A Clinical Study to Assess the Effect of Heparin in Dialyzer Rinsing Solutions

The solution usually recommended for rinsing the blood side, which is an indispensable step in preparing a dialyzer for hemodialysis (HD), contains saline and heparin. The heparin used for rinsing is said to reduce the thrombogenic properties of the dialysis membrane and, hence, also the need for systemic heparinization during the whole procedure. The aim of our study was to establish whether this postulate also applies to polysulphone steam-sterilized dialyzers. To do so, 16 patients on long-term dialysis were randomized into two groups of eight. One group was subsequently treated with polysulphone low-flux dialyzers (F6HPS), the other with polysulphone high-flux dialyzers (F60S). Both groups were examined, in a crossover manner during HD using a dialyzer previously rinsed with 1000 ml of saline plus 2,000 IU of heparin, and during HD using a dialyzer previously rinsed with 500 ml of saline without heparin. Except for the rinsing, HD conditions were completely identical. Blood obtained before HD, and at 15, 60 and 240 min of HD at the dialyzer inlet, was used to determine the activated partial thromboplastin time (to test heparinization control), the thrombin-antithrombin III complex (ELISA, to evaluate coagulation system activation), platelet factor 4 (ELISA, a substance with antiheparin activity), and platelet count. None of the above parameters showed, at any of the collecting intervals, a statistically significant difference between HD with and without heparin with a reduced volume of rinsing solution, or between HD using low- and high-flux dialyzers. It is concluded that heparin used to rinse polysulphone dialyzers before HD has no effect on blood coagulation or on the need for heparin during the procedure.

Activation of coagulation and platelets by candidate membranes of implantable devices in a whole blood model without soluble anticoagulant

Implantable devices are challenged with thrombus formation at their biomaterial interface. Thus the importance of identifying compatible biomaterials that will help to improve the performance of these devices are becoming increasingly paramount. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activation of coagulation and platelets by candidate membranes considered for use in implantable devices on the basis of an adapted whole blood model without soluble anticoagulants. Evaluated materials were incubated with whole blood without soluble anticoagulant in wells coated with heparin. Prothrombin fragment 1+2 (PTF 1+2), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), and β-thromboglobulin (BTG) were analyzed in plasma samples using enzyme immunoassays. The C5 inhibitor eculizumab was used to evaluate the role of complement. Incubation of two of the polyamide membranes PAR and PATF led to an increase in concentration of PTF 1+2 and TAT (p < 0.01 for PAR, ns for PATF). The BTG concentration was significantly increased for five materials [PAR, PATF, polycarbonate (PC), and two polyarylethersulphone membranes PAES-1 and PAES-2]. Complement inhibition had no effect on coagulation or platelet activation induced by PAR and PATF. In conclusion, PAR and PATF were not compatible with blood and should be avoided for use in implantable devices.

Hemocompatibility of silicon-based substrates for biomedical implant applications

Silicon membranes with highly uniform nanopore sizes fabricated using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology allow for the development of miniaturized implants such as those needed for renal replacement therapies. However, the blood compatibility of silicon has thus far been an unresolved issue in the use of these substrates in implantable biomedical devices. We report the results of hemocompatibility studies using bare silicon, polysilicon, and modified silicon substrates. The surface modifications tested have been shown to reduce protein and/or platelet adhesion, thus potentially improving biocompatibility of silicon. Hemocompatibility was evaluated under four categories—coagulation (thrombin–antithrombin complex, TAT generation), complement activation (complement protein, C3a production), platelet activation (P-selectin, CD62P expression), and platelet adhesion. Our tests revealed that all silicon substrates display low coagulation and complement activation, comparable to that of Teflon and stainless steel, two materials commonly used in medical implants, and significantly lower than that of diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) cellulose, a polymer used in dialysis membranes. Unmodified silicon and polysilicon showed significant platelet attachment; however, the surface modifications on silicon reduced platelet adhesion and activation to levels comparable to that on Teflon. These results suggest that surface-modified silicon substrates are viable for the development of miniaturized renal replacement systems.

Does an alteration of dialyzer design and geometry affect biocompatibility parameters?

The aim of the study was to assess the biocompatibility profile of a newly developed high-flux polysulfone dialyzer type (FX-class dialyzer). The new class of dialyzers incorporates a number of novel design features (including a new membrane) that have been developed specifically in order to enhance the removal of small- and middle-size molecules. The new FX dialyzer series was compared with the classical routinely used high-flux polysulfone F series of dialyzers. In an open prospective, randomized, crossover clinical study, concentrations of the C5a complement component, and leukocyte count in blood and various thrombogenicity parameters were evaluated before, and at 15 and 60 min of hemodialysis at both dialyzer inlet and outlet in 9 long-term hemodialysis patients using the FX60S dialyzers and, after crossover, the classical F60S, while in another 9 patients, the evaluation was made with the dialyzers used in reverse order. The comparison of dialyzers based on evaluation of the group including all procedures with the FX60S and the group including procedures with the F60S did not reveal significant differences in platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin times, plasma heparin levels, platelet factor-4, D-dimer, C5a, and leukocyte count at any point of the collecting period. Both dialyzer types showed a significant increase in the plasma levels of the thrombin-antithrombin III complexes; however, the measured levels were only slightly elevated compared with the upper end of the normal range. Biocompatibility parameters reflecting the behavior of platelets, fibrinolysis, complement activation, and leukopenia do not differ during dialysis with either the FX60S or the F60S despite their large differences in design and geometry features. Although coagulation activation, as evaluated by one of the parameters used, was slightly higher with the FX60S, it was still within the range seen with other highly biocompatible dialyzers and therefore is not indicative of any appreciable activation of the coagulation system. Thus, the incorporation of various performance-enhancing design features into the new FX class of dialyzers does not result in a deterioration of their biocompatibility profile, which is comparable to that of the classical F series of dialyzers.

The effect of heparin rinse on the biocompatibility of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration

The aims of our cross-over randomized study were (1) to assess hemostasis in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) and (2) to determine whether or not the generally recommended heparin rinse of the extracorporeal circuit (ECC) prior to the procedure affects thrombogenicity, complement activation, and leukocyte count in blood during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Eleven critically ill ARF patients were treated, in random order, using CVVHDF in postdilution setup following ECC rinse with saline (A) with heparin at a concentration of 2,000 IU/L (10 procedures), (B) with heparin at a concentration of 10,000 IU/L (7 procedures), and (C) without heparin (9 procedures). Except for the rinse, anticoagulation therapy did not differ in individual patients during the procedures. Blood was withdrawn before, and at minutes 15, 60, and 360 invariably at diafilter inlet and outlet. Compared with healthy individuals, patients showed lower blood thrombocyte counts (153 vs 233*10(9)/L, p<0.01, arithmetic means, Student's t test), longer aPTT (44 vs 36 s, p<0.05), higher plasma levels of heparin (0.1 vs 0.0 U/mL, p<0.05), D-dimer (1129 vs 36 ng/mL, p<0.001) and beta-thromboglobulin (BTG) (159 vs 37 U/mL, p<0.001) prior to CVVHDF. The comparison of procedures with different rinsing technique did not reveal any significant difference in their effects on blood thrombocyte and leukocyte counts, aPTT, plasma levels of heparin, BTG, thrombin-antithrombin III complexes, D-dimer, or the C5a complement component.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Patients indicated for CVVHDF show impaired hemostasis involving thrombocytes, coagulation, and fibrinolysis, (2) no beneficial effect of heparin rinse on CVVHDF ECC thrombogenicity, complement activation or blood leukocyte counts was demonstrated.

In vivo evaluation of platelet activation by different cellulosic membranes

This study was undertaken to evaluate platelet activation in vivo induced by different cellulosic membranes by measuring the expression of P-selectin on the platelet surface during hemodialysis in 9 uremic patients. Hollow fiber dialyzers of similar surface with different cellulosic membranes (Cuprophan, cellulose acetate, cellulose triacetate, and Hemophan) were evaluated and compared to a synthetic membrane (polysulfone). Blood samples were obtained before hemodialysis and from the efferent and afferent limbs 5 min after the beginning of dialysis. P-selectin exposure was evaluated by flow cytometry (FACScan) using a monoclonal antibody (RUU 2.17). The percentage of platelets expressing P-selectin before hemodialysis and the percentage from the arterial line during hemodialysis were similar. All membranes evaluated induced platelet activation (estimated as the increase in percentage of platelets expressing P-selectin in samples obtained from the venous line with respect to the arterial line). Cuprophan induced more platelet activation than any other membrane (p < 0.05). The activation induced by cellulose acetate and cellulose triacetate membranes was also higher than that observed with Hemophan (p < 0.05). Hemophan-induced platelet activation was similar to that of polysulfone. These results indicate that all cellulosic membranes induce platelet activation during hemodialysis although there are quantitative differences among them. While Cuprophan induced the highest degree of platelet activation, Hemophan was the only cellulosic membrane that showed a degree of platelet activation similar to the biocompatible membrane polysulfone.

Dialysis treatment using an ethylene vinyl alcohol membrane and no anticoagulation for chronic uremic patients

Anticoagulation used in hemodialysis treatment brings with it the risk of hemorrhagic complications and the possible consequences associated with chronic heparin administration. These problems have not been satisfactorily addressed to date. This study examined a new dialysis method that does not require the administration of anticoagulants. Dialysis is performed for 3 h with a continuous infusion of 750 ml of physiological saline solution in predilution mode and using filters made of ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer membranes. Eleven patients with chronic uremia underwent more than 2,000 dialysis treatments performed with 9 episodes of coagulation of the dialyzer or blood tubings (0.43%). An evaluation of individual treatments revealed a high degree of biocompatibility and only a scanty activation of coagulation. Blood depuration efficacy was very good as evaluated from pretreatment and posttreatment routine blood chemistries. The technique described here represents a simple and effective method for performing regular dialysis treatment and does not require anticoagulant therapy.