Does the Choice of Acellular Scaffold and Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Affect Short-term Outcomes in Cartilage Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on acetabular component positioning and patient anatomy restoration during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Positioning implant components and restoring patient anatomy during total hip arthroplasty (THA) are essential for joint stability, polyethylene liner wear, and range of motion. Previous studies comparing intraoperative fluoroscopy with no fluoroscopy during the posterior or posterolateral approach have reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis evaluated if intraoperative fluoroscopy improves component positioning and femoral component position compared to no fluoroscopy during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards were followed when conducting the systematic review. We searched Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang database in May 2023 to identify studies involving Intraoperative fluoroscopy versus no fluoroscopy during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty. Finally, we identified 1133 patients (1145 hips) assessed in seven studies.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in terms of acetabular cup inclination angle (ACIA, P = 0.43), ACIA within safe zone rate (P = 0.58), acetabular cup anteversion angle (ACAA, P = 0.46); ACAA within safe zone rate (P = 0.72), Combined safe zone rate (P = 0.28), dislocation rate (P = 0.64) and infection rate (P = 0.94) between two groups. Compared with the no fluoroscopy group, the intraoperative fluoroscopy group had more operation time (P < 0.00001), less femoral component offset difference (FCOD, P = 0.03), and less LLD (P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Even though intraoperative fluoroscopy was not related to an improvement in cup location or dislocation incidence. Our findings demonstrate that the restoration of leg lengths and femoral offset can be significantly improved by using intraoperative fluoroscopy to supplement good surgical skills in THA. The advantages of intraoperative fluoroscopy might become more apparent for surgeons with less experience. To ascertain whether intraoperative fluoroscopy for posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty will have clinical benefits and improve the survival of prostheses, more well-powered and well-designed long-term follow-up studies were necessary.

Does intraoperative fluoroscopy improve acetabular component positioning and limb-length discrepancy during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The positioning of implant components for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is essential for joint stability, polyethylene liner wear, and range of motion. One potential benefit of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for THA is the ability to use intraoperative fluoroscopy for acetabular cup positioning and limb-length evaluation. Previous studies comparing intraoperative fluoroscopy with no fluoroscopy during DAA have reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether intraoperative fluoroscopy improves component positioning compared to no fluoroscopy during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. We searched Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang database in May 2023 to identify studies involving intraoperative fluoroscopy versus no fluoroscopy during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. Finally, we identified 1262 hips assessed in seven studies.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in terms of acetabular cup inclination angle (ACIA, P = 0.21), ACIA within safe zone rate (P = 0.97), acetabular cup anteversion angle (ACAA, P = 0.26); ACAA within safe zone rate (P = 0.07), combined safe zone rate (P = 0.33), and limb-length discrepancy (LLD, P = 0.21) between two groups.

CONCLUSION

Even though intraoperative fluoroscopy was not related to an improvement in cup location or LDD. With fewer experienced surgeons, the benefit of intraoperative fluoroscopy might become more evident. More adequately powered and well-designed long-term follow-up studies were required to determine whether the application of the intraoperative fluoroscopy for direct anterior total hip arthroplasty will have clinical benefits and improve the survival of prostheses.

No Difference Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis With or Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A functional intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACLI) is considered to be a prerequisite for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, UKA has been shown to have good clinical efficacy in ACL-deficient (ACLD) knees at 3 to 10 years follow-up. Therefore, the role of ACLD in UKA remains controversial, and more evidence is needed to clarify the role of ACLD in UKA.

METHODS

PubMed, the Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were queried for articles comparing the results of the ACLD and ACLI groups after UKA. Outcomes of interest included the Tegner Activity Scale, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), postoperative slope of the implant (PSI), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), the Lysholm score, and revision rate. There were eight studies included. The mean age was 66 years (range 49 to 87 year old) and the mean follow-up time was 6.9 years (range 1.3 to 16.6 years). There was baseline comparability regarding mean age, duration of follow-up, and body mass index (P > .5) between the ACLD and ACLI groups.

RESULTS

The ACLD and ACLI groups had improved postoperative functional indicators, and that postoperative revision rate (mean difference [MD], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 2.04; P = .4), Tegner score (MD, -0.1; 95% CI, -0.26 to 0.05; P = .19), and Lysholm score (95% CI, -2.46 to 7.32; P = .33) were similar between the groups, with no significant differences; however, the ACLD groups had significantly better KOOS Activities of Daily Living scores, with a significant difference (MD, 4.53; 95% CI, 1.75 to 7.3; P = .001). Also, there were no significant differences between two groups in the PSI, OKS, KOOS.

CONCLUSION

ACL deficiency is not always a contraindication for UKA. With correct patient selection, UKA could be considered for medial knee osteoarthritis with ACL deficiency without antero-posterior instability, especially these people over 60 years of age.