Outcomes After Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction: Response

Contribution of Additional Anterolateral Structure Augmentation to Controlling Pivot Shift in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Several types of anterolateral structure (ALS) augmentation procedures in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have been reported. However, information is limited regarding the effect of additional ALS augmentation on rotatory stability in a clinical setting.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to investigate the contribution of additional ALS augmentation in ACL reconstruction in cases with a high risk of residual pivot shift. The 2 hypotheses were as follows. First, additional ALS augmentation would improve rotatory stability as compared with solely reconstructing the ACL. Second, graft tension changes would be different between the ACL and ALS during knee range of motion and against anterior or rotatory loads.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen patients who met at least 1 of the following criteria were included: (1) revision ACL reconstruction, (2) preoperative high-grade pivot shift, or (3) hyperextended knee. The pivot-shift test was performed preoperatively and during surgery after ACL reconstruction and after additional ALS augmentation with acceleration measurements from a triaxial accelerometer. The tension changes of the ACL and ALS grafts were also measured during knee range of motion and against manual maximum anterior tibial translation, internal rotation, and external rotation.

RESULTS

After ACL reconstruction, the pivot-shift acceleration was still greater than that of the uninjured knee. However, additional ALS augmentation further reduced acceleration when compared with ACL reconstruction alone in both primary and revision cases (P < .05 vs preoperative, P < .05 vs ACL). During knee flexion-extension, the tension of the ACL increased as the knee was extended, whereas that of the ALS did not change. Graft tension of the ACL and ALS became higher with internal rotation and lower with external rotation as compared with the neutral position. Tension of the ACL was significantly increased against anterior tibial translational loads, whereas that of the ALS was not.

CONCLUSION

Additional ALS augmentation further improved the rotatory stability during ACL reconstruction in patients with a high risk of residual pivot shift at the time of surgery. Significant differences in graft tension changes were also observed between the ACL and ALS against different loads. Additional ALS augmentation may be considered to eliminate the pivot shift in patients with a high risk of residual pivot shift.

Proximal fixation anterior to the lateral femoral epicondyle optimizes isometry in anterolateral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Concomitant anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury is often observed in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury leading some to recommend concurrent ALL reconstruction. In ligament reconstruction, it is imperative to restore desirable ligament length changes to prevent stress on the graft. The purpose of this investigation is to identify the optimal femoral and tibial locations for fixation in ALL reconstruction.

METHODS

3D computerized tomography (CT) knee models were obtained from six fresh-frozen, unpaired, cadaveric human knees at 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 90°, 110°, and 125°of knee flexion. Planar grids were projected onto the lateral knee. Isometry between each tibial and femoral grid point was calculated at each angle of flexion by the length change in reference to the length at 0° of knee flexion. The mean normalized length change over the range of motion was calculated for each combination of points at all angles of flexion were calculated.

RESULTS

Fixation of the ALL to the lateral femoral epicondyle or 5 mm anterior to the epicondyle with tibial fixation on the posteroinferior aspect of the tibial condyle (14-21 mm posterior to Gerdy's tubercle and 13-20 mm below the joint line) provided the lowest average length change for all possible ALL tibial insertion points. Minimal length change for all femoral fixation locations occurred from 20° to 40° of flexion, which identifies the angle of flexion where graft tensioning should occur intraoperatively.

CONCLUSION

With the use of 3D reconstructed models of knee-CT scans, we observed that there was no ALL fixation point that was truly isometric throughout range of motion. Fixation of the anterolateral ligament on the lateral femoral epicondyle or anterior to the lateral femoral epicondyle and on the inferoposterior aspect of the tibial condyle restores isometry. Additionally, minimal length change was observed between 20° and 40° of flexion, which is the most appropriate range of knee flexion to tension the graft. Reproducing isometry reduces stress on the graft, which minimizes the risk of graft failure.

Historical perspective on the "discovery" of the anterolateral ligament of the knee

There is a lively debate about the existence, origins and discoverer of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. The complex anatomy of the lateral aspect of the knee has made it difficult to differentiate between various structures such as the iliotibial band, capsulo-osseous layer, Kaplan's fibres and the anterolateral capsule. The "discovery" of a new anterolateral structure in 2013 was the culmination of many historical studies. In 1879, Paul Ferdinand Segond described a tibial plateau fracture in which he noted a pearly band reinforcing the joint capsule. Other anatomists had their suspicions about this ligament; it was described by Vallois in 1914 in his thesis and extensively studied by Jost in 1921. References to it can be found in comparative anatomy studies. This historical review serves as a reminder that understanding and treating knee sprains is not something new.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.