Outcomes After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Revision Reconstruction in Baseball Players

Rehabilitation Protocols in Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review of Articles Published in the Last 20 Years

CONTEXT

Elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries have become increasingly common in athletes. Despite this, rehabilitation protocols appear to vary drastically, which may explain the clinical equipoise regarding optimal management.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review reports rehabilitation characteristics reported after UCL injuries and compares reported outcomes based on early versus delayed rehabilitation.

DATA SOURCES

Our search utilized PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane to identify all articles on UCL rehabilitation published between January 1, 2002 and October 1, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies in English with ≥5 patients that reported rehabilitation protocols for UCL injuries were evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data included sample characteristics, time to achieve physical therapy milestones, outcome scores, and return-to-play (RTP) rate and timing.

RESULTS

Our review included 105 articles with a total of 15,928 elbows (98% male; weighted mean age, 23 years; follow-up, 47 months), with 15,077 treated operatively and 851 treated nonoperatively. The weighted mean time patients spent adhering to nonweightbearing status was 42 days. The mean time until patients were given clearance for active range of motion (ROM) 15 days, full ROM 40 days, and elbow strengthening exercises 32 days. The mean time until all restrictions were lifted was 309 days. The mean time to begin a throwing program was 120 days. Across all rehabilitation characteristics, protocols for patients undergoing nonoperative management started patients on rehabilitation earlier. After UCL reconstruction, earlier active ROM (≤14 days), elbow strengthening (≤30 days), no restrictions (≤180 days), and throwing (≤120 days) postoperatively led to earlier RTP without a negative effect on functional outcome scores.

CONCLUSION

Current literature provides a spectrum of protocols for elbow UCL rehabilitation, regardless of management. Nonoperative patients began ROM activities, strengthening, and throwing programs sooner than operative patients, and earlier milestones led to earlier RTP.

Management of UCL Injuries: Primary and Revision

Ulnar collateral ligament injuries are prevalent among baseball players with an increasing incidence, especially in younger athletes. Diagnosis relies on history, examination, and MRI, with dynamic imaging playing an expanding role. Nonoperative management prioritizes cessation of throwing, correcting kinetic chain deficiencies, and gradual rehabilitation. The decision between reconstruction and repair is based on tear characteristics, tissue quality, patient goals, position, and timing of injury. Primary surgery generally results in high return-to-play rates. Revision surgery has less favorable outcomes with more complications. Emerging trends include the use of hybrid reconstruction techniques for challenging cases and platelet-rich plasma to augment nonoperative care.

Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing a 3-Strand Palmaris Tendon Autograft With a Hybrid Linear Construct

The integrity of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow is vital for the throwing athlete. Although newer techniques exist, reconstruction remains the gold standard for full-thickness UCL tears. An increase in throwing velocity, inadequate recovery, and early sports specialization have contributed to increased rates of UCL injury. As increasing numbers of athletes undergo UCL reconstruction, we continue to search for the optimal technique to return athletes to the same level of competition. We present a UCL reconstruction utilizing a 3-stranded palmaris longus tendon autograft with an inlay linear construct.

Favorable Outcomes Following Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair, Though Repair Associated with Increased Risk of Revision Surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the risk of revision surgery following repair versus reconstruction of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow in a national sample of patients in the United States.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of young patients (≤35 years old) who underwent primary UCL reconstruction or repair for an isolated medial UCL injury of the elbow from October 2015 through October 2022 in a large national database (PearlDiver). Patient demographic data, comorbidities, surgical details, and concomitant ulnar nerve procedures were collected. Time-to-event analyses were used to assess the risk of revision UCL surgery between groups. Two-year complication rates, including ulnar neuropathy, were also assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 1,820 patients (69.9% reconstruction, 30.1% repair) with an average follow-up of 2.9 years met inclusion criteria. The estimated 2-year revision-free survival (95% confidence interval) was 99.5% (99.1%-99.9%) for UCL reconstruction compared to 97.9% (96.4%-99.3%) for UCL repair (unadjusted log-rank P = .032). UCL repair remained associated with an increased risk of revision UCL surgery after adjusting for confounding variables (hazard ratio, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-8.09; P = .037). Complication rates were similar between reconstruction and repair, including the incidence of ulnar neuropathy (13.8% vs 14.5%, P = .78).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that UCL repair was associated with a significantly higher risk of revision UCL surgery than UCL reconstruction in a national sample. Importantly, however, overall failure rates were low, and complication rates were similar between procedures. These findings support the overall favorable outcomes of UCL repair while suggesting it may not necessarily be the optimal treatment for all patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Performance-Based Outcomes after Revision Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Professional Pitchers

OBJECTIVE

To compare performance in baseball pitchers before and after revision ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery using performance metrics.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Public online database.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Players who underwent revision UCL surgery between 2015 and 2021 were identified. Players were included if they were Minor League (MiLB) or Major League (Major League baseball [MLB]) pitchers. Players were excluded if they were not pitchers, if they underwent their revision surgery as an amateur, or if there is no record of their primary reconstruction surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Revision UCL surgery (repair or reconstruction).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Return to sport (RTS) rate, RTS time, pitch velocity, and pitch spin rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-five pitchers underwent revision UCL surgery. MiLB pitchers had a shorter RTS time after their primary surgery (15.62 vs 20.77 months, P < 0.01) compared with MLB pitchers but similar RTS times after their revision reconstruction (19.64 vs 18.48 months, P = 0.44). There was also no difference in return to play (RTP) rate overall after primary versus revision reconstruction ( P = 1.00). Major League baseball pitchers also had decreased RTS time after primary compared with revision reconstruction (15.62 vs 19.64 months, P < 0.01) but similar RTP rates ( P = 0.28). Finally, MLB pitchers had similar pitch breakdowns, velocities, and spin rates before and after their primary and revision repair or reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Both revision UCL repair and reconstruction can return pitchers to preinjury performance levels. Pitchers and teams should be properly counseled on realistic RTP times and postsurgery performance when discussing revision UCL surgeries.

Variable Return to Play and Sport Performance After Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Baseball Players: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To evaluate return to play (RTP) and return to same level of play (RTSP) rates as well as preoperative and postoperative in-game performance metrics in baseball pitchers who underwent ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR). Secondarily, this review sought to assess outcomes based on primary versus revision UCLR as well as level of competition.

METHODS

This review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried to identify articles evaluating UCLR in baseball players between January 2002 and October 2022. Data included RTP, RTSP, and performance metrics including earned run average, innings pitched, walks and hits per inning pitched, batting average against, strikeouts per 9 innings, walks per 9 innings, percentage of fastballs thrown, and average fastball velocity. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria were used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

Analysis included 25 articles reporting on 2,100 elbows. After primary UCLR, RTP ranged from 336 to 615 days (57% to 100% achieved) and RTSP ranged from 330 to 513 days (61% to 95%). After revision UCLR, RTP ranged from 381 to 631 days (67% to 98%) and RTSP ranged from 518 to 575 days (42% to 78%). When stratifying primary UCLR outcomes by competitive level, RTP and RTSP ranged respectively from 417 to 615 days (75% to 100%) and 513 days (73% to 87%) for Major League Baseball only, 409 to 615 days (57% to 100%) and 470 to 513 days (61% to 95%) for Major League Baseball plus Minor League Baseball, and 336 to 516 days (73% to 85%) and 330 days (55% to 74%) for college plus high school. Heterogeneity was seen in postoperative sports performance metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more than half of baseball players appear able to RTP after primary and revision UCLR, RTSP rates after revision UCLR were as low as 42% in the literature. Preoperative and postoperative performance metrics varied.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

Twisting technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow: new possibilities toward enhancing the strength of autografts

Background

Although the ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction procedure has been increasing in popularity annually owing to its stable postoperative outcomes, the number of revision surgeries following ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction has increased. The success of the initial reconstruction surgery and further improvement in the return-to-play rates of the initial surgery are crucial. In this study, we report on ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using the twisting technique, which aims to enhance the strength of the graft (palmaris longus tendon) to improve return-to-play rates.

Methods

We investigated the return-to-play rate and period in 60 cases (2016-2021) that underwent ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using the twisting technique and 211 cases (2007-2019) that did not use the twisting technique. The twisting technique involved inserting the graft through the bone tunnel and then twisting the doubled tendon.

Results

According to the Conway-Jobe scale, the twisting technique group had 98.3% excellent, 1.7% good, 0% fair, and 0% poor results, with a mean return-to-play period of 9.8 months. The non-twisting technique group had 86.7% excellent, 9.0% good, 1.9% fair, and 2.4% poor results, with a mean return-to-play period of 11.4 months. The two groups showed significant differences in return-to-play rate (P = .020) and period (P = .022).

Conclusion

The clinical results of the twisting technique showed that the return-to-play rate of the twisting technique group was higher after than before the procedure, and the return-to-play period was shortened by more than 1 month. The twisting technique may improve the results of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction surgery.

Graft choice and techniques used in elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction over the last 20 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) injuries have become increasingly common, leading to a higher number of mUCL reconstructions (UCLR). Various techniques and graft choices have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of each available graft choice, the surgical techniques most utilized, and the reported complications associated with each surgical method.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysesguidelines. We queried PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify all articles that included UCLR between January 2002 and October 2022. We included all studies that referenced UCLR graft choice, surgical technique, and/or ulnar nerve transposition. Studies were evaluated in a narrative fashion to assess demographics and report current trends in utilization and complications of UCLR as they pertain to graft choice and surgical techniques over the past 20 years. Where possible, we stratified based on graft and technique.

RESULTS

Forty-seven articles were included, reporting on 6671 elbows. The cohort was 98% male, had a weighted mean age of 21 years and follow-up of 53 months. There were 6146 UCLRs (92%) performed with an autograft and 152 (2.3%) that utilized an allograft, while 373 (5.6%) were from mixed cohorts of autograft and allograft. Palmaris longus autograft was the most utilized mUCL graft choice (64%). The most utilized surgical configuration was the figure-of-8 (68%). Specifically, the most common techniques were the modified Jobe technique (37%), followed by American Sports Medicine Institute (ASMI) (22%), and the docking (22%) technique. A concomitant ulnar nerve transposition was performed in 44% of all patients, with 1.9% of these patients experiencing persistent ulnar nerve symptoms after ulnar nerve transposition. Of the total cohort, 14% experienced postoperative ulnar neuritis with no prior preoperative ulnar nerve symptoms. Further, meta-analysis revealed a significantly greater revision rate with the use of allografts compared to autograft and mixed cohorts (2.6% vs. 1.8% and 1.9%, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Most surgeons performed UCLR with palmaris autograft utilizing a figure-of-8 graft configuration, specifically with the modified Jobe technique. The overall rate of allograft use was 2.3%, much lower than expected. The revision rate for UCLR with allograft appears to be greater compared to UCLR with autograft, although this may be secondary to limited allograft literature.

An Interval Throwing Program for Baseball Pitchers Based upon Workload Data

Background

Interval throwing programs (ITP) have been used for decades to enable baseball pitchers to return to competition after injury or surgery by gradually applying load to the throwing arm. Past programs have been based on personal experience; however, advances in our understanding of the biomechanics and workloads of throwing allow for a more modern data-based program to be developed.

Hypothesis/Purpose

To 1) develop a updated ITP for rehabilitation of modern baseball pitchers based upon biomechanical and throwing workload data, and 2) compare the updated program with a past program to determine differences in chronic workload and acute:chronic workload ratios (ACWR).

Study Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

Workloads (i.e. daily, acute, chronic, and ACWR) for the original ITP were built from the prescribed throwing schedule. Elbow varus torque per throw was calculated based upon a relationship between elbow varus torque and throwing distance. Throw counts, daily/chronic/acute workloads, and ACWR were calculated and plotted over time. A new ITP was built to model current pitcher's throwing schedules and gradually increased ACWR over time.

Results

The original ITP had a throwing schedule of 136 days, final chronic workload 15.0, and the ACWR above or below the "safe" range (i.e. 0.7 - 1.3) for 18% of the program with a peak of 1.61. The updated ITP was built to consist of a 217-day schedule, final chronic workload of 10.8, and deviated from the safe range for 9% of the program, with a peak of 1.33.

Conclusion

The newly created ITP is more familiar to modern baseball pitchers while exhibiting a more gradual buildup of chronic workload than traditional ITP programs. This ITP may be used to return baseball pitchers back to competition as safely and efficiently as possible, and potentially with less risk of setbacks or reinjury. The ITP may be used following common injuries or surgeries to the throwing shoulder and elbow, such as Tommy John surgery, while also serving as a basis for future development of shorter duration ITPs.

Level of Evidence

2c.

Tommy John: Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Allograft Reconstruction With Internal Brace

Injuries of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow have previously been career ending for overhead athletes, with gymnasts and baseball pitchers being highly affected. The majority of UCL injuries in this population are chronic, overuse injuries and may be amenable to surgical intervention. The original reconstruction technique, pioneered by Dr. Frank Jobe in 1974, has undergone many modifications over the years. Most notable is the modified Jobe technique developed by Dr. James R. Andrews, which has resulted high rates of return to play and increased career longevity. However, the lengthy recovery time is still problematic. As a way to address the lengthy recovery time, a UCL repair with an internal brace technique improved the time to return to play but has limited applicability to the young patient with an avulsion injury and good tissue quality. Furthermore, there is considerable variety in other published techniques including surgical approach, repair, reconstruction, and fixation. We present here a technique for a muscle splitting, ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with allograft to provide collagen for longevity and internal brace for immediate stability, early rehabilitation, and return to play.

Intersurgeon Consistency of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Internal Brace: A Biomechanical Analysis

BACKGROUND

Injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the medial elbow has been treated successfully with ligament repair augmented with internal brace. Previous work has shown that this procedure does not overconstrain the ulnohumeral joint; however, the procedures were conducted by a single surgeon, which controlled for anchor placement and graft tensioning.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

Our purpose was to evaluate the reproducibility of contact mechanics and joint torque after UCL repair with internal brace as performed by different surgeons compared with repair by a single surgeon. It was hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in elbow contact mechanics, valgus torque, or torsional stiffness between the 2 groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Nine pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were tested biomechanically under 3 conditions: UCL-intact (UCL-I), UCL-deficient (UCL-D), and UCL-repaired with internal brace augmentation (UCLR-IB). For each pair, 1 elbow was repaired by a single surgeon, and the contralateral elbow was repaired by 1 of 9 other surgeons. Testing consisted of valgus torsion between 0° and 5° with the elbow positioned at 90° of flexion. Ulnohumeral contact mechanics and overall joint torque and stiffness were measured and compared between surgeon groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the single-surgeon and multiple-surgeon groups regarding contact area (P = .83), contact force (P = .27), peak pressure (P = .26), or peak force (P = .30); however, contact pressure was significantly affected (P = .02) by surgeon group. Compared with UCL-I, both UCL-D and UCLR-IB conditions had a significant overall effect on contact area (P = .004) and contact force (P = .05); however, contact pressure (P = .56), peak pressure (P = .27), and peak force (P = .24) were not affected by injury condition. Measurements of elbow torque (P = .28) and stiffness (P = .98) were not significantly different between surgeon groups.

CONCLUSION

UCL repair with internal brace provided consistent results among several surgeons when compared with a single surgeon. The procedure did not lead to joint overconstraint while also returning the ligament to near-intact levels of resisting valgus stress.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

UCL repair with internal brace augmentation is a reproducible surgical technique that has good clinical outcomes in the literature.

Pain Is the Most Frequently Cited Reason Athletes Fail to Return to Sport After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

No previous systematic review to our knowledge has examined the reasons that athletes fail to return to sport (RTS) after ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery.

Purpose

To report the rate of failure to RTS after UCL surgery and identify reasons that preclude an athlete's ability to successfully RTS.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

This study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases for studies on athletes who underwent either UCL reconstruction or repair that reported RTS rates and identified reasons for failure to RTS. Data were collected on the number of athletes included, average age, sport played, operative technique, average follow-up, rate of failure to RTS, and reasons for failure to return. A random-effects model was used to conduct the meta-analysis.

Results

Included were 26 studies reporting on 1019 athletes. Primary or revision UCL reconstruction was performed in 913 patients (89.6%), while the remaining 106 patients (10.4%) underwent UCL repair. The pooled rate of failure to RTS after UCL reconstruction or repair was calculated to be 11.4% (95% CI, 8.4-14.7). A significantly higher estimated proportion of athletes failed to return because of elbow-related reasons compared with non-elbow-related reasons (55.3% vs 40.6%; P = .0352). Persistent pain (29/103; 28.2%) was the most common reason for failure to return, followed by elbow limitations and other unspecified elbow problems (19/103; 18.4%). There was moderate evidence for publication bias and study heterogeneity across the included studies.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis estimated the rate of failure to RTS after UCL surgery as 11.4%, with the majority of athletes unable to return because of elbow pain. Future studies reporting outcomes and providing details as to why athletes are unable to RTS can better inform sport surgeons on factors precluding RTS and can guide clinical practice to better help athletes achieve their postoperative goals.

Revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in Major League Baseball pitchers: effects of fastball velocity and usage

BACKGROUND

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears are prevalent in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers and can cause significant loss of time with varying reports of impact on performance. Revision UCL reconstruction (UCLR) is becoming increasingly common, with little known about the effects on fastball (FB) velocity and usage (FB%) in this setting.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the effect of revision UCLR on MLB pitchers with respect to postoperative FB velocity and FB% at 1 and 2 years after return to play. The hypothesis was postoperative FB velocity and FB% would significantly decrease vs. prerevision levels, and that revision UCLRs would result in significantly decreased FB velocity and FB% in comparison to a matched group of MLB pitchers after primary UCLR.

METHODS

Twenty-one pitchers who underwent revision UCLR and returned to MLB play were identified from public records from 2008-2021. The PITCHf(x) system collected FB velocity for 4-seam (4FB) and 2-seam (2FB) fastballs and total FB% for pitchers in the prerevision year as well as the 2 years after return. A matched control group of pitchers who underwent primary UCLR was used for comparison.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in FB velocity between prerevision levels (4FB 92.9 mph, 2FB 91.4 mph) and years 1 (4FB 92.5 mph, 2FB 91.2 mph) and 2 (4FB 93.4 mph, 2FB 91.1 mph) after revision UCLR. FB% decreased from the prerevision season (60.1) and the first (56.2, P = .036) and second years (52.5, P = .002) after return. There were no significant differences between FB velocity and FB% or between the revision and primary UCLR groups.

CONCLUSION

Pitchers returning to the MLB level after revision UCLR can expect similar FB velocity to their prerevision FB velocity and to pitchers undergoing primary UCLR; however, they do demonstrate a decrease in FB%, which may suggest less confidence in their FB after RTP.

Outcomes After Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Graft Repair in Professional Baseball Pitchers With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Background

Rerupture of the reconstructed ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is becoming more frequent at the professional level of baseball. However, there is no literature describing outcomes after UCL graft repair.

Purpose

To evaluate rerupture rate, return to play, performance upon return, and patient-reported outcomes after a novel UCL graft repair technique.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

All included patients underwent UCL graft repair after a previous UCL reconstruction, pitched in at least 1 professional baseball game before repair, and were at least 2 years postprocedure within the same 10-year time period. The authors evaluated patient characteristics and performance metrics, including wins, losses, win percentage, earned run average, innings pitched, walks and hits per inning pitched, for the 2 seasons before and after the procedure. Patients were contacted to assess UCL rerupture, timing of return to sport, current level of competition, Conway score, and Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) Shoulder and Elbow Score.

Results

Six players met the inclusion criteria. All had proximal UCL graft ruptures and underwent flexor-pronator tendon repair in combination with graft repair. At a mean (±SD) follow-up of 56.7 ± 37.8 months, no reruptures were encountered, and the mean KJOC score was 87.9 ± 14.6. Of the 6 pitchers who underwent UCL graft repair, 4 (67%) returned to professional pitching at a mean of 17 ± 6 months. Three of the 6 (50%) achieved an excellent Conway score, signifying a return to prior level of sport. There was no significant difference in demographic or preoperative pitching performance metrics between players who did and did not return to pitching. For those players who returned to professional pitching, there was no significant difference between preprocedure and postprocedure performance statistics.

Conclusion

Repair of the UCL graft appears to yield comparable rates of return to play and performance with revision UCL reconstruction. This technique serves as a viable alternative for proximal avulsion ruptures of the UCL graft.

Differences in Shoulder Internal Rotation Strength Between Baseball Players With Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Healthy Controls

Background:

Studies have indicated decreased shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) strength in the throwing limb of baseball players after ulnar collateral ligament injury. There is limited evidence on the recovery of shoulder rotation strength after primary ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR).

Hypothesis:

At the time of return to throwing, baseball players who underwent UCLR would demonstrate decreased IR and ER shoulder strength in the throwing arm as compared with healthy baseball players.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Male competitive high school and collegiate baseball athletes participated in this study. Athletes who underwent UCLR were compared with healthy controls who were matched by age, height, weight, and position. Bilateral isometric shoulder ER and IR strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer for all participants at the time of initial evaluation (UCLR group) and throughout the course of a season (healthy group). Independent t tests were run to calculate mean differences in ER and IR shoulder strength between the groups, with significance set at P < .05.

Results:

A total of 86 baseball athletes participated in this study (43 UCLR group, 43 healthy group). At the time of return to throwing (mean ± SD, 194 ± 30 days postoperatively), the 2 groups demonstrated no significant differences in nonthrowing arm ER or IR strength (P = .143 and .994, respectively). No significant difference was found between groups for throwing arm ER strength (P = .921); however, the UCLR group demonstrated significantly less throwing arm IR strength than the healthy group (144.2 ± 27.8 vs 157.6 ± 27.1 N; P = .023).

Conclusion:

The results of this study demonstrate that throwing arm rotator cuff strength may not fully recover before the initiation of a return-to-throwing program after UCLR. These data provide a potential framework for clinicians to assist in the management and exercise prescription of the baseball athlete after UCLR and before medical release and the initiation of a return-to-throwing program.