Does Arthroscopic Suture-Spanning Augmentation of Single-Row Repair Reduce the Retear Rate of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear?

Revision rates and progression to shoulder arthroplasty after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the rate of progression to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and to other interventions as revision surgeries after an arthroscopic repair of a massive rotator cuff tear (MRCT). Additionally, the review aimed at defining the best arthroscopic approach for the treatment of MRCTs in terms of failure and revision rates.

METHODS

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the rates of progression to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients who underwent primary arthroscopic repair of an MRCT with different arthroscopic procedures. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the rate of progression to revision surgery and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Eighteen articles were included in the qualitative synthesis and 14 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, 934 patients and 950 shoulders were involved in the review. Seven-hundred and thirty patients and 735 shoulders were included in the meta-analysis. The proportion of revisions to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was 0.9%, 3.3% and 0.1% for complete repair, partial repair and superior capsular reconstruction, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found across the groups in terms of progression to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (n.s.). The average proportions of revisions to interventions different than reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. were 0.9% for complete repair, 2.0% for partial repair and 2.0% for superior capsular reconstruction again, no statistically relevant difference was found among the groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

The current review finds no statistically significant differences in the progression to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or other revision procedures among partial repair, complete repair and superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. It is crucial to understand the long-term outcomes of different surgical techniques for massive rotator cuff tears, particularly regarding failure rates and progression to further procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

The continuous fragility index of outcomes in rotator cuff repair augmentation randomized trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic rotator cuff tears often undergo surgical repair, which may be paired with various augmentation strategies to enhance structural healing rates. While many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluate augmentation techniques, the statistical robustness of many findings in these studies is unknown. This systematic review aims to evaluate the continuous fragility index (CFI) of RCTs on augmentation techniques for rotator cuff repairs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were comprehensively searched from inception to September 2023 for RCTs assessing the efficacy of at least 1 augmentation strategy during rotator cuff repair. Eligible studies reported at least 1 statistically significant finding for a continuous outcome. The CFI for eligible outcomes was calculated, with median CFI presented by type of augmentation and outcome. Multivariable regression was performed to identify associations between CFI and other outcome variables.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs (1305 patients) were included in the final analysis. The median CFI for the 86 outcomes analyzed was 5.85 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.3-14.4). Augmentation-specific analysis demonstrated variability in CFIs, with the most robust outcomes found in platelet-rich plasma studies (median: 10.95; IQR: 3.3-19.0) and suture-spanning augmentation studies (median: 11.90; IQR: 11.45-14.35). Outcome-specific analysis demonstrated range of motion outcomes as most robust (median: 9.85; IQR: 7.58-14.0) and strength-related outcomes as most fragile (median: 2.00; IQR: 1.0-16.3). Multivariable regression identified larger sample size as a statistically significant predictor of greater CFI. Notably, loss to follow-up exceeded the CFI in 31.4% of outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The observed median CFI of 5.85 in augmentation trials is consistent with the CFI reported in orthopedic and sports medicine literature. However, almost a third of outcomes had a loss to follow-up exceeding their CFI, risking the reversal of study findings with more robust follow-up and outcomes. Clinicians and researchers should consider fragility in addition to P values when assessing study results, especially in the context of high loss to follow-up. Future trials should report the fragility of their findings.

Risk factors for symptomatic rotator cuff tears: a retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

The incidence and diagnostic rate of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) have increased significantly. The purpose of this study was to investigate and analyze the risk factors for symptomatic RCTs to provide a basis for their prevention and treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the relevant clinical indicators of 193 randomized clinical trial (RCT) patients and 161 non-RCT patients hospitalized with shoulder pain as the main complaint from January 1, 2017, to August 31, 2021. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the differences in potential risk factors between the two groups.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that age (p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.036), hypertension (p < 0.001), coronary heart disease (p = 0.028), history of shoulder trauma (p < 0.001), hyperlipidemia (p = 0.025), type III acromion (p = 0.012) and critical shoulder angle (CSA) (p < 0.001) increased the risk of RCTs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥ 60 years (OR = 2.61, 95% CI = 1.23 to 5.12), CSA ≥ 35° (OR = 4.24, 95% CI = 1.60 to 11.22), hypertension (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.33 to 4.11) and history of shoulder trauma (OR = 5.20, 95% CI = 2.87 to 9.45) were independent risk factors for symptomatic RCTs.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that age ≥ 60 years, CSA ≥35°, hypertension and history of shoulder trauma are independent risk factors for symptomatic RCTs and can provide directions for further development of prevention and treatment strategies. Future studies need to clarify the mechanism underlying the association between these risk factors and symptomatic RCTs.

Patient-reported outcome tools and baseline scores vary by country and region for arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review

Background

Different patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools are used in patients with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) which complicates outcome comparisons. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare PRO usage and baseline scores across world regions and countries in patients with ARCR of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT).

Methods

A systematic review was performed on ARCR for MRCT. The search was conducted from September to November of 2022 using the MEDLINE database for articles published in the last 15 years. Thirty-seven articles were included after initial screening and full-text review. In each article, PRO usage, baseline scores, and country of origin were collected. PRO usage was reported in percentages and baseline scores were normalized for each region to facilitate comparisons. Normalization was performed using the PRO means from each article. These averages were converted to fractions using the worst and best possible scores. These were combined into a single numerical value, expressed as a decimal from 0 to 1, using the total sample size for each tool per region. Values closer to 0 represent worse functional outcomes.

Results

Thirty-two percent (n = 12) of articles were from Asia, 43.2% (n = 16) from Europe, 5.4% (n = 2) from the Middle East, and 18.9% (n = 7) from North America. The most commonly reported PRO tools were American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) in 19 papers, Constant-Murley Score (CMS) in 26 papers, Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS) in 19 papers, and University of California in Los Angeles (UCLA) in 11 papers. ASES was reported in 51% of articles with 63% being from Asia (n = 12) compared to 21% from North America (n = 4). CMS was reported in 70% of studies with 58% being from Europe. Upon normalization, the preoperative score ranged from 0.30 to 0.44. Europe (0.39), and North America (0.40) showed similar scores. The lowest and highest scores were seen in the Middle East (0.3) and Asia (0.44) respectively.

Conclusion

There is no standardized method to report outcomes in patients undergoing ARCR for MRCT. Great variation in usage exists in PROs which complicates data comparison between world regions. With normalization, baseline scores where similar among Asia, North America, and Europe, and lowest in the Middle East.

Functional and radiologic results of the crimson duvet procedure in rotator cuff treatment: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears are one of the more frequent pathologies of the shoulder. Arthroscopic techniques and biologic augmentation have been developed to improve the rate and quality of healing. The crimson duvet procedure (CDP) theoretically provides mesenchymal stem cells through microfracture treatment of the footprint. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effect of CDP in patients who had undergone arthroscopic surgery for complete rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed in a total of 123 patients, consisting of 59 women and 64 men, with a mean age of 58 years. We included patients with a clinical and radiologic diagnosis of a complete rotator cuff tear. All patients were treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In group 1, the surface of the footprint was débrided; in group 2, the footprint underwent microfracture. The primary outcome was the nonhealing rate, which was detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasonography, and the secondary outcome was the functional result. A Sugaya classification of I to III was considered to indicate healing. For clinical evaluation, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) and Constant scores were evaluated, along with the range of motion. The functional evaluation was performed preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The radiologic (MRI or ultrasonography) evaluation was performed at 6 months. Neither the patients nor the radiologists and physical therapists who performed the postoperative evaluations were informed of the random selection.

RESULTS

We observed a healing rate of 85.11% in the control group and 93.7% in the CDP group, which was not significant (P = .19). However, a significant improvement in function was observed in all patients. The ASES score improved from 68.9 (SD 13.8) preoperatively to 92.2 at 6 months and to 96.4 (SD 6.2) at 12 months (P < .05), but no difference was observed between the groups. A similar level of improvement was observed in the Constant score.

CONCLUSION

The arthroscopic repair of complete rotator cuff tears presents good and excellent clinical results in most patients. Nevertheless, nonhealing occurs at a rate that depends mainly on the age of the patient and the size of the tear. The addition of CDP did not improve the functional results or the healing rate.

Better Short-Term Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair in Studies With Poorer Mean Shoulder Scores and Predominantly Small to Medium-Sized Tears at Baseline: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To perform a meta-analysis to explore factors associated with clinical and structural short-term outcomes in randomized and nonrandomized prospective studies of rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

Medline, clinicaltrials.gov, and Mendeley were searched for literature published from January 2000 to December 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) and nonrandomized prospective cohort studies (PCS) describing the outcome of surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Study quality was assessed by two independent reviewers. We calculated standardized mean difference (SMD) from baseline to follow-up in each trial arm, preferably at 12 months follow-up. Between-study heterogeneity of outcomes, small-study effects and rates of retear were assessed. Meta-regression was performed to estimate associations between prespecified variables and clinical and structural outcomes.

RESULTS

Outcomes in 64 RCT and 19 PCS trial arms were analyzed. Median age was 59 years. There was substantial between-study heterogeneity in clinical outcomes (SMD range: .42 to 6.44; I² = 93% in RCT, 88% in PCS) and summary estimates were not calculated. On the basis of multivariate analysis, better clinical outcome was associated with lower (worse) mean outcome value at baseline, smaller tear size, and lower proportion of large-massive tears (R² = 56 and 44%, respectively). Overall retear rate at median 13-month follow-up was 19.9% (interquartile range: 10-30). Higher mean age together with larger tear size and higher proportion of large-massive tears were associated with increased retear rates (R² = 33% and 58%, respectively). Clinical outcome was not significantly related to rate of retear.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies with lower mean outcome values at baseline and predominantly small- to medium-sized tears reported better clinical outcomes. Studies with higher mean age and a predominance of large-massive tears had significantly increased retear rates, but retear rates were not associated with clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, meta-analysis of level I and II studies.

Transosseous-Equivalent/Suture Bridge Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Combination With Late Postoperative Mobilization Yield Optimal Outcomes and Retear Rate: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the literature in order to assess the evidence defining the optimal combination of surgical technique single-row repair (SRR), double-row repair (DRR), or transosseous-equivalent/suture bridge (TOE/SB) arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and postoperative rehabilitation (early or late) protocol for ARCR.

METHODS

The literature search was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Randomized SSR-early trials (RCTs) comparing SRR vs DRR vs TOE/SB ARCR techniques were included, as well as early vs late postoperative range of motion. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis, with statistical analysis performed using R. The treatment options were ranked using the P-score.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies comprising 2,181 total shoulders met the inclusion criteria. TOE/SB-late (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.46) and DRR-late (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.52) were found to significantly reduce the rate of retear, with TOE/SB-late resulting in the highest P-score for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (P-score: 0.7911) score and retear rate (P-score: 0.8725). DRR-early did not result in any significant improvements over the SRR-early group, except in internal rotation. There was no significant difference in forward flexion between groups, with almost equivalent P-scores. Furthermore, TOE/SB-early and TOE/SB-late trended toward worsening external rotation compared with the control.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggests that rotator cuff repair using the TOE/SB technique and late postoperative mobilization yields the highest functional outcomes and lowest retear rate in the arthroscopic management of symptomatic rotator cuff tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, meta-analysis of Level I studies.

A biomechanical comparison of a mesh suture to a polyblend suture in a porcine tendon model

Background

The suture-tendon interface turned out to be the weak point of a repaired rotator cuff. A double rip-stop (DRS) technique was developed to enhance the strength of the suture-tendon interface. The first aim of this study was to compare the suture-tendon interface strength between mesh suture and the No. 2 FiberWire (FW), which is commonly used in the clinic. The second aim was to compare the biomechanical properties of rotator cuff repair between mesh suture and No. 2 FiberWire using a typical suture-bridge (SB) and DRS techniques.

Methods

Eighteen porcine subscapularis tendon (SST) was randomly assigned to the Mesh-tendon group and FiberWire-tendon group. A single suture loop was passed through the SST with a Mesh suture or FiberWire. Thirty-two infraspinatus tendons (ISTs) were randomly assigned to four groups: SB-Mesh group: SB technique with Mesh suture, SB-FW group: SB technique with FiberWire, DRS-Mesh group: DRS technique with Mesh suture, and DRS-FW group: DRS technique with FiberWire. All repaired specimens were underwent failure testing. Failure modes, load to create a 3-mm gap, failure load, and stiffness were compared.

Results

There were no significant differences between the Mesh-tendon group and FiberWire-tendon group regarding the failure load, stiffness, and ultimate stress. When the same technique was used, the rotator cuff repaired with a mesh suture had the similar load to create a 3-mm gap, failure load, and stiffness compared with FiberWire. When the same suture was used, the DRS technique had a significantly higher load to create a 3-mm gap formation and failure load compared with the SB technique.

Conclusions

The repair failure strength and stiffness using the mesh suture were similar to the FiberWire suture regardless of the repair techniques. However, the repair strength in the DRS technique was significantly stronger than the SB technique when the same suture material was used.