Inoprotection: the perioperative role of levosimendan

Understanding the Clinical Use of Levosimendan and Perspectives on its Future in Oncology

Drug repurposing, also known as repositioning or reprofiling, has emerged as a promising strategy to accelerate drug discovery and development. This approach involves identifying new medical indications for existing approved drugs, harnessing the extensive knowledge of their bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy. Levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer initially approved for heart failure, has been repurposed for oncology due to its multifaceted pharmacodynamics, including phosphodiesterase 3 inhibition, nitric oxide production and reduction of reactive oxygen species. Studies have demonstrated that levosimendan inhibits cancer cell migration and sensitizes hypoxic cells to radiation. Moreover, it exerts organ-protective effects by activating mitochondrial potassium channels. Combining levosimendan with traditional anticancer agents such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has shown a synergistic effect in bladder cancer cells, highlighting its potential as a novel therapeutic approach. This drug repurposing strategy offers a cost-effective and time-efficient solution for developing new treatments, ultimately contributing to the advancement of cancer therapeutics and improved outcomes for patients. Further investigations and clinical trials are warranted to validate the effectiveness of levosimendan in oncology and explore its potential benefits in a clinical setting.

Levosimendan improves contractility in vivo and in vitro in a rodent model of post-myocardial infarction heart failure

AIM

As few studies have presented a thorough analysis of the effect of levosimendan (LEV) on contractility, our purpose was to investigate in vivo cardiac function as well as in vitro cardiomyocyte function and calcium (Ca(2+) ) handling following LEV treatment.

METHODS

Rats with post-myocardial infarction heart failure (HF) induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery and sham-operated animals were randomized to the infusion of LEV (2.4 μg kg(-1) min(-1) ) or vehicle for 40 min. Echocardiographic examination was coupled to pressure-volume sampling in the left ventricle before (B) and after (40 min) infusion. Isolated left ventricular cardiomyocytes were studied in an epifluorescence microscope.

RESULTS

HF LEV (n = 6), HF vehicle (n = 7), sham LEV (n = 5) and sham vehicle (n = 6) animals were included. LEV infusion compared to vehicle in HF animals reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mean arterial pressure (both P < 0.001) and improved the slope of the preload-recruitable stroke work (P < 0.05). Administrating LEV to HF cardiomyocytes in vitro improved fractional shortening and Ca(2+) sensitivity index ratio, and increased the diastolic Ca(2+) (all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In HF animals, LEV improved the contractility by increasing the Ca(2+) sensitivity. Furthermore loading conditions were changed, and LEV could consequently change organ perfusion. An observed increase in diastolic Ca(2+) following LEV treatment and clinical implications of this should be further addressed.

Levosimendan infusion in newborns after corrective surgery for congenital heart disease: randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of levosimendan in neonates with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

Neonates undergoing risk-adjusted classification for congenital heart surgery (RACHS) 3 and 4 procedures were randomized to receive either a 72 h continuous infusion of 0.1 μg/kg/min levosimendan or standard post-CPB inotrope infusion.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (32 cases and 31 controls) were recruited. There were no differences between groups regarding demographic and baseline clinical data. No side effects were observed. There were no significant differences in mortality (1 vs. 3 patients, p = 0.35), length of mechanical ventilation (5.9 ± 5 vs. 6.9 ± 8 days, p = 0.54), and pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) stay (11 ± 8 vs. 14 ± 14 days, p = 0.26). Low cardiac output syndrome occurred in 37 % of levosimendan patients and in 61 % of controls (p = 0.059, OR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.14-1.0). Postoperative heart rate, with a significant difference at 6 (p = 0.008), 12 (p = 0.037), and 24 h (p = 0.046), and lactate levels, with a significant difference at PCICU admission (p = 0.015) and after 6 h (p = 0.048), were lower in the levosimendan group. Inotropic score was significantly lower in the levosimendan group at PCICU admission, after 6 h and after 12 h, (p < 0.0001). According to multivariate analysis, a lower lactate level 6 h after PCICU admission was independently associated with levosimendan administration after correction for CPB time and the need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

CONCLUSIONS

Levosimendan infused in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery was well tolerated with a potential benefit of levosimendan on postoperative hemodynamic and metabolic parameters of RACHS 3-4 neonates.

Clinical review: practical recommendations on the management of perioperative heart failure in cardiac surgery

Acute cardiovascular dysfunction occurs perioperatively in more than 20% of cardiosurgical patients, yet current acute heart failure (HF) classification is not applicable to this period. Indicators of major perioperative risk include unstable coronary syndromes, decompensated HF, significant arrhythmias and valvular disease. Clinical risk factors include history of heart disease, compensated HF, cerebrovascular disease, presence of diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency and high-risk surgery. EuroSCORE reliably predicts perioperative cardiovascular alteration in patients aged less than 80 years. Preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide level is an additional risk stratification factor. Aggressively preserving heart function during cardiosurgery is a major goal. Volatile anaesthetics and levosimendan seem to be promising cardioprotective agents, but large trials are still needed to assess the best cardioprotective agent(s) and optimal protocol(s). The aim of monitoring is early detection and assessment of mechanisms of perioperative cardiovascular dysfunction. Ideally, volume status should be assessed by 'dynamic' measurement of haemodynamic parameters. Assess heart function first by echocardiography, then using a pulmonary artery catheter (especially in right heart dysfunction). If volaemia and heart function are in the normal range, cardiovascular dysfunction is very likely related to vascular dysfunction. In treating myocardial dysfunction, consider the following options, either alone or in combination: low-to-moderate doses of dobutamine and epinephrine, milrinone or levosimendan. In vasoplegia-induced hypotension, use norepinephrine to maintain adequate perfusion pressure. Exclude hypovolaemia in patients under vasopressors, through repeated volume assessments. Optimal perioperative use of inotropes/vasopressors in cardiosurgery remains controversial, and further large multinational studies are needed. Cardiosurgical perioperative classification of cardiac impairment should be based on time of occurrence (precardiotomy, failure to wean, postcardiotomy) and haemodynamic severity of the patient's condition (crash and burn, deteriorating fast, stable but inotrope dependent). In heart dysfunction with suspected coronary hypoperfusion, an intra-aortic balloon pump is highly recommended. A ventricular assist device should be considered before end organ dysfunction becomes evident. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation is an elegant solution as a bridge to recovery and/or decision making. This paper offers practical recommendations for management of perioperative HF in cardiosurgery based on European experts' opinion. It also emphasizes the need for large surveys and studies to assess the optimal way to manage perioperative HF in cardiac surgery.

Use of levosimendan in patients with ischemic heart disease following mechanical reperfusion

Cardiac failure is among the most significant conditions associated with acute coronary syndrome. In ischemic heart disease, serious hemodynamic problems are reported in patients with left ventricular dysfunction during the acute phase despite mechanical revascularization. Several positive inotropic agents in addition to intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) are required to support patients with impaired left ventricular pump function during this phase. Intravenous inotropic agents, beta-mimetics, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors lead to increases in the incidence of arrhythmia and myocardial O(2) consumption owing to their effect of increasing intracellular calcium amount, although they produce rapid hemodynamic improvements in cardiac failure. This causes severe problems particularly in cardiac failure of ischemic origin. Recently, levosimendan, a calcium-sensitizing agent with cardioprotective properties, is being used alone or in combination with IABP in cases with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction during mechanical revascularization procedures (percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary bypass surgery). This review includes studies with levosimendan in cases not recovering due to myocardial stunning in the acute phase despite mechanical approaches applied.