may use in their discussions with patients embarking on pelvic radiation for anorectal cancers. More modern, standardized, and complete data are needed to quantify the risk of SD after treatment. Some methods of sexual toxicity reduction have been studied, but further study into interventions aimed at treating postradiation sexual function are needed.

Patient-Reported GI Outcomes in Patients With Anal Cancer Receiving Modern Chemoradiation

PURPOSE

Among patients with anal cancer, chemoradiotherapy is often associated with toxicities that diminish quality of life. We describe the GI-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients with anal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy to improve patient-physician communication.

METHODS

We prospectively followed patients with nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal who received definitive chemoradiotherapy. Patients completed the bowel subdomain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire before treatment and at 4 subsequent timepoints. We used the paired Wilcoxon test to compare EPIC scores at different times.

RESULTS

The study included 21 patients; median age was 57 years. Most patients (52%) had T2 and either N0 or N1 disease (81%). Most patients (91%) received chemotherapy with cisplatin-fluorouracil and either intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. Compared with the patients' median overall summary score at baseline (66), their median score at 1 week (82) was higher (P = .009), whereas their median score at 5 weeks (54) was lower (P = .025). The patients' median overall summary score at baseline and at 3 months did not differ (P = .919). Three months after radiotherapy, most patients reported minimal adverse effects compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

The GI-related PROs of patients with anal cancer tend to fluctuate during radiotherapy but return to baseline by 3 months, at which time most patients report few or no residual adverse effects. We provide a clear timeline of GI acute toxicity using sequential PRO measurements that will improve patient-physician communication regarding expectations for cancer treatment.

Intrafractional vaginal dilation in anal cancer patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy (DILANA) - a prospective, randomized, 2-armed phase-II-trial

BACKGROUND

The incidence of anal cancer is rising in the last decades and more women are affected than men. The prognosis after chemoradiation is very good with complete remission rates of 80-90%. Thus, reducing therapy-related toxicities and improving quality of life are of high importance. With the development of new radiotherapy techniques like IMRT (Intensity-modulated radiotherapy), the incidence of acute and chronic gastrointestinal toxicities has already been reduced. However, especially in female anal cancer patients genital toxicities like vaginal fibrosis and stenosis are of great relevance, too. Up to now, there are no prospective data reporting incidence rates, techniques of prevention or impact on quality of life. The aim of the DILANA trial is to evaluate the incidence and grade of vaginal fibrosis, to optimize radiotherapy by reducing dose to the vaginal wall to minimize genital toxicities and improve quality of life of anal cancer patients.

METHODS

The study is designed as a prospective, randomized, two-armed, open, single-center phase-II-trial. Sixty patients will be randomized into one of two arms, which differ only in the diameter of a tampon used during treatment. All patients will receive standard (chemo) radiation with a total dose of 45-50.4 Gy to the pelvic and inguinal nodes with a boost to the anal canal up to 54-60 Gy. The primary objective is the assessment of the incidence and grade of vaginal fibrosis 12 months after (chemo) radiation depending on the extent of vaginal dilation. Secondary endpoints are toxicities according to the CTC AE version 5.0 criteria, assessment of clinical feasibility of daily use of a tampon, assessment of compliance for the use of a vaginal dilator and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

Prospective studies are needed evaluating the incidence and grade of vaginal fibrosis after (chemo) radiation in female anal cancer patients. Furthermore, the assessment of techniques to reduce the incidence of vaginal fibrosis like intrafractional vaginal dilation as well as other radiotherapy-independent methods like using a vaginal dilator are essential. Additionally, implementation of a systematic assessment of vaginal stenosis is necessary to grant reproducibility and comparability of future data.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04094454, 19.09.2019).

Quality of Life After Radiotherapy for Rectal and Anal Cancer

Purpose of Review

With advances in radiation therapy (RT) techniques for rectal and anal cancers allowing for the modulation of critical normal tissues, there has been an increased emphasis on improving the quality of life (QOL) of cancer survivors. Herein, we review the literature to examine the impact of RT on QOL and patient reported outcomes (PROs) to better inform providers about the challenges of survivorship.

Recent Findings

Large systematic reviews, recent studies and long-term follow-up of pivotal clinical trials have shown that RT impacts QOL, particularly fecal continence and sexual function. Modern preoperative RT techniques allow for decreased dose to organs-at-risk will likely improve QOL.

Summary

RT, though critical in the treatment of rectal and anal cancer, has a profound impact on QOL for some patients. Recent studies have included PROs and validated QOL metrics to better inform providers and patients.