A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Single-Row With Double-Row Fixation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Long-Term Follow-up

Clinical Outcomes and Repair Integrity After Double-Row Modified Mason-Allen Repair Technique With a Single Knot in Small to Medium Supraspinatus Tears

Background

Various arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques are being used for the treatment of rotator cuff tears with the development of surgical instruments. However, retears after repair are not completely avoidable, and efforts to reduce retears remain a challenge.

Purpose/Hypothesis

To introduce a new repair technique, the double-row modified Mason-Allen technique with a single knot, and to compare clinical outcomes and retear rates with the single-row modified Mason-Allen technique. It was hypothesized that this new technique would have a better clinical outcome and significantly lower retear rate than the single-row modified Mason-Allen technique.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 110 patients with small- to medium-sized (<1.5 cm) full-thickness supraspinatus tears were enrolled into 2 groups, with 65 patients receiving the single-row modified Mason-Allen technique (group A) and 45 patients receiving the double-row modified Mason-Allen technique with a single knot (group B). The clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction scores. All patients enrolled in this study were monitored for a minimum of 24 months. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to analyze the integrity of tendons and retear at 6 months after surgery.

Results

No statistically significant differences between the 2 groups were found regarding the VAS for pain, ASES, and DASH scores. However, retear was found in 9 patients (13.8%) in group A and 1 patient (2.2%) in group B. The difference in the retear rate was statistically significant between the 2 groups (P = .037).

Conclusion

A significantly lower retear rate and comparable clinical outcomes were seen after the double-row modified Mason-Allen repair technique with a single knot when compared with the single-row modified Mason-Allen technique. Based on these findings, the double-row modified Mason-Allen repair technique with a single knot can be considered a surgical treatment option that can provide sufficient stability in small- to medium-sized supraspinatus tears.

Dyslipidemia may impact initial recovery following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The current literature shows that dyslipidemia can lead to a higher incidence of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and an increased retear rate after repair. We aimed to evaluate the influence of preoperative dyslipidemia on postoperative pain, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), active range of motion (ROM), and structural integrity.

METHODS

A cohort of 111 patients who underwent arthroscopic RCT repair between January 2021 and July 2022, and whose complete preoperative serum lipid data were available within one week prior to surgery was retrospectively reviewed. Dyslipidemia was defined as the presence of an increase or decrease in at least one blood lipid profile (triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, or non-high-density lipoprotein). There were 43 patients in the dyslipidemia group and 68 in the ortholiposis group. Patient evaluations, including pain score, PROs, and ROMs, were conducted preoperatively; at 3 and 6 months postoperatively; and at the last follow-up. Structural integrity was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 6 months after surgery if possible, and Sugaya type 4 or 5 was considered a retear. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias.

RESULTS

The RCT size, surgical technique, preoperative pain status, PROs, and active ROM were comparable between patients with dyslipidemia and those with ortholiposis. Three months after surgery, patients in the dyslipidemia group had worse average PROs (Constant score: P = 0.001; ASES score: P = 0.012; UCLA score: P = 0.015), forward flexion (P = 0.012), and internal rotation (P = 0.001) than patients in the ortholiposis group did. The difference between the two groups persisted after PSM but disappeared at the sixth month after surgery. No significant differences in pain score, PROs, or active ROMs were detected between the dyslipidemia and ortholiposis groups after a mean follow-up of 24 months. Of the 72 patients who underwent MRI, 4 retears (5.6%) were found, and all were in the ortholiposis group. There was no difference in the rate of retears between the two groups (P = 0.291) or with (P = 0.495) PSM.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we found that perioperative dyslipidemia may impact initial recovery within the first 3 months following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair but may have no effect on pain, PROs, or active ROMs at a mean 2-year follow-up or rotator cuff integrity at 6 months postoperatively. Trail registration Retrospectively registered.

Differences in Clinical Outcomes Between Patients With Retear After Supraspinatus Tendon Repair and Those With Intact Repair at 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

It is well known that rotator cuff repair is associated with an overall retear rate of 21% to 26%. However, a cuff retear may not necessarily be associated with poor clinical outcomes.

HYPOTHESIS

There would be no difference in clinical outcomes between patients with a cuff retear and those with an intact repair at a midterm follow-up of 5 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted involving patients who received arthroscopic complete repair of the supraspinatus tendon between January 2009 and December 2017. Patients who did not have a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan or who had a follow-up of <5 years were excluded. Clinical outcomes, including the visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and active forward flexion (FF) of the involved shoulder were assessed at the 2-year and 5-year follow-up points.

RESULTS

The study group included 105 patients with a mean follow-up of 85 months. MRI scans were performed at a mean of 20 months. Fourteen full-thickness cuff retears and 91 intact repairs were identified using postoperative MRI scans. Significant improvement in VAS score, ASES score, and FF were found between the preoperative assessment and the 2 designated follow-up points (2 years and 5 years) in both the cuff retear and the intact repair groups (P < .001). The VAS and ASES scores at the 2-year follow-up for the intact repair group were 1.8 ± 2.0 and 80.7 ± 18.1, respectively. The corresponding values for the retear group were 2.3 ± 2.2 and 71.9 ± 19.5, respectively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in the VAS and ASES scores at the 2-year follow-up. However, patients with an intact repair had a better VAS score (1.4 ± 1.8; P = .049) and ASES score (81.7 ± 17; P = .019) than those with a cuff retear at the 5-year assessment (3.0 ± 2.8 and 67.1 ± 22.9, respectively). In the intact repair group, 91% of patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference for the 5-year VAS score, compared with 54% in the cuff retear group (P < .001). The corresponding values for the 5-year ASES score were 80% and 54%, respectively (P = .044). FF measurements at the 5-year follow-up in patients with intact repair and those with a cuff retear were 161°± 23° and 144°± 37°, respectively (P = .059). Continuous improvement in VAS score and FF between the 2-year and 5-year follow-up was observed in the intact repair group (P = .005 and P = .04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The patients with an intact repair had better VAS and ASES scores compared with those who had a cuff retear at a midterm follow-up of 5 years. Between the 2-year and the 5-year follow-up, some further improvement was observed in the VAS score and FF in the intact repair group.

Arthroscopic Modified Broström Repair with Suture-Tape Augmentation of the Calcaneofibular Ligament for Lateral Ankle Instability

Surgical repair of acute or chronic lateral instability of the ankle may be unsuccessful in the presence of associated anterior fibulotalar ligament (AFTL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) injury. This Technical Note presents an arthroscopic double-row repair technique of the AFTL associated with suture tape augmentation of the CFL. The patient is in the supine position with the ankle hanging over the edge of the surgical table. The anteromedial portal is created inside the anterior tibial tendon, and the anterolateral portal is created under arthroscopic control. The ATFL is released from the capsule with a beaver blade. The calcaneal tunnel is created percutaneously at the footprint of the CFL. A soft anchor is impacted at the tip of the lateral malleolus with thread and tape. With the foot in the neutral position, the tape is then passed into the calcaneal tunnel and attached with an interference screw to strengthen the CFL. The ATFL is grasped with a Mini-Scorpion suture passer and pressed against the anchor with the foot in neutral position. A knotless anchor is impacted 5 mm above with the threads of the soft anchor, creating double-row fixation. This technique is indicated in proximal tears of the AFTL associated with a stretched CFL.

Editorial Commentary: Bioinductive Collagen Implants Reduce Rotator Cuff Retear, yet Cost-Effectiveness and Improvement in Clinical Outcomes Are Unclear

The estimated health care costs of failed arthroscopic rotator cuff retears (RCRs) performed in the United States represent a huge economic burden of greater than $400 million per 2-year period. Unfortunately, retear rates do not appear to have improved significantly since the 1980s, despite advances in surgical technology and the biomechanics of repair. The failure of these advances to translate into improved clinical results suggests that the limiting step in reducing retear rates is biology rather than the biomechanics of repair. Bioinductive collagen implants (BCIs) are an emerging and potentially useful option for biological augmentation. Recent meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies demonstrates that biological augmentation significantly lowers the risk of retear. Retrieval studies from human RCR subjects who underwent treatment with BCI demonstrate cellular incorporation, tissue formation, and maturation, providing a logical basis for a reduction in retear rates as well as small increases in tendon thickness at the footprint. Although BCIs show potential as a possible game-changing solution for reducing failure rates of RCR, concerns remain regarding cost-effectiveness analyses and demonstration of functional outcome improvement.

Changes in the Lateral Acromion Angle in Rotator Cuff Tear Patients with Acromioplasty

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic surgery has been established as an efficacious intervention for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the modifications in the lateral acromial angle (LAA) subsequent to rotator cuff repair surgery using single-row rivet fixation and double-row rivet fixation techniques. Furthermore, we sought to investigate the influence of LAA on the prognosis of rotator cuff repair surgery.

METHOD

This observational study retrospectively enrolled 105 patients diagnosed with degenerative rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2016 and 2019. Following the exclusion of two patients with subscapularis or superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) tears, as well as three patients who were lost to follow-up, a cohort of 100 patients was included for clinical and imaging evaluation. Among these individuals, 50 were assigned to the double-row repair group, whereas the remaining 50 comprised the single-row repair group. Bilateral shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were conducted no less than 24 months post-surgery. Experienced arthroscopic surgeons, blinded to the LAA measurements, assessed the rotator interval (RI) using a control MRI. Functional assessment was performed using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) quick disability of the shoulder and arm, shoulder and hand (qDASH) score. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for dependent samples was employed to compare data between the pre- and post-intervention groups. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the relationship between different parameters.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 73 female patients and 27 male patients, with a mean age of 58.32 ± 5.29 years and a mean follow-up duration of 25.88 ± 8.11 months. Preoperatively, the mean LAA was 75.81° ± 11.28°, RI was 4.78 ± 0.62, UCLA score was 17.54 ± 2.44, and qDASH score was 2.45 ± 0.25. The average tear size was 8.95 ± 2.11 mm. A statistically significant difference in LAA was observed between the preoperative and postoperative measurements, with the double-row repair group exhibiting a greater LAA than the single-row repair group. Finally, a significant correlation was identified between LAA, RI, and qDASH scores after a 24-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

According to our findings, the utilization of double-row rivet fixation has a greater LAA angle than single-row rivet fixation. Moreover, this preservation of LAA is significantly associated with the functional recovery of the shoulder joint.

Single-row or Double-row Rotator Cuff Repair

Rotator cuff tears are potentially a career-ending injury for athletes. The surgeon must identify which patients will benefit from surgical repair. The factors to consider are age, type of sport, time since injury, athlete's level, and the patient's expectations. An essential and independent fact determining the surgical treatment is whether the damage is due to overuse or from a traumatic/collision injury. Some sports are more demanding than others resulting in different return-to-participation (RTP) rates. This RTP return rate can present a real challenge and more so by a desire to reach the pre-injury level of play. The incidence of rotator cuff tearing varies from one sport to another. In football players this can be 12% whereas for tennis players this incidence is 4% to 17%. The RTP rate must be considered when making treatment decisions and is influenced by the level of the athlete: for professional athletes, the rate is 61%, and for recreational 73%. When the surgeon and the patient decide on the surgical treatment, the surgeon must consider whether to perform a double-row or a single-row rotator cuff tendon repair. The decision-making and the surgical technique will be addressed.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a single or double row technique: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare the double row technique versus the single row technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, in order to assess whether there are clinical differences.

METHODS

Systematic review of randomized clinical trials comparing the clinical results of the double-row technique versus the single-row technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were analyzed, including functional scores, tendon healing rate, and re-tear rate.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized clinical trials were selected. 437 patients in the single row group (50.7%) and 424 patients in the double row group (49.3%) were analyzed. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of age (P=.84), sex (P=.23) and loss to follow-up (P=.52). Significant differences were found for the better results of the double row technique at the UCLA level (P=.01). No significant differences were found on the Constant-Murley scale (P=.87) or on the ASES scale (P=.56). Similarly, there was a higher healing rate (P=.006) and less risk of rotator cuff re-tears with the double row technique (P=.006).

CONCLUSIONS

In rotator cuff repair, the double row technique was found to be superior to the single row technique in terms of better UCLA score, better tendon healing rate, and lower re-tear rate. No clinically significant differences were found on the Constant-Murley scale or on the ASES scale.

Biodegradable vs nonbiodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

The use of non-biodegradable suture anchors (NBSA) in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) has increased significantly. However, several complications such as migration, chondral damage, revision, and imaging difficulties have been reported. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of biodegradable suture anchors (BSA) in overcoming such complications and achieving functional outcomes requires further study. Thus, we aim to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of RCR using BSA and NBSA using direct comparison studies.

Methods

Two independent reviewers conducted systematic searches in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from conception to September 2022. Using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools, we assessed the included studies for bias. We applied GRADE to appraise our evidence. Our PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022354347.

Results

Six studies (two randomized controlled trials, one retrospective cohort, and three case-control studies) involving 423 patients were included (211 patients received BSA and 212 patients received NBSA). BSA was comparable to NBSA in forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, Constant-Murley score, and perianchor cyst formation (P = 0.97, 0.81, 0.56, 0.29, and 0.56, respectively). Retear rates were slightly higher while tendon healing was reduced in BSA compared to NBSA, but the differences were not significant (P = 0.35 and 0.35, respectively).

Conclusion

BSA and NBSA appear to yield similar shoulder functions and complications in rotator cuff repairs.

Double-Row Root Repair with Bridging Centralization Using Double Nonsliding Anchors for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear

Medial meniscal posterior root tears disrupt the "hoop" function of the meniscus and may lead to knee osteoarthritis. Although root repair could be a key to osteoarthritis prevention, this surgery does not necessarily guarantee an optimal result even when combined with meniscal centralization and high tibial osteotomy. To address this issue, we made five modifications to the original combined approach, namely two anchors to fix the root, instead of one; bridging centralization instead of single centralization; release of the meniscotibial capsule vs no release; release of valgus stress before knot tying vs no release; and prohibiting postoperative cross-legged sitting and sitting on heels. The advantages of this approach over the original approach are numerous and comprise ease of performing concurrent open wedge high tibial osteotomy, shorter fixation distance, better anatomical reattachment of the meniscal root, increased bone-meniscus contact and contact pressure, and larger contact area between the capsule and tibial rim. The disadvantages of the approach are that knot-tying is cumbersome, pie-crusting of the medial collateral ligament is necessary in patients not undergoing open wedge high tibial osteotomy, and tears >3 mm from the attachment are a contraindication. We describe the steps in this modified approach in detail.

Impact of surrogate outcomes in randomized controlled trials for shoulder rotator cuff tears

PURPOSE

Surrogate outcomes are clinical endpoints that are used as substitutes for direct measures of how a patient feels, functions, or survives. The present study aims to analyze the impact of surrogate outcomes on the results of randomized controlled trials on shoulder rotator cuff tears disorders.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to rotator cuff tear conditions published up until 2021 were retrieved from the PubMed and ACCESSSS databases. The primary outcome of the article was considered a surrogate outcome when the authors used radiological, physiologic, or functional variables. The result of the article was considered positive when results supported the intervention based on the trial's primary outcome. We recorded the sample size, the mean follow-up, and the type of funding. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 112 papers were included in the analysis. The mean sample size was 87.6 patients; mean follow-up period was 25.97 months. Thirty-six out of 112 RCTs used a surrogate outcome as a primary endpoint. More than half of papers using surrogate outcomes reported a positive finding (20 out of 36), while 10 out of 71 RCTs using patient-centered outcomes favored the intervention (14.08%, p < 0.001) [RR = 3.94 (95% CI 2.07-7.51)]. The mean sample size was smaller in trials using surrogate endpoints (75.11 vs 92.35 patients, respectively, p = 0.049), while the follow-up was shorter (14.12 m vs. 31.9 m, p < 0.001). Approximately 25% of the papers that reported surrogate endpoints (22.58%) were industry-funded projects.

CONCLUSIONS

The substitution of surrogate endpoints for patient-important outcomes in shoulder rotator cuff trials quadruplicates the chances of obtaining a favorable result that favors the analyzed intervention.

Comparison of Arthroscopic Single-row and Double-row Repair for Rotator Cuff Injuries With Different Tear Sizes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

There is no clinical gold standard for the indications for single-row (SR) versus double-row (DR) repair according to small, large, or massive rotator cuff tear size.

Purpose

To conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes and retear rates after arthroscopic SR and DR repair for rotator cuff injuries with different tear sizes.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

On the basis of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria, the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and China BioMedical Literature database were searched for relevant studies published before November 1, 2021, using the following search terms: "Rotator Cuff Injuries," "Rotator Cuff Tears," "Arthroscopy," "Arthroscopic Surgery," "single-row," and "double-row"; a total of 489 articles were retrieved. Quality evaluation was conducted for all the studies that met the inclusion criteria. This study evaluated the Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and range of motion (ROM) as well as retear rate. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was adopted to calculate the results and assess risk.

Results

A total of 10 clinical studies were included, with 404 cases of DR and 387 cases of SR. Regarding overall results, DR had better forward elevation ROM (mean difference [MD] = -4.03° [95% CI, -6.00° to -2.06°]; P < .0001; I 2 = 46%) and a lower retear rate (MD = 2.39 [95% CI, 1.40 to 4.08]; P = .001; I 2 = 0%) compared with SR repair. With regard to small tears (<3 cm), there was no noticeable difference on any of the 3 outcome scores between SR and DR. For large rotator cuff tears (≥3 cm), DR repair showed significantly better ASES scores (MD = -3.09 [95% CI, -6.19 to 0.02]; P = .05; I 2 = 73%) and UCLA scores (MD = -1.47 [95% CI, -2.21 to -0.72]; P = .0001; I 2 = 31%) compared with SR repair.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis revealed that DR had better UCLA scores, ASES scores, and ROM in forward elevation and lower retear rates. In rotator cuff tears <3 cm, there were no statistical differences in clinical outcome between SR and DR.

Arthroscopic Double-Row Repair for Acute Proximal Detachment of the Lateral Collateral Ligament in a Complex Ankle Sprain

Management of ankle sprains is still being discussed. For athletes, recent studies recommend surgical treatment for acute grade III rupture, because of better long-term ankle stability. The purpose of this technical note is to describe the arthroscopic acute double-row repair for proximal disinsertion of collateral lateral ligament ankle. With the patient in dorsal decubitus under spinal anesthesia, the foot and ankle are extended beyond the edge of the surgical table. The anteromedial portal is created inside the anterior tibial tendon in which the arthroscope is introduced. The anterolateral approach is simulated with a needle under arthroscopic control, in front and under the tip of the lateral malleolus. The anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) is released from the capsule with a beaver blade. The tip of the lateral malleolus is sharpened, and a soft anchor is impacted there. ATFL is caught with a Mini-Scorpio plier, a Lasso loop is performed to improve tissue grasping. The ligament is pressed against the anchor, with the foot in maximum dorsiflexion and eversion. A knotless anchor is impacted 5 mm above and with the threads of the soft anchor, creating a double-row fixation. The arthroscopic acute double-row repair for proximal desinsertion of collatéral lateral ligament ankle can be done especially for athletes.

A discrete shear lag model of the mechanics of hitchhiker plants, and its prospective application to tendon-to-bone repair

Tendon-to-bone repairs often fail when sutures pull through tendon, like a wire through cheese. Repair strength is maximized when loads are balanced equally among all sutures, relative to the pullout resistance of the tendon and the strength of the sutures. This problem of balancing loads across multiple, discrete attachment sites has been solved in nature by hitchhiker plants that proliferate by adhering relatively stiff fruit to relatively soft fur and fabrics through arrays of hooks. We, therefore, studied the fruits of such a plant, Harpagonella palmeri , and developed a discrete shear lag analysis of the force distributions in H. palmeri 's linear arrays of long, slender hooks of varied lengths and spacing. Results suggested that strategies were used by the plant to distribute loads, including variations in the spacing and stiffnesses of hooks that serve to equalize forces over attachment sites. When applying these models to suturing schemes for surgical reattachment of tendon to bone, results suggested that strategies exhibited by H. palmeri show promise for balancing forces over sutures, potentially doubling repair strength relative to what could be achieved with a uniform suture distribution. Results suggest a potential pathway for strengthening surgical repairs, and more broadly for optimizing fasteners for bi-material attachment.

Shoulder Surgery Postoperative Immobilization: An International Survey of Shoulder Surgeons

BACKGROUND

There is currently no consensus on immobilization protocols following shoulder surgery. The aim of this study was to establish patterns and types of sling use for various surgical procedures in the United States (US) and Europe, and to identify factors associated with the variations.

METHODS

An online survey was sent to all members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) and European Society for Surgery of the Shoulder and Elbow (ESSSE). The survey gathered member data, including practice location and years in practice. It also obtained preferences for the type and duration of sling use after the following surgical procedures: arthroscopic Bankart repair, Latarjet, arthroscopic superior/posterosuperior rotator cuff repair (ARCR) of tears <3 cm and >3 cm, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA), and isolated biceps tenodesis (BT). Relationships between physician location and sling type for each procedure were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests and post-hoc tests using Bonferroni-adjusted p-values. Relationships looking at years in practice and sling duration preferred were analyzed using Spearman's correlation tests.

RESULTS

In total, 499 surgeons with a median of 15 years of experience (IQR = 9-25) responded, with 54.7% from the US and 45.3% from Europe. US respondents reported higher abduction pillow sling use than European respondents for the following: Bankart repair (62% vs. 15%, p < 0.0001), Latarjet (53% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), ARCR < 3 cm (80% vs. 42%, p < 0.001) and >3 cm (84% vs. 61%, p < 0.001), aTSA (50% vs. 21%, p < 0.001) and rTSA with subscapularis repair (61% vs. 22%, p < 0.001) and without subscapularis repair (57% vs. 17%, p < 0.001), and isolated BT (18% vs. 7%, p = 0.006). European respondents reported higher simple sling use than US respondents for the following: Bankart repair (74% vs. 31%, p < 0.001), Latarjet (78% vs. 44%, p < 0.001), ARCR < 3 cm (50% vs. 17%, p < 0.001) and >3 cm (34% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), and aTSA (69% vs. 41%, p < 0.001) and rTSA with subscapularis repair (70% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and without subscapularis repair (73% vs. 39%, p < 0.001). Increasing years of experience demonstrated a negative correlation with the duration of sling use after Bankart repair (r = -0.20, p < 0.001), Latarjet (r = -0.25, p < 0.001), ARCR < 3 cm (r = -0.14, p = 0.014) and >3 cm (r = -0.20, p < 0.002), and aTSA (r = -0.37, p < 0.001), and rTSA with subscapularis repair (r = -0.10, p = 0.049) and without subscapularis repair (r = -0.19, p = 0.022. Thus, the more experienced surgeons tended to recommend shorter durations of post-operative sling use. US surgeons reported longer post-operative sling durations for Bankart repair (4.8 vs. 4.1 weeks, p < 0.001), Latarjet (4.6 vs. 3.6 weeks, p < 0.001), ARCR < 3 cm (5.2 vs. 4.5 weeks p < 0.001) and >3 cm (5.9 vs. 5.1 weeks, p < 0.001), aTSA (4.9 vs. 4.3 weeks, p < 0.001), rTSR without subscapularis repair (4.0 vs. 3.6 weeks, p = 0.031), and isolated BT (3.7 vs. 3.3 weeks, p = 0.012) than Europe respondents. No significant differences between regions within the US and Europe were demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variation in the immobilization advocated by surgeons, with geographic location and years of clinical experience influencing patterns of sling use. Future work is required to establish the most clinically beneficial protocols for immobilization following shoulder surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Intraoperative Channeling in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, the retear rate remains high. New methods to optimize healing rates must be sought. Bone channeling may create a quicker and more vigorous healing response by attracting autologous mesenchymal stem cells, cytokines, and growth factors to the repair site.

HYPOTHESIS

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bone channeling would result in a higher healing rate compared with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without adjuvant channeling.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Our primary objective was to compare healing rates in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for degenerative tears, with and without bone channeling. Secondary objectives included comparisons of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, Constant strength subscore, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score between groups. Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were recruited at 3 sites and were randomized to receive either bone channeling augmentation or standard repair. Healing was determined via ultrasound at 24 months postoperatively. WORC, ASES, and Constant scores were compared between groups at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2018. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no statistical differences in healing rates between the 2 interventions at 24 months postoperatively. Statistically significant improvements occurred in both groups from preoperatively to all time points for the WORC, the ASES score, the Constant score or Constant strength subscore, and the VAS for pain (P < .0001). No differences were observed between the bone channeling and control groups in WORC, ASES, Constant, and VAS pain scores at any time point.

CONCLUSION

This trial did not demonstrate the superiority of intraoperative bone channeling in rotator cuff repair over standard rotator cuff repair at 24 months postoperatively. Healing rates, patient-reported function, and quality-of-life outcomes were similar between groups.

REGISTRATION

NCT01877772 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Three Medial All Suture Anchors Improves Contact Force Compared to Two Hard Body Anchors in a Biomechanical Two-Tendon Rotator Cuff Tear Model

Purpose

To biomechanically compare a knotless double-row construct with 3 medial all-suture (3AS) anchors with a standard 2 medial hard body (2HB) anchor construct.

Methods

Twelve matched cadaveric shoulder specimens with a mean age of 57 years (range: 54-61 years) were randomized to receive a knotless double-row repair with either a 3AS or 2HB construct. In the 3AS construct, three 2.6-mm all-suture anchors were placed adjacent to the articular margin and secured laterally with two 4.75-mm knotless hard body anchors. In the 2HB construct, two 4.75-mm medial hard body anchors were placed medially, lateral fixation was identical to the 3AS construct. Creep, displacement, stiffness, and ultimate load were recorded for each sample. In addition, a SynDaver model was used to compare contact pressure between the 2 repair constructs.

Results

There were no differences in cyclic displacement at 1, 30, and 100 cycles (P = .616, .497, .190, respectively), cyclic stiffness (.928), ultimate load (.445), or load to failure (P = .445) between the 2 constructs. The 3AS repair construct had improved contact pressure between tendon and bone when compared with the 2HB construct at loads of 20 N, 30 N, and 40 N (P = .01, .02, and .04, respectively).

Conclusions

Displacement and load to failure properties are similar between knotless constructs using either 2HB or 3AS for the medial row. However, contact force may improve with the use of 3 medial all-suture anchors.

Clinical Relevance

As all-suture anchors are smaller in size when compared with hard body anchors. For this reason, there is potential to place an additional all-suture medial anchor to improve contact force and potentially improve rotator cuff healing when compared with the use of hard body anchors.

Minimum 15-year follow-up for clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery is one of the most common shoulder procedures performed in the United States. Although several studies have shown considerable symptomatic relief in the short term following surgery, a relatively high rate of recurrent defects has led surgeons to question the long-term durability of this operation. We hypothesized that outcomes at a minimum of 15 years of follow-up in patients who underwent all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair would be maintained and would remain significantly improved compared with the preoperative status.

METHODS

All-arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were performed in 193 patients from 2003 to 2005. Patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 1, 2, 5, and ≥15 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Secondary outcomes included Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS), visual analog scale, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Upper Extremity (UE) scores. Patient demographic characteristics, revision surgical procedures, and complications were recorded. Generalized estimating equations were used to model scores over time, and multiple comparisons between time points were performed using Tukey adjustment.

RESULTS

This study included 60 patients with a mean follow-up period of 16.5 years (range, 15.8-17.7 years). The mean ASES score improved from 60.2 ± 18.8 preoperatively to 93.0 ± 9.4 at ≥15 years (P < .0001). The mean visual analog scale pain score decreased from 4.1 ± 0.7 preoperatively to 0.7 ± 0.3 at ≥15 years (P < .0001). The average SANE, SAS, and PROMIS-UE scores at ≥15 years were 87.8 ± 14.8, 8.8 ± 4.3, and 49.6 ± 10.2, respectively. Of 60 patients, 7 underwent revision surgery. Older age and female sex were associated with lower SAS scores at 15 years, whereas female sex was associated with lower PROMIS-UE scores. There were no factors predictive of ASES or SANE scores.

CONCLUSION

At long-term follow-up (≥15 years), the patient-reported outcomes of all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair show significant improvement from baseline preoperative function and remain durable over a period of 15 years. This information is useful in counseling patients regarding the long-term results of this procedure.