Roles of Intravenous Iron Therapy in Various Patient Settings

Objective:

To provide clinical information on intravenous iron products and their role in chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis, oncology, critical illness, and heart failure.

Data Sources:

Intravenous iron products information, national clinical practice guidelines, and the latest primary literature available were reviewed. PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched from January 2000-December 2009.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

All FDA-approved intravenous iron products information, available national clinical practice guidelines, and primary literature were included.

Data Synthesis:

Iron deficiency is common in patients with CKD, dialysis, oncology, critical illness, and heart failure. Routine supplementation with intravenous iron therapy is indicated in patients with CKD, including those receiving dialysis; however, its role in oncology, critical illness, and heart failure is not clearly defined. Assessing patients for iron deficiency, evaluating their status, and knowing the risks of adverse events are important in determining the roles of intravenous iron therapy in each setting. If patients are initiated on intravenous iron, they must be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of adverse drug reactions, as well as clinical worsening. Additionally, intravenous iron must be discontinued upon resolution of iron deficiency.

Conclusions:

The importance of intravenous iron therapy is well established in patients with CKD, including those receiving dialysis, who have iron deficiency. Its roles in oncology, critical illness, and heart failure should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Iron management in hemodialysis patients: optimizing outcomes in Vicenza, Italy

The management of anemia in uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis requires the appropriate combination of erythropoietin treatment, iron supplementation, and on occasion androgen therapy. Identifying and correcting functional iron deficiency is crucial to optimizing erythropoietin efficiency. Recently, however, the trend to administer maintenance iron with resultant high serum ferritin and high transferrin saturation has led to an increase in reports of iron overload. Oral iron supplementation is inexpensive and safe, but poor patient compliance and reduced intestinal absorption may limit its efficacy. Intravenous iron, on the other hand, is effective, and its safety is related to the iron salt used. Currently available data suggest that iron saccharate may be the safest iron salt available for intravenous administration, although iron gluconate is safer than the dextran forms of intravenous iron. It should be kept in mind, however, that all forms of intravenous iron may have the potential of inducing iron overload. At this time, the levels of ferritin that define iron overload are not clearly established. The side effects of iron overload are well recognized (infections, malignancies, vascular diseases); however, no guidelines exist for safe practice. There are many markers of iron deficiency, with serum ferritin and hypochromic red cell percentage currently the best markers available in clinical practice.