Reduction of Mononuclear Cytokine Production in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Steam-Sterilized Low-Flux Polysulphone Membranes

An increased cytokine production, correlated with long term complications of uremic disease, has been described during hemodialysis. To identify possible differences in the cytokine release of differently sterilized membranes, we enrolled six uremic patients on chronic hemodialysis. The patients underwent dialysis with ETO-sterilized low-flux polysulphone membranes (F6, Fresenius AG) for at least three months (At), they were then switched to steam-sterilized polysulphone membranes (F6-HPS Fresenius AG) and further evaluations after one (B1) and two months (B2) were carried out. A final evaluation (A2) was made one month after switching back to F6 dialyzers. At each time period, samples were drawn to measure IL-1B released by cultured mononuclear cells (MN). Moreover, dialysate samples were collected to test endotoxin levels. C3a and C5a levels were assessed at 0, 5, 15 and 60 min from starting hemodialysis. Anti-ETO IgE levels were also assayed at A1, B1 and A2.

The LAL test revealed a good quality dialysate. The mean pre-dialysis IL-1B levels were 215 pg/million cells at A1; falling to 49 at B1, and 54 at B2 (p≤0.01); there was then a sharp rebound at A2:284, p≤0.01. Post-dialysis levels followed the same pattern. No correlation between the dialysate endotoxin level and cytokine release was found. Complement activation did not change and in all the phases of the study no anti-ETO IgE was detected in any of the subjects. Our data suggest that the steam sterilized polysulphone membrane induces a lower cytokine release than the ETO sterilized membrane, although the mechanism by which it does so remains to be clarified.

UNRESOLVED ISSUES IN DIALYSIS: Ultrapure Dialysate: Facts and Myths

During hemodialysis, blood comes in contact with a large volume of dialysate. Since the purity of dialysate has been linked to acute and long-term complications in hemodialysis patients, the limit of bacterial and endotoxin contamination has been reduced in recent years. Questions have been raised as to whether ultrapure dialysate is required to prevent such complications; in particular, the chronic inflammatory status frequently found in chronically hemodialyzed patients. In vivo and in vitro data suggest that cytokine stimulation in the blood depends on the concentration of bacteria or endotoxin in the dialysate and on the endotoxin permeability of the dialysis membrane. It is not proven whether ultrapure dialysate reduces significantly proinflammatory cytokine generation compared with standard dialysate within the limits of recent recommendations, if rather impermeable dialysis membranes are used. Cuprophane membranes are more permeable to cytokine-inducing substances compared with synthetic membranes such as polysulfone and polyamide. Clinical reports have also attempted to link several acute and chronic complications of hemodialysis to dialysate purity. To date, however, there is no large randomized clinical trial demonstrating that ultrapure dialysate significantly reduces biomarkers of inflammation and other consequential putative complications, including dialysis-related amyloidosis, erythropoietin requirement, and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In conclusion, based on the existing clinical data, ultrapure dialysate is recommended in the setting of suboptimal bacteriologic quality of standard dialysate and the use of permeable dialysis membranes.

Biocompatibility issues in hemodialysis

Hemodialysis, as a life-saving treatment modality for uremic patients, implies a repeated and compulsory contact of blood with foreign materials. As a consequence, biocompatibility problems are unavoidable. The same applies for the material used for the creation of vascular access, and for the alternative dialysis method, CAPD (continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis), although each system might cause its own and specific problems. Although in early dialysis the focus has been on maintenance of life and elimination of toxins, later on the important morbid implications of this lack of biocompatibility have been recognized. Eight major problems will be discussed, especially in the perspective of recent new findings in this field: (1) coagulation and clotting; (2) complement and leukocyte activation; (3) susceptibility to infection; (4) leaching or spallation; (5) surface alterations of solid materials; (6) allergic reactions; (7) shear; (8) transfer of compounds from contaminated dialysate. After description of the major biochemical and clinical implications of these problems, ways to prevent morbid events and future perspectives will be described.