Geriatric psychiatry training in Canada: current teaching facilities and resources

Psychogeriatric training in Australia and New Zealand: a survey of psychiatry trainees and training program co-ordinators

Psychiatry trainees and training program co-ordinators in Australia and New Zealand were surveyed about psychogeriatric training. Responses were received from the co-ordinators of all training programs and 68% of trainees. Over 94% of responding trainees believe they require at least 3 months' psychogeriatric training. Currently about 70% of trainees obtain a psychogeriatric term by Year 4 of training, with 17 out of 21 training programs having positions available. Most trainees positively rate their psychogeriatric training experiences, with 89% enjoying it and 78% believing it adequate for their needs. It is recommended that psychogeriatric training be available to all trainees before sitting the RANZCP Section 1 examinations.

Geriatric psychiatry: training guidelines and their application. Section on Geriatric Psychiatry of the Canadian Psychiatric Association

Geriatric psychiatry is now a mandatory part of psychiatric residency education in Canada. Educational requirements in geriatric psychiatry were updated by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada in 1988, and guidelines were developed in more detail in 1989 by the Section on Geriatric Psychiatry of the Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA). These guidelines are presented here together with a survey, conducted in the fall of 1991, of all 16 Canadian psychiatry residency programs. Thirteen of the training centres now require residents to have a formal rotation in geriatric psychiatry, generally three months in length. Residents are exposed to elderly patients in other services, such as consultation/liaison, but these services may not include formal teaching in geriatric psychiatry. Most programs have a seminar series in geriatric psychiatry and have training guidelines similar to those of the CPA. However, it is not clear how closely these are being followed, since it was felt in almost one-third of all programs that there was an insufficient number of teachers to fulfill the training requirements. In addition, a number of training directors felt that the objectives were too comprehensive to be met in the three month period. Earlier studies in the field are reviewed, implications of the current findings are discussed, and suggestions are made for further research.

An exploratory use of the Symptoms Checklist-90 in a mixed geriatric study group

There are currently no self-rating scales of general psychopathology in the older population. Such scales can be used to screen patients who may then be referred on for psychiatric assessment. The validity of the Symptoms Checklist-90 (SCL-90), a self-rating scale of general psychopathology widely used in the nongeriatric adult population, was explored in 44 older subjects. It was compared with the Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric (SCAG) scale and a measure of functional disability, the London Psychogeriatric Rating Scale (LPRS). Caregivers to all subjects also rated the degree of difficulty experienced with their care on a four-point scale. Thirty of the subjects attended a geriatric day hospital, and the remaining 14 were waiting to go into long-term care facilities. Symptoms Checklist-90 was not significantly different between the two groups of subjects (day hospital and preinstitutional) after Bonferroni corrections, though SCAG scale and LPRS were (P less than .01 for both). Although SCL-90 was correlated significantly with the SCAG scale (r = .46), it was not significantly correlated with the LPRS. It showed good internal consistency but poor face validity and an inability to differentiate between levels of difficulty for the caregiver. It is concluded that the use of SCL-90 in older people may be limited because of the lack of sensitivity to functional disability and care difficulty. This nevertheless needs to be further explored, perhaps with some modification of the scale for older people.