The performance of galactomannan in combination with 1,3-β-D-glucan or aspergillus-lateral flow device for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: Evidences from 13 studies

Galactomannan (GM), 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG) and aspergillus-lateral flow device (LFD) are recognized as diagnostic tools for invasive aspergillosis (IA). The combined performance of these assays, however, is inconsistent in various studies. We undertook a meta-analysis of 13 studies involving 1513 patients to evaluate the utility of GM in combination with BDG or LFD for diagnosing IA. The pooled SEN, SPE, PLR, NLR and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated and constructed to summarize the overall combined performance. Combining both positive results of GM and BDG assays leaded to the pooled SEN 0.49 (95%CI 0.27-0.72), SPE 0.98 (95%CI 0.94-1.00), PLR 31.68 (95%CI 5.36-187.37), NLR 0.52 (95%CI 0.32-0.84) and DOR 61.23 (95%CI 6.96-538.90). Comparing with GM and BDG assays, both positive results of GM and LFD leaded to high SEN, similar SPE, low PLR and NLR. At least one positive result of GM or LFD conferred great SEN 0.93 and low NLR 0.08. Both positive results of GM and BDG or LFD assay were in favor of confirming the existence of IA. And both negative results of GM and LFD were beneficial to rule out IA. Further studies with sufficient sample size should focus on the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of these combined tests in clinical setting.

Use of 1,3-β-D-glucan in invasive fungal diseases in hematology patients

INTRODUCTION

Invasive fungal diseases (IFD) remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hematology patients. Within a diagnostic-driven approach, the use of the serum (1,3)-ß-D-glucan (BDG) test represents a valid tool for the early diagnosis and treatment of IFD. Areas covered: The available literature on the use of BDG in hematology patients was systematically retrieved. Then, it was reviewed and discussed, to identify key issues pertaining to a clinically-oriented narrative presentation of the topic. Expert commentary: The use of BDG in hematology patients at risk for invasive aspergillosis (IA) is secondary to the use of galactomannan. However, since BDG is not specific for IA, it offers an advantage of diagnosing also other IFD, such as candidiasis and pneumocystosis. The limitations of BDG include high costs and lower sensitivity in hematology patients compared to other cohorts. The risk of false positive results is possibly lower in real life than in theory, since glucan-free equipment is available and modern dialysis membranes and blood products usually do not release BDG. Thus, in experienced hands and selected clinical situations, BDG is a useful diagnostic tool, particularly due to short turnover time to results and versatility in diagnosing different IFD.

Evaluation of serum (1 → 3)-β-D-glucan clinical performance: kinetic assessment, comparison with galactomannan and evaluation of confounding factors

PURPOSE

We investigated the clinical performance of (1 → 3)-β-D-glucan (BG), as an early marker of invasive fungal infections (IFI), in different clinical settings.

METHODS

BG serum levels were assessed by Fungitell (Associates of Cape Cod, Inc), in parallel with galactomannan (GM) when requested by clinicians. By a prospective monocentric study, 270 episodes at risk or with suspect of IFI were enrolled, namely 58 proven-probable invasive aspergillosis (IA), 27 proven invasive candidiasis (IC), 11 possible IC, 16 P.jirovecii pneumonia (PJP), 4 episodes of other IFI and 154 non-IFI controls.

RESULTS

We found that (a) the BG overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) were 87.9, 80.5, 76.7 and 89.9 %, respectively; (b) the highest sensitivity was found in the IC groups, followed by PJP, IA and other IFI groups; (c) an association was observed between BG kinetics and patients outcome; (d) in the IA episodes, the combination of BG or GM vs GM alone increased sensitivity from 60.0 to 83.3 % in the haematological patients; (e) false-positive BG results were related to Gram-negative infections or infusion of polyclonal IgM-enriched immunoglobulins, where high levels of BG were indeed detected.

CONCLUSION

Besides strengthening its overall good clinical performance, we provide evidence that serum BG correlates with clinical outcome and that, once used in combination with GM, BG allows to enhance IFI diagnosis rate. The high sensitivity and NPV, observed in the Intensive Care Unit setting, open to BG validation as a marker for assessment of antifungal treatment.