Psoriasis induced by infliximab in a patient suffering from Crohn's disease

Paradoxical Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α) Inhibitor-Induced Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors have been shown to be well tolerated among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis. Meanwhile, more recently, clinical practice and research efforts have uncovered increasing cases of psoriatic lesion development tied to initiating treatment with a TNF-α inhibitor. The underlying mechanisms associated with this occurrence have yet to be fully elucidated. A review and analysis of cases of paradoxical psoriasis currently published in the literature is warranted. In addition, exploring possible mechanisms of action and potential treatment options associated with favorable outcomes is much needed. A systematic literature review was performed utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar databases (1992-present), in which 106 cases of paradoxical psoriasis were reviewed. The most common morphology developed was plaque psoriasis vulgaris. There was a female predominance (61.3%), and the most common underlying autoimmune disease was rheumatoid arthritis (45.3%). In addition, the most commonly associated drug with the onset of psoriatic lesions was infliximab (62.3%). Furthermore, the findings suggest that the most well-supported mechanism of action involves the uncontrolled release of interferon-alpha (IFN-α) from plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) after TNF-α inhibition. While TNF-α inhibitors have been shown to have great benefits to patients with rheumatologic diseases, cases of paradoxical psoriasis demonstrate the importance of close monitoring of patients on TNF-α inhibitors to allow for early recognition, treatment, and potentially change to a different mechanism of action of the medication used to prevent further progression of the inflammatory lesions.

The Association between Alopecia and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IMPORTANCE

The link between autoimmune gut disorders and different types of hair loss conditions has been recently investigated with an increased interest. With acknowledgement of the connection between immune dysregulation and the gut microbiome, this pathway is now becoming recognized as playing an important role in hair growth. The inflammatory cascade that results from the disruption of gut integrity such as seen in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has been associated with certain types of alopecia.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to evaluate the association between alopecia and IBD.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A primary literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify articles on co-occurring alopecia and IBD from 1967 to 2020. A total of 79 studies were included in the review. A one-way proportional meta-analysis was performed on 19 of the studies to generate the pooled prevalence of alopecia and IBD.

FINDING

The pooled prevalence of non-scarring alopecia among IBD patients was 1.12% (k = 7, I2 = 98.6%, 95% CI 3.1-39.9); the prevalence of IBD among scarring and non-scarring alopecia was 1.99% (k = 12; I2 = 99%, 95% CI 6.2-34). The prevalence of non-scarring alopecia areata (AA) among IBD was compared to the prevalence of AA in the general population (0.63 vs. 0.1%; p < 0.0001). Similarly, the prevalence of IBD among the scarring and non-scarring alopecia groups was compared to the prevalence of IBD in the general population (1.99 vs. 0.396%; p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

IBD and alopecia, particularly AA, appear to be strongly associated. Dermatology patients with alopecia may benefit from screening for IBD.

A Review of Drugs that Induce or Exacerbate Psoriasis

Background

Psoriasis is a common disorder of the skin, immune system, and joints that is influenced by genetic and environmental factors. It can be aggravated or induced by drugs.

Objectives

To identify the major drugs implicated in inducing or exacerbating psoriasis and to discuss their characteristics.

Methods

We performed a PubMed literature search for reviews and case reports on drugs that exacerbate or induce psoriasis. Articles were screened by title and abstract and then examined for their findings and references.

Results

Drugs most often reported to exacerbate or induce psoriasis were β-blockers, lithium, synthetic antimalarials, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, interferons, tetracyclines, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, and steroid withdrawal.

Conclusions

Characterizing drugs that induce or exacerbate psoriasis by latency and type of psoriatic eruption can help guide clinical reasoning. Although a relatively uncommon occurrence, psoriatic lesions can be caused by drugs, allowing astute physicians to recognize and change their management plans accordingly.

Paradoxical SAPHO syndrome observed during anti-TNFα therapy for Crohn's disease

Currently, anti-TNFα antibodies are used to treat Crohn’s disease. We report on a 45-year-old Japanese female with Crohn’s disease developing SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) syndrome following exposure to the anti-TNFα antibody adalimumab. Initially, adalimumab induced remission, but the patient showed SAPHO syndrome 11 weeks following the start of adalimumab therapy for the first time. Cutaneous and articular involvement were exacerbating the condition, so adalimumab was discontinued and the patient was put on low-dose methotrexate to control her symptoms. To our knowledge, this is the first report of SAPHO syndrome occurring during anti-TNF therapy, which is thought to be a paradoxical response to adalimumab.

Anti-TNF antibody-induced psoriasiform skin lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease are characterised by interferon-γ-expressing Th1 cells and IL-17A/IL-22-expressing Th17 cells and respond to anti-IL-12/IL-23 antibody treatment

BACKGROUND

We analysed incidence, predictors, histological features and specific treatment options of anti-tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antibody-induced psoriasiform skin lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

DESIGN

Patients with IBD were prospectively screened for anti-TNF-induced psoriasiform skin lesions. Patients were genotyped for IL23R and IL12B variants. Skin lesions were examined for infiltrating Th1 and Th17 cells. Patients with severe lesions were treated with the anti-interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 p40 antibody ustekinumab.

RESULTS

Among 434 anti-TNF-treated patients with IBD, 21 (4.8%) developed psoriasiform skin lesions. Multiple logistic regression revealed smoking (p=0.007; OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.55 to 13.60) and an increased body mass index (p=0.029; OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.24) as main predictors for these lesions. Nine patients with Crohn's disease and with severe psoriasiform lesions and/or anti-TNF antibody-induced alopecia were successfully treated with the anti-p40-IL-12/IL-23 antibody ustekinumab (response rate 100%). Skin lesions were histologically characterised by infiltrates of IL-17A/IL-22-secreting T helper 17 (Th17) cells and interferon (IFN)-γ-secreting Th1 cells and IFN-α-expressing cells. IL-17A expression was significantly stronger in patients requiring ustekinumab than in patients responding to topical therapy (p=0.001). IL23R genotyping suggests disease-modifying effects of rs11209026 (p.Arg381Gln) and rs7530511 (p.Leu310Pro) in patients requiring ustekinumab.

CONCLUSIONS

New onset psoriasiform skin lesions develop in nearly 5% of anti-TNF-treated patients with IBD. We identified smoking as a main risk factor for developing these lesions. Anti-TNF-induced psoriasiform skin lesions are characterised by Th17 and Th1 cell infiltrates. The number of IL-17A-expressing T cells correlates with the severity of skin lesions. Anti-IL-12/IL-23 antibody therapy is a highly effective therapy for these lesions.

Dermatological adverse reactions during anti-TNF treatments: focus on inflammatory bowel disease

The clinical introduction of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors has deeply changed the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). It has demonstrated impressive efficacy as compared to alternative treatments, allowing for the chance to achieve near-remission and long-term improvement in function and quality of life and to alter the natural history of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). As a consequence of longer follow-up periods the number of side effects which may be attributed to treatment with biologics is growing significantly. Cutaneous reactions are among the most common adverse reactions. These complications include injection site reactions, cutaneous infections, immune-mediated complications such as psoriasis and lupus-like syndrome and rarely skin cancers. We review the recent literature and draw attention to dermatological side effects of anti-TNF therapy of inflammatory bowel disease.

Clinical management of paradoxical psoriasiform reactions during TNF- α therapy

There have been reports of paradoxical induction or worsening of psoriasis during treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and certolizumab). It has been hypothesized that an imbalance between TNF-α and interferon α might have a role in the etiology and pathogenesis of these reactions. Paradoxical psoriasiform reactions can be divided clinically into de novo psoriasis and exacerbation of preexisting psoriasis. The first, which is more common and more extensively described in the literature, occurs in patients without a history of psoriasis who are receiving TNF-α therapy for another inflammatory disorder. The second can occur with or without changes in the morphology of the lesions. In this article, we review the literature on the clinical and histologic features of paradoxical psoriasiform reactions, analyze their clinical course and treatment, and propose a clinical management model for use in routine practice.

Induction or exacerbation of psoriatic lesions during anti-TNF-α therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review based on 222 cases

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical cases of psoriatic lesions induced or exacerbated by anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapy have been reported more frequently in recent years, but data related to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are rare. A systematic literature review was performed to provide information about this adverse effect in patients with IBD who receive anti-TNF therapy.

METHODS

Published studies were identified by a search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane, SciELO, and LILACS databases.

RESULTS

A total of 47 studies (222 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. Clinical and therapeutic aspects varied considerably among these reports. Of the 222 patients, 78.38% were diagnosed with Crohn's disease, and 48.20% were female. The mean patient age was 26.50 years, and 70.72% of patients had no history of psoriasis. Patients developed psoriasiform lesions (55.86%) more often than other types of psoriatic lesions, and infliximab was the anti-TNF-α therapy that caused the cutaneous reaction in most patients (69.37%). Complete remission of cutaneous lesions was observed in 63.96% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that psoriatic lesions occurred predominantly in adult patients with Crohn's disease who received infliximab and had no previous history of psoriasis. Most patients can be managed conservatively without discontinuing anti-TNF-α therapy.

The onset of psoriasis during the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases with infliximab: should biological therapy be suspended?

CONTEXT

Several paradoxical cases of infliximab-induced or-exacerbated psoriatic lesions have been described in the recent years. There is disagreement regarding the need to discontinue infliximab in order to achieve the resolution of these adverse cutaneous reactions specifically in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature to collect information on IBD patients that showed this adverse cutaneous reaction, focusing mainly on the therapeutic approach.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed utilizing Medline, Embase, SciELO and Lilacs databases. Published studies were identified, reviewed and the data were extracted.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies (69 IBD patients) met inclusion criteria for review. There was inconsistency in reporting of some clinical and therapeutic aspects. Most patients included had Crohn's disease (89.86%), was female (47.83%), had an average age of 27.11 years, and no reported history of psoriasis (84.05%). The patients developed primarily plaque-type psoriasis (40.58%). There was complete remission of psoriatic lesions in 86.96% of IBD patients, existing differences in the therapeutic approaches; cessation of infliximab therapy led to resolution in 47.83% of cases and 43.48% of patients were able to continue infliximab therapy.

CONCLUSION

As increasing numbers of IBD patients with psoriasis induced or exacerbated by infliximab, physicians should be aware of its clinical manifestations so that appropriate diagnosis and treatment are properly established. The decision whether to continue or discontinue infliximab should be individualized.

Anti-TNF-alpha induced psoriasiform eruptions with severe scalp involvement and alopecia: report of five cases and review of the literature

We describe 5 cases of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) induced psoriasiform eruptions with severe scalp involvement inducing inflammatory alopecia and review the literature on this subject. All our 5 patients were provided topical therapy, with good results in only 1 case. The remaining 4 were provided systemic therapy (methotrexate ± cyclosporine): 3 concomitantly suspended the anti-TNF-α treatment (2 are currently clear/almost clear but 1 has so far only observed mild improvement) and 1 switched anti-TNF-α (recurrent flare-ups of the disease continue). So far, no patient has developed scarring alopecia. To our knowledge, a total of 15 cases of anti-TNF-α induced psoriatic alopecia have been described. Anti-TNF-α was discontinued in 9 of the 15 patients and systemic therapy was provided to 9 of the 15 patients. Nonetheless, 2 patients developed scarring alopecia. We conclude that in anti-TNF-α induced psoriasiform eruptions some patients may respond to topical treatment, however in cases of severe scalp involvement anti-TNF-α suspension and systemic treatment should be considered in order to avoid scarring alopecia.

Paradoxical inflammation induced by anti-TNF agents in patients with IBD

Anti-TNF antibodies have acquired a prominent place in the management of IBD (including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis), rheumatologic conditions (such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis) and psoriasis. They have a good safety profile, especially when contraindications such as demyelinating disease, active infections and/or abscesses are ruled out, and when necessary precautions to prevent reactivation of tuberculosis are taken. However, with increasing use of these agents, paradoxical adverse events have been reported. Some of these features are shared with the underlying disease for which these drugs are given, making management of these conditions challenging. For example, anti-TNF therapy is used for the treatment of psoriasis, but psoriasiform lesions are sometimes observed in patients receiving therapy. Similarly, anti-TNF therapy is used for the treatment of rheumatologic diseases, but arthralgias and arthritis are sometimes observed in patients receiving anti-TNF agents. We review the paradoxical inflammation induced by anti-TNF agents in patients with IBD, provide hypotheses for the occurrence of this paradoxical inflammation and give practical advice on how to manage these patients.

Broad range of adverse cutaneous eruptions in patients on TNF-alpha antagonists

Biologic therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha have become a mainstay in the management of a number of autoimmune diseases. We report a series of adverse skin eruptions in six patients (four females, two males, age: 21-58 years, mean: 39) receiving 4 months to 10 years (mean 3.1 years) of anti-TNF-alpha therapies (infliximab, n = 4; adalimumab, n = 1 or etanercept, n = 1). The following drug-associated diagnoses were made in eight skin biopsies performed at Massachusetts General Hospital between 3/2007 and 10/2010: pustular folliculitis, psoriasis, interface dermatitis, neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis, Sweet's syndrome, lupus, vasculitis and palmoplantar pustulosis. The descriptions of neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis-like and Sweet's-like hypersensitivity eruptions induced by anti-TNF-alpha therapies are the first such cases described in the literature. Each cutaneous eruption improved or resolved with switching to a different TNF-alpha inhibitor, discontinuation of the anti-TNF-alpha agent, and/or topical or systemic steroids. There was a clear chronologic relationship with, and clinical remission upon withdrawal or steroid suppression of the anti-TNF-alpha agents. The mechanism for such diverse cutaneous eruptions among this class of medications remains poorly understood. The cutaneous adverse reaction profile of TNF-alpha inhibitors is broad and should be considered in the histopathologic differential in this clinical setting.

Infliximab-induced psoriasis during therapy for Crohn's disease

Although therapy with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (anti-TNF) provides beneficial effects in different immune inflammatory disorders, paradoxical cases of anti-TNF-induced psoriasis have increasingly been reported, mostly in the setting of rheumatologic diseases. To date, less than 50 cases of infliximab-induced psoriasis in inflammatory bowel disease patients have been described. The present report was aimed at describing two new cases of infliximab-induced psoriasis during therapy for Crohn's disease and at carrying out a review on this intriguing phenomenon.

Paradoxical and bidirectional drug effects

A paradoxical drug reaction constitutes an outcome that is opposite from the outcome that would be expected from the drug's known actions. There are three types: 1. A paradoxical response in a condition for which the drug is being explicitly prescribed. 2. Paradoxical precipitation of a condition for which the drug is indicated, when the drug is being used for an alternative indication. 3. Effects that are paradoxical in relation to an aspect of the pharmacology of the drug but unrelated to the usual indication. In bidirectional drug reactions, a drug may produce opposite effects, either in the same or different individuals, the effects usually being different from the expected beneficial effect. Paradoxical and bidirectional drug effects can sometimes be harnessed for benefit; some may be adverse. Such reactions arise in a wide variety of drug classes. Some are common; others are reported in single case reports. Paradoxical effects are often adverse, since they are opposite the direction of the expected effect. They may complicate the assessment of adverse drug reactions, pharmacovigilance, and clinical management. Bidirectional effects may be clinically useful or adverse. From a clinical toxicological perspective, altered pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics in overdose may exacerbate paradoxical and bidirectional effects. Certain antidotes have paradoxical attributes, complicating management. Apparent clinical paradoxical or bidirectional effects and reactions ensue when conflicts arise at different levels in self-regulating biological systems, as complexity increases from subcellular components, such as receptors, to cells, tissues, organs, and the whole individual. These may be incompletely understood. Mechanisms of such effects include different actions at the same receptor, owing to changes with time and downstream effects; stereochemical effects; multiple receptor targets with or without associated temporal effects; antibody-mediated reactions; three-dimensional architectural constraints; pharmacokinetic competing compartment effects; disruption and non-linear effects in oscillating systems, systemic overcompensation, and other higher-level feedback mechanisms and feedback response loops at multiple levels. Here we review and provide a compendium of multiple class effects and individual reactions, relevant mechanisms, and specific clinical toxicological considerations of antibiotics, immune modulators, antineoplastic drugs, and cardiovascular, CNS, dermal, endocrine, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, haematological, respiratory, and psychotropic agents.

Psoriasis associated with anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a new series and a review of 120 cases from the literature

BACKGROUND  Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies are used to treat both psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease. The seemingly paradoxical occurrence of psoriasis in patients treated with anti-TNF antibodies is increasingly recognised, but the distinct features associated with inflammatory bowel disease have been incompletely characterised. AIM  To identify inflammatory bowel disease patients who developed psoriasis while receiving an anti-TNF antibody at two academic medical centres between 2000 and 2009 and review all published cases of this phenomenon in inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS  We identified retrospectively all cases of anti-TNF-induced psoriasis in inflammatory bowel disease patients attending two North American healthcare centres. We analysed these cases alongside the published reports of anti-TNF-induced psoriasis. RESULTS  We identified 30 subjects who developed a psoriatic rash while receiving anti-TNF therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Forty-seven per cent (14/30) responded to topical therapy and 23% (7/30) ultimately discontinued the anti-TNF. The new data were combined with those from 120 published cases of anti-TNF-induced psoriasis in inflammatory bowel disease. Anti-TNF-induced psoriasis in inflammatory bowel disease was more common in women (70%). The most common distributions were palmoplantar (43%) and scalp (42%). Complete follow-up in 148 cases showed that 41% responded to topical therapy but 43% required definitive withdrawal of anti-TNF therapy due to the rash. A second anti-TNF was tried in 27 cases with recurrence or persistence of the rash in 14 (52%). CONCLUSIONS  In this analysis, psoriasiform lesions related to anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease occurred most commonly in women. Approximately 41% of those who developed psoriasis while on anti-TNFs responded to topical therapy and were able to continue the drug, while 52% of those treated with an alternate anti-TNF had recurrence of the rash.

Histopathologic spectrum of psoriasiform skin reactions associated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy. A study of 16 biopsies

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors (anti-TNF-α biologic drugs), currently used to treat different autoimmune conditions, may be associated with cutaneous drug reactions. New onset or worsening of psoriasis and psoriasis-like reactions have been reported in these patients. However, not much is known about the different histopathologic patterns of such skin lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pathologic spectrum of clinically papulosquamous to pustular "psoriasiform" lesions in this setting. Sixteen biopsies from 9 patients on anti-TNF-α therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (n = 7), Crohn disease (n = 1), and Behçet disease (n = 1) who developed a "psoriasiform" skin rash during treatment were included in this study. None of the patients had history of psoriasis. Five patients (10 biopsies) showed a psoriasis-like pattern that varied from that seen in guttate lesions (4 biopsies), to well-established plaques (3 biopsies) to pustular psoriasis (3 biopsies). Three patients (4 biopsies) showed an interface/lichenoid dermatitis mimicking lichen planus. Two patients (2 biopsies) showed features of pustular folliculitis. Eosinophils varied from none (2 biopsies) to scattered (7 biopsies) to numerous (7 biopsies). Plasma cells were present in most cases. All pustular lesions had negative cultures. In conclusion, anti-TNF drugs elicit a spectrum of cutaneous reactions that go beyond the classical eosinophilic-rich hypersensitivity reaction and may closely mimic primary dermatitis. In addition to psoriasis-like lesions, lichen planus-like dermatitis and sterile pustular folliculitis should be included in the list of anti-TNF-α-related drug reactions. Because the different histopathologic findings may be subtle, clinical correlation is crucial to make the diagnosis.

Infliximab and adalimumab-induced psoriasis in Crohn's disease: a paradoxical side effect

Treatment with antitumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-α) offers a significant improvement in several immune-based diseases, including Crohn's disease (CD) and psoriasis. Different cutaneous side effects have been described for anti-TNF-α therapy such as psoriasis. Previous reports showed that inhibition of TNF-α can induce over expression of cutaneous IFN-α, which in turn caused a predisposition to psoriasis. We report a 31-year-old woman with extensive CD and perianal lesions, without response to conventional treatment. She paradoxically developed a cutaneous eruption with psoriasiform morphology and distribution during treatment with both anti-TNF-α approved in Europe for CD, infliximab and adalimumab. These lesions cleared after topical application of corticosteroids and cessation of the anti-TNF-α treatment. Due to uneffectiveness of pharmacological treatment on disease, the patient had to undergo surgery. TNF-induced psoriasis in patients with CD is rare and has been previously documented with infliximab or adalimumab. The reason for this apparently paradoxical effect of the therapy is still unclear. This is the first case of psoriasis induced first by infliximab and later by adalimumab in the same CD patient. We would like to review and to draw attention about psoriasis as a cutaneous side effect with anti-TNF-α treatments.