Nitric oxide production and blood pressure reduction during haemodialysis

AIM

A decrease of systolic blood pressure in excess of 20 mmHg during haemodialysis treatment (IDD) is common for haemodialysis patients. Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is symptomatic IDD by definition. Overproduction of nitric oxide (NO) is a possible cause of IDD. Dialysate nitrate and nitrite amount can be used as an indicator of intradialysis NO production. Our aim was to find the predictor of NO production in IDD patients.

METHODS

Partial dialysate samples were collected during the whole haemodialysis session and total dialysate nitrate and nitrite amount was measured to assess the association of intradialysis NO production with blood pressure change.

RESULTS

There were 31 IDD patients and 71 patients who did not develop IDD (NIDD) included in the study. Among the IDD patients, 13 were IDH patients with a mean systolic blood pressure lower than that of the other 18 symptomless IDD patients (96.6 ± 3.4 mmHg vs 125.0 ± 3.8 mmHg, P<0.001). The median value of NO production was higher in the IDD than in the NIDD patients (447.7 μg vs 238.8 μg, P<0.001). The NO production correlated linearly with blood pressure reduction (R=0.487, P<0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that NO production was positively associated with predialysis systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

Nitric oxide production during haemodialysis was higher in IDD than in NIDD patients. IDH often occurred when systolic blood pressure was reduced to below 100 mmHg. The amount of NO produced during haemodialysis, which may be associated with predialysis systolic blood pressure, can be used to predict intradialysis blood pressure decrease.

Complement activation-related pseudoallergy: a new class of drug-induced acute immune toxicity

A major goal in modern pharmacotechnology is to increase the therapeutic index of drugs by using nanoparticulate vehicle systems in order to ensure slow release or targeted delivery of drugs. With all great benefits, however, these innovative therapies can carry a risk for acute immune toxicity manifested in hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) that do not involve IgE but arises as a consequence of activation of the complement (C) system. These anaphylactoid reactions can be distinguished within the Type I category of HSRs as "C activation-related pseudoallergy" (CARPA). Drugs and agents causing CARPA include radiocontrast media (RCM), liposomal drugs (Doxil, Ambisome and DaunoXome) and micellar solvents containing amphiphilic lipids (e.g., Cremophor EL, the vehicle of Taxol). These agents activate C through both the classical and the alternative pathways, giving rise to C3a and C5a anaphylatoxins that trigger mast cells and basophils for secretory response that underlies HSRs. Pigs provide a useful model for liposome-induced CARPA as minute amounts of reactogenic lipomes cause C activation with consequent dramatic cardiovascular and laboratory abnormalities that mimic some of the human symptoms. Consistent with the causal role of C activation in liposome-induced HSRs, a recent clinical study demonstrated correlation between the formation of C terminal complex (SC5b-9) in blood and the presence of HSRs in patients treated with liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil). Overall, the CARPA concept may help in the prediction, prevention and treatment of the acute immune toxicity of numerous state-of-the-art drugs.

Cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

When the kidney fails the blood-borne metabolites of protein breakdown and water cannot be excreted. The principle of haemodialysis is that such substances can be removed when blood is passed over a semipermeable membrane. Natural membrane materials include cellulose or modified cellulose, more recently various synthetic membranes have been developed. Synthetic membranes are regarded as being more "biocompatible" in that they incite less of an immune response than cellulose-based membranes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different haemodialysis membrane material in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PreMEDLINE, HealthStar CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biosis, SIGLE, CRIB, UK National Research Register and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted biomedical companies, known investigators and handsearched selected journals and conference proceedings. Date of most recent search: June 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing different haemodialysis membrane material in patients with ESRD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of studies. Data was abstracted onto a standard form by one reviewer and checked by another. Relative Risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)) MAIN RESULTS: Thirty two studies were identified. Pre-dialysis ss(2) microglobulin concentrations were not significantly lower in patients treated with synthetic membranes (WMD -14.67, 95% CI -33.10 to 4.05). When analysed for change in ss(2) microglobulin, a fall was only noted with high-flux membranes. The incidence of amyloid was less in patients who were dialysed for six years with high-flux synthetic membranes (one study, RR 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.54). There was a significant difference in favour of the synthetic (high-flux) membrane in comparison to cellulose membranes for triglycerides (WMD -0.66; 95% CI -1.18 to -0.14) but not for modified cellulose membranes. Dialysis adequacy measured by Kt/V was marginally higher when cellulose membranes were used (WMD -0.10; 95% CI -0.16 to 0.04), whereas synthetic membranes achieved significantly higher Kt/V values when compared with modified cellulose membranes (WMD 0.20, 95% 0.11 to 0.29) . There were no data on quality of life measures.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of benefit when synthetic membranes were compared with cellulose/modified cellulose membranes in terms of reduced mortality no reduction in dialysis-related adverse symptoms. Despite the relatively large number of RCTs undertaken in this area none of the included studies reported any measures of quality of life.

Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

When the kidney fails the blood borne metabolites of protein breakdown and water cannot be excreted. The principle of haemodialysis is that such substances can be removed when blood is passed over a semipermeable membrane. Natural membrane materials can be used including cellulose or modified cellulose, more recently various synthetic membranes have been developed. Synthetic membranes are regarded as being more "biocompatible" in that they incite less of an immune response than cellulose-based membranes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different haemodialysis membrane material in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Medline (1966 to December 2000), Embase (1981 to November 2000), PreMedline (29 November 2000), HealthStar (1975 to December 2000), Cinahl (1982 to October 2000), The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 1, 1996), Biosis (1989 to June 1995), Sigle (1980 to June 1996), Crib (10th edition, 1995), UK National Research Register (September 1996), and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted biomedical companies, investigators and we hand searched Kidney International (1980 to 1997). Date of the most recent searches: November 2000.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials comparing different haemodialysis membrane material in patients with ESRD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of studies. Data was abstracted from included studies onto a standard form by one reviewer and checked by another.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty seven studies met our inclusion criteria and where possible data from these were summated by meta-analyses (Peto's odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)). Twenty two outcome measures were sought in 10 broad areas. For two (number of episodes of significant infection per year and quality of life) no data were available. For the comparison of cellulose with synthetic membranes, data for 12/20 outcome measures were available in only a single trial. For modified cellulose and synthetic membranes, data for three outcome measures were available in one trial only and for 12 of the outcomes no data were found, crossover studies were analysed separately and studies which randomised by patient yet analysed by dialysis sessions adjusted for clustering. Pre-dialysis beta2 microglobulin concentrations were significantly lower at the end of the studies in patients treated with synthetic membranes (WMD - 14.5; 95% CI -17.4 to -11.6). One crossover study showed a lowering of beta2 microglobulin when low flux synthetic membranes were used. When analysed for a change in beta2 microglobulin across a trial a fall was only noted when high flux membranes were used. In one very small study the incidence of amyloid was less in patients who were dialysed for six years with high flux synthetic membranes (OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.18). In the single study which measured triglyceride values there was a significant difference in favour of the synthetic (high flux) membrane (WMD -0.66; 95% CI -1.18 to -0.14). Serum albumin was higher in patients treated with synthetic membranes (both low and high flux) although this just bordered statistical significance (WMD -0.09; 95% CI -0.18 to 0.00). Dialysis adequacy measured by Kt/V was marginally higher when cellulose membranes were used (WMD 0.10; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.16). There was no significant difference between these membranes for any of the other clinical outcomes measures but confidence intervals were generally wide. No differences were found between modified cellulose and synthetic membranes although many fewer trials were carried out for this comparison.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

For clinical practice This systematic literature review has generated no evidence of benefit when synthetic membranes were used compared with cellulose/modified cellulose membranes in terms of reduced mortality nor reduction in dialysis related adverse symptoms. Despite the relatively large number of RCTs undertaken in this area none of the included studies reported any measures of quality of life. End-of-study beta2 microglobulin values, and possibly the development of amyloid disease, were less in patients treated with synthetic membranes compared with cellulose membranes. Plasma triglyceride values were also lower with synthetic membranes in the single study that measured this outcome. Differences in these outcomes may have reflected the high flux of the synthetic membrane. Serum albumin was higher when synthetic membranes of both high and low flux were used. Kt/V and urea reduction ratio were higher when cellulose or modified cellulose membranes were used in the few studies that measured these outcomes. We are hesitant to recommend the universal use of synthetic membranes for haemodialysis in patients with ESRD because of; the small number of trials (particularly for modified cellulose membranes, most with low patient numbers), the heterogeneity of many of the trials compared, the variations in membrane flux, the differences in exclusion criteria, particularly relating to comorbidity and the relative lack of patient-centred outcomes studied. Such evidence as we have favours synthetic membranes but even if we assume extra benefit it may be at considerable cost, particularly if high flux synthetic membranes were to be used. For further research A further systematic review of RCTs comparing high and low flux haemodialysis membranes, subgrouped according to membrane composition (cellulose, modified cellulose, synthetic) and reporting clinical outcomes of major importance to patients needs to be undertaken. Further pragmatic RCTs are required to compare the different dialysis membranes available. We recommend that they: - Take into account other properties including flux as well as the material from which the membrane is made and test modified cellulose membranes as well as standard ones. - Record an agreed minimum dataset on primary outcomes of major importance to patients. - Explicitly record whether symptoms are patient- or staff-reported recognising that generally patient reporting will be more appropriate for evaluating effectiveness but staff reported data may be necessary for calculating the cost of treating complications. - Be multi-centre (and possibly multinational) to have sufficient patients to complete the study to allow for a considerable number of withdrawals and dropouts. - Have sufficient length of follow up to draw conclusions for important clinical outcome measures and continue to follow patients who have renal transplants. - Include older patients and those with comorbid illnesses and take into account age and comorbidity when assessing outcomes (possibly by stratification at trial entry). - Carry out, in parallel, an economic evaluation of the different policies being compared in the trial.

Clinical Characterisation of Polysulfone LS Membrane for Renal Replacement Therapy

The solute transport characteristics and biocompatibility of a new polysulfone membrane (Polysulfone LS, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) has been established and compared for two different sizes of dialyser (1.3 and 1.8 m2). The in vivo small molecular clearance of the two sizes of dialyser showed an overlap in performance. Neutropenia was slight and independent of the membrane area as were changes in C5ades Arg. The membrane induced neutrophil degranulation characterised by the release of elestase α1 inhibitor complex with time averaged values over 180 minutes related to membrane area (p=0.010). Heparin activity during dialysis with the membrane was within the therapeutic range necessary for anticoagulation (0.3–1.0 IU/ml), but despite this an increase in thrombin antithrombin III levels during treatment was noted. Polysulfone LS extends the range of polysulfone membranes available for clinical use and its performance is such that it may be considered as a membrane for the treatment of patients awaiting a transplant, or in whom use of the high flux therapies may be inappropriate.

Clinical investigation of the role of membrane structure on blood contact and solute transport characteristics of a cellulose membrane

Regenerated cellulose membranes contain cellulose chains with crystalline and amorphous regions in the direction of extrusion. A study was undertaken to investigate if reduced contact surface arising from alteration of pore size alters biocompatibility (complement activation (C3a and C5a) and neutropenia) and solute transport. The average pore size for the membrane studied (RC HP400A) was 7.23 compared to 2.76 nm for the standard membrane (Cuprophan). C3a levels rose to 6861+/-1595 compared to 2723+/-1228 ng/ml for Cuprophan at 15 min after initial blood contact (P < 0.0001). C5a levels also rose to 30.1+/-11.9 compared to 21.3+/-6.6 ng/ml for Cuprophan (P = 0.18). Both fractions gradually returned to baseline levels thereafter. Circulating white cell count fell rapidly over the same time period to 39+/-17% of the baseline value by 15 min and was similar to Cuprophan (27.5+/-11.2%) (P = 0.25). A small (< 10%) change in platelet numbers was noted for both membranes. Removal of urea (60 Da) was independent of pore size; however, the RC HP400A removed r2 microglobulin (11818 Da). These findings indicate that pore distribution fails to influence material-induced complement activation but influences large solute transport.

Synthetically modified cellulose: an alternative to synthetic membranes for use in haemodialysis?

Renal replacement therapy relies predominantly on the use of cellulose-based membranes. Such membranes have a biocompatibility profile which is inferior to membranes manufactured from synthetic polymers. Synthetically modified cellulose (SMC) is a new, low-flux haemodialysis membrane in which hydroxyl groups have been replaced with benzyl groups. The biocompatibility profile characterized by changes in white cell and platelet counts and the activation of complement components (C3a, C5a and C5b-9) have been studied in vivo and compared with those of cellulose acetate, unmodified cellulose (Cuprophan ) and low-flux polysulphone (Fresenius Polysulfone) in the same group of patients. For SMC, the white cell count at 15 min declined to 65.6% of pretreatment level, compared with 63.8% for the cellulose acetate, 79.6% for low-flux polysulphone and 28.1% for Cuprophan, thereafter returning to pretreatment levels. Both modified cellulose membranes were superior to unmodified cellulose (P = 0.001); the differences between the modified cellulose membranes were not significant statistically. The changes induced by all three cellulose-based membranes exceeded those for low-flux polysulphone (P = 0.001). Associated with the neutropenia was a reduction in platelet count, but this was independent of membrane type. The mean time-averaged concentrations of C3a(des Arg) over 150 min were 1168 ng ml(-1) (SMC), 1030 ng ml(-1) (cellulose acetate), 1297 ng ml(-1) (Cuprophan) and 790 ng ml(-1) (low-flux polysulphone). Equivalent values for C5a(des Arg) were 6.12 (SMC), 2.98 (cellulose acetate), 11.03 (Cuprophan) and 1.33 ng ml(-1) (low-flux polysulphone). C5b-9 values were 385 (SMC), 386 (cellulose acetate), 177 (Cuprophan) and 185 ng ml(-1) (low-flux polysulphone). For each of the complement components the differences between the membranes were significant [P = 0.0009 (C3a(des Arg)), P = 0.0001 (c5a(des Arg) and C5b-9)]. The levels of C5b-9 generated during dialysis also showed a significant positive correlation compared to C5a for all membranes considered as a single group (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.870, P = 0.0001). It is concluded that the modification of the cellobiosic unit is a promising approach to improve the biocompatibility profile of cellulose-based membranes. The two different methods of modification lead to similar improvements in biocompatibility compared with unmodified cellulose, but as yet do not match that of low-flux polysulphone.