Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Preoperative Factors Associated With Outcome Deterioration Over 2 Years

Comparative outcomes of middle trapezius tendon transfer using Achilles tendon allograft vs. fascia lata autograft for isolated supraspinatus tendon tears

BACKGROUND

Irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears pose significant challenges in surgical management, particularly when conventional arthroscopic repair methods are inadequate. Middle trapezius tendon (MTT) transfer has emerged as a potential salvage procedure, but the comparative efficacy of different interpositional grafts-such as Achilles tendon allografts and fascia lata autografts-remains unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective case series evaluated patients who underwent MTT transfer with either an Achilles tendon allograft (group A) or fascia lata autograft (group F) from December 2019 to March 2022. Included patients had persistent pain after conservative treatment, minimal glenohumeral arthritis, and severe supraspinatus retraction with high fatty infiltration. Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using visual analog scale for pain, along with patient-reported outcome measures including the Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California, Los Angeles, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores. Radiological assessments evaluated the integrity of the transferred tendon and glenohumeral arthritis progression.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients (20 in group A and 13 in group F) were included. Both groups showed significant improvements in visual analog scale scores and patient-reported outcomes (P < .001) with no notable differences between them. Shoulder range of motion and strength also improved significantly in both groups. There was no significant progression of glenohumeral arthritis and no significant difference in rate of complications between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MTT transfer is an effective surgical option for patients with irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears, yielding substantial improvements in pain and shoulder function regardless of the interpositional graft used. Both Achilles tendon allografts and fascia lata autografts demonstrated similar outcomes, offering flexibility in surgical approach based on individual patient considerations.

Arthroscopic Patch Bridging Using Fascia Lata for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

We describe an arthroscopic technique for irreparable rotator cuff tears using patch bridging reconstruction with fascia lata autograft. Compared with conventional rotator cuff repair, this technique reconstitutes the rotator cuff as a dynamic structure, preserves the rotator cuff remnant, reduces excessive tension of the rotator cuff, and preserves the shoulder joint. The fascia lata patch itself is low cost and avoids risks of transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases and rejection. Although the bridging reconstruction is a complex operation with a long learning curve, we believe patch bridging using fascia lata is a highly effective and reproducible surgical protocol for appropriate irreparable rotator cuff tear patients.

Arthroscopic Margin Convergence Repair Without Suture Anchors Improves Clinical Outcomes for Full- and Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical outcome scores of an arthroscopic margin convergence technique without the use of suture anchors to repair different types of rotator cuff tears and to determine whether the type or extent of the tear has an effect on clinical outcome scores after this procedure.

Methods

Patients receiving arthroscopic margin convergence repair without suture anchors for rotator cuff tears from 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Arthroscopically determined partial- or full-thickness rotator cuff tears with a minimum follow-up period of 20 months were included. Outcomes were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score; and visual analog scale (VAS) score. A 2-tailed distribution paired t test was used to determine statistical significance (P < .05) between preoperative scores and scores at final follow-up. Correlation tests and linear regression analysis were used to determine the correlation between various clinical variables and outcomes. A cohort-specific minimal clinically important difference analysis was performed for each outcome score, calculated as one-half of the standard deviation of the delta score.

Results

A total of 38 patients were included for analysis: 12 with partial-thickness tears and 26 with full-thickness tears. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 33.9 months (range, 22.2-94.5 months), with a minimum follow-up period of 22 months. The mean age of the patients was 62 ± 15.1 years. The minimal clinically important difference values for the ASES, UCLA, and VAS scores were 9.68, 2.92, and 1.13, respectively. There were significant improvements in the ASES (from 29.3 ± 18.3 preoperatively to 93.7 ± 8.3 postoperatively, P = .001), UCLA (from 14.3 ± 6.2 to 32.8 ± 2.6, P = .001), and VAS (from 7.37 ± 1.8 to 0.63 ± 1.02, P = .001) clinical outcome scores. However, patients with either Patte stage 3 retraction (P = .033 for ASES score and P = .020 for UCLA score) or U-shaped tears (P = .047 for ASES score and P = .050 for UCLA score) had significantly lower clinical outcome scores than patients with less severe retraction or differently shaped tears.

Conclusions

The arthroscopic margin convergence technique without the use of suture anchors may be a suitable option in patients with partial- or full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Factors associated with patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: do they differ by age?

BACKGROUND

Several studies have investigated factors affecting patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR); however, it is unknown if these factors vary according to age. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the factors associated with satisfaction of ARCR in individuals 70 years and older versus younger patients.

METHODS

Among 319 consecutive patients who underwent ARCR, 173 were included. Patients were divided into an old age group (≥70 years) and a young age group (<70 years), and the two age groups were further divided into satisfied and unsatisfied subgroups. Patient satisfaction was evaluated at the final follow-up visit using a binary question (yes or no). Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Satisfaction rates in the older and younger age groups were 75.41% and 79.47%, respectively. Mean changes in Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were significantly different between the satisfied and unsatisfied subgroups (P=0.031 and P=0.012, respectively) in the young patients. In the old patients, there was a significant difference in the mean change in depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (P=0.031) and anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (P=0.044) scores between the satisfied and unsatisfied subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors affecting patient satisfaction after ARCR differed according to age. Psychological improvement was more important to elderly patients, whereas restoration of function was more important to younger patients. Pain relief was important for both age groups. Level of evidence: III.

Effect of Medial or Lateral Graft Failure on Graft Volume and Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

BACKGROUND

Graft failure is a common complication after superior capsule reconstruction (SCR). The graft in SCR is fixed on the greater tuberosity and superior glenoid, and graft failure has been reported on both sides.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical manifestations of patients with graft failure after SCR and identify the clinical and radiological differences between medial and lateral graft failure.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent SCR with a dermal allograft for symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears between March 2018 and September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had minimum 2-year follow-up and underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months postoperatively. Patients with graft failure were divided into 2 groups: those with lateral graft failure on the greater tuberosity side (group I) and those with medial graft failure on the glenoid side (group II). Patients with intact grafts were included in group III as a control group. Intergroup differences in clinical and radiological characteristics were analyzed, and multiple regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Among the 93 patients included, there were 18 patients in group I, 15 in group II, and 60 in group III. Overall, 11 patients (61.1%) in group I and 9 patients (60.0%) in group II had a partial graft rupture at one anchor. The postoperative graft volume was significantly lower in group I than in groups II and III (2514.0 ± 564.3 mm3, 3183.5 ± 547.1 mm3, and 3198.0 ± 584.8 mm3, respectively; P = .002 for group I vs II; P < .001 for group I vs III). The acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was significantly increased at 6 months postoperatively compared with before surgery in group I (6.6 ± 1.6 mm vs 4.3 ± 1.9 mm, respectively; P < .001) and group II (7.4 ± 1.3 mm vs 5.7 ± 1.7 mm, respectively; P = .002). However, group I exhibited a significantly greater decrease in the AHD over time than group II (P < .001) and a significantly lower AHD at the final follow-up than the other groups (P < .001). The postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was significantly lower in group I than in the other groups (P < .001). On multiple regression analysis, fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle, Hamada grade, and graft width were independent factors for lateral graft failure.

CONCLUSION

Patients with lateral graft failure had inferior clinical outcomes and lower postoperative graft volumes than those with medial graft failure after SCR using a dermal allograft. The AHD of patients with lateral graft failure improved postoperatively; however, it deteriorated over time.

Investigation of the pressure value while performing biceps tenodesis for superior capsuler reconstruction

BACKGROUND

To compare the histopathological results of biceps tenodesis (BT) performed with normal, low, and high pressures for superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in rabbits with massive rotator cuff tears.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty rabbits were divided into three groups. Rabbits 1-10 underwent SCR with BT at the same pressure (Group 1), value measured in the groove; 50% lower (Group 2); 50% higher (Group 3). After the 4-week follow-up, shoulder were en-bloc excised and histopathological evaluation was performed with modified Bonar's scale. Results were compared between the groups, statistically.

RESULTS

Extracellular matrix were significantly lower in group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Cellularity levels were significantly lower in group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Group 2 had no difference between the sides (p > 0.05). Group 2 had lower vascularity levels compared to the other groups (p = 0.01).

DICSUSSION

When the biceps tendon was in the bicipital groove and in a more mobile state with lower pressure exposure. BT performed with a tension that creates less pressure than the biceps in the groove is more successful in SCR.

Joint-preserving treatment for global irreparable rotator cuff tears: combined anterior Latissimus dorsi and Teres major tendon transfer

INTRODUCTION

Treating global irreparable rotator cuff tears (GIRCTs) that involve both antero-and postero-superior cuff tendon tears could be a challenging problem. There has been limited joint-preserving treatment options in high-demand patients with minimal glenohumeral arthritis. The study aims to assess the clinical outcome of combined anterior latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon (aLDTM) transfer for patients with both GIRCTs and minimal glenohumeral arthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent combined aLDTM transfer for GIRCTs between 2018 May and 2020 October. Clinical outcomes include pain VAS, Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), activities of daily living requiring active internal rotation (ADLIR) score, active range of motion (aROM), strength, rates of pseudoparalysis or pseudoparesis reversal and return to work. Radiographic assessment included the acromiohumeral distance (AHD), Hamada grade, and transferred tendon integrity at final follow-up.

RESULTS

23 patients (mean age: 64.7 ± 5.9 years [55-74]) were included and the mean follow-up period was 28.2 ± 4.3 [24‒36] months. Postoperatively, VAS, Constant, ASES, UCLA, and ADLIR scores significantly improved at final follow-up (P < .001). Postoperative aROM was significantly improved in forward elevation (FE) to 129° ± 29°, abduction (ABD) to 105° ± t3°, and internal rotation (IR) at back to 5.9 ± 2.5. Strength of both FE and IR were also significantly improved (P < .001). Patients with preoperative pseudoparalysis (2 of 4 patients) and pseudoparesis (6 of 6 patients) experienced a reversal. No significant change in AHD and hamada grade was confirmed at final follow-up. 3 patients experienced partial tear of the transferred tendon.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found significant improvement in clinical outcomes with no significant progression of arthritis by final follow-up. The aLDTM transfer could be an alternative choice of joint-preserving treatment option for young and active patients with GIRCTs and minimal glenohumeral arthritis. However, large and long-term studies should be conducted to establish its adequacy.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Partial rotator cuff repair versus debridement for irreparable rotator cuff tears: A systematic review

Introduction

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) are a significant cause of shoulder disability and pain, presenting a unique challenge in terms of management with multiple options for care ranging from debridement alone to partial rotator cuff repair. In this study we investigate how clinical outcomes and complications of partial rotator cuff repair compare to simple debridement in the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Materials and methods

A total of 1594 publications were identified on PubMed from 1946 to 2017 with 16 level III to level IV studies that were reviewed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Results

A total of 709 shoulders from 706 patients were reviewed, with 380 patients receiving a partial repair and 329 shoulders receiving debridement. Fifteen outcome measures were utilized with visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and patient satisfaction being the most common. Pre- and post-operative mean VAS scores reported in 155 shoulders treated with partial repair were 6.0 (5.1-6.9) and 2.0 (1.7-3.2), respectively. Pre- and post-operative mean VAS scores in 113 shoulders treated with debridement were 6.5 (4.5-7.9) and 1.9 (1-2.9), respectively. Patient satisfaction in 111 shoulders treated with partial repair was reported as 75 % (51.6-92). In 153 shoulders treated with debridement, post-operative satisfaction was 80.7 % (78-83.9).

Conclusion

This systematic review study demonstrates that both partial repair and debridement alone can result in acceptable clinical outcomes with no significant differences noted for patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears in short to mid-term follow up.

Outcomes of Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

(1) Background: Addressing large to massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs) poses complex challenges. This systematic review investigated outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) compared to conventional rotator cuff repair (RCR) for LMRCTs. (2) Methods: A systematic search across the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases until 1 October 2023 identified studies that directly compared SCR with LHBT with conventional RCR in patients with LMRCTs and included a minimum of a 12-month follow-up period. The assessed outcome measures encompassed retear rates, functional outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and acromiohumeral interval (AHI). Risk of bias assessment was conducted via the Robins-I tool. (3) Results: In six studies with 456 cases (210 SCR using LHBT and 246 using RCR), SCR with LHBT significantly reduced retear rates (OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.12-0.36; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%). Furthermore, SCR with LHBT showed significant improvement in range of forward flexion (SMD 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09-0.55, p < 0.01, I2 = 39%) and AHI (SMD 0.61, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) postoperatively. (4) Conclusion: SCR with LHBT is a safe and effective treatment for LMRCTs, reducing retear rates, maintaining greater postoperative AHI, and improving ROM compared to conventional RCR. Additional high-quality interventional studies are needed to confirm these results.

The Arthroscopic Biceps Rerouting Technique Shows Better Early Clinical Outcomes within 1 Year Than Partial Repair in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Background and Objectives: The arthroscopic biceps rerouting (BR) technique was introduced as a novel technique for large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs). This method can restore shoulder stability, and its biomechanical effect was verified in a cadaver experiment. Recent reports have shown favorable clinical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of partial repair with those of the BR technique in LMRCTs. Materials and Methods: We included 72 patients who had undergone LMRCTs. Arthroscopic partial repair was performed in 31 patients (group I), while repair with the BR technique was performed in 41 patients (group II). Functional and imaging outcomes were evaluated and compared using a visual analog scale for pain, range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and Korean Shoulder Score (KSS) before the surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery and at the last follow-up. Tendon integrity was investigated using magnetic resonance in all the patients at 12 months postoperative. Results: The mean follow-up period was 22.11 ± 10.47 months (range, 12-53 months). Forward flexion (p = 0.02) and external rotation at the side (p = 0.04) were significantly higher in group II than in group I on postoperative day (POD) 12 months. For internal rotation, group II showed significant improvement compared to group I on POD 3 months (p = 0.002) and at 6 months postoperative (p = 0.01). On POD 12 months, the ASES (p = 0.047) and KSS (p = 0.048) were better in group II. Significant improvements in pain and clinical scores were observed in both groups at the last follow-up. However, the two groups had no significant differences in pain, clinical scores, or ROM at the last follow-up. Retear of the repaired tendon was observed in nine patients in group I (29.03%) and eight in group II (19.51%, p = 0.35). Conclusions: Partial repair and repair using the BR technique effectively improved clinical and radiologic outcomes. The BR technique revealed early recovery of ROM and better clinical results than partial repair at one year postoperative. This could be a useful method in treating LMRCTs.

An Algorithmic Approach to the Surgical Management of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Based on Imaging, Function, and Repairability

Massive rotator cuff tears are one the most challenging conditions to treat in the shoulder. A variety of surgical approaches have been used to manage massive rotator cuff tears, such as repair with or without augmentation, superior capsule reconstruction, tendon transfer, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The choice between joint preservation or reverse shoulder arthroplasty is first considered based on preoperative imaging and functional status, as well as patient factors. When joint preservation is the goal of treatment, a combination of repairability, patient function, and age can be used to provide an algorithmic approach to treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Clinical effectiveness of superior capsular reconstruction using Teflon felt graft in the elderly for pain relief: a comparison using tensor fascia lata graft

Background

The graft material generally used in superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) may be a human dermal allograft or an autologous tensor fascia lata (TFL) graft. According to a previous biomechanical study, a dermal graft (3 mm) was found to be insufficient and a thicker and stiffer graft was required. However, graft-site mobility should be considered when harvesting TFL, especially in the elderly. We have used Teflon felt as a graft material for SCR in the elderly for pain relief. This study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects and clinical outcomes between Teflon felt and TFL graft.

Methods

This study included 39 patients (Teflon felt group: 19 patients, TFL group: 20 patients) who underwent SCR with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patients with painful irreparable rotator cuff tears but with shoulder elevation (abduction or flexion) of at least 130° were included in the study. Shoulder range of motion, acromiohumeral distance, and the numerical rating scale were evaluated preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively.

Results

There were no significant differences between the Teflon felt and TFL groups in terms of shoulder elevation (151 ± 33° vs. 164 ± 15°, P = .57), acromiohumeral distance (8.3 ± 2.2 mm vs. 7.5 ± 2.5 mm, P = .14), and numerical rating scale (1.0 ± 1.2 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8, P = .93).

Conclusion

SCR with Teflon graft provided pain relief equivalent to TFL graft. It may be an effective treatment option in elderly patients for irreparable rotator cuff tears with respect to pain relief.

Female Sex and Higher Infraspinatus Fatty Infiltration Are Linked to Dissatisfaction at a Minimum Follow-Up of 4 Years after Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Purpose

To evaluate patient satisfaction at a minimum of 4 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT), to identify preoperative and intraoperative characteristics associated with satisfaction, and to compare clinical outcomes between satisfied and dissatisfied patients.

Methods

A retrospective review on prospectively collected data was conducted on ARCRs of MRCTs performed at 2 institutions between January 2015 and December 2018. Patients with a minimum 4-year follow-up, preoperative and postoperative data, and primary ARCR of MRCTs were included for analysis. Patient satisfaction was analyzed according to patient demographics, patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score [ASES], visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, Veteran Rands 12-item health survey [VR-12], and Subjective Shoulder Value [SSV]), range of motion (forward flexion [FF], external rotation [ER], and internal rotation [IR]), tear characteristics (fatty infiltration, tendon involvement, and tear size), and clinical significant measures (minimal clinical important difference [MCID], substantial clinical benefit [SCB], and patient-acceptable symptomatic state [PASS]) for ASES and SSV. Rotator cuff healing was also assessed with ultrasound in 38 patients at final follow-up.

Results

A total of 100 patients met the study's criteria. Overall, 89% of patients were satisfied with ARCR of a MRCT. Female sex (P = .007) and increased preoperative infraspinatus fatty infiltration (P = .005) were negatively associated with satisfaction. Those in the dissatisfied cohort had significantly lower postoperative ASES (80.7 vs 55.7; P = .002), VR-12 (49 vs 37.1; P = .002), and SSV scores (88.1 vs 56; P = .003), higher VAS pain (1.1 vs 4.1; P = .002) and lower postoperative range of motion in FF (147° vs 117°; P = .04), ER (46° vs 26°; P = .003), and IR (L2 vs L4; P = .04). Rotator cuff healing did not have an influence on patient satisfaction (P = .306). Satisfied patients were more likely to return to work than dissatisfied patients (97% vs 55%; P < .001).

Conclusions

Nearly 90% of patients who undergo ARCR for MRCTs are satisfied at a minimum 4-year follow-up. Negative preoperative factors include female sex and increased preoperative infraspinatus fatty infiltration, but no association was observed with rotator cuff healing. Furthermore, dissatisfied patients were less likely to report a clinically important functional improvement.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, prognostic case series.

Massive and Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Review of Current Definitions and Concepts

Background

While massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) have been abundantly studied, inconsistent definitions in the literature and theories about pain and dysfunction related to them can be difficult to navigate when considering an individual patient.

Purpose

To review the current literature for definitions and critical concepts that drive decision-making for MIRCTs.

Study Design

Narrative review.

Methods

A search of the PubMed database was performed to conduct a comprehensive literature review on MIRCTs. A total of 97 studies were included.

Results

Recent literature reflects added attention to clarifying the definitions of "massive, "irreparable," and "pseudoparalysis." In addition, numerous recent studies have added to the understanding of what generates pain and dysfunction from this condition and have reported on new techniques for addressing them.

Conclusion

The current literature provides a nuanced set of definitions and conceptual foundations on MIRCTs. These can be used to better define these complex conditions in patients when comparing current surgical techniques to address MIRCTs, as well as when interpreting the results of new techniques. While the number of effective treatment options has increased, high-quality and comparative evidence on treatments for MIRCTs is lacking.

Outcomes of Isolated Biceps Tenodesis/Tenotomy or Partial Rotator Cuff Repair Associated with Biceps Tenodesis/Tenotomy for Massive Irreparable Tears: A Systematic Review

Irreparable large to massive rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) are a prevalent cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction, and nonoperative treatment may not always be effective. Various surgical options exist, with isolated biceps tenotomy/tenodesis (BT) or arthroscopic partial repair with associated biceps tenotomy/tenodesis (PCR-BT) being the most common. The aim of this study was to systematically review the available data on the clinical and functional outcomes of BT and PCR-BT in patients with MIRCTs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for studies on the treatment of MIRCT. We included studies with BT or PCR-BT with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) score was used to assess study quality. Outcomes included were the visual analog scale for pain, functional scores such as Constant-Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, range of motion, radiological measurements, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1101 patients (506 had a BT and 595 had a PCR-BT) from 22 studies were included (cases series = 13, case-control = 7, randomized control trial = 1, prospective cohort study = 1). The mean MINORS score was 13.2 ± 3.2. The mean age and follow-up were 67 ± 6.8 years and 4.58 ± 1.1 years (range, 2, 12), respectively. The VAS improvement showed at the last follow-up for PCR-BT (range, 1.97, 5.8) and BT (range, 4, 6.1). CMS was improved at the final follow-up for PCR-BT (range, 13, 47.6) and BT (range, 10.8, 28). Regarding the ASES, it has demonstrated significant improvements for PCR-BT (range, 31.81, 44.8) and BT (range, 30,45.8). For forward flexion, PCR-BT showed improvement (range, -14°, 59.4°), as well as the BT group (range, 2°, 27.9°).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrated that both BT and PCR-BT improve functional outcomes and reduce pain at midterm follow-up for MIRCT. Since we know that a failed cuff repair would worsen the shoulder, it might be beneficial in terms of the risk-benefit ratio to not repair in certain patients with MIRCT.

Early postoperative recovery comparisons of superior capsule reconstruction to tendon transfers

BACKGROUND

The management of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears is controversial, with no gold standard. Two recently developed techniques that have shown promising initial results include arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and tendon transfers (latissimus or lower trapezius). However, there remains a scarcity of studies examining each procedure's early postoperative clinical outcomes individually or in comparison to each other. The purpose of this study is to compare the early postoperative recovery outcomes of tendon transfers (TTs) to SCR.

METHODS

Using the surgical outcomes system global database (Arthrex Inc.), we assessed the postoperative recovery outcomes for all patients who had outcomes recorded at least 6 months after SCR or TT. The time points analyzed included preoperative and postoperative (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years). The outcomes analyzed included pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, VR-12 physical, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE).

RESULTS

Overall, 163 patients underwent SCR and 24 arthroscopically assisted TT. The mean age for SCR and TT was 60 and 56 years, respectively. Postoperative recovery curves demonstrate that both procedures produced improved outcomes at each postoperative time point compared to preoperative. The pain and functional outcomes measures, including VAS, ASES, SANE, and VR-12 physical, were comparable for TT and SCRs, with similar recovery curves between the 2 techniques. Ultimately at 2 years postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the early outcomes associated with arthroscopic treatment of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears demonstrated that the arthroscopically assisted tendon transfers and arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction had similar pain and functional outcomes throughout the 2-year postoperative recovery period. Overall, the process of recovery appears equivalent between the 2 techniques. Future studies are needed to assess the outcomes of each technique and specific indications in an attempt to delineate an algorithm for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Management of Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears-A Current Concepts Review and Proposed Treatment Algorithm by the AGA Shoulder Committee

Posterosuperior rotator cuff tears range among the most common causes of shoulder complaints. While non-operative treatment is typically reserved for the elderly patient with low functional demands, surgical treatment is considered the gold standard for active patients. More precisely, an anatomic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is considered the most desirable treatment option and should be generally attempted during surgery. If an anatomic RCR is impossible, the adequate choice of treatment for irreparable rotator cuff tears remains a matter of debate among shoulder surgeons. Following a critical review of the contemporary literature, the authors suggest the following evidence- and experience-based treatment recommendation. In the non-functional, osteoarthritic shoulder, treatment strategies in the management of irreparable posterosuperior RCT include debridement-based procedures and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as the treatment of choice. Joint-preserving procedures aimed at restoring glenohumeral biomechanics and function should be reserved for the non-osteoarthritic shoulder. Prior to these procedures, however, patients should be counseled about deteriorating results over time. Recent innovations such as the superior capsule reconstruction and the implantation of a subacromial spacer show promising short-term results, yet future studies with long-term follow-up are required to derive stronger recommendations.

Superior capsule reconstruction, partial cuff repair, graft interposition, arthroscopic debridement or balloon spacers for large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple non-arthroplasty surgical techniques are described for the management of large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. There is currently no consensus on the best management strategy. Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes following arthroscopic debridement, arthroscopic partial cuff repair, superior capsule reconstruction, balloon spacers or graft interposition for the management of large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed of the following databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Data were extracted from relevant studies published since January 2000 according to the pre-specified inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the post-operative improvement in shoulder scores. Meta-analysis of the primary outcome was performed. Secondary outcomes included retear rates and complications.

RESULTS

Eighty-two studies were included reporting the outcomes of 2790 shoulders. Fifty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis of the primary outcome. The definition of an irreparable tear varied. All procedures resulted in improved shoulder scores at early follow-up. Shoulder scores declined after 2 years following balloon spacers, arthroscopic debridement and partial cuff repair. High retear rates were seen with partial cuff repairs (45%), graft interposition (21%) and superior capsule reconstruction (21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Large initial improvements in shoulder scores were demonstrated for all techniques despite high retear rates for reconstructive procedures. Shoulder scores may decline at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Accuracy of the rotator cuff reparability score

BACKGROUND

The reparability of large or massive rotator cuff tears is difficult to determine pre-operatively. We previously identified age ≥ 65 years, acromiohumeral interval ≤ 6 mm, and anteroposterior tear size ≥ 22 mm as risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure. We therefore developed a rotator cuff reparability score where each of the above risk factors is assigned a score of one point.

AIM

To determine the accuracy of a rotator cuff reparability score.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of recruited patients with large or massive rotator cuff tears treated at our institution between January 2013 and December 2019. Exclusion criteria were revision surgery and patients with contraindications for surgery. All patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and were categorized into either complete or partial rotator cuff repair. Rotator cuff reparability scores were calculated for each patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratio were assessed. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the optimal cut-off rotator cuff reparability score.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (mean age, 61 years; range, 25–84 years; 41 females and 39 males) were recruited. Intra- and inter-observer reliabilities were good to excellent. The number of patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure were 24, 33, 17, and 6, respectively. Complete repair was performed in all patients without risk factors. Two of the 33 patients with one risk factor and seven of the 17 patients with two risk factors underwent partial repair. One of the six patients with three risk factors underwent complete repair. The area under the curve was 0.894. The optimal cut-off score was two points with a sensitivity of 85.71% and a specificity of 83.33%.

CONCLUSION

A rotator cuff reparability score of two was determined to be the optimal cut-off score for predicting the reparability of large or massive rotator cuff tears.

A Technique for a Suture-Based Cable Reconstruction of an Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tear

The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears remains challenging. In patients in whom a complete repair cannot be obtained, a partial repair remains an option. The goal of a partial rotator cuff repair is to obtain a stable glenohumeral joint fulcrum by restoring the rotator cable complex. Traditionally, partial repair has been performed with independent reattachment(s) of the rotator cable complex with or without margin convergence medially. This Technical Note describes an alternative approach to a partial rotator cuff repair with a suture-based cable reconstruction.

Nonarthroplasty options for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears have improvement in range of motion and patient-reported outcomes at short-term follow-up: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To compare various nonarthroplasty treatment options for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears, including allograft bridging/augmentation, debridement, partial repair, superior capsule reconstruction (SCR), subacromial balloon spacer, and tendon transfer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted through the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for all articles pertaining to nonarthroplasty treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Inclusion criteria included manuscripts published between 2009 and 2020 with at least 1 year follow-up and Level I-IV evidence. Articles were separated into six groups: debridement, arthroscopic and open repair, allograft bridging/augmentation, SCR, subacromial balloon spacer, and tendon transfer. Data points included range of motion (external rotation, abduction, forward flexion, and internal rotation), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, rate of revision surgery, and rate of conversion to arthroplasty.

RESULTS

A total of 83 studies and 3363 patients were included. All treatment options had statistically significant improvements in postoperative range of motion and patient-reported outcomes. Debridement had statistically significantly greater postoperative abduction and forward flexion range of motion, as well as better VAS pain scores, compared to the other treatment options. The SCR subgroup had the greatest improvement in ASES scores postoperatively. The overall revision rate was 7.2% among all surgical options, with the allograft bridging/augmentation group having the lowest rate of revision at 0-8.3%. The overall rate of conversion to arthroplasty was 7.2%, with debridement having the greatest rate of conversion at 15.4%.

CONCLUSION

All six nonarthroplasty treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears resulted in statistically significant improvements in range of motion and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year follow-up or more, with low rates of revision and conversion to arthroplasty. Debridement had statistically significantly greater postoperative abduction and forward flexion range of motion, as well as better VAS pain scores, compared to the other treatment options. However, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneous nature of the data, lack of prospective randomized control trials, and short-term follow-up. The findings of this study highlight the complexity of irreparable, massive rotator cuff tears, and the need for an individualized approach when treating these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Partial Rotator Cuff Repair Provides Improved Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Superior Capsule Reconstruction (SCR)

Purpose

To evaluate the role of concomitant partial rotator cuff repair (RCR) (i.e., infraspinatus) on patient-reported clinical outcomes following superior capsule reconstruction (SCR).

Methods

Postoperative recovery outcomes of SCR alone were compared with SCR with concomitant infraspinatus rotator cuff repair (SCR+RCR) at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Patients were included if they had an SCR surgery with or without a concomitant infraspinatus repair. Patients were excluded if they did not have a minimum of 6 months’ follow-up or if a preoperative baseline questionnaire was not performed. Outcome measures included pain visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Function, ASES Shoulder Index, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score.

Results

Overall, 180 patients were evaluated, including 163 patients who underwent SCR alone and 17 patients who underwent concomitant infraspinatus repair (SCR+RCR). There was no difference in demographic data including age, sex, and body mass index. The postoperative recovery curves demonstrated SCR alone and SCR+RCR both provide significantly improved pain and functional scores at 2 years postoperatively (P < .001). When we compared the 2 groups, SCR+RCR provided significantly improved ASES Index (87.6 vs 78.2, P = .048) and ASES Function (25.5 vs 21.7, P = .02). There was no statistically significant difference in SANE scores (75.5 vs 64.2, P = .07) at 24 months’ follow-up.

Conclusions

SCR provides modest improvements in pain and function at 2 years postoperatively in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. Patients who underwent SCR and concomitant infraspinatus repair demonstrated significantly improved ASES Index and ASES Function scores and statistically nonsignificant improvement in SANE scores at 24 months postoperatively when compared with SCR alone.

Level of Evidence

III, retrospective cohort study.

Graft Augmentation of Repairable Rotator Cuff Tears: An Algorithmic Approach Based on Healing Rates

We provide our algorithm for tissue augmentation of rotator cuff repairs based on the current available evidence regarding rotator cuff healing. A variety of factors are associated with healing following rotator cuff repair. Increasing tear size and retraction as well as severe fatty degeneration have been associated with worsening rates of tendon healing. Given the correlation between tendon healing and postoperative outcomes, it is important to identify patients at high risk for failure and to modify their treatment accordingly to minimize the risk of early biomechanical failure and maximize the potential for structural healing. One approach that may be used to improve healing is tissue augmentation. Tissue augmentation is the use of tissue patches and scaffolds to provide rotator cuff reinforcement. Surgical management for rotator cuff tears (RCTs) continues to be a challenging task in orthopaedic surgery today. Appropriate treatment measures require an in depth understanding and consideration of the patient's prognostic factors such as age, fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles, bone mineral density, rotator cuff retraction, anteroposterior tear size, work activity, and degenerative changes of the joint. Using these factors within the Rotator Cuff Healing Index, we can determine a patient's surgical treatment that will yield the maximum healing rate. For nonarthritic RCTs, joint-preserving strategies should be first-line treatment options. For young, active patients with a reparable RCT and minimal fatty infiltration, a complete repair can be effective. For young patients with irreparable RCTs, superior capsular reconstructions, and tendon transfers are viable options. For elderly patients with low work activity, an irreparable RCT and significant fatty infiltration, a partial repair with or without graft augmentation can be attempted if minimal to no arthritic changes are seen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Subacromial Spacer Implantation During Arthroscopic Partial Repair in Patients With Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Provides Satisfactory Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Purpose

To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of partial rotator cuff repair (RCR) with and without implantation of a biodegradable subacromial spacer in the treatment of symptomatic irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs).

Methods

Patients with MRCT who underwent arthroscopic partial repair alone (PR) or combined with subacromial spacer augmentation (PRS) were included. Patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant scores in addition to range of motion (ROM) were collected preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Additionally, we determined the percentages of all of the patients in groups that achieved the minimal clinical important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the VAS, ASES, and Constant scores. Acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was determined as well.

Results

A total of 32 patients were included. Group PR included 20 patients with a median age of 68 years (range: 64-73) and median follow-up 28.0 months (14.0-60.0). Group PRS included 12 patients with a median age of 68.5 years (range: 63-74) and median follow-up of 17.0 months (12.0-32.0). At the final follow-up, the ASES, VAS, and Constant scores were significantly higher in the PRS group (75.5 [55-88.3], 1.0 [0-3], and 70.0 [43-79], respectively, compared to the PR group (55.0 [37.5-65], 2.0 [0-4], and 55.0 [31-79], respectively; P < .05). The only statistically significant differences were found between the PR and PRS groups in terms of the proportions of the patients who achieved MCID for the ASES (70% vs. 100%; P = .04) and in terms of the proportions of the patients who achieved SCB for the ASES (60% vs 100%; P = .01) There was also statistically significant difference between the PR and PRS groups, in terms of the proportions of the patients who achieved PASS for the VAS and ASES ([30 % vs 66.7 %; P = .04] and [0 % vs 50 %; P = .001], respectively). AHD was also improved in the PRS group (8.4 [7-9.5] vs 7.85 [5.5-9]; P < .05). ROM was greater in the PRS group at final follow-up with median forward flexion degree, 140.0° (90°-150°) versus 120.0° (80°-153°) (P < .001) and median abduction degree, 100.0° (70°-130°) versus 90.0° (70°-110°). There was no difference in terms of external rotation between groups (3° [2°-5°] vs 3.0° (2°-4°); P = .4).

Conclusions

Arthroscopic partial RCR with implantation of a subacromial spacer leads to satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with symptomatic irreparable MRCT compared with patients treated with partial repair alone.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Tendon transfers for massive rotator cuff tears

Massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) present a particular challenge due to high rates of retear that can range from 18 to 94%, failure of healing after repair, and potential for irreparability.

Management of MRCTs must take into consideration the patient's characteristics, clinical examamination and expectation, number and quality of muscle tendons units involved.

Conservative treatment, arthroscopic long head of the biceps tenotomy, cuff debridement, partial repair, and superior capsule reconstruction are viable solutions to treat selected patients.

The goal of tendon transfers is to achieve stable kinematic by restoring rotational strength and force coupling of the shoulder joint.

The ideal candidate is a young, motivated patient with small degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint, a massive irreparable cuff tear, significant atrophy, fatty infiltration, and functional deficit.

Patients with posterosuperior massive tears have impaired shoulder function with external rotation weakness and eventually lag sign If the teres minor is affected.

Latissimus dorsi transfer is the most used with results lasting for long follow-up and lower Trapezius transfer is becoming a surgical option. For anterosuperior tears, there is still controversial if pectoralis major is the best option when compared to latissimus dorsi although this last has a similar vector force with the supraspinatus tendon.

Complications associated with tendon transfers include neurovascular injury, infection, and rupture of the transferred tendon.

Subacromial balloon spacer for irreparable rotator cuff tears of the shoulder (START:REACTS): a group-sequential, double-blind, multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

New surgical procedures can expose patients to harm and should be carefully evaluated before widespread use. The InSpace balloon (Stryker, USA) is an innovative surgical device used to treat people with rotator cuff tears that cannot be repaired. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of the InSpace balloon for people with irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, group-sequential, adaptive randomised controlled trial in 24 hospitals in the UK, comparing arthroscopic debridement of the subacromial space with biceps tenotomy (debridement only group) with the same procedure but including insertion of the InSpace balloon (debridement with device group). Participants had an irreparable rotator cuff tear, which had not resolved with conservative treatment, and they had symptoms warranting surgery. Eligibility was confirmed intraoperatively before randomly assigning (1:1) participants to a treatment group using a remote computer system. Participants and assessors were masked to group assignment. Masking was achieved by using identical incisions for both procedures, blinding the operation note, and a consistent rehabilitation programme was offered regardless of group allocation. The primary outcome was the Oxford Shoulder Score at 12 months. Pre-trial simulations using data from early and late timepoints informed stopping boundaries for two interim analyses. The primary analysis was on a modified intention-to-treat basis, adjusted for the planned interim analysis. The trial was registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN17825590.

FINDINGS

Between June 1, 2018, and July 30, 2020, we assessed 385 people for eligibility, of which 317 were eligible. 249 (79%) people consented for inclusion in the study. 117 participants were randomly allocated to a treatment group, 61 participants to the debridement only group and 56 to the debridement with device group. A predefined stopping boundary was met at the first interim analysis and recruitment stopped with 117 participants randomised. 43% of participants were female, 57% were male. We obtained primary outcome data for 114 (97%) participants. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score at 12 months was 34·3 (SD 11·1) in the debridement only group and 30·3 (10·9) in the debridement with device group (mean difference adjusted for adaptive design -4·2 [95% CI -8·2 to -0·26];p=0·037) favouring control. There was no difference in adverse events between the two groups.

INTERPRETATION

In an efficient, adaptive trial design, our results favoured the debridement only group. We do not recommend the InSpace balloon for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.

FUNDING

Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health and Care Research partnership.

Clinical effect of arthroscopic long head of biceps transfer and tenodesis on irreparable rotator cuff tear

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of arthroscopic long head of biceps transfer and tenodesis for on irreparable rotator cuff tear.

Methods

A total of 18 patients with irreparable rotator cuff tear who were treated in the Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University School of Medicine from April 2018 to March 2020 were included in this study. They all underwent arthroscopic long head of biceps transfer and tenodesis. Shoulder joint motions (forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation angle) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed. Moreover, visual analogue scale (VAS) and university of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score were conducted during follow-up.

Results

Preoperative symptoms lasted from 3 to 16 months, with an average duration of 10 months. All patients healed in the first stage without obvious complications were included. All patients were followed up for 4 to 14 months after the surgery, with an average duration of 11.1 months. The range of shoulder joint motions, including forward flexion (80.52° ± 31.19° vs. 149.47° ± 28.36°), abduction (65.13° ± 37.59° vs. 152.46° ± 28.64°) and lateral rotation (30.17° ± 15.15° vs. 71.49° ± 11.42°) was significantly improved after operation (P < 0.05). The VAS score was notably decreased after operation (8.46 ± 0.80 vs. 1.55 ± 0.70), but the UCLA score was markedly increased (15.27 ± 2.89 vs. 31.17 ± 2.36). MRI imaging showed that 15 patients had good tissue healing, with a healing rate of 83.3% (15/18).

Conclusion

Arthroscopy of the biceps long head tendon transposition can significantly relieve pain in patients with large rotator cuff tears, improve joint mobility, and restore joint function.

Interposition Graft Bridging Reconstruction of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Medium-Term Results

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the medium-term clinical outcomes for patients who underwent bridging reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who underwent bridging reconstruction between 2010 and 2018. Patients who were missing either pre- or postoperative outcome scores were excluded. All included patients completed self-reported questionnaires (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff [WORC] and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH]) pre- and postoperatively at 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. All scores were reported out of 100.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients initially met our inclusion criteria, and 33 were excluded owing to lack of either pre- or postoperative outcome scores. Nine patients were lost to follow-up; therefore, 49 patients were finally evaluated, including 30 males (61.2%) and 19 females (38.8%) with an age of 59.6 ± 10.4 years (mean ± standard deviation) and mean follow-up of 5.3 years (range 2 to 9). Both WORC and DASH scores significantly improved from pre- to postoperatively (WORC: 69.6 ± 12.2 to 27.9 ± 23.7, P < .001; DASH: 51.5 ± 17.5 to 24.5 ± 23.0, P = .001). For WORC and DASH, 92% and 74% of patients, respectively, met the minimal clinical importance difference.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that patients' clinical outcome scores significantly improved with an average of 5-year follow-up, which demonstrates that bridging reconstruction is a safe procedure with promising midterm clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective case series.

The functional outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double-row knotless vs knot-tying anchors

To date two main techniques are used in arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff tears, the conventional knot-tying suture bridge technique and the knotless technique. We evaluated whether there is a difference in clinical outcome using both techniques. Our patients underwent arthroscopic treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears, and we retrospectively evaluated clinical function, strength and surgery time. Eighty-three shoulders operated between September 2012 and December 2013 were included in the study. We had nineteen patients in the knotless group, and sixty-four in the knot-tying group. In addition, we performed preoperatively radiological (magnetic resonance imaging-MRI) conformation of full-thickness rotator cuff tear in our patients. For clinical evaluation, we used Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (q-DASH) and the Shoulder Pain and Disability (SPADI) score, and we measured the strength of a range of motion postoperatively using a conventional dynamometer. The patients were evaluated preoperatively, and at 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The follow-up period was 12 months. The scores in both treatment groups improved at twelve months follow-up, but there was no statistical difference between both groups at twelve months after surgery; q-DASH score between groups (p = 0.092) and SPADI score (p = 0.700). Similarly, there was no statistical difference between the groups in regard to strength, surgery time, and range of motion at the twelve months follow-up. Our data confirm that both techniques may be used successfully to repair full-thickness rotator cuff tears with very good functional outcome.Level of evidence IV.

Irreparable Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears With Low-Grade Fatty Degeneration of the Infraspinatus Tendon: Minimum 7-Year Follow-up of Fascia Autograft Patch Procedure and Partial Repair

BACKGROUND

In shoulders with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) with high-grade fatty degeneration (Goutallier stage 3 or 4) of the supraspinatus tendon and low-grade fatty degeneration (Goutallier stage 1 or 2) of the infraspinatus tendon (ISP), arthroscopic patch grafting (PG) has been reported as superior to partial repair (PR) regarding the ISP retear rate at short-term to midterm follow-up. However, the longer term outcomes are unclear.

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and structural outcomes in the PG and PR groups at a minimum of 7 years postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We evaluated 24 patients in the PG group and 24 patients in the PR group. We primarily used the Constant score for clinical outcomes and performed magnetic resonance imaging for structural outcomes in the PG and PR groups. The risk factors for a retear of the ISP were identified by univariate and multivariate (forward stepwise selection method) logistic regression analyses. We primarily compared values at midterm follow-up (<4 years) with values at the final follow-up (minimum 7 years) for each patient.

RESULTS

The mean midterm and final follow-up times for the PG group were 41.0 and 95.1 months, respectively, compared with 35.7 and 99.3 months, respectively, for the PR group. We found significant differences for the midterm and final follow-up Constant total scores in the PG and PR groups (midterm follow-up: 79.1 vs 69.9, respectively [P = .001]; final follow-up: 76.0 vs 65.3, respectively [P = .006]) and in the Constant strength scores (midterm follow-up: 14.6 vs 8.5, respectively [P < .001]; final follow-up: 13.1 vs 8.3, respectively [P = .001]). Treatment group (PR) was a significant predictor of an ISP retear in the logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 3.545; P = .043).

CONCLUSION

Patients with low-grade massive RCTs treated with PG or PR improved significantly in terms of clinical outcomes at the midterm and final follow-up time points. However, Constant scores were significantly better in the PG group at the final follow-up.

Isolated Biceps Tenodesis and Tenotomy: A Systematic Review of Indications and Patient Satisfaction

Biceps tenodesis and tenotomy are increasingly being used as treatment options for shoulder pathology, but patient satisfaction remains largely unstudied. A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was conducted to identify clinical outcome studies on isolated biceps tenodesis or tenotomy that reported patient satisfaction. Within the 15 investigations that were included, the indication for tenotomy was rotator cuff pathology, whereas the indication for tenodesis was biceps pathology or type 2 superior labral tear from anterior to posterior. Patients undergoing tenotomy were 13.6 years older than those undergoing tenodesis (P<.001). Patient satisfaction was high following both procedures, at 85.6% following tenotomy and 92.3% following tenodesis. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):333-340.].

Treatment Options for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears present a significant challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. No single treatment, particularly among joint-preserving options, has been shown to be superior. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, including partial repair with and without graft augmentation, interposition grafts, superior capsule reconstruction, subacromial balloon spacers, tendon transfer, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. We will also offer guidance on surgical indications based on our clinical experience.

RECENT FINDINGS

Partial repair may offer reasonable clinical improvement for patients with lower preoperative function despite high re-tear rates. Additionally, several types of interposition grafts have shown promising short-term results and may outperform repair alone. Subacromial balloon spacers may lead to clinical improvement, especially in patients without glenohumeral osteoarthritis or pseudoparalysis, and recently received FDA approval for use in the USA. Superior capsule reconstruction is a technically demanding procedure that appears to produce excellent short-term results particularly when performed at high volume, but long-term studies in heterogeneous study groups are needed. Tendon transfers improve function by restoring force coupling in the shoulder, offering a promising option for younger patients. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a reliable option for treatment of irreparable cuff tears in elderly patients with lower functional demands. Irreparable cuff tears remain a difficult condition to treat. Recommended treatment for younger patients without glenohumeral osteoarthritis is particularly controversial. For older patients with low-demand lifestyles and glenohumeral osteoarthritis, RTSA is an effective treatment option. For all discussed procedures, patient selection appears to play a critical role in clinical outcomes.

Evaluating the role of graft integrity on outcomes: clinical and imaging results following superior capsular reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) addresses massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears in young patients. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate clinical outcomes and graft integrity in patients following SCR.

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients undergoing SCR by 2 surgeons with minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Functional outcomes were obtained, including Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), visual analog scale (VAS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. Graft integrity was evaluated on magnetic resonance images (MRIs).

RESULTS

Thirty-five shoulders in 34 patients were identified. Four patients underwent subsequent surgery. The mean preoperative scores were SST 21.6 ± 17.6, ASES 28.3 ± 10.1, SANE 50.6 ± 22.1, and VAS 6.6 ± 1.7. The mean postoperative outcomes were SST 79.1 ± 19.6, ASES 79.9 ± 17.4, SANE 74.3 ± 18.7, and VAS 1.5 ± 2.2. There was statistically significant improvement in SST, ASES, and VAS following SCR. MRI revealed graft failure in 62% (n = 13 of 21) of shoulders. Radiographic evidence of graft healing did not have any effect on SST, ASES, SANE, or VAS scores.

CONCLUSION

Given the high rate of graft failure without a significant difference in clinical outcomes, graft healing after SCR might not be an independent predictor of success. The improved clinical improvement in patients undergoing SCR may be due to other known beneficial aspects of the procedure, including partial rotator cuff repair, débridement, and biceps management.

Clinical outcomes of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer and superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Functionally irreparable rotator cuff tears (FIRCTs) present an ongoing challenge to the orthopedic surgeon. The aim of this systematic review was to critically compare the outcomes of three latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDT) techniques and two superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) techniques in treatment of FIRCTs.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies evaluating the outcome of FIRCT treatment was performed via a search of four databases in April 2020. Each included study was reviewed in duplicate by two reviewers for evaluation of methodological quality. The treatments analyzed were arthroscopic LDT (aLDT), open LDT Gerber technique (oLDTG), open LDT L'Episcopo technique (oLDTL), SCR with allograft (SCR-Allo), and SCR with autograft (SCR-TFL). Demographics, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures, radiographic acromiohumeral distance (AHD), treatment failures, and revisions were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies (1287 shoulders) met criteria for inclusion. Twenty-three studies involved open latissimus transfer, with 445 shoulders undergoing oLDTG with mean follow-up of 63.2 months and 60 patients undergoing oLDTL with mean follow-up of 51.8 months. Ten studies (n = 369, F/U 29.2mo) reported on aLDT. Seven studies (n = 253, F/U 16.9mo) concerned SCR-Allo, and six studies (n = 160, F/U 32.mo) reported on SCR-TFL. Range of motion and subjective outcome scores improved in all techniques with no differences across treatments. Both SCR methods provided greater improvement in AHD than open LDT methods (p < 0.01). The re-tear rates were lower in both oLDT groups compared to the SCR groups (p = 0.03). Clinical failure rates were higher in the SCR-Allo and oLDTG groups, while overall treatment failures were lowest in oLDTL compared to all four other groups.

CONCLUSION

SCR techniques were associated with improved short-term radiographic acromiohumeral distance, while the open LDT techniques had lower tendon re-tear and treatment failure rates. All techniques resulted in improved clinical outcomes and pain relief compared to preoperative levels with no differences across techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Systematic review of case series and cohort studies.

Comparison between partial and full coverage repair in massive rotator cuff tears. A minimum five year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Massive rotator cuff surgical management can be challenging. Controversy exists in the literature regarding the potential benefit of full head coverage for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to compare re-tear rate and clinical outcome of arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears in relation to the achievement of full humeral head footprint coverage or not. Hypothesis We hypothesized that there will be no difference in re-tear rate and clinical outcomes between full and partial coverage rotator cuff repairs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all adult patients with a massive rotator cuff tear who underwent arthroscopic repair with a minimum five years follow-up was performed. Outcomes analyzed included re-tear rate, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score, and the Penn Shoulder Score. Correlation and subgroup analyses were performed in order to evaluate whether age, symptom duration, tear size, coverage percentage, and fatty infiltration had any effect in outcome.

RESULTS

The average ASES score was 76.3±25.2, and average Penn Shoulder Score was 75.8±23.1 at 7.9 years mean follow-up in 27 patients analyzed. Re-tear rate was similar between full and partial footprint coverage repair with 2 versus 4 failures, respectively (p=0.64). ASES and Penn Shoulder scores were 84.2 and 83.7 for full rotator cuff repair versus 70.6 and 71.1, for partial coverage repair (p=0.20 and p=0.22, respectively). The percentage of head coverage and the tear size were both found to be significantly correlated with outcome, with coefficient of determination R² of 0.40 and 0.217, respectively, while a global fatty degeneration index GFDI <1.5 was associated with improved functional outcome.

DISCUSSION

No difference in failure rate and functional outcome was detected between full and partial coverage rotator cuff repair. The size of the tear and fatty infiltration were inversely correlated with functional score while the percentage of coverage achieved was positively correlated with favorable outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective comparative study.

Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients With Rotator Cuff Retear

Background:

The treatment for retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) has long been a challenge.

Purpose:

This study aimed to (1) summarize the characteristics of patients with a retear after primary ARCR and (2) determine the risk factors for poor clinical outcomes after a retear.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We collected the data of patients with a retear after primary ARCR between January 2011 and December 2016. There were 45 patients with retears included (19 men [42.2%] and 26 women [57.8%]; mean ± SD age, 63.11 ± 8.87 years). Initially, the demographic and outcome data of patients with a retear were analyzed. Patients were classified into good and poor outcome groups according to their overall satisfaction at final follow-up. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the factors for poor clinical outcomes after a retear.

Results:

A total of 31 patients were classified into the good outcome group, and 14 patients were classified into the poor outcome group. Both the good and the poor outcome groups showed that clinical scores significantly improved at the time of the retear diagnosis, but the final scores were maintained or worse compared with scores at the time of the retear diagnosis. Final range of motion (ROM), except external rotation in the good outcome group, was worse or had no significant change compared with ROM at the time of the retear diagnosis. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, current smoking (odds ratio [OR], 45.580 [95% CI, 3.014-689.274]; P = .006), female sex (OR, 32.774 [95% CI, 2.433-441.575]; P = .009), and retears of the same or larger size than the initial tear (OR, 10.261 [95% CI, 1.544-68.202]; P = .016) showed a higher OR for poor clinical outcomes after a retear.

Conclusion:

Smoking, female sex, and retears of the same or larger size than the initial tear were independent risk factors for poor clinical outcomes after a rotator cuff retear. Final clinical scores and ROM were similar or worse compared with the scores and ROM at the time of the retear diagnosis. Therefore, revision surgery should be actively considered in female patients or those who smoke with poor clinical outcomes and a larger retear size than the preoperative tear size at the time of the retear diagnosis.

Midterm Functional and Structural Outcomes of Large/Massive Cuff Tears Treated by Arthroscopic Partial Repair

Background:

Previous studies have shown good clinical outcomes in patients with irreparable large or massive rotator cuff tears treated using arthroscopic partial repair (APR); however, few studies have evaluated both functional and structural outcomes in these patients.

Purpose:

To evaluate both functional and structural outcomes in patients with large or massive rotator cuff tears treated using APR.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Between March 2009 and November 2016, a total of 30 patients underwent APR because of the irreparability of their large or massive rotator cuff tears during surgery. Of these patients, 24 completed the minimum 24-month follow-up (mean, 61.8 ± 27.1 months; range, 24-112 months) and were included in this study. Functional outcome measures included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scores and the visual analog scale for pain. Structural outcome measures comprised preoperative fatty degeneration, mediolateral tear size, residual tendon attachment area, and glenohumeral (GH) arthritic changes evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging scans or plain radiographs before and after surgery. Functional and structural outcomes were evaluated preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively, and at the final follow-up.

Results:

The JOA scores for all patients significantly improved from 67.9 ± 11.3 preoperatively to 85.4 ± 15.6 postoperatively (P < .0001). Similarly, the UCLA scores significantly improved from 15.8 ± 4.20 preoperatively to 29 ± 6.69 at final follow-up postoperatively (P < .0001). The mediolateral tear size were significantly decreased at 3 months postoperatively (P < .001) and at the final follow-up (P < .001). Compared with preoperative scores, the novel score evaluating the residual tendon attachment area improved from 3.08 ± 0.46 to 3.54 ± 0.41 (P < .001) after surgery overall, although it significantly deteriorated from 3 months postoperatively to the final follow-up. GH osteoarthritis progressed in 6 patients (25%). Patients who developed osteoarthritis had lower JOA and UCLA scores than did those who did not (JOA, P = .010; UCLA, P = .037).

Conclusion:

In irreparable large or massive rotator cuff tears treated using APR, functional outcome improved after surgery. Although the residual tendon attachment area improved, functional outcome after APR corresponded to the GH alterations at the midterm follow-up. Longer-term follow-up is needed to further elucidate the effect of APR on clinical outcomes in these patients.

Clinical Outcomes for Isolated Subscapularis Tears With Advanced Fatty Infiltration: Nonoperative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic Single-Row Repair

Background:

No study has investigated the treatment outcomes of isolated subscapularis tears with advanced fatty infiltration and tear progression to the supraspinatus tendon.

Purpose:

To assess the natural progression of isolated subscapularis tears with advanced fatty infiltration and compare clinical outcomes between nonoperative and operative treatment.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This study included 52 patients who received either operative (group A) or nonoperative (group B) treatment at our institution for isolated subscapularis full-thickness tears with grade 3 or 4 advanced fatty infiltration. All study patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. The following 4 functional measures were used: visual analog scale for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and University of California Los Angeles score. The modified belly-press test was used to assess subscapularis muscle strength. In group A, structural integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months after surgery. In addition, ultrasonographic evaluation was performed on both groups during the follow-up period to assess tear progression into the supraspinatus tendon.

Results:

At initial presentation, all functional assessment scores were significantly worse in group A versus group B (P ≤ .05 for all 4 scores). When we compared the mean change in scores before treatment versus after treatment, the group A patients were found to have significantly greater improvement than group B patients (P < .001 for all 4 scores); however, no significant difference was seen in final outcome scores between the groups. Although a high retear rate of 78.6% (22/28) was identified in group A, both groups showed no further tear progression to the supraspinatus tendon at the final ultrasonographic evaluation.

Conclusion:

For isolated subscapularis tears with advanced fatty infiltration, clinical improvement was seen with both nonoperative and operative treatment. Although the operatively treated group started with lower baseline scores, there were no significant differences in outcomes at final follow-up. Considering the high retear rate even after repair, surgical treatment of these lesions may not be warranted. Early detection and prompt repair of subscapularis tears, before the lesion becomes advanced with grade 3 or 4 fatty infiltration, are important for better outcomes.

Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair vs. latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in patients with massive and partially repairable rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on clinical outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair (APR) and latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) for posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears (mRCTs). We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of APR and LDTT for partially repairable posterosuperior mRCTs and to determine whether outcomes differ among tears that involve the teres minor.

METHODS

We retrieved the records of 112 consecutive patients with mRCTs deemed partially repairable due to fatty infiltration (FI) stage ≥3 in one or more rotator cuff muscles. Of the tears, 12 involved the subscapularis, 32 were managed conservatively, 14 were treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and 7 were treated by stand-alone biceps tenotomy. Of the remaining 47 shoulders, 26 underwent APR and 21 underwent LDTT. At a minimum of 12 months, we recorded complications, active forward elevation, external rotation, the Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score.

RESULTS

No significant differences between the APR and LDTT groups were found in terms of follow-up (23.4 ± 3.5 months vs. 22.1 ± 4.1 months, P = .242), Constant-Murley score (64.8 ± 13.7 vs. 58.9 ± 20.0, P = .622), ASES score (78.3 ± 19.3 vs. 74.4 ± 14.5, P = .128), active forward elevation (158.1° ± 19.4° vs. 142.8° ± 49.1°, P = .698), or external rotation (33.3° ± 17.4° vs. 32.2° ± 20.9°, P = .752). By contrast, the APR group had a higher SSV (73.3 ± 17.5 vs. 59.5 ± 20.0, P = .010), and SST score (8.3 ± 2.4 vs. 6.4 ± 3.0, P = .024). Univariable analysis revealed that advanced FI of the teres minor compromised Constant-Murley scores (β = -25.8, P = .001) and tended to compromise ASES scores (β = -15.2, P = .062). Multivariable analysis corroborated that advanced FI of the teres minor compromised Constant-Murley scores (β = -26.9, P = .001) and tended to compromise ASES scores (β = -16.5, P = .058).

CONCLUSION

Both APR and LDTT granted similar early clinical outcomes for partially repairable posterosuperior mRCTs, regardless whether the teres minor was intact or torn. Advanced FI of the teres minor was the only independent factor associated with outcomes, as it significantly compromised Constant-Murley scores and tended to compromise ASES scores.

Partial Rotator Cuff Repair for Massive Tears Rarely Require Revision Surgery

Purpose

To determine the significance of initial and residual rotator cuff tear defect size on the need for revision surgery or additional nonsurgical therapy, in a consecutive group of patients undergoing partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was carried out for all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed by a single surgeon between January of 2013 and December of 2016. All patients with massive rotator cuff tears (>30 cm²) who underwent partial repair were included in the study. Outcomes for the surgical procedure were measured based on the necessity for revision surgery or adjunct therapy, including steroid injections or additional physical therapy after initial release from care.

Results

In total, 1954 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were identified. Thirty-eight of these met the inclusion criteria. Those patients undergoing revision surgery represented 5.2% (2/38) of the series and had an average initial/residual tear defect area of 45.0/7.0 cm². Patients requiring adjunct therapy represented 7.9% (3/38) of the series and possessed an average initial/residual tear defect size of 40.0/16.0 cm². The remaining 33 (86.9%) patients did not require revision surgery or adjunct therapy at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. There was no significance between initial and/or residual rotator cuff tear defect size and the need for revision surgery. However, there was a significant difference in the mean residual defect size in the patients requiring additional nonoperative treatment after initial release from care (P = .012).

Conclusions

There was no relationship between residual defect size after partial repair and the need for revision surgery. Patients who returned for additional nonoperative treatment after being released from care were noted to have a statistically larger residual defect size at the time of index surgical intervention. Only 5% of patients underwent subsequent surgery at an average of more than 4 years’ follow-up, suggesting that partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears can provide a durable, joint-preserving intervention.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, Therapeutic Case Series

Outcome of arthroscopically assisted lower trapezius transfer to reconstruct massive irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to report the outcome of arthroscopically assisted lower trapezius transfer to reconstruct irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tear.

METHODS

Forty-one consecutive patients with irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tears who underwent an arthroscopically assisted transfer of the lower trapezius transfer were included in this study. The patients' average age was 52 years (range 37-71), and average follow-up was 14 months (range 6-19 months). Nineteen patients had true pseudoparalysis preoperatively, whereas 66% had a prior failed rotator cuff repair. Outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, range of motion, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven (90%) patients had significant improvement of all outcome scores: VAS, SSV, and DASH. The presence of a subscapularis tear did not affect the outcome. However, 3 patients who had preoperative rotator cuff arthropathy changes of the shoulder had persistent pain and limited range of motion of the shoulder after surgery, and 2 of them underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Two additional patients had a traumatic rupture of the transfer as a result of fall (at 5 and 8 months postop). One underwent revision arthroscopic repair and did well after surgery, and the other had good pain relief but recurrent weakness and limited range of motion, and elected not to have a revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic-assisted lower trapezius transfer may lead to a good outcome in patients with massive irreparable posterior-superior rotator cuff tears, including patients with pseudoparalysis. The presence of an associated reparable subscapularis tear did not affect the outcome.

Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears versus anatomic complete arthroscopic repair: a case-control study

PURPOSE

To investigate whether a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tear (RCT) produces satisfactory clinical outcomes comparable to those of an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study (prospectively collected data, mean follow-up: 32.7 months ± 29.5; range 12-80 months) was conducted with patients with massive RCT who underwent either an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair (group A: 34 patients) or a non-anatomic arthroscopic repair (partial repair or medialized repair, group B: 30 patients). The rate of success was calculated primarily by the number of patients per group who achieved a minimal clinically important difference between the preoperative and postoperative values of (a) the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score, (b) the constant score and (c) secondarily, the visual analogue scale (VAS-pain). Active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion, abduction, external rotation in 0° and 90° abduction), muscle strength and external rotation lag sign were also assessed.

RESULTS

No significant statistical differences amongst groups were found concerning the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. All postoperative clinical and functional scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001). According to our primary and secondary success rate criteria, both treatments were found to be successful, whereas there was no significant difference amongst them.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-anatomic arthroscopic repair of massive RCT illustrated satisfactory outcomes, which are not significantly different from those reported after an anatomic complete arthroscopic repair.

Surgical Management of Massive Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: Arthroscopic-Assisted Lower Trapezius Transfer

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Functionally irreparable rotator cuff tears (FIRCTs) remain one of the most challenging pathologies treated in the shoulder. The lower trapezius transfer represents a very promising treatment option for posterosuperior FIRCT. This article reviews the role for the lower trapezius transfer in the treatment of patient with FIRCTs and highlights the tips and tricks to performing this arthroscopic-assisted procedure.

RECENT FINDINGS

The treatment of posterosuperior FIRCTs contemplates a wide array of surgical options, including partial repair, biceps tenodesis/tenotomy, superior capsule reconstruction, subacromial balloon, reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and open-/arthroscopic-assisted tendon transfers. Tendon transfers have emerged as very promising reconstructive options to rebalance the anterior-posterior force couple. Controversy remains regarding the relative indications of latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) and lower trapezius transfer (LTT). Initially used with very good success in patients with brachial plexus injuries, the open LTT has shown excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes in a recent series of patients with FIRCTs. However, this technique should be reserved for patients with an intact or reparable subscapularis tendon and no advanced glenohumeral arthritis or humeral head femoralization. With advancements in surgical technique, the arthroscopic-assisted LTT has shown similar promising results. However, studies on arthroscopically assisted LTT are limited to short-term follow-up, and future comparative trials with large patient numbers and longer follow-up are needed to better understand the indications for this novel tendon transfer in the treatment of FIRCT. The arthroscopic-assisted LTT is a novel, promising option for the treatment of patients with functional irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Careful attention to indications and technical pearls are paramount when performing this procedure to optimize postoperative clinical outcomes.

The lower trapezius transfer: a systematic review of biomechanical data, techniques, and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lower trapezius (LT) transfers were originally described to restore external rotation (ER) in the management of brachial plexus palsy; however, there is recent interest in the role of this transfer to restore shoulder function, specifically ER, in patients with a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear (RCT). The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the current literature pertaining to LT transfers, including biomechanics, techniques, and clinical outcomes for patients with brachial plexus palsy and massive RCTs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched for biomechanical and clinical studies, as well as technique articles. Four biomechanical studies reported on moment arms, range of motion (ROM), and force vectors. Seven clinical studies reported postoperative ROM and functional outcomes, and weighted mean improvements in ROM were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 18 studies were included, and then subdivided into 3 themes: biomechanical, technique, and clinical. Biomechanical studies comparing LT and latissimus dorsi (LD) transfers observed an overall larger moment arm in abduction and ER in adduction for the LT transfer, with similar results in forward elevation. Clinical studies noted significant improvement in shoulder function following the LT transfer, including ROM and functional outcome scores. There were several described techniques for performing the LT transfer, including arthroscopically assisted and open approaches, and the use of both allograft and autograft augmentation.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the LT transfer is generally safe, and the clinical and biomechanical data to date support the use of the LT transfer for restoration of function in these challenging patient populations.

Efficacy of Imaging Modalities Assessing Fatty Infiltration in Rotator Cuff Tears

BACKGROUND

Fatty atrophy is a diagnosis characterized by the combination of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy of the rotator cuff. Studies have shown a strong positive correlation between the level of fatty infiltration and the risk of experiencing a chronic rotator cuff tear. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to review the current literature on radiographic imaging of fatty infiltration and fatty atrophy to better aid surgeons in predicting functional outcome and to help guide patient decisions.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in PubMed. The exact search queries included "rotator cuff" in the MeSH Terms field; "fatty atrophy," fatty infiltration," and "fatty muscle degeneration" in the Title/Abstract field; and various combinations of these searches. We initially found 184 articles using these keywords, including both human and animal studies. The 25 animal studies were excluded, leaving 159 articles. The abstracts of all remaining articles were reviewed and selected on the basis of our inclusion criteria of focusing on patients with rotator cuff tears (preoperatively and postoperatively), fatty infiltration, fatty atrophy, and imaging modalities. We excluded an additional 127 articles, leaving 32 articles that were selected for the final review and inclusion in this study.

RESULTS

Among 45 shoulder specialists across different studies, interrater agreement for Goutallier staging with use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ranged from 0.24 to 0.82 and intrarater agreement for supraspinatus fatty changes ranged from 0.34 to 0.89. Our review also showed strong positive correlations when assessing the severity of fatty atrophy of the rotator cuff between MRI and ultrasound or ultrasound modalities such as sonoelastography.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff is associated with greater repair failure rates and hence poorer overall clinical outcomes. MRI remains the gold standard for the imaging of rotator cuff tears and postoperative healing. Ultrasound can decrease health-care expenditures associated with the assessment of repair integrity postoperatively, although ultrasound is not as precise and has some limitations compared with MRI.

"Strings" (Multiple Tendon Interposition Autografts) for Reconstruction of Presumably Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Irreparable rotator cuff tears are challenging to treat. Especially in younger patients without concomitant osteoarthritic changes, joint-preserving procedures are warranted. To date, no treatment guideline exists because none of the available techniques has shown superiority over the others, and long-term survivorship data are missing. The aim of the "Strings" is to provide an arthroscopic solution to anatomically reconstruct presumably irreparable rotator cuff tears by bridging the gap with multiple string-like tendon interposition autografts.

Arthroscopic partial repair with versus without biodegradable subacromial spacer for patients with massive rotator cuff tears: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

To investigate whether arthroscopic partial repair with the additional use of a biodegradable subacromial spacer would be proven better treatment for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) compared to single arthroscopic partial repair.

METHODS

A matched-pairs case-control study of 32 patients suffering from irreparable MRCT who underwent an arthroscopic partial repair with (Group B: 16 patients) or without (Group A: 16 patients) InSpace Balloon (ISB^®; Orthospace, Caesarea, Israel) implantation was conducted. For the clinical and functional assessment of the patients, the visual analog scale, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Range of Motion (RoM), and patients' satisfaction were obtained.

RESULTS

The two groups were matched in all baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (n.s.). All mean final quantitative postoperative clinical and functional scores of group A (partial repair and ISB) and group B (single partial repair), as well as active RoM, were significantly improved (t test) in comparison with the mean preoperative values (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in relation to the two success rate criteria (ASES minimal clinically important difference or MCID > 17, Constant score MCID > 10.4), as well as pain relief and RoM 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic partial repair, either with or without ISB implantation, resulted in significantly improved clinical and functional short-term outcomes for the treatment of MRCT. Patients who were treated with combined partial repair and ISB implantation had a potential propensity toward better functional outcomes and higher patient satisfaction compared to the single-partial-repair-treated group. However, given that these differences were not significant, we feel that further studies are required to clarify the potential therapeutic value of ISB implantation in the treatment of irreparable MRCT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

CLINICAL TRIALS' REGISTRY

German Clinical Trials Register (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). ID number: DRKS00014725. Date of registration: 07/05/2018.

The Role of Partial Rotator Cuff Repairs in Patients With Massive Irreparable Tears Without Arthritis

In patients with chronic massive rotator cuff tears, complete repair is often not achievable or the repair is performed under significant tension with risk of early failure. The goal of a partial rotator cuff repair is to decrease pain, restore force couples, and improve range of motion of the shoulder. A systematic review was performed to assess active range of motion (ie, forward elevation, external rotation), pain, and patient-reported outcome scores after partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Significant improvements in forward elevation, visual analog scale pain scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and Constant scores were observed, and perioperative complication rates were minimal. Partial rotator cuff repairs remain a viable treatment option in this patient population. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(1):e1-e7.].

Management of the Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear

When evaluating patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears, orthopaedic surgeons have an increasingly wide array of surgical options, including both established techniques and emerging technologies. However, significant variability exists in the clinical evaluation and surgical indications in this subset, and definitions for pseudoparalysis and tear irreparability are inconsistent. In older patients with symptomatic rotator cuff arthropathy and relatively sedentary demands, the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has been established as the preferred treatment option, producing reliable improvements in both pain and function. In younger patients without glenohumeral arthritis or pseudoparalysis, joint-preserving options are preferred, with recent literature highlighting alternative options including partial repair, bridging or interpositional graft placement, tendon transfers (ie, latissimus, trapezius, and pectoralis major), superior capsular reconstruction, and subacromial spacer placement. In this review article, we address the topic of irreparable rotator cuff tears, emphasizing the workup, indications for various treatment options, and clinical outcomes.

Low level of evidence for all treatment modalities for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears

PURPOSE

This systematic review assesses evidence for improvements in outcome for all reported types of treatment modalities [physical therapy, tenotomy or tenodesis of the long head of the biceps, debridement, partial repair, subacromial spacer, deltoid flap, muscle transfer, rotator cuff advancement, graft interposition, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), and reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA)] used for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The primary aim was to be able to inform patients about expectations of the amount of clinical improvement after these treatments.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for studies on irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff lesions without glenohumeral osteoarthritis, published from January 2007 until January 2019, with minimum 2-year follow-up. Studies with pre-operative and/or intra-operative determination of cuff tear irreparability were included. We defined the non-adjusted Constant Score as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Sixty studies (2000 patients) were included with a fair mean quality score, according to the Modified Coleman Methodology Score. The employed definitions of 'irreparable' were mainly based on MRI criteria and were highly variable among studies. The smallest weighted mean preoperative to post-operative improvements in Constant Score were reported for biceps tenotomy/tenodesis (10.7 points) and physical therapy (13.0). These were followed by debridement (21.8) and muscle transfer (27.8), whereas the largest increases were reported for partial repair (32.0), subacromial spacer (32.5), rotator cuff advancement (33.2), RSA (34.4), graft reconstruction (35.0), deltoid flap (39.8), and SCR (47.4). Treatment using deltoid flap showed highest mean weighted improvement in Constant Score among studies with available medium-term (4-5-year) follow-up. Treatments deltoid flap, muscle transfer, and debridement were the only treatments with available long-term (8-10-year) follow-up and showed similar improvements in Constant Score at this time point.

CONCLUSION

The variability in patient characteristics, co-interventions, outcome reporting, and length of follow-up in studies on irreparable rotator cuff tears without osteoarthritis complicates sound comparison of treatments. Clinically important treatment effects were seen for all 11 different treatment modalities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.