Blink reflex in cluster headache:evidence of a trigeminal system disfunction

Pathophysiology of cluster headache: From the trigeminovascular system to the cerebral networks

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in neuroimaging and electrophysiology, cluster headache's pathogenesis remains unclear. This review will examine clinical neurophysiology studies, including electrophysiological and functional neuroimaging, to determine if they might help us construct a neurophysiological model of cluster headache.

RESULTS

Clinical, biochemical, and electrophysiological research have implicated the trigeminal-parasympathetic system in cluster headache pain generation, although the order in which these two systems are activated, which may be somewhat independent, is unknown. Electrophysiology and neuroimaging have found one or more central factors that may cause seasonal and circadian attacks. The well-known posterior hypothalamus, with its primary circadian pacemaker suprachiasmatic nucleus, the brainstem monoaminergic systems, the midbrain, with an emphasis on the dopaminergic system, especially when cluster headache is chronic, and the descending pain control systems appear to be involved. Functional connection investigations have verified electrophysiological evidence of functional changes in distant brain regions connecting to wide cerebral networks other than pain.

CONCLUSION

We propose that under the impact of external time, an inherited misalignment between the primary circadian pacemaker suprachiasmatic nucleus and other secondary extra- suprachiasmatic nucleus clocks may promote disturbance of the body's internal physiological clock, lowering the threshold for bout recurrence.

The neurobiology of cluster headache

Cluster headache is a primary headache form occurring in paroxysmal excruciatingly severe unilateral head pain attacks usually grouped in periods lasting 1-2months, the cluster periods. A genetic component is suggested by the familial occurrence of the disease but a genetic linkage is yet to be identified. Contemporary activation of trigeminal and cranial parasympathetic systems-the so-called trigemino-parasympathetic reflex-during the headache attacks seem to cause the pain and accompanying oculo-facial autonomic phenomena respectively. At peripheral level, the increased calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) plasma levels suggests trigeminal system activation during cluster headache attacks. The temporal pattern of the disease both in terms of circadian rhythmicity and seasonal recurrence has suggested involvement of the hypothalamic biological clock in the pathophysiology of cluster headache. The posterior hypothalamus was investigate as the cluster generator leading to activation of the trigemino-parasympathetic reflex, but the accumulated experience after 20 years of hypothalamic electrical stimulation to treat the condition indicate that this brain region rather acts as pain modulator. Efficacy of monoclonal antibodies to treat episodic cluster headache points to a key role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of the condition.

Habituation and sensitization in primary headaches

The phenomena of habituation and sensitization are considered most useful for studying the neuronal substrates of information processing in the CNS. Both were studied in primary headaches, that are functional disorders of the brain characterized by an abnormal responsivity to any kind of incoming innocuous or painful stimuli and it's cycling pattern over time (interictal, pre-ictal, ictal). The present review summarizes available data on stimulus responsivity in primary headaches obtained with clinical neurophysiology. In migraine, the majority of electrophysiological studies between attacks have shown that, for a number of different sensory modalities, the brain is characterised by a lack of habituation of evoked responses to repeated stimuli. This abnormal processing of the incoming information reaches its maximum a few days before the beginning of an attack, and normalizes during the attack, at a time when sensitization may also manifest itself. An abnormal rhythmic activity between thalamus and cortex, namely thalamocortical dysrhythmia, may be the pathophysiological mechanism subtending abnormal information processing in migraine. In tension-type headache (TTH), only few signs of deficient habituation were observed only in subgroups of patients. By contrast, using grand-average responses indirect evidence for sensitization has been found in chronic TTH with increased nociceptive specific reflexes and evoked potentials. Generalized increased sensitivity to pain (lower thresholds and increased pain rating) and a dysfunction in supraspinal descending pain control systems may contribute to the development and/or maintenance of central sensitization in chronic TTH. Cluster headache patients are characterized during the bout and on the headache side by a pronounced lack of habituation of the brainstem blink reflex and a general sensitization of pain processing. A better insight into the nature of these ictal/interictal electrophysiological dysfunctions in primary headaches paves the way for novel therapeutic targets and may allow a better understanding of the mode of action of available therapies.

Impairment of trigeminal sensory pathways in cluster headache

Cluster headache (CH) typically presents in clusters of attacks of intense (peri)orbital, unilateral pain. The distribution of the pain implies involvement of central and/or peripheral trigeminal pathways. These can be investigated by means of trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials (TSEP) and blink reflexes (BR). We aimed to relate functional changes in trigeminal sensory pathways to the presence of cluster periods. TSEP and BR were performed in 28 episodic CH patients during a cluster period and repeated in 22 outside a cluster period. TSEP latencies (N1, P1 and N2) and amplitude (N1-P1 and P1-N2) and BR latencies (R1, R2 ipsilateral and R2 contralateral) were compared between sides, during and outside a cluster period and with healthy control data (n = 22). During a cluster period, N2 TSEP latencies were longer on the symptomatic side compared with the non-symptomatic side (27.2 +/- 3.0 ms vs. 26.3 +/- 3.4 ms, P = 0.02), and compared with the same side outside the cluster period (26.7 +/- 3.1 ms vs. 25.1 +/- 3.0 ms, P = 0.01). N1, P1 and N2 latencies on the symptomatic side in patients during the cluster period (14.8 +/- 2.3 ms, 20.4 +/- 2.5 ms and 27.2 +/- 3.0 ms, respectively) were significantly longer than those of healthy controls (13.4 +/- 1.9 ms, 18.8 +/- 2.4 ms and 25.0 +/- 2.6 ms, respectively, P < 0.03). Outside the cluster period, N1 latencies of both sides (15.3 +/- 2.8 ms symptomatic side and 15.4 +/- 2.6 ms asymptomatic side) were longer compared with controls (13.4 +/- 1.9 ms, P < 0.04). TSEP amplitudes and BR latencies revealed no significant differences. We conclude that abnormalities of the afferent trigeminal pathway are present in patients with cluster headache, most prominent during the cluster period, and on the symptomatic side. This seems primarily due of changes within the higher cerebral regions of the system.

Trigeminofacial reflexes in primary headaches

Nociceptive processing in trigeminal system is likely to undergo to significant changes in chronic pain disorders such as in primary headache. The electrophysiological testing of brainstem reflexes seems to offer a valuable adjunct to the clinical evaluation, providing direct evidence for central dysmodulation of sensory and pain neurotransmission, i.e. dishabituation pattern and reduced pain threshold. We review the contribution of trigeminofacial reflex studies in the light of those recent data supporting the view of a dysfunctional sensory processing in primary headache.

Clinical neurophysiology of headache

Methods of clinical neurophysiology are of little use for the diagnosis of headache disorders. They are, however, invaluable tools for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of functional headaches. They are traumatic, able to explore simple or more complex neural activities, and to some extent capable of reflecting activity in certain neurotransmitter systems as well as the action of pharmacologic agents on the CNS. This article reviews the interest and limits of electroencephalography, evoked potentials, electromyography, and nocifensive reflexes in primary headaches. Because neurophysiologic methods are no more than indirect means of looking into the "black box," their results need to be interpreted with caution and, whenever possible, should be compared in the same study with clinical behavioral and biochemical data.

The blink reflex in migraine

The blink reflex is an objective and useful method to study the trigeminal system. It was recorded in 43 migraine patients and the findings compared with those of 31 healthy controls. The latencies of the R1 component were in the normal range in both groups. The R2 latencies ranged between 30 and 32 ms in the control group. In contrast, more than half of the patients with migraine had R2 latencies between 32 and 35 ms in the migraine group. Some migraine patients had latencies above 35 ms. The R2 latency was statistically significantly different between controls and migraineurs (p < 0.0001). Our findings indicate that trigeminal afferents and/or polysynaptic pathway in brainstem may be altered in migraine.

Unilateral impairment of pupillary response to trigeminal nerve stimulation in cluster headache

The pupillary constriction induced ipsilaterally by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of the infratrochlear nerve was measured, using an electronic pupillometer, in 26 episodic cluster headache (CH) and 15 migraine sufferers tested during an attack-free period and in 16 healthy controls. In controls, TENS gave rise to a miosis which was slow in onset and long-lasting in duration, and which was comparable to that mediated by tachykinins in animals. A similar miotic response was bilaterally observed in migraine patients and in CH patients examined during the inactive phase. In CH sufferers during the cluster period, TENS only elicited a normal pupillary constriction in the asymptomatic eye, whereas the resulting response in the symptomatic eye was markedly decreased. Although the exact mechanism underlying the dysfunction remains to be clarified, these results seem to indicate that ocular trigeminal pathways are involved in CH.