Emotional aspects of arm or leg amputation in children

Examining the effects of acquired limb loss on the family network: a grounded theory study

Background: Individuals with acquired limb loss are faced with various challenges. Family networks become important in facilitating coping and recovery, but the limited research into their own experiences has so far only examined spousal and parental carers.Aims: This research aimed to: understand the experiences of acquired limb loss from the perspective of the family network; and to develop a theoretical model to explain how they experience limb loss of the other. The use of 'network' was adopted to include kin self-identified as family.Method: Participants (n = 14) were recruited nationally. Interviews were conducted in a process moving from unstructured, semi-structured and structured interviews, using Grounded Theory method.Findings: A theoretical model was developed around the interaction of five core categories. Families witness the difficulties faced by the person with limb loss, leading to a responsibility to provide support. Families subsequently experience various challenges of limb loss; together with numerous emotional reactions. Various forms of coping are used in order to resolve these experiences.Conclusions: Families are involved in the processes and challenges of an amputation in another family member, regardless of aetiology, gender or relationship structure. The theoretical model can be understood through the integration of existing research. The issues identified indicate potential considerations for services supporting such families.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe challenges and emotions experienced by family members have potential consequences for the support offered to the person with limb loss.This could ultimately influence the physical and psychological rehabilitation of the person with limb loss.Services should support families in witnessing difficulties in the person with limb loss, adjusting to relational changes and managing health care systems.

Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review

PURPOSE

To review the existing literature on the social and psychological challenges faced by people with an amputation and to provide a detailed analysis of the literature examining psychological adjustment to these challenges across time.

METHOD

Existing papers on psychological adjustment to amputation were analysed according to their results, methodology, and conclusions.

RESULTS

Although depression and anxiety are relatively high up to 2 years post-amputation, they appear to decline thereafter to general population norms. However, social discomfort and body-image anxiety have also been found among some people with amputations, and these have been associated with increased activity restriction, depression, and anxiety. Factors associated with positive adjustment to limb loss include greater time since amputation, more social support, greater satisfaction with the prosthesis, active coping attempts, an optimistic personality disposition, a lower level of amputation in the case of lower limbs, and lower levels of phantom limb pain and stump pain.

CONCLUSION

The majority of studies on adjustment to amputation are cross-sectional in design and have used noncomparable measures. Furthermore, they have neglected to study many important areas of rehabilitation, including immediate reaction to amputation, adjustment during and shortly after the rehabilitation period, and development of a changed sense of self and identity. In order to address these concerns, more longitudinal and qualitative research is called for. We end by outlining the components of a descriptive phased model of the rehabilitation process.

Psychological aspects of mutilating hand injuries

The immediate and long-term outcome of a mutilating hand injury can be positively influenced by health care professionals adopting a biopsychosocial perspective toward treatment and management. Such an injury produces a psychological and social impact that should be openly and candidly addressed with the injured individual and with the family. The earlier and the more skillfully these issues are addressed, the more likely it is that psychological factors will not impede functional outcome.