1
|
Klungsøyr JA, Vagstad T, Klungsøyr PJ, Myklebust TÅ, Lund Hanssen H, Hoff SR, Drogset JO. The Arthroscopic Subscapular Sling Procedure Results in Low Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability at 24 Months of Follow-Up. Arthroscopy 2024:S0749-8063(24)00167-1. [PMID: 38453096 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the results of the subscapular sling procedure developed for anterior shoulder instability in patients with less than 10% anterior glenoid bone loss. METHODS Patients were treated surgically with the arthroscopic subscapular sling procedure. A semitendinosus graft was used to reconstruct the anterior labrum and to establish a sling suspension around the upper part of the subscapularis tendon. The patients were followed up with radiographs (at 12 and 24 months). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder region and clinical examinations were performed at 3, 12, and 24 months. Recurrent dislocation was the primary endpoint. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and MRI results were secondary outcome measures. An independent physiotherapist assessed residual instability and range of motion. RESULTS Fifteen patients were included with a dislocation rate of 0% after 24 months follow-up. There was a significant clinical improvement of the WOSI score from 57% (904) at baseline to 88% (241) at 24 months (P < .001). The proportion of patients with an improvement in the WOSI Total score larger than the estimated minimal clinically important difference was 100% both at 12 and 24 months. MRI showed an intact sling in all patients. External rotation was not significantly reduced (52° at baseline vs 47° at 24 months, P = .211). Flexion and abduction were significantly improved from 152° to 174° (P = .001) and 141° to 170° (P < .001) after 24 months. The surgical procedures were completed without any intraoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS The subscapular sling procedure resulted in low recurrent shoulder instability and improved patient-reported outcome measures at 24 months of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Arild Klungsøyr
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.
| | - Terje Vagstad
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Peter Johannes Klungsøyr
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Tor Åge Myklebust
- Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Håkon Lund Hanssen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Solveig Roth Hoff
- Department of Radiology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jon Olav Drogset
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital and Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Calvo E, Itoi E, Landreau P, Arce G, Yamamoto N, Ma J, Sparavalo S, Wong I. Anterior and posterior glenoid bone augmentation options for shoulder instability: state of the art. J ISAKOS 2021; 6:308-317. [PMID: 34145077 DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2019-000413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Bony lesions are highly prevalent in anterior shoulder instability and can be a significant cause of failure of stabilisation procedures if they are not adequately addressed. The glenoid track concept describes the dynamic interaction between the humeral head and glenoid defects in anterior shoulder instability. It has been beneficial for understanding the role played by bone defects in this entity. As a consequence, the popularity of glenoid augmentation procedures aimed to treat anterior glenoid bone defects; reconstructing the anatomy of the glenohumeral joint has risen sharply in the last decade. Although bone defects are less common in posterior instability, posterior bone block procedures can be indicated to treat not only posterior bony lesions, attritional posterior glenoid erosion or dysplasia but also normal or retroverted glenoids to provide an extended glenoid surface to increase the glenohumeral stability. The purpose of this review was to analyse the rationale, current indications and results of surgical techniques aimed to augment the glenoid surface in patients diagnosed of either anterior or posterior instability by assessing a thorough review of modern literature. Classical techniques such as Latarjet or free bone block procedures have proven to be effective in augmenting the glenoid surface and consequently achieving adequate shoulder stability with good clinical outcomes and early return to athletic activity. Innovations in surgical techniques have permitted to perform these procedures arthroscopically. Arthroscopy provides the theoretical advantages of lower morbidity and faster recovery, as well as the identification and treatment of concomitant pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Calvo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de la Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Universidad Autonoma, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eiji Itoi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | | | - Guillermo Arce
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Instituto Argentino de Diagnostico y Tratamiento (IADT), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Nobuyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Jie Ma
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Sara Sparavalo
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Ivan Wong
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gilat R, Haunschild ED, Lavoie-Gagne OZ, Tauro TM, Knapik DM, Fu MC, Cole BJ. Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure Versus Free Bone Block Procedures for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:805-816. [PMID: 32795174 DOI: 10.1177/0363546520925833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Free bone block (FBB) procedures for anterior shoulder instability have been proposed as an alternative to or bail-out for the Latarjet procedure. However, studies comparing the outcomes of these treatment modalities are limited. PURPOSE To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing anterior shoulder stabilization with a Latarjet or FBB procedure. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from inception to 2019 for human-participants studies published in the English language. The search was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement including studies reporting clinical outcomes of patients undergoing Latarjet or FBB procedures for anterior shoulder instability with minimum 2-year follow-up. Case reports and technique articles were excluded. Data were synthesized, and a random effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the proportions of recurrent instability, other complications, progression of osteoarthritis, return to sports, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) improvement. RESULTS A total of 2007 studies were screened; of these, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. These studies reported outcomes on a total of 4540 shoulders, of which 3917 were treated with a Latarjet procedure and 623 were treated with an FBB stabilization procedure. Weighted mean follow-up was 75.8 months (range, 24-420 months) for the Latarjet group and 92.3 months (range, 24-444 months) for the FBB group. No significant differences were found between the Latarjet and the FBB groups in the overall random pooled summary estimate of the rate of recurrent instability (5% vs 3%, respectively; P = .09), other complications (4% vs 5%, respectively; P = .892), progression of osteoarthritis (12% vs 4%, respectively; P = .077), and return to sports (73% vs 88%; respectively, P = .066). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores improved after both Latarjet and FBB, with a significantly greater increase after FBB procedures (10.44 for Latarjet vs 32.86 for FBB; P = .006). Other recorded PRO scores improved in all studies, with no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION Current evidence supports the safety and efficacy of both the Latarjet and FBB procedures for anterior shoulder stabilization in the presence of glenoid bone loss. We found no significant differences between the procedures in rates of recurrent instability, other complications, osteoarthritis progression, and return to sports. Significant improvement in PROs was demonstrated for both groups. Significant heterogeneity existed between studies on outcomes of the Latarjet and FBB procedures, warranting future high-quality, comparative studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Gilat
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eric D Haunschild
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Tracy M Tauro
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Derrick M Knapik
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael C Fu
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun Y, Wei Z, Xiang X. [The causes of Latarjet surgery failure and the revision surgeries]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2021; 35:246-251. [PMID: 33624482 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202005105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To review the causes of Latarjet surgery failure and various revision surgeries, in order to provide the reference for the revision of treatment options for Latarjet surgery failure. Methods Literature on the causes of Latarjet surgery failure and revision surgeries was extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results Latarjet surgery is widely used in clinical practice for recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder with glenoid defects, especially for the defects of more than 25%. The main reasons for its failure are ununion, bone resorption, graft dislocation, trauma, and graft fracture, etc. The revision surgeries are diverse, the standard treatment has not yet been formed. The revision surgeries include open iliac bone grafting, microscopic Eden-Hybinette surgery, soft tissue reconstruction, open or arthroscopic bone grafting, etc. The differences among the revisions are mainly reflected in grafts, complications, and their costs. Conclusion Latarjet surgery is difficult to operate and requires high technical requirements for the surgeons. It is necessary to continuously improve the surgical technology to reduce the complications related to Latarjet surgery and its revision surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youqiang Sun
- Institute of Sports Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P.R.China
| | - Zhihua Wei
- Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P.R.China
| | - Xiaobing Xiang
- Institute of Sports Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klungsøyr JA, Vagstad T, Ferle M, Drogset JO, Hoff SR, Dalen AF, Hurschler C, von Falck C, Klungsøyr P. The novel arthroscopic subscapular quadriceps tendon-bone sling procedure provides increased stability in shoulder cadavers with severe glenoid bone loss. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29:170-180. [PMID: 32060592 PMCID: PMC7862209 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-05900-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment of anterior glenoid bone loss in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability is a challenge. The subscapular sling method with quadriceps tendon bone (QTB) graft is a modification of the subscapular sling with a semitendinosus (ST) graft. The aim of the study was to test the biomechanical stability of the QTB sling procedure in human shoulder cadavers with severe anterior glenoid bone loss. METHODS Fourteen cadaveric shoulders were tested with a force-moment-guided robot in three conditions: physiologically intact, anterior glenoid bone resection, and the subscapular sling procedure with a QTB graft. Joint stability was measured in anterior, anterior inferior and inferior directions in four glenohumeral joint positions: 0° and 60° of glenohumeral abduction, with each at 0° and 60° of external rotation. Maximum external rotation was measured at 0° and 60° glenohumeral abduction. Computer tomography scans were obtained preoperatively to plan the glenoid bone resection, as well as postoperatively to calculate the proportion of the glenoid bone actually resected. RESULTS Significantly decreased translations were observed in the shoulders with the QTB sling compared to the intact joint and the glenoid bone loss model. No significant differences in maximum external rotation were observed between the three different conditions. CONCLUSION This biomechanical study revealed a significant stabilizing effect of the arthroscopic subscapular QTB graft sling procedure in human shoulder cadavers without compromising external rotation. Clinical trials may reveal the usefulness of this experimental method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Arild Klungsøyr
- Orthopedic Department, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Health Trust, Ålesund, Norway. .,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Terje Vagstad
- Orthopedic Department, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Health Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Manuel Ferle
- Labor für Biomechanik und Biomaterialien, Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover-Annastift, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jon Olav Drogset
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway ,Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Solveig Roth Hoff
- Department of Radiology, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway ,Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Andreas F. Dalen
- Orthopedic Department, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Health Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Christof Hurschler
- Labor für Biomechanik und Biomaterialien, Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover-Annastift, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christian von Falck
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH) Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Peter Klungsøyr
- Orthopedic Department, Ålesund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Health Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| |
Collapse
|